X Marks the Spot

Anyone else smell elephant?

Or is it just me?

Anyone else smell elephant?

Or is it just me?

Tonight, I feel very foggy....

Something is 'up' with me....

And I'm not sure what it is.

Tonight, I feel very foggy....

Something is 'up' with me....

And I'm not sure what it is.

Feeling foggy huh...

Rediscovering F. A. Hayek’s The Sensory Order has been exciting.

Hayek began his inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology in 1919 before specializing in economics (and winning a Nobel Prize in that latter field in 1974). He didn’t publish The Sensory Order until 1952, when he found “with considerable surprise” that theoretical psychology “remained pretty much in the same state in which it had been” 30 years before. He attributed this stasis to “the prevalence during this period of an all too exclusively empirical approach and of an excessive contempt for ‘speculation’.

It seems almost as if ‘speculation’ (which, be it remembered, is merely another word for thinking) had become so discredited among psychologists that it has to be done by outsiders who have no professional reputation to lose.” (Preface, p. vi, 1976 paperback reprint by University of Chicago Press.) Hayek presents the fundamental problem with which psychology is concerned to be explaining the existence of and differences between the sensory order of our minds and the physical or objective order as delineated by the various sciences. It’s the distinction between things as related to us and things as related to each other.

For example, the sensory order classifies colors in a circle: red shades into blue through the color purple. But in the physical order the colors are a short segment of a much longer linear continuum, and purple doesn’t exist. Drawing on the largely physiological investigations of the previous century, Hayek notes that all nerve impulses are identical. A receptor cell discharges its tiny current; the next cell on the path to the brain is thereby stimulated to fire; and so on until the last cell in the brain fires. There’s no continuity in current and no variation in current: cells either fire or not. There’s no transfer of specific information. The only thing that distinguishes one nerve impulse from another is its location with respect to all other nerves.

The sensory order thus arises from relationships of impulses relative to each other. It’s not a manipulation of stimuli carrying information from objects in the physical world but a classification of internal relationships that stand in mutable correspondences to physical relationships. Hayek further notes that these impulses are not isolated. They occur in associations or ‘linkages’ with each other. Any one impulse will have a ‘following’ of other impulses..............

there is something we notice interesting regarding enochian language which is it is spiritual technology and we know this because in our 21st century enochian language forms practical and emotional sense when the experience is experienced within the knowing of the spiritual technology the language forms a description of
from this we may notice that neither john dee or kelly possessed within their imagination the notion electricity and the "angels" that provided the information were unable to provide any description themselves to prompt the notion of electricity
similarly alister never once mentions electricity in anything he says and knowing the nature of aleister , if he had the notion he would have voiced the notion and like dee and kelly whatever he spoke to failed to prompt the notion of electricity into his imagination
thus we may consider 2 things
they were not told because nothing they spoke to knew
or
everything they spoke to knew and decided to never tell them

This also explains the “incommensurability” of paradigms: A stimulus that energizes a particular group of impulses in one person (the word ‘plasma’ for a mainstream physicist, evoking associations of ‘ionized gas’ and ‘ideal gas law’) will energize an entirely different group of impulses in an electric-universe physicist (‘plasma’ evoking ‘filamentation’ and ‘jets’).

Hayek again (p. 142): “If sensory perception must be regarded as an act of classification, what we perceive can never be unique properties of individual objects but always only properties which the objects have in common with other objects. Perception is thus always an interpretation, the placing of something into one or several classes of objects. An event of an entirely new kind which has never occurred before, and which sets up impulses which arrive in the brain for the first time, could not be perceived at all.” [link to www.thunderbolts.info]

Lost souls?

spiritual technology is a new phrase that has arisen form first thought , do we possess a description of spiritual technology as yet

spiritual technology is a new phrase that has arisen form first thought , do we possess a description of spiritual technology as yet

Since the dawn of the Age of Science, humankind has been engaged in a methodical quest to understand the cosmos. With the development of quantum mechanics, the notion that everything is solid matter, is being replaced with the idea that information or thought may be the true source of physical reality. Such scientific inquiry has led to a growing interest in the brain's unique and mysterious ability to create perception, possibly through quantum interactions. Consciousness is now being considered as much a fundamental part of reality as the three dimensions we are so familiar with. Although this direction in scientific thought is seen as a new approach, the secret wisdom of the ancients presented just such a view thousands of years ago. Building on René A. Schwaller de Lubicz's systematic study of Luxor's Temple of Amun-Mut-Khonsu during the 1940s and '50s, Edward Malkowski shows that the ancient Egyptian's worldview was not based on superstition or the invention of myth but was the result of direct observation using critical faculties attuned to the quantum manifestation of the universe. This understanding of reality as a product of human consciousness provided the inspiration for the sacred science of the ancients precisely the philosophy modern science is embracing today. In the philosophical tradition of Schwaller de Lubicz, THE SPIRITUAL TECHNOLOGY OF ANCIENT EGYPT investigates the technical and religious legacy of ancient Egypt to reveal its congruence with today's New Science.

The Church of Spiritual Technology, also known as CST, is a Californian 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, incorporated in 1982, which owns all the copyrights of the estate of L. Ron Hubbard. The CST is doing business as L. Ron Hubbard Library. The organization receives its income from royalty fees paid to it by licensing of the copyrighted materials of Dianetics and Scientology to Scientology-connected organizations approved by the Religious Technology Center, and from its wholly owned for-profit subsidiary Author Services Inc. which publishes and promotes Hubbard's fiction works.

In a 1993 memorandum by the Church of Scientology International, the role and function of CST has been described as follows:

"[...] CST [...] is an autonomous church of the Scientology religion outside of the international Scientology ecclesiastical hierarchy. CST conducts an extensive program of activities to preserve and archive the Scientology Scriptures for use by future generations. CST also owns the option to acquire RTC's rights to the Scientology advance[d] technology and religious marks under three narrowly defined sets of circumstances, each of which contemplates a serious threat to continued existence of the religion. CST is the principal beneficiary of Mr. Hubbard's estate, provided that it obtains recognition of its tax-exempt status.

Financial and tax exemption The Church of Spiritual Technology (CST) was incorporated by Sherman Lenske in Woodland Hills, California on May 27, 1982.....

i think something unusual occurred today
when i came on line a thread was red pinned
i posted and no one else posted except one post just before
i posted again, noticing the view count was rushing up
within 30 seconds of my second post it became unpinned
none of the others did
and it disappeared into obscurity
may be nothing but i never noticed that before


Thread: SCIENTOLOGISTS BUILD UNDERGROUND ALIEN CATHEDRAL..Toooo freaky. (Page 2)

Naming it technology would be correct, as if I go to my computer and want to learn something, it is all good and well knowing that it is out there in the www, yet I have to have the picture in my mind of what I seek, for it to be found.

:Goodmorning:

I had a weird dream. It was a huge pool of water with people playing on the surface. But I was looking for something at the bottom that was lost. The pool was really deep. So the people playing at the pool decided to drain it to see what was at the bottom. What was found was interesting. There was secret rooms where people lived behind the deep walls at the bottom. And some were still down there living.

Good morning

Naming it technology would be correct, as if I go to my computer and want to learn something, it is all good and well knowing that it is out there in the www, yet I have to have the picture in my mind of what I seek, for it to be found.

Heya Fancy...

My first impression is the scene in Labyrinth when Sara is standing outside the Labyrinth speaking to Hoogle. She is inquiring about 'the door' but continues to receive evasive answers from Hoggle.

When she get frustrates he says to her,

'Not if you ask the right question...'

To which she respond, How do I get into the Labyrinth?

To which he then responds, That is the right question.


Thanks for sharing, as proper question asking, be the Key...

:)

good morning, steven greer would say you are sensing our non gaia friends utilizing the under surface of gaia
others may say you are experiencing our underworld
the good news is the texture of your dream is friendly and of advantage to all to know

lovely

Lost souls?

Your right about friendly. I wasn't scared at all. But I did leave right when I met them because I wasn't ready as I still didn't find what I dropped in the pool.

what is a lost soul, is it our non material structure of charge and field bereft of material structure thus sustained/retained within gaia`s non material field structures and functioning with our 7% of conscious self switched off by our labeled sub conscious thus we function as we always did and respond to that which prompts us to respond whilst we retain no memory of our responses once our responses are complete
thus we continuously experience with no memory of any experience within the domain of gaia

would that be labeled lost