Laugh all you want re: John Titor he called it CIVIL WAR in US

You are incorrect, sir.

Not a civil war but rather a revolution. Please turn to Webster for the fine nuances betwixt the two.

I called it in the late 90's, didnt know when, but the ingredients were there.

When you have Americans buying things they don't need (made in china), not saving but splurging,

but yet taking government assistance while spending themselves into oblivion,

then you had companies sending all of our manufacturing jobs, which was the backbone of our nation to other countries, and fast food restaurants popping up everywhere to take their place paying minimum wage with no unions.

And you had a nation that turned away from god and crime shooting thru the roof with homosexuals, child molesters, perverts, dope heads, and low life people running rampant doing whatever they wanted with whomever they wanted,

Marriage going down the toilet, people killing their own children and calling it a "right" all the while everyone was trying to be politically correct and not argue with the government or its war on Smoking and other General rights of a free citizen.

Cameras everywhere, the influx of debt and credit card usage, among a whole list of other things that went array,

It was pretty obvious that the train was headed down the wrong track. Endless Wars, Endless Spending, Nanny Pansy citizens wanting more and more handouts, and acting like jack asses all at the same time.

Only an idiot wouldn't have predicted it.

This,

Its not going to be citizen against citizen,

Its going to be citizen against the government and governmental entities and those who side with the government.

We kicked Englands ass, and now were going to have to kick our governments ass.

Our senators and government officials should have been drug out in the street years ago.

I dont advocate violence, but there comes a time to show them who is boss, and its not them.

They are put there to represent us and our ideals, not their own.

:way...:

its gonna be a civil war folks

between the makers and the takers

Well said.

really? and what did you do 15 years ago?

I disagree

52 percent of the population appears to fine with the nations course.

that, my friend, is civil war..not revolution.

I was in School being indoctrinated by the governments teachers,

But it didn't work, I studied History on my own and learned about what is really going on.

More than likely the country will be split into sections/tribes. Government has become unnecessary and useless. We can survive without Washington, but Washington cannot survive without us.

i back tar and feathering politicains 100%

Civil War happened in my world but it doesn't have to happen here. Just pay a higher minimum wage and keep everyone working.

No offense, but you're kinda naive then if you took their bait. Think on it, you voted on them based upon their platform. Their views SHOULD be your own unless they're a flip-flopper

It is impossible when a Chinese, Mexican or Indian worker will work for a pittance compared to what Westerners ask...

A Fanuc robot won't commit suicide.

It could very well be both and as one article stated it could be a parallel to Sarajevo where there was government and ethnic clashes.

A civil war is, simply put, a war between citizens of the same country. Be it a division that falls along political, racial, gender, geographic region, or any other lines, if it is involves citizens of the same country who are at war with each other it is classified as a civil war. Civil Wars generally are fought for political independence (or dominance) of each side - they may or may not result in a splitting of the original country, but those wars where secession is a stated goal of one side (not just an outcome) are generally always considered a Civil War.

A revolution is a war fought to overthrow or rid yourself of a government in order to establish a new one. The old government may be indigenous, or may be external (i.e. colonial). In general, the main point of a revolution is to completely overthrow the existing government and replace it with a native government, NOT to split the country. Revolutions can be civil wars, but civil wars do not have to be revolutions.

[link to wiki.answers.com]

No its not...NYS is a prime example...they trashed the 2nd amendment. Not any resisistence at all!No protests no nothing...This is what will happen throughout the whole nation too. Proud gun owners talk a good game on the internet....but in the end....they will be disarmed, with no resistence at all. This is not the America of 1775! They had proud strong men...now we have internet complaining pussies. Forget it...we are done for!

If this time it turns out like what happened in mine, all the police and military, there won't be a difference, will have fully automatic weapons. There will be metal detectors everywhere but they'll only be checking to see if non-police have automatics. Or if certified or convicted people are carrying. People who qualify be able to carry revolvers. But in my world you can be charged with failure to assist in stopping a crime. It's complicated but with security cameras everywhere you won't want to be caught not doing your "duty".

The war may start as a revolt against government, but will turn into a civil war. The stage has been set for this by the like of Obama and his mentors, doling out "entitlement" to those who do not produce, creating an undercurrent of racism and the drive for "reparations".

Sad to think what is coming if the course is not changed.