Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,837 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 735,953
Pageviews Today: 956,822Threads Today: 244Posts Today: 3,403
08:15 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject The Developing Archetype - No Music Vids
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
Forget it. I'll just get this thread banned.

GLP isn't the way it used to be, and I gave an effort to see if it was still an informational and valuable site. There is nothing here but politics, religitards, and gossipers nowadays.

I'll let this thread go for about 30 more minutes (or less) and have it removed from the database.

People, even on the fringe, are just refusing to discuss ANYTHING without the taint of tabloid idiocy, and Repetition of YouTube not thought mediocrity.

FFS
 Quoting: Swinging on Spirals


What would you like to discuss, Sos?

If they're like me, they're tired of the slow, tedious process that is message boards.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47126440


I posted that a while ago.

hmm

What would I like to discuss?

I'm kind of at a loss on that now. I really don't have any questions, unless you have inside information. Even then, though, I really don't have direct questions, as they would just be about what will occur (if anything). How about discussing things... yeah, that will work, I suppose.

um...how does one go about manifesting change within embedded paradigms? I suppose initially, it requires out of the box thinking. The boxes are the paradigms, after all.

But, politics rule the era. And, media controls information to the masses. The strongest aspect of this current era of information, is repeat a lie long enough, and it becomes thought-form truth.

How do you deconstruct these particular thought-forms that have no exact foundation? Truth does not matter, only belief concepts (turned constructs). How do you do it?

Within our current era, there is only one true beginning answer. Think about it. We are a global civilization that has access to a myriad of information, whether it is drawn from interest, purpose, frivolity, etc. The blind spots within information is where the error of discernment comes into play. BUT, the possibility of correctly concluding the discernment must be observed from a level above the action, NOT within the level. When we observe from within a system, we observe with bias/beliefs, not with knowledge/understanding (which comes from experience of said level). If we do not experience said level, but still adhere to knowledge/understanding of said level, then it is not knowledge/understanding of said level, it is merely FAITH.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP