Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option” | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30470642 United States 12/21/2012 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In all seriousness how many people would actually kill to keep their guns if the time came or just hand them over? Quoting: Tanos Think outside of what YOU would do, what America as a whole would do. Shut the fuck up! Stay out of US politics you fucking socialist tit sucking maggot! Worru about your own failing government! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8397139 United States 12/21/2012 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29643034 United States 12/21/2012 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | that you never read just a name of a book that is on your list of talking points to try and prove something shill. Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01 Take a hike I read the book cover to cover and it was written by the founding fathers contemporaries The best thing for you is to do your own research or STFU [link to dailycaller.com] These are called STATISTICS, they are use to back up a logical persons argument. Try it sometime :) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ignorant bastard is violating his oath of office!! Blatantly! Quoting: MarkinAZ What about his OATH of office that included a clause to "PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"?? The president is NOT the only official that is required to take that pledge as part of their oath of office. There are legal and lawful means for changing the US Constitution. It's been done often enough with mixed results (look at Prohibition!) But for a Congressman or Senator to just BLATANTLY SUPPORT VIOLATING THE 2nd AMENDMENT is FOOLISH and very BAD FORM - as well as being grounds for his RECALL!! Obama doesn't have to protect and defend anything especially something as evil as a gun |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24854023 Ireland 12/21/2012 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27997099 United Kingdom 12/21/2012 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WAKEUPAMERICA01 User ID: 30489425 United States 12/21/2012 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | that you never read just a name of a book that is on your list of talking points to try and prove something shill. Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01 Take a hike I read the book cover to cover and it was written by the founding fathers contemporaries The best thing for you is to do your own research or STFU typical liberal behavior no facts no real argument and no grounds for a debate or even a discussion. Trying to force feed the sheep your shit might work in some places but you are way over your head here. research hahaha cover to cover ya right you have a picture of the front and back and some talking points that are of no relevance here or anywhere for that matter. Nice try though smart guy. It is just one book that is taught in first year pol. science classes in liberal universities to give students another look at the retarded liberals opinions and their own twisting of the facts which they like to so often engage in. it means nothing you troll. WAKE UP AMERICA "I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death." Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, No. 1, December 19, 1776 "Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it." Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, No. 4, September 11, 1777 "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President. "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, [79 years now in 2012] freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by statutes of national emergency." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24854023 Ireland 12/21/2012 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ignorant bastard is violating his oath of office!! Blatantly! Quoting: MarkinAZ What about his OATH of office that included a clause to "PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"?? The president is NOT the only official that is required to take that pledge as part of their oath of office. There are legal and lawful means for changing the US Constitution. It's been done often enough with mixed results (look at Prohibition!) But for a Congressman or Senator to just BLATANTLY SUPPORT VIOLATING THE 2nd AMENDMENT is FOOLISH and very BAD FORM - as well as being grounds for his RECALL!! Obama doesn't have to protect and defend anything especially something as evil as a gun Fuckin stupid prick.. post your addy.. I promise to see you tomorrow if you do! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27972246 United States 12/21/2012 09:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | that you never read just a name of a book that is on your list of talking points to try and prove something shill. Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01 Take a hike I read the book cover to cover and it was written by the founding fathers contemporaries The best thing for you is to do your own research or STFU typical liberal behavior no facts no real argument and no grounds for a debate or even a discussion. Trying to force feed the sheep your shit might work in some places but you are way over your head here. research hahaha cover to cover ya right you have a picture of the front and back and some talking points that are of no relevance here or anywhere for that matter. Nice try though smart guy. It is just one book that is taught in first year pol. science classes in liberal universities to give students another look at the retarded liberals opinions and their own twisting of the facts which they like to so often engage in. it means nothing you troll. Read earlier in the thread and you will I presented all my sources and I even double checked to see if they were factual just read earlier in the thread |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24854023 Ireland 12/21/2012 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The second amendment was never intended for future developments. Thomas Jefferson Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 Holland Imperial Museusm of Historical Records Yawn... more silly lies. Denial,This quote is in the Holland Imperial Museusm of Historical Records Yawn... more silly lies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21000351 United States 12/21/2012 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is why only idiots fill out form 4473 to purchase a gun. I never and never will have my name on any such form. No one knows if I own a gun or not and that is exactly how it should be. You do not ask permission to exercise a right. It is a right, you do not need to ask first. I will never ask. I will never tell. Do you ask permission to speak? No, and you should never have to ask permission to own a gun. Ever. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27972246 United States 12/21/2012 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ignorant bastard is violating his oath of office!! Blatantly! Quoting: MarkinAZ What about his OATH of office that included a clause to "PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"?? The president is NOT the only official that is required to take that pledge as part of their oath of office. There are legal and lawful means for changing the US Constitution. It's been done often enough with mixed results (look at Prohibition!) But for a Congressman or Senator to just BLATANTLY SUPPORT VIOLATING THE 2nd AMENDMENT is FOOLISH and very BAD FORM - as well as being grounds for his RECALL!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24854023 Ireland 12/21/2012 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | that you never read just a name of a book that is on your list of talking points to try and prove something shill. Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01 Take a hike I read the book cover to cover and it was written by the founding fathers contemporaries The best thing for you is to do your own research or STFU typical liberal behavior no facts no real argument and no grounds for a debate or even a discussion. Trying to force feed the sheep your shit might work in some places but you are way over your head here. research hahaha cover to cover ya right you have a picture of the front and back and some talking points that are of no relevance here or anywhere for that matter. Nice try though smart guy. It is just one book that is taught in first year pol. science classes in liberal universities to give students another look at the retarded liberals opinions and their own twisting of the facts which they like to so often engage in. it means nothing you troll. Read earlier in the thread and you will I presented all my sources and I even double checked to see if they were factual just read earlier in the thread Yawn... more silly lies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30595732 United Kingdom 12/21/2012 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ignorant bastard is violating his oath of office!! Blatantly! Quoting: MarkinAZ What about his OATH of office that included a clause to "PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"?? The president is NOT the only official that is required to take that pledge as part of their oath of office. There are legal and lawful means for changing the US Constitution. It's been done often enough with mixed results (look at Prohibition!) But for a Congressman or Senator to just BLATANTLY SUPPORT VIOLATING THE 2nd AMENDMENT is FOOLISH and very BAD FORM - as well as being grounds for his RECALL!! Obama doesn't have to protect and defend anything especially something as evil as a gun Fuckin stupid prick.. post your addy.. I promise to see you tomorrow if you do! perfect example why you shouldn't have guns.. fucking spastics can't fight with their fists |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27997099 United Kingdom 12/21/2012 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is what the founding fathers thought. If the Government turns into a tyrant,they can't hurt the people because the people are wearing armor. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27997099 The metal covered people win!!! They were some smart guys back then. If Americans just put on 18th century armor,the government can't hurt or kill us. WE WIN! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The second amendment was never intended for future developments. Thomas Jefferson Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 Holland Imperial Museusm of Historical Records Yawn... more silly lies. Denial,This quote is in the Holland Imperial Museusm of Historical Records Yawn... more silly lies. Did I hit a nerve ,gun hill billy |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27972246 United States 12/21/2012 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29643034 How is this a false dichotomy? that is the biggest fuckin copout i have ever heard address the points i bring up what about all the criminals who STILL will have guns...i realize responding to this requires a semblance of thought and intelligence, something you may not have, so what do you have to say? Non-Sequitur I answered your question earlier but since you want it again If there are no guns in circulation no criminals can have them and if they have them and decide to use them rest assured they wont have it anymore "Can" means Ability. Apparently English is not your first language after all. Do yourself a favor, stick to Latin. Fallacy of fallacy refute the rest of the information Your conditional Logic declaration has several illogic constructions built right into it. Ero, you fail. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24854023 Ireland 12/21/2012 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ignorant bastard is violating his oath of office!! Blatantly! Quoting: MarkinAZ What about his OATH of office that included a clause to "PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"?? The president is NOT the only official that is required to take that pledge as part of their oath of office. There are legal and lawful means for changing the US Constitution. It's been done often enough with mixed results (look at Prohibition!) But for a Congressman or Senator to just BLATANTLY SUPPORT VIOLATING THE 2nd AMENDMENT is FOOLISH and very BAD FORM - as well as being grounds for his RECALL!! Obama doesn't have to protect and defend anything especially something as evil as a gun Fuckin stupid prick.. post your addy.. I promise to see you tomorrow if you do! perfect example why you shouldn't have guns.. fucking spastics can't fight with their fists Perfect example of why you limey pricks are so fucked up and backward.. your shitheeled assumptions. I'l beat him into the ground like a tentpeg.. outside his own door, it will be enjoyable. You are the only festering, pustulent pussy fart talking about using a gun.. fuckin wanker. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is what the founding fathers thought. If the Government turns into a tyrant,they can't hurt the people because the people are wearing armor. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27997099 The metal covered people win!!! They were some smart guys back then. If Americans just put on 18th century armor,the government can't hurt or kill us. WE WIN! If Americans used 18th century guns........ You see the fallacy of your arguments |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24854023 Ireland 12/21/2012 09:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27997099 United Kingdom 12/21/2012 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WAKEUPAMERICA01 User ID: 30489425 United States 12/21/2012 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | one source is your answer. I have read the entire thread nitwit and just because your ref. is one book that is still taught in the first year of pol. science class does not make it factual, it is a liberal interpretation of the way they think and that is all. You can call them contemporaries all you want that still does not make it fact. Just liberal talking points. WAKE UP AMERICA "I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death." Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, No. 1, December 19, 1776 "Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it." Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, No. 4, September 11, 1777 "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President. "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, [79 years now in 2012] freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by statutes of national emergency." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29643034 United States 12/21/2012 09:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is what the founding fathers thought. If the Government turns into a tyrant,they can't hurt the people because the people are wearing armor. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27997099 The metal covered people win!!! They were some smart guys back then. If Americans just put on 18th century armor,the government can't hurt or kill us. WE WIN! If Americans used 18th century guns........ You see the fallacy of your arguments [link to dailycaller.com] what do you have to say about this article? some valid points |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27972246 United States 12/21/2012 09:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27997099 United Kingdom 12/21/2012 09:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Manu-Koelbren User ID: 1312616 Spain 12/21/2012 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This debate didn't go how I wanted it I hope when we leave we will leave with a mutual respect of each other though we may not respect each others ideologies Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 I don't respect folks who don't respect individual rights and liberty. Banned as usual. “It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 Denial,This quote is in the Holland Imperial Museusm of Historical Records Yawn... more silly lies. Did I hit a nerve ,gun hill billy Yawn... more silly lies. Yawn grasping at straws at the fact that I out debater all of you by presenting clear and logical facts. At the end of the day America is not my country and I do not make the final choice |