| Users Online Now: 2,087 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,846,524 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,728,895 | Threads Today: 740 | Posts Today: 15,527 |
| 10:19 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,087 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,846,524 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,728,895 | Threads Today: 740 | Posts Today: 15,527 |
| 10:19 PM | ||
Hotel CCTV Proves It Wasn’t A Plane That Hit The Pentagon | |
G. House  User ID: 28537106  Netherlands11/28/2012 02:00 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How does this prove there wasn't an aircraft? Quoting: G. House It came in very low, low enough to take down streetlights. The Pentagon is three stories (at least) high and you can't see that in the video either. You'd have to know all the angles and heights to know for sure. Also I think the aircraft was coming from the right side of the video... where all the tree foliage is blocking the view. have you watched the doc in plane site? personally imo just according to the way your talking here, i don't think you have. because if you did, you certainly would not be talking the way you are... good doc, not long either. about 75 minutes blunt and to the point, if you can handle it Just saying what and what not can be seen in the friggen video that's been presented. Notice that you can see vehicles moving on an elevated highway? You can't see the Pentagon in that video. The aircraft hit the Pentagon very low at a very shallow angle. You wouldn't expect to see it in this video. This video does not in any shape or form PROVE what you people claim. The Pentagon security video DOES show the aircraft before it hits. THAT camera has an extreme wide angle lens which YOU guys don't take into account. It's pointless to argue this with YOU guys as YOU people made up your mind regardless of especially the eyewitness accounts of people who describe the airliner hitting the building. The airliner also took down street light poles as it came in. YOUR missile that you claim hit the building would not have had the mass needed to do that without exploding the ordinance it would carry. Last Edited by G. House on 11/28/2012 02:01 AM "Everybody lies." |
| MindShaft User ID: 1554827  United States11/28/2012 02:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  Bring on any rational re-buffs to challenge the fact that the WHOLE 9/11 story sucks. It's full of holes. We DEMAND an independent review. If you're a true American Patriot, you should request the same. Many of the original 9/11 Committee members stated that the original investigation was designed to 'fail', and was set up to simply support and report the corporations' pre-determined bullshit explanations. It's well-past time to demand the ugly truth, dammit! "People have been conditioned to ridicule all that they are incapable of understanding." Goethe "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe that they are free." Goethe |
| MindShaft User ID: 1554827 United States11/28/2012 02:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How does this prove there wasn't an aircraft? Quoting: G. House It came in very low, low enough to take down streetlights. The Pentagon is three stories (at least) high and you can't see that in the video either. You'd have to know all the angles and heights to know for sure. Also I think the aircraft was coming from the right side of the video... where all the tree foliage is blocking the view. have you watched the doc in plane site? personally imo just according to the way your talking here, i don't think you have. because if you did, you certainly would not be talking the way you are... good doc, not long either. about 75 minutes blunt and to the point, if you can handle it Just saying what and what not can be seen in the friggen video that's been presented. Notice that you can see vehicles moving on an elevated highway? You can't see the Pentagon in that video. The aircraft hit the Pentagon very low at a very shallow angle. You wouldn't expect to see it in this video. This video does not in any shape or form PROVE what you people claim. The Pentagon security video DOES show the aircraft before it hits. THAT camera has an extreme wide angle lens which YOU guys don't take into account. It's pointless to argue this with YOU guys as YOU people made up your mind regardless of especially the eyewitness accounts of people who describe the airliner hitting the building. The airliner also took down street light poles as it came in. YOUR missile that you claim hit the building would not have had the mass needed to do that without exploding the ordinance it would carry. Have you ever attended the aftermath of a plane crash? Have you ever walked through a crashed passenger jet 'debris field'? Tell us about your experiences ... Last Edited by MindShaft on 11/28/2012 02:14 AM "People have been conditioned to ridicule all that they are incapable of understanding." Goethe "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe that they are free." Goethe |
| MindShaft User ID: 1554827 United States11/28/2012 02:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Click on this poster's karma bar and see how he/she makes his scores!!! Get a fucking life, - and get an education too. What a Joke !!! "People have been conditioned to ridicule all that they are incapable of understanding." Goethe "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe that they are free." Goethe |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3961153 United States12/29/2012 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For all the poeple who believe there WAS a plane....do ur reasearch..not ur local bias news stations...just for starters look at past plane crashes....if ur not a blind person...then u should at least see a couple airline seats..airplane engines..something...if not tha whole dam plane...now if they say that the planes not there...becauce the jet fuel was so hot it melted the plane...i gotta call a bulls#¡t...if it melted tha plane how did they recover the "black box"...an ask urself thiz...y still to thiz day...cant u view pentagon cameras of the footage... that a plane did in fact hit the pentagon...my opinion 911 was a cover up for somethin that already happened or will be used to justifie future plans...like taking our civil rights..freedom of speech...an now since that elementry school that got shot up...there looking at stonger gun laws...if not take away...if u dont care about this or anthing gov does..cuz it dosent affect u...all i gotta say is....JUST WAIT |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 31068086 United States12/29/2012 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How does this prove there wasn't an aircraft? Quoting: G. House It came in very low, low enough to take down streetlights. The Pentagon is three stories (at least) high and you can't see that in the video either. You'd have to know all the angles and heights to know for sure. Also I think the aircraft was coming from the right side of the video... where all the tree foliage is blocking the view. have you watched the doc in plane site? personally imo just according to the way your talking here, i don't think you have. because if you did, you certainly would not be talking the way you are... good doc, not long either. about 75 minutes blunt and to the point, if you can handle it Just saying what and what not can be seen in the friggen video that's been presented. Notice that you can see vehicles moving on an elevated highway? You can't see the Pentagon in that video. The aircraft hit the Pentagon very low at a very shallow angle. You wouldn't expect to see it in this video. This video does not in any shape or form PROVE what you people claim. The Pentagon security video DOES show the aircraft before it hits. THAT camera has an extreme wide angle lens which YOU guys don't take into account. It's pointless to argue this with YOU guys as YOU people made up your mind regardless of especially the eyewitness accounts of people who describe the airliner hitting the building. The airliner also took down street light poles as it came in. YOUR missile that you claim hit the building would not have had the mass needed to do that without exploding the ordinance it would carry. Hey, shill...it was a drone armed with a missile. The missile hit the Pentagon split seconds before the drone impacted the recently renovated Wedge One. Either way you are lying through your teeth as usual. Do something useful for once and go play in traffic. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 13825301 United States12/29/2012 08:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Who is independent and qualified? I strongly suspect that anyone who is immune to threats and bribes will be too much of a small-fry to be granted access to relevant information. Anyone "big" enough to do a thorough job will be on the take, or sufficiently intimidated so that they simply support the official story. |
