Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,561 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 174,107
Pageviews Today: 289,365Threads Today: 93Posts Today: 1,685
03:46 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

X Marks the Spot

 Thread Locked 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32430667
United States
02/22/2013 03:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
...


I've been thinking on your coptic jars and forms and the connection with water. All forms of water could fit in the jars but ice because it is solid. This morning I woke up and forgot my dream but when I opened the fridge I remembered when I looked at ice forming. My dream was 'there was mold in the ice'.scratching
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32430667


vinegar cleans ice makers welltounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34944405


Yes, like an onion, I assume I need a new filter and to throw out the ice. Bout to get my face mask on and get to it, lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32430667


Heavy fish in an electromagnetic sea. Each organ a filter and an inherent bias.

Batteries, batteries, batteries and superconductors of course.

Happy German Beer night!
 Quoting: Dionysian Fullaflattus

cheers
Seer777
Ride the wings of the mind

User ID: 31248385
United States
02/22/2013 03:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
...


Perhaps that is where the concept of the sky 'rolling up like a scroll' originates from...

hmm
 Quoting: Seer777


i would say with certainty it is
 Quoting: aether


and remember abyss
seems to fit our topic of this moment
suddenly tounge
 Quoting: aether


a lot of mixed memory comes with that /z\
blame
anger
hate
despair
distrust
revenge

whoa
quite a yucky emotional sensation
 Quoting: aether



Not sure I would utilize those particular emotions, but concern perhaps, at the very least...

Kolbrin pg 11

The Appearance of the Destroyer God


"Then came the day when all things became still and apprehensive, for God caused a sign to appear in the
Heavens, so that men should know the Earth would be afflicted, and the sign was a strange star".

"The star grew and waxed to a great brightness and was awesome to behold. It put forth horns and sang, being
unlike any other ever seen. So men , seeing it, said among themselves, 'Surely, this is God appearing in the
Heavens above us'.
The star was not God, though it was directed by His design, but the people had not the
wisdom to understand'.

"Then God manifested Himself in the Heavens. His voice was as the roll of thunders and He was clothed with
smoke and fire. He carried lightings in His hand and His breath, falling upon the Earth, brought forth brimstone
and embers. His eye was a black void and His mouth an abyss containing the winds of Destruction.

He encircled
the whole of the Heavens, bearing upon His back a black robe adorned with stars".


"Such was the likeness and manifestation of God in those days. Awesome was His countenance, terrible His
voice of wrath, the sun and moon hid themselves in fear and there was a heavy darkness over the face of the
Earth
".
 Quoting: Seer777


earth

Last Edited by Seer777 on 02/22/2013 03:12 PM
Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body...
~Seneca
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 03:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
they became the god that went away
and they would, we see that now
the origin of the "hims"
the dominant one (first one)
the girl that came after (venus) was never the one
because she was never the first one
they see it now because we can show them

 Quoting: aether


kronos was 4 males, first gay couples, lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32430667


1rof1
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 03:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun.
 Quoting: observation
nobody
User ID: 34494410
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 03:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
early chemistry experiments teach within the parameters then known,,

the irony is now was then,,

yet not until recently understood,, we taught of fire created by water upon contact,,

the water dragon,,

potassium nitrate guides the beligerent mind thus within an understanding of such,, as many reactions are simply mis-understood by the ''then unknown'' electrical design respects,,

much love,,
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
...


i would say with certainty it is
 Quoting: aether


and remember abyss
seems to fit our topic of this moment
suddenly tounge
 Quoting: aether


a lot of mixed memory comes with that /z\
blame
anger
hate
despair
distrust
revenge

whoa
quite a yucky emotional sensation
 Quoting: aether



Not sure I would utilize those particular emotions, but concern perhaps, at the very least...

Kolbrin pg 11

The Appearance of the Destroyer God


"Then came the day when all things became still and apprehensive, for God caused a sign to appear in the
Heavens, so that men should know the Earth would be afflicted, and the sign was a strange star".

"The star grew and waxed to a great brightness and was awesome to behold. It put forth horns and sang, being
unlike any other ever seen. So men , seeing it, said among themselves, 'Surely, this is God appearing in the
Heavens above us'.
The star was not God, though it was directed by His design, but the people had not the
wisdom to understand'.

"Then God manifested Himself in the Heavens. His voice was as the roll of thunders and He was clothed with
smoke and fire. He carried lightings in His hand and His breath, falling upon the Earth, brought forth brimstone
and embers. His eye was a black void and His mouth an abyss containing the winds of Destruction.

He encircled
the whole of the Heavens, bearing upon His back a black robe adorned with stars".


"Such was the likeness and manifestation of God in those days. Awesome was His countenance, terrible His
voice of wrath, the sun and moon hid themselves in fear and there was a heavy darkness over the face of the
Earth
".
 Quoting: Seer777


earth
 Quoting: Seer777


i got not that abyss
it was the abyss where you ask the question why would what comes out not conflict with god
that abyss is what we are hovering over
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
02/22/2013 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun.
 Quoting: observation

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280
Seer777
Ride the wings of the mind

User ID: 31248385
United States
02/22/2013 03:19 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
i got not that abyss
it was the abyss where you ask the question why would what comes out not conflict with god
that abyss is what we are hovering over
 Quoting: aether


Yes.

Perhaps they are one and the same.

hmm

Last Edited by Seer777 on 02/22/2013 03:20 PM
Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body...
~Seneca
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
i got not that abyss
it was the abyss where you ask the question why would what comes out not conflict with god
that abyss is what we are hovering over
 Quoting: aether


Yes.

Perhaps they are one and the same.

hmm
 Quoting: Seer777


yes
what we are getting is earth side of the story and the emotions woven into our and Boitatá`s (abyss) emotions over a long linear period regarding that which keeps hurting us while it becomes our new to us god (planetary close encounter)

so they are one of the same (cause)

a lot of yuck emotions quite naturally arising from that long experience

we`ll move past it tounge
Seer777
Ride the wings of the mind

User ID: 31248385
United States
02/22/2013 03:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun.
 Quoting: observation

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280

 Quoting: Septenary Man


That was one of the more beautiful things I have seen.

Wonderful.


Reminded me of a waterfall...

cool2
Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body...
~Seneca
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19535695
United States
02/22/2013 03:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun.
 Quoting: observation

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280

 Quoting: Septenary Man


wonder if this would apply in some way to that tho SS..



Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

(a) A closed timelike curve, in which p2 is a chronology-respecting system, and p1 is a time-traveling system that can jump from point tA to the past point tB through a spacetime wormhole, has the ability to interact with itself in the past. (b) In an open timelike curve (OTC), the system cannot interact with itself in the past. In the new study, physicists have theoretically shown that OTCs can violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provided p1 is entangled with p2. This proposal could be tested by performing experiments on entangled systems in Earth’s gravitational field. Credit: J. L. Pienaar, et al. ©2013 American Physical Society (Phys.org)
—If an object traveling through spacetime can loop back in time in a certain way, then its trajectory can allow a pair of its components to be measured with perfect accuracy, violating Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This new finding involves a particular trajectory called an open timelike curve (OTC), which is a special case of a closed timelike curve (CTC), a theoretical concept that has previously provoked controversy because it raises the possibility of traveling backwards in time.

Read more at: [link to phys.org]

hmm
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 03:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun.
 Quoting: observation

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280

 Quoting: Septenary Man


oh yes
you feel sparky today
nobody
User ID: 34494410
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 03:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun.
 Quoting: observation

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280

 Quoting: Septenary Man


wonder if this would apply in some way to that tho SS..



Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

(a) A closed timelike curve, in which p2 is a chronology-respecting system, and p1 is a time-traveling system that can jump from point tA to the past point tB through a spacetime wormhole, has the ability to interact with itself in the past. (b) In an open timelike curve (OTC), the system cannot interact with itself in the past. In the new study, physicists have theoretically shown that OTCs can violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provided p1 is entangled with p2. This proposal could be tested by performing experiments on entangled systems in Earth’s gravitational field. Credit: J. L. Pienaar, et al. ©2013 American Physical Society (Phys.org)
—If an object traveling through spacetime can loop back in time in a certain way, then its trajectory can allow a pair of its components to be measured with perfect accuracy, violating Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This new finding involves a particular trajectory called an open timelike curve (OTC), which is a special case of a closed timelike curve (CTC), a theoretical concept that has previously provoked controversy because it raises the possibility of traveling backwards in time.

Read more at: [link to phys.org]

hmm
 Quoting: >~* Flutterby Fringe*~<


some experienced remote viewers already achieve this in principal,, simply by using a fixed future event point,,


interpretations with regards to closed circuits experiments with increased barium are relient only upon the rebound,,


yet barium as a reflective of timing within such experiments,, is perhaps not the key,,




much love,,
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19535695
United States
02/22/2013 03:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
some experienced remote viewers already achieve this in principal,, simply by using a fixed future event point,,


interpretations with regards to closed circuits experiments with increased barium are relient only upon the rebound,,


yet barium as a reflective of timing within such experiments,, is perhaps not the key,,




much love,,
 Quoting: nobody 34494410


gives rise to the question of why they put barium in the chemtrails, and why we travel in reverse thru the zodiac... Have experienced a couple of time lapses this week and the speeding up of my clock once again in the last couple of weeks, it is now 53 mins fast ...

groundhog day? the valley of the sine wave hmm
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
02/22/2013 03:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun.
 Quoting: observation

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280

 Quoting: Septenary Man


oh yes
you feel sparky today

 Quoting: aether


I am feeling...sparky is a good word I suppose, lol. Been jumping around to different things all day, with work being the same.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19535695
United States
02/22/2013 03:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
hugs be back later its starting to thunder ( big booms) and rain

Love to You All

:Heart cloud:
nobody
User ID: 34494410
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 04:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
bye fringe,,

much love,,
Azeratel Axo

User ID: 20063747
Canada
02/22/2013 04:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Bye Fringe...

...

Good afternoon, the rest... lmao
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4022074
United States
02/22/2013 04:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
...

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280

 Quoting: Septenary Man


oh yes
you feel sparky today

 Quoting: aether


I am feeling...sparky is a good word I suppose, lol. Been jumping around to different things all day, with work being the same.
 Quoting: Septenary Man


Lol. I saw you ask what yes language was..on magestic threadtounge
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
02/22/2013 04:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun.
 Quoting: observation

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280

 Quoting: Septenary Man


wonder if this would apply in some way to that tho SS..



Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

(a) A closed timelike curve, in which p2 is a chronology-respecting system, and p1 is a time-traveling system that can jump from point tA to the past point tB through a spacetime wormhole, has the ability to interact with itself in the past. (b) In an open timelike curve (OTC), the system cannot interact with itself in the past. In the new study, physicists have theoretically shown that OTCs can violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provided p1 is entangled with p2. This proposal could be tested by performing experiments on entangled systems in Earth’s gravitational field. Credit: J. L. Pienaar, et al. ©2013 American Physical Society (Phys.org)
—If an object traveling through spacetime can loop back in time in a certain way, then its trajectory can allow a pair of its components to be measured with perfect accuracy, violating Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This new finding involves a particular trajectory called an open timelike curve (OTC), which is a special case of a closed timelike curve (CTC), a theoretical concept that has previously provoked controversy because it raises the possibility of traveling backwards in time.

Read more at: [link to phys.org]

hmm
 Quoting: >~* Flutterby Fringe*~<


Hey Fringe. For some reason I am pulling away from 'time' related concepts like above. I think because I am not 'seeing' time like I use to. I think it is much more 'complex' then how we view it now, though simpler at the same time. I 'feel' as if time is...like consciousness and time are embedded together.

Once they begin talking about 'time loops', then they are talking about non-material aspects...superluminal. If human waking consciousness were inside that time-loop, it would not be able to keep up with the processing of superluminal information/observation. Basically, it becomes almost dream-like and I would guess EXTREMELY hard to remember what took place, and possibly very difficult to discern exactly what happen when coming back to the NOW moment, whether it be 'backwards' in time or forward.

It is my strong opinion that the concept of time has been misrepresented. It has been treated as a type of dimension, as if it could be separate from reality.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
02/22/2013 04:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
hugs be back later its starting to thunder ( big booms) and rain

Love to You All

:Heart cloud:
 Quoting: >~* Flutterby Fringe*~<


Get a Schumann Resonance rate while you are enjoying the storm! lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
02/22/2013 04:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Lol. I saw you ask what yes language was..on magestic threadtounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4022074


I was trying to track that down, The Language of YEs, but was unsuccesful.

sad
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31036731
Canada
02/22/2013 06:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
...

 Quoting: aether


Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun?

See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields?


 Quoting: Rain-Man 34949280

 Quoting: Septenary Man


wonder if this would apply in some way to that tho SS..



Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

(a) A closed timelike curve, in which p2 is a chronology-respecting system, and p1 is a time-traveling system that can jump from point tA to the past point tB through a spacetime wormhole, has the ability to interact with itself in the past. (b) In an open timelike curve (OTC), the system cannot interact with itself in the past. In the new study, physicists have theoretically shown that OTCs can violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provided p1 is entangled with p2. This proposal could be tested by performing experiments on entangled systems in Earth’s gravitational field. Credit: J. L. Pienaar, et al. ©2013 American Physical Society (Phys.org)
—If an object traveling through spacetime can loop back in time in a certain way, then its trajectory can allow a pair of its components to be measured with perfect accuracy, violating Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This new finding involves a particular trajectory called an open timelike curve (OTC), which is a special case of a closed timelike curve (CTC), a theoretical concept that has previously provoked controversy because it raises the possibility of traveling backwards in time.

Read more at: [link to phys.org]

hmm
 Quoting: >~* Flutterby Fringe*~<


Hey Fringe. For some reason I am pulling away from 'time' related concepts like above. I think because I am not 'seeing' time like I use to. I think it is much more 'complex' then how we view it now, though simpler at the same time. I 'feel' as if time is...like consciousness and time are embedded together.

Once they begin talking about 'time loops', then they are talking about non-material aspects...superluminal. If human waking consciousness were inside that time-loop, it would not be able to keep up with the processing of superluminal information/observation. Basically, it becomes almost dream-like and I would guess EXTREMELY hard to remember what took place, and possibly very difficult to discern exactly what happen when coming back to the NOW moment, whether it be 'backwards' in time or forward.

It is my strong opinion that the concept of time has been misrepresented. It has been treated as a type of dimension, as if it could be separate from reality.
 Quoting: Septenary Man




Time is contingent on the shape of space and the awareness of the data collecting device.

Thus it is relative to the breadth and keeness of the relation.

The gnostic bible calls it the state of fullness.

After my nacho plate I am hyperexpanded.
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 06:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
just saw thishf

Bumblebees Communicate with Flowers Via Electric Fields

[link to www.scienceworldreport.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34944405


"More recently though, it is being discovered that flowers take advantage of more and more of their pollinators' senses to send their messages


Insects use several senses to forage, detecting floral cues such as color, shape, pattern, and volatiles. We report a formerly unappreciated sensory modality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris), detection of floral electric fields. These fields act as floral cues, which are affected by the visit of naturally charged bees. Like visual cues, floral electric fields exhibit variations in pattern and structure, which can be discriminated by bumblebees. We also show that such electric field information contributes to the complex array of floral cues that together improve a pollinator's memory of floral rewards. Because floral electric fields can change within seconds, this sensory modality may facilitate rapid and dynamic communication between flowers and their pollinators.
 Quoting: observation

[link to www.sciencemag.org]
our sciences are confirming non material structures
further more they are confirming the non material structure of a soul/personality exists to be measured within an electric universe


2/10/2011 6:11 AM


reminder for me to write

soul/personality/charge
 Quoting: aether



this /z\ is no longer the tricky topic it was of 2 years ago

Last Edited by aether on 01/25/2014 09:25 AM
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 06:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Lol. I saw you ask what yes language was..on magestic threadtounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4022074


I was trying to track that down, The Language of YEs, but was unsuccesful.

sad
 Quoting: Septenary Man


i thought he said the language of the birds which is a another name for boyd bushmans language of mother nature
nobody
User ID: 34494410
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 06:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
interesting,,

much love,,
Seer777
Ride the wings of the mind

User ID: 31248385
United States
02/22/2013 06:53 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
Lol. I saw you ask what yes language was..on magestic threadtounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4022074


I was trying to track that down, The Language of YEs, but was unsuccesful.

sad
 Quoting: Septenary Man


i thought he said the language of the birds which is a another name for boyd bushmans language of mother nature
 Quoting: aether


The birds and the bees is it?

lol.


sunflower
Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body...
~Seneca
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 06:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
just saw thishf

Bumblebees Communicate with Flowers Via Electric Fields

[link to www.scienceworldreport.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34944405


"More recently though, it is being discovered that flowers take advantage of more and more of their pollinators' senses to send their messages
 Quoting: aether


Insects use several senses to forage, detecting floral cues such as color, shape, pattern, and volatiles. We report a formerly unappreciated sensory modality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris), detection of floral electric fields. These fields act as floral cues, which are affected by the visit of naturally charged bees. Like visual cues, floral electric fields exhibit variations in pattern and structure, which can be discriminated by bumblebees. We also show that such electric field information contributes to the complex array of floral cues that together improve a pollinator's memory of floral rewards. Because floral electric fields can change within seconds, this sensory modality may facilitate rapid and dynamic communication between flowers and their pollinators. [link to www.sciencemag.org]
 Quoting: observation


our sciences are confirming non material structures
further more they are confirming the non material structure of a soul/personality exists to be measured within an electric universe


2/10/2011 6:11 AM


reminder for me to write

soul/personality/charge
 Quoting: aether



this /z\ is no longer the tricky topic it was of 2 years ago


this will make more sense now
c/f/s is charge, field and spin

8/5/2010 7:05 PM

Your question will fly in the face of Out-of-body proponents...hah! That is why, once out of body during OBE's etc., the physical aspects of reality are malleable or distorted...with pineal and/or eyes, the vision remains 'true' to actual physical representation...they are the 'physical' receptors and 'antennae' that 'solidify' the vision for the human body to function in proper physicality with other humans...
 Quoting: sept


yes but what comes out?

when i go out charge/field/spin (cfs) soul/personality leaves my body , i don`t need the antenna,/structure

i`m self supporting autonomous aether accepted by aether cos we fit

i get no distortions cos cfs in or out of the body is the same

i`m functioning at femto speed and up matching my environment (aether)

time does not exist to me because i am non material within the non material dimension
 Quoting: aether


Last Edited by aether on 01/25/2014 09:29 AM
Seer777
Ride the wings of the mind

User ID: 31248385
United States
02/22/2013 06:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
The Sun JUST came out...

banana2
Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body...
~Seneca
aether  (OP)

User ID: 34923382
United Kingdom
02/22/2013 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: X Marks the Spot
10/24/2010 2:23 PM

so when the environmental changes caused by the golden age finally ceased and the remaining humans around the globe where interacting with unknown pulses (waves of information/energy)from our universe as we see know today but ,to our ancestors, a totally alien environment

the aether/field translates the interaction between them (ancestors) and it (universe) and neither had met each other before

i`m getting a picture, earth is humanities life point within our magnetosphere, we form (born) here

for eternity to us, we lived within a stable environment of very different ingredients to the one we have lived within for several thousands of years

when our past environment (golden age) was removed we and our earth were and are, within another environment but our magnetosphere and earth remain intact and the same shape

because of the nature of form (birth) and reform (death) of our personalities/souls our ancestors essence/emotions/memories may remain within our magnetosphere to this day

it`s not like trapped but it is because we/they have yet to come to terms with where we are and until we do, we will never satisfy either ourselves or them as to what happened

when we know they know and when we all know, we are all okay

i imagine
 Quoting: aether


Thread: Whats to Come Again...the lost and fallen will weep when we see what we have done, when we realize who we are... (Page 4)

that was a good question you asked sept tounge
 Quoting: aether





GLP