The Dick Act of 1902/03 - Forbids Gun Control

This is all well and good EXCEPT for the fact that....
The United States is a Foreign Corporation. Therefore, the Constitution as we know it doesn't apply to them (meaning the powers that "want" to be). When they incorporated, one word they used changed everything.

The real nations' Constitution was called: The Constitution "for" the united States of America.

After incorporation it was called: The Constitution "of" the United States of America.

The simple change of the preposition changes the meaning.

The Federal government is a foreign entity its' powers/jurisdiction limited to Washington D.C.

The States of the union were the ones who had autonomy. The Federal Govt. position was to act as a facilitator between the States. Nothing more.

A thread was posted on this forum which showed that Congress is basically empty. Those who occupy the seats there are Contractors for the govt vs. representatives of the people.

"...The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871."

What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land..." more at
[link to www.serendipity.li]

We have not been governed under the Constitution since this change. There have been two tiers of government. One for those that know this and one for the "sheeple" that gives the impression that things never changed.

Why do you think none of the courts have actively addressed the legality of the current president? Why do you think that the inhabitants of congress have basically said a big Screw You to the people of this nation by committing obvious illegal acts under the "so-called" Constitution without fear of being impeached or retribution for violation of the oath they supposedly took? I could go on but I believe you get my point.

This is the power they have over many--As many fail to see that under everyone's noses, they have changed the rules. That which was supposed to be the facilitator on behalf of the States, has become the Dictator "to" the states.

The Constitution has been replaced by contract law. Failure to voice ones' dissent, has allowed for an implied agreement between the parties involved to set the precedent(s).

Also, I am wondering if the Constitution was ever valid in the first place, as some of the signers of said document, were also lawyers under (and for the court) of King George.
I have not seen anything,whereby those individuals renounced their title of Esquire either before or after their arrival in the new world.

I believe any binding legal agreement under English or Napoleonic Law, must have distinct separation with regard to involvement. Like your lawyer can't negotiate for you and the person you are suing and then sign off on the agreement on both your behalf. Please correct me if I'm wrong but it seems like the Founding Fathers did just that. They did not renounce their legal status under King George, they merely renounced various other behaviours/demands set forth by the Crown and sought to create a government "of the people" in the New World.

If this is true, then one must begin to deal with "them" on the level of Natural Law by understanding where "they" stand and what "they" believe gives them authority to make the decisions they do. When one finds that, one has the key to peacefully putting things back on track.

You know what Anonymous Coward, whether you got a Dick or not you guys are F'd. Your President, Valerie Jarrett, will keep poking Obo till he signs an executive order to offer a $1000.00 a gun, He will slide one of those $1,000,000,000,000 dollar Coins into a change machine and when all 320,000,000 guns come back he will deposit the $680,000,000,000 dollars change into a Goldman Sachs Pocket, to be distributed to those most deserving.
What will it be?
Peace, Love or War?

lean forward

Just like Posse-Comantatus, they'll just ignore it unless someone sues over it...

The Dick Act is quite real...but it's been ignored before, and will probably be ignored again...

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Last Edited by Saddletramp on 01/08/2013 08:19 PM

If this is a serious post,how do people like yourself arrive at such a degraded and debased position?

I am reasonably sure that the john warner defense act already gutted posse comitatus. That was passed during the boy shrub reign.

Last Edited by s. d. butler on 01/08/2013 08:29 PM

Whether you have a Dick Act or a Dick, your President, Valerie Jarrett, will keep poking OBO until he signs an executive order to Grab Your Gun.
He will start out by throwing a Trillion dollar coin on the table and offering $3,000 a piece. in hopes of snagging the whole 330 million weapons.
Whatever doesn't come back, he will go after with stage two. That could get you a stay at a camp at the best, or a free high speed injection from DHS at the worst.

What do you want now?
Peace, love or War?

I've seen you post those exact same words repeatedly to posters you don't agree with. Get some new material.

Yes I have used them before. Because they are appropriate.

They remove the 2nd this is nothing..

A real man always wants peace, but is prepared for war...

At least now I know how that name got such a bad rep.

what are you doing?

The cited act never passed in 1902. It was stopped in the house.

the daily caller.com
the big list of who hates guns

Most of the organizations on the list are government agencies and unions. I didn't know unions held that much power.

AARP
AFL-CIO
Ambulatory Pediatric Association
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Civil Liberties Union
American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing
American Medical Women`s Association
American Medical Student Association
American Medical Association
American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
American Trauma Society
American Federation of Teachers
American Association of School Administrators
American Alliance for Rights and Responsibilities
American Medical Association
American Bar Association
American Counseling Association
American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Association for World Health

this is just a small sample

The bill did pass in 1903, but read the language. Hint... its different.

STFU kraut.

good info

It passed and was signed into law either in late 1902 or early 1903 depending on which source you site...and the law has even been used on numerous occasions...

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Last Edited by Saddletramp on 01/08/2013 10:38 PM

Interesting. Keep this sucker pinned so I can finish reading with some coffee in the AM

<snip>


AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES (AARR)
Center for Community Interest
1146 19th Street, NW, Suite 250
Washington, DC 20036-3703

Roger L. Conner, Executive Director
Tel: (202) 785-7844
Fax: (202) 785-4370
TDD: None

AARR works to foster community life and defends the safety and civility of the public institutions that support it. The AARR represents community interest in legislative and litigation matters, including addressing public housing.

Geographic areas(s) served: United States
Type(s) of publications: Quarterly newsletter and periodic studies

=====


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION (ACLU)
132 W. 43rd Street
New York, NY 10036

Ira Glasser, Executive Director
Tel: (212) 944-9800
Fax: (212) 354-5290
TDD: None

Since its founding in 1920, ACLU has dedicated itself to the protection and expansion of the civil rights and liberties of all minority groups in America-racial, ethnic, religious, and sexual. This is accomplished through litigation, legislation, and public education.

Geographic areas(s) served: United States
Type(s) of publications: Newsletter, public policy reports, briefing papers, books

[link to www.usccr.gov]

WE have a senate under the thumb of a president whos right to this position is questionable at best, go 1350 days .. four years without a budget. That is against the constitution.. against the law.. who's making them uphold the law or even be accountable? NO ONE.

If they have enough balls to ignore the law .. they have enough balls to make new laws and see they are enforced by hook or by crook.

A nation of laws we are not .. not since Obama and his commies took charge.

It was passed in 1903, hence the title of the post showing the date 1902/03.