Did Icke expose Jimmy Savile as a paedophile before he died? This guy says he didn't and is a "vile, cowardly man" | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26503335 ![]() 10/30/2012 08:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Did Icke expose Jimmy Savile as a paedophile before he died? This guy says he didn't and is a "vile, cowardly man" It's amazing to me that no one came forward and many people had to know. I believe David dIcke knew for years as well. Some of those who knew had to have told their spouses and other people, people normally have a hard time keeping quiet about such things. It makes no sense to me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24760791 ![]() 10/30/2012 08:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26631038 ![]() 10/30/2012 08:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Did Icke expose Jimmy Savile as a paedophile before he died? This guy says he didn't and is a "vile, cowardly man" Oh please. David dIcke has been saying, for decades, that the Royal family is involved in pedophilia and Jimmy Savile was and is part of that story. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24760791 I know all about the things he said and wrote about the Royals, but what I'm asking is, can anyone provide links to him exposing Savile decades ago or long before he died, even? I'm not saying Icke didn't come forward years ago, the guy who wrote the blog said it. So I'm asking for evidence that Icke outed Savile back in the day and not after he died. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26631038 ![]() 10/30/2012 09:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Did Icke expose Jimmy Savile as a paedophile before he died? This guy says he didn't and is a "vile, cowardly man" It's amazing to me that no one came forward and many people had to know. I believe David dIcke knew for years as well. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26503335 Some of those who knew had to have told their spouses and other people, people normally have a hard time keeping quiet about such things. It makes no sense to me. Icke wrote in reference to an article on Savile: "This is an excellent article and while I cannot verify every fact the theme is absolutely right. I know from my own unimpeachable sources that Saville was a sick abomination of a human being who not only abused children, but was a necrophiliac, which is defined as an 'obsessive fascination with death and corpse' and an 'attraction to or sexual contact with corpses' - hence his famous 'volunteering' to be a 'porter' at Leeds General Infirmary." So he could have given these unimpeachable sources a voice in his books many years beforehand, but didn't do so. He claims he only learned of Savile's behaviours in the late 90's, but I somehow doubt this, as Icke worked at the BBC in the early 80's for 8 years -- when Savile was there and rumours had long been circulating. And it doesn't matter whether he knew in the 80's or not -- fact is, Icke was informed by his "unimpeachable" sources in the 90's, but did nothing about it, yet he wrote about Ted Heath, the Royals, George Bush, Dick Cheney... but no Savile. Here's what he recently wrote: "I was told the extraordinary background to Jimmy Savile by insiders in the late 1990s, including his connections into the royal family and the British establishment in general, and it is far worse than even what is coming out now. Put it this way: at the most extreme end of paedophile and sexual-Satanic activity is the desire to have sex with disabled children and dead people (in hospital mortuaries, for instance). What is happening with these Savile exposures is that a chink of light is being shone on the super-sick, depraved and covert world of the bloodlines - to which Savile was deeply connected - that I have been exposing for more than 20 years. So many have dismissed what I say because 'it's not possible' and 'they would never do that', but these same dismissers would have said the same about 'national treasure' Jimmy Savile until this week. They can keep laughing and keep dismissing, but they will have to face the truth eventually of the beyond-sick royal and political establishment that rules them. They have been forced to do so with royal friend Savile and he was only an oil rag to the real engineers of child abuse, child sacrifice and human enslavement." |