The evolution of Man is the most idiotic lie ever taught in school

Ever stop and think about just how silly the supposed history of the world is that you were taught in school?

The lie:
2 MILLION YEARS ago "Humanlike" species emerged in Africa...

...THEN for the next HALF A MILLION YEARS they stayed there, until suddenly they began to migrate over the eastern half of the globe for the next 1.25 MILLION YEARS during which time they learned to speak.

...THEN about 40,000 YEARS AGO they migrated to australia and the americas.

...THEN SUDDENLY, INDEPENDENTLY, these "spear throwing, grunting cavemen" who could barely figure out how to make fire, FOUNDED INDEPENDENT EMPIRES AND CIVILIZATIONS at DIFFERENT SPOTS ON THE GLOBE AT ROUGHLY THE SAME TIME??

But none of them figured out how to do it during the prior 2 MILLION YEARS?? HUH???

We have 5000 years of recorded history...and then 2 million years of make believe invented in the 19th century by darwinists.

-------------------------------------------------------

The first question is, where are all the sub-human spin offs?

Yes there are primates and monkeys and etc., but where are the "sort of almost but not quite humans?" The ones that can speak or kind of speak, or can kind of pass as a human but not exactly?

The other species have them...horses have donkeys and zebras and mules (donkey/horse halfbreed) and one could even argue things like dogs and deer and mooses fall on that spectrum....

break it down further-look at dogs...foxes, coyotes, wolves, chiahauhas, graeat danes, st. bernards, pit bulls, etc.....huge variety of close to not so close spin offs....

So whats the closest thing to a human? Monkeys? Apes? Animals that cant talk, covered with hair, barely walk upright momentarily, and could never even come close to getting mistaken for human. Hardly even in the same ballpark.

Where are all the "close to sort of human" animals that can somewhat speak or have only slightly different anatomy? They don't exist.

Secondly...Wheres the great empires and nations of say 11000 bc? 15000 bc? or 32000 bc? or 143000bc?

They suggest that for MILLIONS OF YEARS humans lived like cavemen...but then suddenly, simultaneously, on different spots on the globe "independently", around 6000 years ago humans learned how to become civilized, write, and form cities and empires?

So from 2 MILLION BC to roughly 4000 BC there was virtually nothing in the way of civilization...then *poof* we get the babylonians, greeks, romans, incas, chinese, egyptians, Indus valley, Aztecs, Mayans, Etc...Great thinkers like Plato, Aristotle, Pythagrious....great works of art, architecture, incredible leaps of science and engineering...INDEPENDENTLY?

What are the odds that after almost 2 million years of "Evolving" and non-civiliation, that the in India, China, Sumeria, Mexico, Peru, Egypt, Athens, and Rome would all sprout independent civilizations and learn to write and begin recording history all within the same couple thousand years??? BUT NONE could do it in the prior 2 MILLION YEARS?

ZERO.

The truth is, Modern man began in the middle east about 4000 bc, spread over the globe rather rapidly, and started civilizations across the planet as he went. Its the only thing that makes sense.

The idea that MILLIONS OF YEARS of existence of man took place before that...with no development of written records, no cities, no great ruins or abandoned architecture, no traces of his effect on the face of the planet from that time...is IDIOTIC.

The Idea that in MILLIONS OF YEARS man could do little more that grunt and chuck spears and live in caves and nothing more, and NEVER in ALL THAT TIME build cities, monuments, learn to write, exhibit advanced thinking skills, or make ANY significant mark upon the planet other than a few scant cave paintings, ...but THEN SUDDENLY sprout civilizations ALL OVER THE GLOBE INDEPENDENTLY at roughly the SAME TIME is too absurd to even contemplate,...yet we are programmed to accept it as fact??

THAT IS THE BIGGEST LIE EVER!!

And it can't be challenged, because any scientist that suggests otherwise is blackballed. Its a one party system, and either everyone parrots the party line just like they were programmed too in school.

Don't believe the lie.