| Users Online Now: 1,860 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,514,130 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,157,329 | Threads Today: 527 | Posts Today: 10,230 |
| 04:51 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,860 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,514,130 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,157,329 | Threads Today: 527 | Posts Today: 10,230 |
| 04:51 PM | ||
A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22538971  United States09/04/2012 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Cancer is caused by a nutritional defficiency that allows cancer virus to grow in body. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23127508 No drug can cure a nutritional deficiency. The viruses will just keep coming back untill the deficiency is addressed. Like only vitamin C can cure scurvy. No drug can cure scurvy. + Inflammation. Our bodies are pretty amazing.. especially when given the correct nutrition. However, super foods that are anti inflammatory is where its really at. Most degenerative diseases, including cancer, are inflammatory diseases. But your sooOOoo right about nutritional deficiency.. If we weren't deficient, we wouldn't be susceptible to so many ailments. |
CmdrWorf  User ID: 12070171  Canada09/04/2012 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Red Harvest User ID: 14185604 United States09/04/2012 02:53 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Cancer is a FUNGUS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2192414 Cure? Baking soda and maple syrup Hemp oil Vit b 17 Mushrooms where are your facts to make such a lame post,none of the above will cure cancer, sad part is neither will chemo and radiation, what you have listed above gives one false hope, chemo and rads gives the same only with added benefits like weakness,rashes,internal bleeding,headaches,weight loss, Constipation,diarrhea,hair loss and the list go's on and on Some win most don't,either way. OK, Here's one "cocktail:" ONE part baking soda (NOT with aluminum in it), THREE parts Maple syrup (ALL NATURAL only). Mix & heat, but NOT to boiling. What does it do? Syrup is sugar....draws cancer cells to it (they LIVE and reproduce by eating sugar) Baking soda kills them by changing the Ph balance in your blood to more alkaline, less acidic. Take ONE teaspoon once or twice a day. THAT's how that one works, TARDS. Vit B17 is also supposed to work, but has - for the most part - been banned (It's laetril...it's supposedly toxic? So what! If someone is facing a death sentence, shouldn't they have the right to try something that MIGHT save them if they want?). Hemp? Never heard that one 'Shrooms? That one neither! Do a little more research.. [link to phkillscancer.com] you will find out he raised his PH to 8 and kept it there 5 days,a cancer patient in dire straights has no chance in hell to achieve this. There is so much wrong with the assumption that mixing sugar with baking soda would kill cancer its laughable if it wasn't dangerous to tell people. Too high blood Ph causes Alkalosis and obviously sugar is converted into glucose and goes to the liver before being used by your cells. So how this "cure" supposedly works is idiotic at best. “Phantoms fill the skies around you.” |
| VooDooRoo User ID: 22600163  Australia09/04/2012 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2538819 Canada09/04/2012 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2538819 Canada09/04/2012 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2045712  United Kingdom09/04/2012 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1568805 where are your facts to make such a lame post,none of the above will cure cancer, sad part is neither will chemo and radiation, what you have listed above gives one false hope, chemo and rads gives the same only with added benefits like weakness,rashes,internal bleeding,headaches,weight loss, Constipation,diarrhea,hair loss and the list go's on and on Some win most don't,either way. OK, Here's one "cocktail:" ONE part baking soda (NOT with aluminum in it), THREE parts Maple syrup (ALL NATURAL only). Mix & heat, but NOT to boiling. What does it do? Syrup is sugar....draws cancer cells to it (they LIVE and reproduce by eating sugar) Baking soda kills them by changing the Ph balance in your blood to more alkaline, less acidic. Take ONE teaspoon once or twice a day. THAT's how that one works, TARDS. Vit B17 is also supposed to work, but has - for the most part - been banned (It's laetril...it's supposedly toxic? So what! If someone is facing a death sentence, shouldn't they have the right to try something that MIGHT save them if they want?). Hemp? Never heard that one 'Shrooms? That one neither! Do a little more research.. [link to phkillscancer.com] you will find out he raised his PH to 8 and kept it there 5 days,a cancer patient in dire straights has no chance in hell to achieve this. There is so much wrong with the assumption that mixing sugar with baking soda would kill cancer its laughable if it wasn't dangerous to tell people. Too high blood Ph causes Alkalosis and obviously sugar is converted into glucose and goes to the liver before being used by your cells. So how this "cure" supposedly works is idiotic at best. What's just as idiotic is people believing these "cure" testimonials and stories on the internet. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20003334 United States09/04/2012 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1568805 where are your facts to make such a lame post,none of the above will cure cancer, sad part is neither will chemo and radiation, what you have listed above gives one false hope, chemo and rads gives the same only with added benefits like weakness,rashes,internal bleeding,headaches,weight loss, Constipation,diarrhea,hair loss and the list go's on and on Some win most don't,either way. OK, Here's one "cocktail:" ONE part baking soda (NOT with aluminum in it), THREE parts Maple syrup (ALL NATURAL only). Mix & heat, but NOT to boiling. What does it do? Syrup is sugar....draws cancer cells to it (they LIVE and reproduce by eating sugar) Baking soda kills them by changing the Ph balance in your blood to more alkaline, less acidic. Take ONE teaspoon once or twice a day. THAT's how that one works, TARDS. Vit B17 is also supposed to work, but has - for the most part - been banned (It's laetril...it's supposedly toxic? So what! If someone is facing a death sentence, shouldn't they have the right to try something that MIGHT save them if they want?). Hemp? Never heard that one 'Shrooms? That one neither! Do a little more research.. [link to phkillscancer.com] you will find out he raised his PH to 8 and kept it there 5 days,a cancer patient in dire straights has no chance in hell to achieve this. There is so much wrong with the assumption that mixing sugar with baking soda would kill cancer its laughable if it wasn't dangerous to tell people. Too high blood Ph causes Alkalosis and obviously sugar is converted into glucose and goes to the liver before being used by your cells. So how this "cure" supposedly works is idiotic at best. (Pure maple syrup Catalyst) Not straight sugar. Raising one's ph to 7.5-8.0 temporarily is an easy tradeoff when considering it's potential to kill cancer. Anyone who has not researched the anti-cancer properties of cannabis must be living under a rock! Or? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1735556 United States09/04/2012 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Frustrating how there's no consenus on what exactly is cancer, is it a virus, fungus, a product of unstoppable cell multiplication fueled by genetic triggers, toxicity, or poor nutrition... It should be obvious that the earthly powers that be don't want a cure because it would mean population growth and a culling of the cancer business, be it research, medical, or organizational. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18768713 United States09/04/2012 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Cancer "treatment" is big business. Anything that easily eradicates it is a threat to big pharma, oncologists and associations that collect money to "find a cure" but never do. One day we'll probably look back on chemotherapy the way we do on blood-letting as a cure. But not until greed and big interests get out of the way. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9231012 United States09/04/2012 03:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in NOt profitable for human use. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1546575 See if it wipes out all the profitable treatments(not cures) of cancer, many huge powerful drug companies stand to loose BILLIONS. Come on, you must know how the world works by now. I agree with you, I'd bet within 3 years this man will be found dead. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9231012 United States09/04/2012 03:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in A very good 5star read on B17 vitamin, the lying assed FDA and Laetrile. [link to www.worldwithoutcancer.org.uk] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 904715  New Zealand09/04/2012 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1546575 United Kingdom09/04/2012 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Cancer is a FUNGUS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2192414 Cure? Baking soda and maple syrup Hemp oil Vit b 17 Mushrooms Please don't post such misinformed bullshit Actually the hemp oil part is verified, and violently rejected by doctors because of the views of the medical establishment. profit profit profit. Treatments not cures.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1568805 United States09/04/2012 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Cancer is a FUNGUS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2192414 Cure? Baking soda and maple syrup Hemp oil Vit b 17 Mushrooms Please don't post such misinformed bullshit Actually the hemp oil part is verified, and violently rejected by doctors because of the views of the medical establishment. profit profit profit. Treatments not cures. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23018311 United States09/04/2012 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22611128 United Kingdom09/04/2012 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Cancer is caused by a nutritional defficiency that allows cancer virus to grow in body. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23127508 No drug can cure a nutritional deficiency. The viruses will just keep coming back untill the deficiency is addressed. Like only vitamin C can cure scurvy. No drug can cure scurvy. stop spewing bullshit like this. a vitamin deficiency doesnt cause the sudden rapid growth of rogue cells in your body. just be quiet if you dont know what you are talking about please. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21814696 Canada09/04/2012 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in I read the entire posted reference article. It took me about 15 minutes or so. FIVE STARS. Quoting: Old Coot Excellent article with great human interest story. Scientist has cure for cancer but has no backers to fund him. Big Pharma says no to him and red-tape from government makes it just about impossible for scientist to do anything. If story is true, would be a very good investment for someone. Scientist needs about $2-3 Million. ^^This^^ Hopefully someone with deep pockets or fundraising ability will take notice.  Big Pharma and Government doesn't want a cure. Its better that the person stay sick creating huge payments to Pharma companies. Then look at the world population and available food and water. Put them together and we are where we are! |
| SaveAmericaFightNWO User ID: 23016970 United States09/04/2012 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Fhirinne User ID: 17348671 United Kingdom09/04/2012 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Frustrating how there's no consenus on what exactly is cancer, is it a virus, fungus, a product of unstoppable cell multiplication fueled by genetic triggers, toxicity, or poor nutrition... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1735556 It should be obvious that the earthly powers that be don't want a cure because it would mean population growth and a culling of the cancer business, be it research, medical, or organizational. I have to admit I am starting more and more to lean towards this take on things. Just because the average human body contains so many chemicals this theory below could very well pan out to be just what cancer is. Cancer tumors as Metazoa 1.0: tapping genes of ancient ancestors [link to iopscience.iop.org] or [link to gaia-health.com] [link to gaia-health.com] You are the CEO of your own wellness. You need to take back your health from the disease-care system |
| Captain Spaulding User ID: 18366995 United States09/04/2012 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Cancer is a FUNGUS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2192414 Cure? Baking soda and maple syrup Hemp oil Vit b 17 Mushrooms A very close friend, ex-inside linebacker, was given a diagnosis of stage 4 throat cancer, three moths to live. He went to canada for Hemp Oil treatment, illegal here in the states. That was almost three years ago now and he has a 10 month old son. I had per-cancerous polyps removed from my colon. They left the largest one and went back for it 3 moths later. I had changed my diet to "mostly" raw food, less red meat, and I juice veggies every night ALONG with the maple syrup and baking soda (both organic) and the polyp was biopsied and had no signs of cancer at all. NO THANKS TO MY GI DOCTOR HERE. He said it, my diet, wouldn't make a difference and started discussing chemo before he went in the for second time. Screw the AMA. This country is only number 37 from the bottom of 191 countries in health care quality. That puts Arizona in the bottom 7 per cent of 191 countries for health care. Even the feds rate this states' medical system as "dismal at best". And all people are worried about here is Sheriff Joke and his posse. You've got to be proactive about your health. There's too many people making too much money off us being sick to trust ANY of them. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7813790  France09/04/2012 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1507912 United States09/04/2012 05:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Well here's a reason for you. It's not going to make Big Pharma millions of dollars. And you really believe that don't you? It takes on average $900 million to develop a single drug. Think about it. $900 million. That’s an amount of money that even Bill Gates would have trouble finding down the back of the sofa on a regular basis. Of the drugs that get out of pre-clinical testing, 70% will fail at Phase 1 trial stage. One of the reasons that drug discovery is so expensive is that (apart from the fact that it’s difficult), the pharmaceutical industry is so heavily regulated. Now I’m not defending Big Pharma. Far from it. I can't stand them. Their price fixing and handling of off-patent drugs in the 3rd world is criminal, they aren’t always transparent with their methods and data and when they mess up, people die. But they exist to make money and if, for example, 1 in 3 people in the Western world will get cancer in their lifetime do you not think that they would exploit a cure, any cure and have us over a barrel to make money from it? Not to mention the kudos, the plaudits, the Nobel Prizes that any scientist would receive if they managed to cure the potentially incurable? The idea that they would regularly throw away close to a billion dollars while sitting on possibly one of the most lucrative ideas of all time is laughable. You are forgetting something, there are people out there that want to reduce the population of the world. They treat the disease, they don't cure the disease. They injected cancer into ww2 veterans. One of the Rockefeller, during that time said it was as good of away to die as any. Pharma co. were very much into some very bad things. The cancer charities make a lot of money, you might need to research them and who are the ones running it. If you put your trust in people, without knowing their back ground, you just might have a treatment that is worse than the disease. Who do you think was involved in eugenics? Who are they now? Genome study, genetics in all forms, they study people like lab animals. The good one have accidents. |
| rhubarbgal User ID: 1304964 United States09/04/2012 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Actually, this is NOT a novel treatment. My dad, who suffered from pancreatic islet cell cancer (a form of neuroendocrine tumor), participated in initial trials of the Seneca Valley virus. That vaccine also induced flu-like symptoms, but regrettably was regrettably ineffective in arresting dad's cancer. I trust that future endeavors, like this one, lead to widespread success--cancer is a scourge from hell. [link to www.cancer.gov] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1304964 United States09/04/2012 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Actually, this is NOT a novel treatment. My dad, who suffered from pancreatic islet cell cancer (a form of neuroendocrine tumor), participated in initial trials of the Seneca Valley virus. That vaccine also induced flu-like symptoms, but was regrettably ineffective in arresting dad's cancer. I trust that future endeavors, like this one, lead to widespread success--cancer is a scourge from hell. Quoting: rhubarbgal 1304964 [link to www.cancer.gov] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22690918 United States09/04/2012 07:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in a refrigerator in a Swedish laboratory. Quoting: waht Sitting in a refrigerator in a Swedish laboratory is what promises to be a cheap and effective cancer treatment. So why are the trials to bring it to market not going ahead? On the snow-clotted plains of central Sweden where Wotan and Thor, the clamorous gods of magic and death, once held sway, a young, self-deprecating gene therapist has invented a virus that eliminates the type of cancer that killed Steve Jobs. 'Not "eliminates"! Not "invented", no!' interrupts Professor Magnus Essand, panicked, when I Skype him to ask about this explosive achievement. 'Our results are only in the lab so far, not in humans, and many treatments that work in the lab can turn out to be not so effective in humans. However, adenovirus serotype 5 is a common virus in which we have achieved transcriptional targeting by replacing an endogenous viral promoter sequence by…' It sounds too kindly of the gods to be true: a virus that eats cancer. 'I sometimes use the phrase "an assassin who kills all the bad guys",' Prof Essand agrees contentedly. [link to www.telegraph.co.uk] Hmm, has anyone ever seen the movie, "I Am Legend" ? THIS^, YOU FOOLS! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20399685 United States09/04/2012 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in :wow: OP...and so it begins! Great find :5stars: Quoting: BetteDavisEyes The vid above is in this thread: Thread: NAME A POLKA-DOT-like DISEASE !! It Could Be The Clincher! [UPDATE: Denver Airport's AU-AG!] Also, if I were to count the days in between... Zombie attack in Miami - 5/26 28 Days movie release date - 6/27 London Olympics opening- 7/27 Paralympics opening- 8/29  And get this...I believe it was mentioned that the timeline in the movie took place between SEPTEMBER 5th - 9th  Thread: 28 DAYS LATER ?!! US Release on June 27!! A Dream of Katy Perry's "ET"/Revelation of LMFAO's Party Rock Anthem!! [I Am Legend too] ^^WATCH THE VID!^^ :colorbump: |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2045712 United Kingdom09/05/2012 03:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in Well here's a reason for you. It's not going to make Big Pharma millions of dollars. And you really believe that don't you? It takes on average $900 million to develop a single drug. Think about it. $900 million. That’s an amount of money that even Bill Gates would have trouble finding down the back of the sofa on a regular basis. Of the drugs that get out of pre-clinical testing, 70% will fail at Phase 1 trial stage. One of the reasons that drug discovery is so expensive is that (apart from the fact that it’s difficult), the pharmaceutical industry is so heavily regulated. Now I’m not defending Big Pharma. Far from it. I can't stand them. Their price fixing and handling of off-patent drugs in the 3rd world is criminal, they aren’t always transparent with their methods and data and when they mess up, people die. But they exist to make money and if, for example, 1 in 3 people in the Western world will get cancer in their lifetime do you not think that they would exploit a cure, any cure and have us over a barrel to make money from it? Not to mention the kudos, the plaudits, the Nobel Prizes that any scientist would receive if they managed to cure the potentially incurable? The idea that they would regularly throw away close to a billion dollars while sitting on possibly one of the most lucrative ideas of all time is laughable. You are forgetting something, there are people out there that want to reduce the population of the world. They treat the disease, they don't cure the disease. They injected cancer into ww2 veterans. One of the Rockefeller, during that time said it was as good of away to die as any. Pharma co. were very much into some very bad things. The cancer charities make a lot of money, you might need to research them and who are the ones running it. If you put your trust in people, without knowing their back ground, you just might have a treatment that is worse than the disease. Who do you think was involved in eugenics? Who are they now? Genome study, genetics in all forms, they study people like lab animals. The good one have accidents. Look at this way... Medicine, advances in hygiene and better nutritional advice are mainly responsible for the growth in population. Agreed? Therefore one can argue that the ones promoting these quack cures are responsible for any depopulation... |
