| Users Online Now: 1,540 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 128,075 | |
| Pageviews Today: 246,860 | Threads Today: 128 | Posts Today: 1,907 |
| 02:45 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,540 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 128,075 | |
| Pageviews Today: 246,860 | Threads Today: 128 | Posts Today: 1,907 |
| 02:45 AM | ||
Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!! | |
| THE Professor ! User ID: 24513996  United States10/07/2012 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AND, your reading comprehension =0 ! The rods are 4-5 stories IN THE AIR, ready to fall on the GROUND, NO WATER to cool same ... = Fire, explosions in about 8 hours, right NEXT TO 1000s of other fuel rods in 'CASKS' that will go TOO! You'll be dead in less than a year, IF your LUCKY ! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25132288  Brazil10/07/2012 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25131536  Japan10/07/2012 02:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AC 18073150 ..... YOUR IN DREAM LAND ! Quoting: THE Professor ! 24513996 AND, your reading comprehension =0 ! The rods are 4-5 stories IN THE AIR, ready to fall on the GROUND, NO WATER to cool same ... = Fire, explosions in about 8 hours, right NEXT TO 1000s of other fuel rods in 'CASKS' that will go TOO! You'll be dead in less than a year, IF your LUCKY !  you been saying that for over a year and a half now.Dont you get bored with it? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25008029 United States10/07/2012 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interview with Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland English-Chinese translation by Asianjijo Published on Aug 3, 2012 h/t onesizjk Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland: Due to its ground has been sinking, Unit 4 is now endangered in collapse. [...] According to secretary of former Prime Minister Kan, the ground level of the building has been sinking 80 cm [31.5 inches] unevenly. Because the ground itself has the problem, whether the building can resist a quake bigger than M6 still remains a question. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25008029 United States10/07/2012 02:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1546575  United Kingdom10/07/2012 02:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| THE Professor ! User ID: 24513996 United States10/07/2012 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25131536 Japan10/07/2012 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25131536 Japan10/07/2012 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interview with Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland English-Chinese translation by Asianjijo Published on Aug 3, 2012 h/t onesizjk Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland: Due to its ground has been sinking, Unit 4 is now endangered in collapse. [...] According to secretary of former Prime Minister Kan, the ground level of the building has been sinking 80 cm [31.5 inches] unevenly. Because the ground itself has the problem, whether the building can resist a quake bigger than M6 still remains a question. finger on the button eh? a magnitude 6 would fuck most things up, dont need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. please feel free to research how many m6.0 quakes japan has had since March 11 and sleep easy tonight knowing you dont have to get off the planet just yet. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1546575 United Kingdom10/07/2012 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | new live stream at fukushima. direct VLC player video link. open networkstream. [link to mfile.akamai.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25131536 Japan10/07/2012 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | new live stream at fukushima. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1546575 direct VLC player video link. open networkstream. [link to mfile.akamai.com] shit, cancel all my meetings and get the popcorn in, im going to watch a live stream of nothing happening. |
Watching the world  User ID: 21685109 United States10/07/2012 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | new live stream at fukushima. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1546575 direct VLC player video link. open networkstream. [link to mfile.akamai.com] That's a cool link. Ignorance is bliss until reality bites you in the ass. I take care of the dead...always. |
| Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States10/07/2012 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interview with Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland English-Chinese translation by Asianjijo Published on Aug 3, 2012 h/t onesizjk Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland: Due to its ground has been sinking, Unit 4 is now endangered in collapse. [...] According to secretary of former Prime Minister Kan, the ground level of the building has been sinking 80 cm [31.5 inches] unevenly. Because the ground itself has the problem, whether the building can resist a quake bigger than M6 still remains a question. finger on the button eh? a magnitude 6 would fuck most things up, dont need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. please feel free to research how many m6.0 quakes japan has had since March 11 and sleep easy tonight knowing you dont have to get off the planet just yet. 87 .......6.0 or larger since 3.11.11.. What else do you want to know..? |
| CE1 ***** User ID: 9342578 United States10/07/2012 02:26 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25062401 United Kingdom10/07/2012 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| the mighty Atom User ID: 23715861 Japan10/07/2012 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AC 18073150 ..... YOUR IN DREAM LAND ! Quoting: THE Professor ! 24513996 AND, your reading comprehension =0 ! The rods are 4-5 stories IN THE AIR, ready to fall on the GROUND, NO WATER to cool same ... = Fire, explosions in about 8 hours, right NEXT TO 1000s of other fuel rods in 'CASKS' that will go TOO! You'll be dead in less than a year, IF your LUCKY ! I am not AC from Japan but let us see what would happen in the case that Building would really collapse: The majority of the Fuel Rods would be still inside the Cask and inside the Pool, (The Pool itself is a own separate Part) because they are deep inside, 4 Meter, of a holding System (They are not freely floating inside of the Pool) When the cooling Water is gone it would be refilled and the Cooling Circle Re-Established, when the Pool cant hold the Water they would spray the Rods with a Borium/ Water Melange for 24 Hours Non Stop until the Rods get moved to the Common spend Fuel-Pool! The Rods would not start anon to melt and burn, according to my knowledge this need Time, ca. 48 Hours. This Time will expand with the spraying of Cooling Water. The Tepco People even think (Dream?) that the Fuel Rods can stand "outside" even for a long Time as long as the Spraying continue. Maybe this is possible but they will emit a lot of Radiation! In Theory every single Pool could collapse in a strong Earthquake! It is stupid to look only for F'Shima when we have Nuclear Reactors that cant even stand a Mag. 5,5! We need to switch them off, all of them but we should start with the most weak and old ones! G.Y.!B.E. |
| the mighty Atom User ID: 23715861 Japan10/07/2012 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States10/07/2012 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The geology of the plant site is mudstone or mudrock. Cracks like pottery.... [link to en.wikipedia.org] [snip] Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit. Fateful Move Exposed Japan Plant Quoting: Waterbug Tokyo Electric Lowered Elevation of Land Before Building Nuclear Facility, Weakening Tsunami Defense. In 1967, Tepco chopped 25 meters off the 35-meter natural seawall where the reactors were to be located, according to documents filed at the time with Japanese authorities. That little-noticed action was taken to make it easier to ferry equipment to the site and pump seawater to the reactors. It was also seen as an efficient way to build the complex atop the solid base of bedrock needed to better protect the plant from earthquakes. But the razing of the cliff also placed the reactors five meters below the level of 14- to 15-meter tsunami hitting the plant March 11, triggering a major nuclear disaster resulting in the meltdown of three reactor cores. A former senior Tepco executive involved in the decision-making says there were two main reasons for removing the cliff. First, a lower escarpment made it easier to deliver heavy equipment used in the plant, such as the reactor vessels, turbines and diesel generators, all of which were transported to the site by sea. Second, the design of the plant required seawater to keep the reactor cool, which was facilitated by a shorter distance to the ocean. [link to online.wsj.com] |
| the mighty Atom User ID: 23715861 Japan10/07/2012 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The geology of the plant site is mudstone or mudrock. Cracks like pottery.... Quoting: Waterbug [link to en.wikipedia.org] [snip] Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit. Fateful Move Exposed Japan Plant Quoting: Waterbug Tokyo Electric Lowered Elevation of Land Before Building Nuclear Facility, Weakening Tsunami Defense. In 1967, Tepco chopped 25 meters off the 35-meter natural seawall where the reactors were to be located, according to documents filed at the time with Japanese authorities. That little-noticed action was taken to make it easier to ferry equipment to the site and pump seawater to the reactors. It was also seen as an efficient way to build the complex atop the solid base of bedrock needed to better protect the plant from earthquakes. But the razing of the cliff also placed the reactors five meters below the level of 14- to 15-meter tsunami hitting the plant March 11, triggering a major nuclear disaster resulting in the meltdown of three reactor cores. A former senior Tepco executive involved in the decision-making says there were two main reasons for removing the cliff. First, a lower escarpment made it easier to deliver heavy equipment used in the plant, such as the reactor vessels, turbines and diesel generators, all of which were transported to the site by sea. Second, the design of the plant required seawater to keep the reactor cool, which was facilitated by a shorter distance to the ocean. [link to online.wsj.com] Bedrock, not Mudstone! G.Y.!B.E. |
| Waterbug User ID: 1295673 United States10/07/2012 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The geology of the plant site is mudstone or mudrock. Cracks like pottery.... Quoting: Waterbug [link to en.wikipedia.org] [snip] Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit. Fateful Move Exposed Japan Plant Quoting: Waterbug Tokyo Electric Lowered Elevation of Land Before Building Nuclear Facility, Weakening Tsunami Defense. In 1967, Tepco chopped 25 meters off the 35-meter natural seawall where the reactors were to be located, according to documents filed at the time with Japanese authorities. That little-noticed action was taken to make it easier to ferry equipment to the site and pump seawater to the reactors. It was also seen as an efficient way to build the complex atop the solid base of bedrock needed to better protect the plant from earthquakes. But the razing of the cliff also placed the reactors five meters below the level of 14- to 15-meter tsunami hitting the plant March 11, triggering a major nuclear disaster resulting in the meltdown of three reactor cores. A former senior Tepco executive involved in the decision-making says there were two main reasons for removing the cliff. First, a lower escarpment made it easier to deliver heavy equipment used in the plant, such as the reactor vessels, turbines and diesel generators, all of which were transported to the site by sea. Second, the design of the plant required seawater to keep the reactor cool, which was facilitated by a shorter distance to the ocean. [link to online.wsj.com] Bedrock, not Mudstone! We doing this dance again..? |
| THE Professor ! User ID: 24513996 United States10/07/2012 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just HOW is the crash of the fuel pool from 4-5 stories up supposed to stand the drop AND remain UPRIGHT,OR be able to hold water ?? WHO will give up their lives to get close enough to " Spray water..." on the exposed rods ? WHERE did you get the 48 hours time figure for the fuel, WITHOUT water cooling, to NOT burst into flames ? YOU'RE pulling this crap out of your rectum ! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25062401 United Kingdom10/07/2012 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25059617  Canada10/07/2012 02:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One of the real bad thing is that this whole Quoting: the mighty Atom Fuel Rod Story happen/ed only because of us, the People who are toooooo critical and never accepted a final Storage Facility! We need this Places now. ASAP.! Or is there someone with better Ideas? Take a break from shilling you paid stooge. You are not credible. You jump all over Fukushima threads to diss the magnitude of the doom like a fat kid jumping on a Mars Bar or a Jap jumping on some free sushi. |
| the mighty Atom User ID: 23715861 Japan10/07/2012 02:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The geology of the plant site is mudstone or mudrock. Cracks like pottery.... Quoting: Waterbug [link to en.wikipedia.org] [snip] Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit. Fateful Move Exposed Japan Plant Quoting: Waterbug Tokyo Electric Lowered Elevation of Land Before Building Nuclear Facility, Weakening Tsunami Defense. In 1967, Tepco chopped 25 meters off the 35-meter natural seawall where the reactors were to be located, according to documents filed at the time with Japanese authorities. That little-noticed action was taken to make it easier to ferry equipment to the site and pump seawater to the reactors. It was also seen as an efficient way to build the complex atop the solid base of bedrock needed to better protect the plant from earthquakes. But the razing of the cliff also placed the reactors five meters below the level of 14- to 15-meter tsunami hitting the plant March 11, triggering a major nuclear disaster resulting in the meltdown of three reactor cores. A former senior Tepco executive involved in the decision-making says there were two main reasons for removing the cliff. First, a lower escarpment made it easier to deliver heavy equipment used in the plant, such as the reactor vessels, turbines and diesel generators, all of which were transported to the site by sea. Second, the design of the plant required seawater to keep the reactor cool, which was facilitated by a shorter distance to the ocean. [link to online.wsj.com] Bedrock, not Mudstone! We doing this dance again..? Up to you! [link to a34.idata.over-blog.com] G.Y.!B.E. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4443279  Finland10/07/2012 02:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| the mighty Atom User ID: 23715861 Japan10/07/2012 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The geology of the plant site is mudstone or mudrock. Cracks like pottery.... Quoting: Waterbug [link to en.wikipedia.org] [snip] Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit. ... Bedrock, not Mudstone! We doing this dance again..? Up to you! In order to build the plant - originally only Unit 1 - the upper sedimentary layers were excavated. These are Quaternary alluvial deposits composed of clay and sand which are friable or semi-hard (green and brown in the cross-section). Thus the plant was built on "mudrock" type sedimentary rock (yellow in the cross-section), which is a muddy rock composed of clay and silt (very fine sand). But the term "muddy" does not mean that the rock is soft. It simply means that it is a rock whose matrix is clay; it is also called "argillite". Source: [link to fukushima.over-blog.fr] [link to a34.idata.over-blog.com] Last Edited by the mighty Atom on 10/07/2012 03:01 PM G.Y.!B.E. |
| the mighty Atom User ID: 23715861 Japan10/07/2012 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One of the real bad thing is that this whole Quoting: the mighty Atom Fuel Rod Story happen/ed only because of us, the People who are toooooo critical and never accepted a final Storage Facility! We need this Places now. ASAP.! Or is there someone with better Ideas? Take a break from shilling you paid stooge. You are not credible. You jump all over Fukushima threads to diss the magnitude of the doom like a fat kid jumping on a Mars Bar or a Jap jumping on some free sushi. And you are a stupid and ignorant Canatard, your Food can show up to 1.000 Bq and you would still eat it, the Uran is coming from your Country and you think that i am shilling  Get a Brian, you Mormon! G.Y.!B.E. |
| the mighty Atom User ID: 23715861 Japan10/07/2012 03:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The mangy Atom PLOY ..... ( Used to be 'Boy' ) Quoting: THE Professor ! 24513996 Just HOW is the crash of the fuel pool from 4-5 stories up supposed to stand the drop AND remain UPRIGHT,OR be able to hold water ?? WHO will give up their lives to get close enough to " Spray water..." on the exposed rods ? WHERE did you get the 48 hours time figure for the fuel, WITHOUT water cooling, to NOT burst into flames ? YOU'RE pulling this crap out of your rectum ! I am Reading it, i do my Research not only here. I have the luck that i can speak with educated People who know how it look alike! And i can read in at least 3 different Languages! The Pool will not stand upside down, this is impossible or we would see a physical Wonder like a Fuel Pool Salto! G.Y.!B.E. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24513996 United States10/07/2012 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24398416 United States10/07/2012 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
