Idea of how to debate with an anti-gun proponent

It has occurred to me when discussing pro-gun/anti-gun topics, the end result is dueling interpretations of a hypothetical future event of violence or a perceived past one. It seems we must frame anti-gun arguments as anti-constitutional ones. It is, after all, a constitutional mainstay.

First question when debating anti-gun advocate is, "Would you please tell me why you hate the constitution so much?"

Espousing the constitution and rejecting the 2nd Amendment are joint exhaustive.

Then you have them cornered.


Keep in mind a cornered and passionately sophomoric proponent of disarmament WILL begin to argue irrationally with hyper-emotive conjurings, garingly reminiscent of a 16th century nitwit.