Weather Satellite Photo July 1969 Matches Apollo Broadcast Weather Pattern.

What do we believe?
How did they get the accurate weather photo from the orbiter window? Or did they really go to the Moon???

Then there is this:

Latest Moon Photos from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
SPACE.com Staff
Date: 04 May 2012 Time: 10:30 AM ET
[link to www.space.com]

Click thru all the photos and answer these questions:
1. Why are the photos black & white? Why not color?
2. If these photos were taken in 2012 why aren't they using telescopic zoom lens on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter?
I have an Olympus superzoom that goes upto 30x Optical zoom. Surely they could have taken real close ups with the kind of technology NASA has today?
The images of the Apollo Landers are like tiny flea specks.


??

The comments are interesting:
Both pro and con:

Jose Escamilla ·
First of all the fact that NASA has perpetuated the "lie" that the Moon is GREY is a great starting point here. I have proven the Moon is a full color celestial body. Everything NASA presents here is nothing more than lies upon lies upon lies.

_Craig Heath · Top Commenter
It took 65 years, from the time we figured out how to fly, to put people on the Moon. However, all we’ve done in the 42 years since then is make excuses for why the sons aren’t as capable as the fathers and grandfathers.

We should all be collectively ashamed to the point of rededicating ourselves to being the flag-bearer of humanity in space. It’s a place of pride that Americans were challenged to achieve and we conquered. It was a product of American ingenuity and exceptionalism and that product has been sacrificed by those who’d rather cater to the slackards and do-nothings in our society. It’s the sort of thinking that plagues and infests our once-great country today. It’s bad enough there are people out there without a proper education but what is truly abhorrent is the Cult of Ignorance that is so disgustingly prevalent today, where people are actually PROUD of being pants-on-head retarded about things and look down their noses (and all four chins) at intelligent and ambitious people with dreams because “them’s better ‘n us and that’s bad! Where do they get off thinkin’ that they’re better than the rest of us?”.
[link to www.space.com]

yep
i got also match when compared still frame from the start of the video, with the frame from the end of the video (the second one)
[link to i290.photobucket.com]
[link to i290.photobucket.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Yeah, they are really close. The screen grab you posted need to be turned slightly to match the weather satellite photo.

yes i must rotated it, to get the exact overlay
so this serves as PRO moon landing argument..

We have weather satellites out in a geosynchronous orbit

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

That is the exact same photo from the exact same satellite...what are the odds we would take the picture at that exact location too?

I just saw this...it's even better....the pictures you are using are from the NASA weather satellite.....Hmmmmmm...wonder why they look the same...

Yeah, this means there is something to the hoax debunkers who said they DID go to the Moon.
We need the truth.
Im not pro-hoax.
Im pro-truth, whatever that is.
But its not easy being pro-they went to the moon.
Too many anomalies, being explained by slick shills.

I wonder the same too.
How did they get the weather pictures to match.
And don't forget, EVERY Apollo mission also had to do the same thing. Every picture of the Earth HAD to have a real match with Real weather data.

This is difficult, unless they actually did go to the Moon.

If the jets from the lander blew the dust away on landing, how can you get photos of foot prints in the "moon dust".

How could they talk to each other without delay, because of the distance?

Why are there reports of fake moon rocks?

If there is technology that can move in so close as to see a persons' face on earth, why are the photos of the Apollo missions so small and of poor quality?

This video is extremely misleading. The astronauts could easily go from the earth to the moon and back but getting from lunar orbit to the surface and back is a whole other monkey. This video cleverly uses video taken on July 18 1969. It shows that the weather pattern is the same as the satellite image. That does not prove that they landed on the moon. All it proves is that they were in the capsule and they were taking video.

The dust wasn't blown into space.
No dust under the lander, a few metres away there was plenty of dust.
A whole Moon covered with it.


They didn't.
Watch the unedited recordings.


Because there are morans (and liars).


Because such technology doesn't exist outside of Hollywood techno-thrillers.
I'm sure the NRO would like you to believe it though.



And that they were at the distance they said they were, beyond the VABs.
It demolishes quite a lot of hoaxie claims.
It also exposes that Bart Sibrel deliberately manufactured 'evidence'.

[link to www.apfn.org]

[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]

Simple goggle search presents something different.

Last Edited by Boatsmac on 08/31/2012 09:14 PM

ORLY!?

[link to lmgtfy.com]