Houston couple arrested for making snuff films of animals being tortured and killed | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8542117 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27644686 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
thetrickybigguy User ID: 27811635 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:18 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | a few weeks ago here in ft laud an 82 YO man was sentenced to three years in prison for letting his dog attack a cat and kill it. it was all caught on video and hopefully this POS will die in prison. Falling down is a part of life, getting back up is living. ~ Life is about choices, you get to make them each and every day of your life. ~ Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.~ Only in America... do we use the word 'politics' to describe the process so well: 'Poloi' in Greek meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures'.~ “When a government is dependent for money upon the bankers, they and not the government leaders control the nation. This is because the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Financiers are without patriotism and without decency.” If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain. Winston Churchill |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21175241 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28784677 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
alexisj9 User ID: 1376880 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They made at least 8 videos for sale [called 'crush' films apparently for people with a sexual fetish to see animals being tortured and killed], including puppies, kittens, chickens, lobsters, etc., Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28787033 Brent Justice, 51, and Ashley Nicole Richards, 21, face two years in jail Puppy, kittens and rabbits, among other animals, tortured with high heels, meat cleaver, knives, screwdrivers and pliers Read more: [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook SICK, SICK BASTARDS. The prosecutor stopped reading the descriptions of the 'alleged' crimes because they were 'too gruesome'. Good hope they get whats coming to them. Those poor animals never hurt anyone. |
Ralph--a house dog User ID: 25802009 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The article was several months old. I wonder what happened to them; don't remember seeing anything about it but then I don't watch much local news. It is a shame that they could have gotten sent to prison for only 2 years, but then that's all that piece of shit Michael Vick got. Side notes re fucktard M. Vick: all but 2 of his 50 pit bulls were successfully rehabilitated and were adopted into forever homes. I hear he still gets hate mail and some people jeer him at football games. Good for them. "Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night.....Rage, rage against the dying of the light"-----Dylan Thomas HIS NAME IS SETH RICH [link to biblicalselfdefense.com] [link to forum.1111ers.blog] Always remember that "for the greater good" will not include YOU. "Who decides?" ---Robert A. Heinlein -'Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.'—Benjamin Franklin [link to www.westcoasttruth.com] The only thing worth paying full retail for is pantyhose. You cannot do all of the good the world needs, but the world needs all of the good you can do. |
dookie stain User ID: 1404507 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Zombietard User ID: 27257544 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28385893 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28691353 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I can only hope you are right about that. These people should be tortured and killed slowly. And for fucks sake we are going to let them out in two years? Probably less with good time. One can only imagine what people are hiding in their basement being tortured. I mean why top at animals. This is serial killer in the making shit. |
Hawk-02 Hawk-o-holic User ID: 897951 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:53 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17938575 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they're animals, they don't have any rights to access the justice system, they don't even pay taxes, it's a sick thing to do, making snuff films, but it's not criminal activity Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28385893 you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed The difference is intent. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23535565 ![]() 11/30/2012 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ralph--a house dog User ID: 25802009 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.chron.com] They could get up to 7 years for each count of animal crushing and up to 5 years for each count of obscenity. "Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night.....Rage, rage against the dying of the light"-----Dylan Thomas HIS NAME IS SETH RICH [link to biblicalselfdefense.com] [link to forum.1111ers.blog] Always remember that "for the greater good" will not include YOU. "Who decides?" ---Robert A. Heinlein -'Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.'—Benjamin Franklin [link to www.westcoasttruth.com] The only thing worth paying full retail for is pantyhose. You cannot do all of the good the world needs, but the world needs all of the good you can do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27644686 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they're animals, they don't have any rights to access the justice system, they don't even pay taxes, it's a sick thing to do, making snuff films, but it's not criminal activity Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28385893 you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed Are you stupid? Animals are in fact protected by the criminal justice system. Every state has animal cruelty laws, including for livestock, so farmers/processors who are abusive get charged. You are a FUCKING IDIOT! If you can't see that you are an idiot. Lame attempt at a smart post there, though, Corkey. ![]() ![]() |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27644686 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These creeps now face Federal charges as well as the state charges. Quoting: Ralph--a house dog [link to www.chron.com] They could get up to 7 years for each count of animal crushing and up to 5 years for each count of obscenity. If I was the US Attorney, I'd throw the fucking book at them, and try to get them an upward departure from the federal sentencing guidelines on EVERY FUCKING COUNT! I would offer no deal whatsoever! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27644686 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GD, this MUST be the end. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23535565 The people who buy these should be shot. Yanking it to puppy torture? Is there no end to the depravity? I agree that people that buy these should be shot. Just like pedophiles who like kiddie porn, these people are sick and should not be among us in civil society. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1043775 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28385893 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they're animals, they don't have any rights to access the justice system, they don't even pay taxes, it's a sick thing to do, making snuff films, but it's not criminal activity Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28385893 you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed The difference is intent. Intent here is irrelevant. An animal can be killed, but it can't be murdered, since animals don't have rights. However, a pet owner has a legitimate grievance at civil tort if someone kills his pet. There's no provable harm to society here, so it's not criminal. |
alexisj9 User ID: 1376880 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they're animals, they don't have any rights to access the justice system, they don't even pay taxes, it's a sick thing to do, making snuff films, but it's not criminal activity Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28385893 you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed The difference is intent. Intent here is irrelevant. An animal can be killed, but it can't be murdered, since animals don't have rights. However, a pet owner has a legitimate grievance at civil tort if someone kills his pet. There's no provable harm to society here, so it's not criminal. All animals have the right to live. |
Ralph--a house dog User ID: 25802009 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they're animals, they don't have any rights to access the justice system, they don't even pay taxes, it's a sick thing to do, making snuff films, but it's not criminal activity Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28385893 you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed The difference is intent. Intent here is irrelevant. An animal can be killed, but it can't be murdered, since animals don't have rights. However, a pet owner has a legitimate grievance at civil tort if someone kills his pet. There's no provable harm to society here, so it's not criminal. There's a relatively new Federal law that says animal snuff films are obscene, and that IS criminal with appropriate penalties. "Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night.....Rage, rage against the dying of the light"-----Dylan Thomas HIS NAME IS SETH RICH [link to biblicalselfdefense.com] [link to forum.1111ers.blog] Always remember that "for the greater good" will not include YOU. "Who decides?" ---Robert A. Heinlein -'Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.'—Benjamin Franklin [link to www.westcoasttruth.com] The only thing worth paying full retail for is pantyhose. You cannot do all of the good the world needs, but the world needs all of the good you can do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4035350 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They made at least 8 videos for sale [called 'crush' films apparently for people with a sexual fetish to see animals being tortured and killed], including puppies, kittens, chickens, lobsters, etc., Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28787033 Brent Justice, 51, and Ashley Nicole Richards, 21, face two years in jail Puppy, kittens and rabbits, among other animals, tortured with high heels, meat cleaver, knives, screwdrivers and pliers Read more: [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook SICK, SICK BASTARDS. The prosecutor stopped reading the descriptions of the 'alleged' crimes because they were 'too gruesome'. Wait for it, they were abused as kids. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27644686 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they're animals, they don't have any rights to access the justice system, they don't even pay taxes, it's a sick thing to do, making snuff films, but it's not criminal activity Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28385893 you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed The difference is intent. Intent here is irrelevant. An animal can be killed, but it can't be murdered, since animals don't have rights. However, a pet owner has a legitimate grievance at civil tort if someone kills his pet. There's no provable harm to society here, so it's not criminal. Where did you go to law school, moron? Cruelty to animals IS IN FACT CRIMINAL! In TX we have the entirety of 42.09 of our Penal Code dedicated to animal cruelty! FOR FUCKS SAKE YOU'RE STUPID! |
Redpaw360 User ID: 11235712 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Crimes like this should be an automatic revocation of us citizenship. I'm sure the muzzles could deal out what we would like to do. Oregon Constitution Article I, Section 27 The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power. |
Ralph--a house dog User ID: 25802009 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ship them to Iran. Let's see how they view prison there. Quoting: Redpaw360 Crimes like this should be an automatic revocation of us citizenship. I'm sure the muzzles could deal out what we would like to do. They wouldn't do anything to them, altho I'd like to see that! Radical Islam does not like dogs much more than they like pigs. Don't know why, but that's how it is. Last Edited by Ralph--a house dog on 11/30/2012 04:29 PM "Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night.....Rage, rage against the dying of the light"-----Dylan Thomas HIS NAME IS SETH RICH [link to biblicalselfdefense.com] [link to forum.1111ers.blog] Always remember that "for the greater good" will not include YOU. "Who decides?" ---Robert A. Heinlein -'Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.'—Benjamin Franklin [link to www.westcoasttruth.com] The only thing worth paying full retail for is pantyhose. You cannot do all of the good the world needs, but the world needs all of the good you can do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28385893 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they're animals, they don't have any rights to access the justice system, they don't even pay taxes, it's a sick thing to do, making snuff films, but it's not criminal activity Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28385893 you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed The difference is intent. Intent here is irrelevant. An animal can be killed, but it can't be murdered, since animals don't have rights. However, a pet owner has a legitimate grievance at civil tort if someone kills his pet. There's no provable harm to society here, so it's not criminal. All animals have the right to live. So animals have a right to live. Okay, now go picket outside of every restaurant and grocery store in the country to prove that. Most "animal rights" types are liberals who support abortion, so you probably don't even think humans have a right to live. Humans have a right to live because we can decree it, animals can't, so it's up to mankind to act as custodian of the earth. However, stomping kittens isn't a criminal act, it's a sick act, about as sick as playing "Call of Duty" or other violent and depraved video games. Farmers harvest their steers for meat for commerce, while these sickos stomped cats for commerce. And I know that many of you think that animals are the moral equivalent of humans, but there's simply no reason that any legal jurisdiction in the country should move against such commerce as this. I myself find it abhorrent, but the law isn't there to ensure a lack of abhorrence in life, the law is there to ensure that civil order is maintained. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27644686 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Intent here is irrelevant. An animal can be killed, but it can't be murdered, since animals don't have rights. However, a pet owner has a legitimate grievance at civil tort if someone kills his pet. There's no provable harm to society here, so it's not criminal. All animals have the right to live. So animals have a right to live. Okay, now go picket outside of every restaurant and grocery store in the country to prove that. Most "animal rights" types are liberals who support abortion, so you probably don't even think humans have a right to live. Humans have a right to live because we can decree it, animals can't, so it's up to mankind to act as custodian of the earth. However, stomping kittens isn't a criminal act, it's a sick act, about as sick as playing "Call of Duty" or other violent and depraved video games. Farmers harvest their steers for meat for commerce, while these sickos stomped cats for commerce. And I know that many of you think that animals are the moral equivalent of humans, but there's simply no reason that any legal jurisdiction in the country should move against such commerce as this. I myself find it abhorrent, but the law isn't there to ensure a lack of abhorrence in life, the law is there to ensure that civil order is maintained. No one is saying you can't kill animals. It's sanctioned by every state through farming/ranching, processing, and hunting/fishing. It's the torture that is not allowed, and every jurisdiction in the U.S. has found a compelling reason to protect animals from torture. These people and those that buy their videos should die. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28385893 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they're animals, they don't have any rights to access the justice system, they don't even pay taxes, it's a sick thing to do, making snuff films, but it's not criminal activity Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28385893 you people who think animals have rights, you're sick, too, just as sick as these animal snuffers there's no objective difference between slaughtering a cow to eat, gutting a fish to fry, or stomping a little kitty in the skull with high heels for fun, any differences one might presume are purely subjective, because in each case the results are essentially the same, the animal is killed The difference is intent. Intent here is irrelevant. An animal can be killed, but it can't be murdered, since animals don't have rights. However, a pet owner has a legitimate grievance at civil tort if someone kills his pet. There's no provable harm to society here, so it's not criminal. Where did you go to law school, moron? Cruelty to animals IS IN FACT CRIMINAL! In TX we have the entirety of 42.09 of our Penal Code dedicated to animal cruelty! FOR FUCKS SAKE YOU'RE STUPID! Yes, I know all that about the penal code at animal abuse. But I maintain that those laws are largely unjust, unnecessary, unconstitutional, and capricious. I don't like kitten stomping any more than anyone else, but it's simply outrageous to confer human rights upon animals. Conferring human rights upon animals is satanic. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28691353 ![]() 11/30/2012 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |