Abraham Lincoln was the second antichrist

does any one have the similar thoughts.

Gee.

A single bullet can stop Lucifer ?

when you read American civil war you can feel it.

Last Edited by Star God on 01/13/2013 08:16 AM

It was Jesus Christ who wanted to enslave the people.Christians invaded Africa and brought slaves to the new world.But Lincoln later released them.

Last Edited by Star God on 01/13/2013 08:37 AM

uh

...

no

y not?

Either 4th or 5th. I thought everyone knew that.

King Richard(lion heart) is also an antichrist.

Way off OP. Lincoln was far from being an antichrist.

he was a traitor, not antichrist....

very terrible man, no doubt though.

Can you count?

Jesus didn't want people enslaved either, you idiot.

What about that goat legged, fly eating reptillian you call queen where does she fit in on your antichrist list?

I'd think an anti-christ would have to a) consolidate power within an empire, b) claim a direct lineage to God and c) lead his followers into a new train of thought such that humanity's collective psyche splits in roughly two sub-psyches, the original and the derivative (ie. mother and child.)

That said, I think the last anti-christ was Julius Caesar. We (our collective psyche) chose Julius over the Christs of that day. The matrix system rewrote history, attributing the miracles of Christ to Julius under a repackaged Jesus. The jews/christians chose the God of war, Mars, over the message of peace. The rest is history.

so many unaccounted antichrists in the history.most of them were ignored as they spoke English.

I am not a fan of royals.Only one was the Diana because she was so hot.

Last Edited by Star God on 01/19/2013 06:18 AM

Though I am far from believing Lincoln was a liberator and I opened this thread which few paople wanted to read [...]
Thread: APE Braham Lincoln film...
[...] I have to say you are WRONG because black people themselves were making slaves of their own race back there in Africa, so slavery is not "just" white Caucasian fault.
Also Lincoln didn't "release" them out of bondage but his motives were different in that period of time. He wanted black people to get back to Africa where he thought they belonged to avoid more bloodshed even among white people. He didn't think the same about Irish or German people dwelling in USA who came as European immigrants wiping out original American native indians.
Now, let's suppose I am wrong and he was the "hero" most of the mass of people have forced to believe by "history" books, magazines, parades or Walt Disney's animatronic (which inspired the film Westworld)...., if you are saying yourself he "released them" you're inconsistent with your very thread, aren't you?

And the films are codes....

The term "triangulation," as it is used in politics, is said to be a dirty word, a cynical tactic. But in this case, as one modern strategist phrased it, "isn't about compromising on principles or policies, but about preempting conservative wedge issues by addressing them through progressive policies" -- or, finding a way to accomplish your goals without alienating one side or another, through careful use of language and limits. This may involve strategic tradeoffs or compromises on short-term goals in order to position yourself to accomplish greater ones in the future. Think about the practical, empirical wisdom in those words: It's true because it works.

"Lincoln" weaves images of such triangulation through the entire film. It's even there in the visual positioning of the three men in the telegraph room, and in the last sentence of the speech above: balance, fairness, justice. It's there in the House of Representatives, with the Lincoln Republicans on one side of the chamber, the opposition Democrats on the other and the Speaker (or the member holding the floor) at the front, moderating between them.

At times, the apex of the triangle is reversed, shifted to a point in the balcony at the rear of the hall, where Mrs. Lincoln (Sally Field) or various Negro citizens might be witnessing the historic proceedings.