So If OJ Is Innocent Does That Make You a Complete A**hole?

OJ did it.

Guilty as SIN!!!!!!

He did your Mom.

400 pieces of DNA evidence point towards the dirtbag.....

OJ is where he is at, because of his own actions. He isn't above the law, although he got away with it the first time.

Is was all over the glove that didn't fit at trial. But the glove was soaked in blood and sat in an evidence bag for months. What happens to leather when it's wet? It shrinks. He did it. Why do you think he ran in the first place?

AND MORE! The other glove was found on his own property. The crime scene was so contaminated they had to throw out the other glove as evidence, because it was picked up and taken to the crime scene by a police officer. There was blood spots found all the way up to OJs home and a full thumb print in blood on his blazer. There was heavy duty plastic and an old shovel in the back of his pristine Blazer. What was he going to use that for?> Come on! The box that held the knife was in his bathroom! He had taken his clothes off and thrown them in his washer as soon as he made his mad dash home.

Yes... yes it does.

Huh...I can't believe I'm the only person who 1* this crap thread.

I've told this story before, here on glp.
We (family) are friends with a black family we meet at a place called Big Canoe, in the north Georgia mountains. It's
a resort with single family homes and time share homes. We've had this time share for over 20 yrs, just like this
black family. we became friends and see them every summer
up there in the mountains. Their son became a lawyer and
works for a law firm in the Atlanta area. The owner of the
law firm was a friend of Johnny Cochran(sp) who was on the
defence team of OJ. The lawfirm did a lot of work for OJ's
defence team, and were privy to a lot of information that
was not given to the public.
This is what the couples son told us.
OJ's son is the one that killed OJ's ex. and Goldman.
OJ's son, (can't remember his name) was going to make dinner
for Nichol and kids and other people in her party, after the event or what ever the daughter was in, that afternoon. Nichol had promised OJ's son that she and her party would
come to the restaurant where he worked as a chef. It is one
of the restaurant where the chef prepares the dinner at the table with a grill where everyone sits around it. Nichol
changed her mind and went to the restaurant where Goldman
worked. She didn't bother to let OJ's son know that they weren't coming, and he was really embarrassed and pissed
off because he had told all his fellow workers that Nichol and friends were coming and he was going to cook the meal for them. Our friends son said that OJ's son had a mental
problem, and he had been in the hospital in the past, to be treated for it. That night after work, OJ's son left the
restaurant, but not before cleaning his chefs kit. Most of
your professional chefs have their own special knives for
cutting different types of meat,etc., and these knives are
really sharp. Some of the private investagaters said after
they interviewed people at the restaurant, that the son, for
some reason, sharpened his knives before he left the restaurant.
The police could not find anything that linked OJ's son to
the murders, they had some very questionable evidence that
implicated one of them. They where pretty sure that the son
was the one that did it, because of types of cuts. But again, no evidence linking the son. So they went after OJ,
hoping that he would give up his son if they pushed hard enough

yeah but that pesky DNA makes your story BS

Frankly, I have gone back and forth with whether or not OJ was guilty.

The reason I question it is because of what I know, which I will not reveal here.

are you a moron or just simply and idiot?

The original question wasn't: did O.J. Do it, but was rather the hypothetical question of, if he didn't are you an a-hole.

The answer to that is no, I don't think so. I didn't weigh in at the time and have never claimed to know who did what, why or when in that case.

The court found him not guilty, which is all we have to go on. So far he hasn't done anything similar, if it was him, so that seems to have worked out, as far as prevention goes.

Now, if he is innocent then I think a lot of people would have a need to rethink why they believed so strongly in his guilt at the time.

DNA evidence? If you recall there was a lot of indication it was tampered with. That invalidates it all, because we can't risk that kind of thing.

The bloody glove? It was well known that his knuckles had been swollen due to arthritis. Punch a wall a few times a day for a month and that glove wouldn't fit at all. In a prison cell no one would even notice you doing it.

So on and so forth.

We can't know, but if a person was casting blame, no matter how certain they feel on the matter and it turned out they were wrong, some great internal reflection would be advisable.

NO FUCK YOU ASSHOLE IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT HERE GET THE FUCK OUT AND OJ IS THE MURDER HE GOT A SLICK TALKING LAWYER HE GOT HIM OFF

You mean you never saw the video of OJ's first attorney
distracting L.A. detectives so that the murder weapon or other importance evidence could be whisked away?

What was OJ hiding? If he was innocent why was this bag
sneaked away from the eyes of the police? Why were the two lead detectives distracted from this bag?

It's on film and even the prosecutors missed this video!

OJ was set up.

If hes not innocent, he deserves what hes getting.

OJ took the fall for his son.
His psychotic son committed the murders.

Do the research.