I no longer drive, I "travel". You cannot be stopped for travelling?

it means every crime needs a victim. Not a potential victim or possible victim or a supposed victim, but an actual victim.

so unless you knock someone over, hit another can or end up in someone's living room, you may procede.

OP, learn the difference between:

- traveling, what is your unalienable Constitutional right;
- operating a motor vehicle on public roads, for what you need a driver's license.

The idea you're presenting is a "Sovereign Citizen" delusion, tried and failed on US courts many times.

*

you can walk anywhere you wanna walk
used to be waterfronts and rivers were accessible to all of us
but notsomuch now access is severely limited and maritime law seems to be the way

aye, governed by people who think its possible to walk on water

This is not how law works. Learn the difference between crimes and offenses.

Crime is a violation of a law in which there is injury to the public or a member of the public. Offense is a punishable violation of law of any type or magnitude. Operating a motor vehicle on public roads without the DL is an offense not a crime.

*

Men should ride big manly horses.

prefer natural law.

if you think about it, no human laws do anything
the common law crime of murder does not prevent murder, only makes it possible to puninsh the murderer, to make the state look like they are looking after you. its a scam.
the people most interested in prosecuting others are the god-fearing. why do you think they make people swear an oath on the bible, or why do see such things as orbes with crosses on them in court rooms. why is the 'ministry' of justice so called.

prefer the way its done in other parts of the world, where if someone's family member is murdered and the perpitrator is caught and poved guilty, its up to the family to carry out the justice,not the state.

The only law of the nature is survival of the fittest; you can exercise it in the wild nature if you can find it. In civilized societies you have to follow the laws of the land or get your ass kicked – like it or not. Without some kind of laws there wouldn’t be any civilization; they serve to their purpose and punishment as well.

Even if the punishment is a mean of general prevention it cannot prevent crimes, but restrict them as much as possible - and remove sociopaths out of the society. The pseudo legal philosophy cannot grant you immunity from laws; while a lot of money can. I agree, the later is not fair, but that’s the way it is.


You prefer the principle of blood feud / vendetta? Whoa! Then you should move to Albania or Calabria / Southern Italy.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

*

Next time if ever you find yourself in court and your NAME is called reply to the court "Are you calling Jon Doe the PERSON?? or Jon Doe the Man??

Then just watch the reaction you'll get :)

here comes the shills

Motor vehicle laws only apply to electric cars.

Gasoline powered vehicles are "engine vehicles"

The definition of motor and engine are different.

I declare that no motor vehicle laws are applicable if your car runs on petrol chemical fuel.

WRONG, If you are in a car/truck/Motorbike you need to have insurance.. Unless your state does not make you have it.. otherwise get insurance and STFU.. And if you think just because you tell the cop you are traveling and dont need it you are a stupid ass and I hope you enjoy your stay at thier jail

I was pulled over in the late 90's for driving without a license, I used this very argument, I actually got the cops to admit. They were wrongly arresting me and when I asked them why they were still arresting me, they couldn't answer.

The constitution is worded in that every American has the right to travel without "limitations or restrictions", a license is a "limitation or restriction".

I don't drive a car, the engine & wheels do that. I am just traveling in the vehicle.

If the cops pull you over, your first question to them should be "who is the injured party"?

What does that really mean; "without imprisonment or restraint unless by due process of law"


uuuuuuuuuuh basically IF they catch you breaking a LAW,
you get your due process,
and if found guilty,you go to jail--
not guilty you get back outside and continue to travel.

Very well written, dear Eagle.
I would like to add, that the evil "elite" does not just cause misery for hard working Americans, but for all righteous and hard working common people/citizens of the whole world.

There are a couple of things missing in this comment and in this thread in general.

Yes, everyone in the US has the right to travel. However, if you are traveling in a automobile or truck that has license plates, you do not own the conveyance in it entirety, the state does. Therefore, if you are to travel in a conveyance, you can not have license plates on it.

Also, if you are stopped for any reason and you have a passenger in the conveyance, you are in violation of commercial law. You can not travel with passengers, this means you are "For Hire".

It means you cannot be restrained or imprisoned without going to court first. courts provide the due process. get it. sk

Let me know how 'unchained' you feel when you hit an old lady crossing the road, and they lock you up for not having insurance...A license...Registration...Brains...

The reaction looks a lot like this:

No court has jurisdiction over you, unless you have caused an injury. A demonstrable, specific injury. This is by the courts own rules and rulings. Read people. It is the only value you recieved through public education.
PS. I can read, but spelling is another thing.

"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

There is your answer.

Exactly what Eagle said... he's one of the few who can see the truth.

Ever actually read the entire decision?

Nah...

When you 'apply' (beg) for a license, you are entering a contract where you create the leagle fiction known as a driver. This is an agreement between the now 'driver' (not man)and the government to follow rules. only by entering a contract do you create for yourself the rules (laws).

After all, a begger knows what he's begging for.

These are THE key words to comprehend not understand.
Understanding, the officer, for example, means you agree to stand-under whatever was being said to you. i.e mandates not laws or 'acts' of law.

Submit
application
registration

you Submit an Aplication for Registration.

If you don't fully comprehend the language you are using, then you aren't prepared for the court.

e.g
summoned;

This has the definition of conjouring a compliant spirt.
If you are truely free, you reply to the summons informing the court of your freedom while remianing in honour, then you have a good chance of proving your freedom.
(you could also summonds the judge to appear at your court,(before the date your due in his court) and if he doesnt you can turn up to court and make him aware of his dishonour)

Nice (and entertaing) video on the subject is:

Bursting bubbles of government deception, find it here;

[link to www.youtube.com]

please excuse the fact i dont have time to spell check, GL.

Also never say you are of a 'fixed' address if you want to be able to call yourself a traveler. It's contradictory and therefore dishonourable (i.e a lie)

More importantly, there are states that require insurance against the uninsured, fucking get some.