Indians Migrated To Australia 4000 Years Before The Europeans

Other information suggests that Tamil (Indians) are descendants of Aboriginals, going back many more years than this study did.

They floated off and became India when the original continents broke up.

It just makes sense, as many have speculated, myself included, over the years, go and look at southern India and full blood aboriginals, no difference(which means there is also an Egyptian/Pharaoh connection but even further back, which could explain the southern India phenomena being discussed here).
What most don't understand is how that all happened, i would suggest that its linked to the Persian empire, who were know to do similar cultural exportation similar to the Babylonians, meaning they controlled Both Ethiopia and India, and i suspect if there are historical records, a mass deportation from Ethiopia to Southern India is in there, still that doesn't predate the genetics here, so that suggests there were already communities similar in southern India, for Persia to have made such a decision.
Another interesting factor in possible rebellion to trigger such a thing by the Persians would be descendants of the queen of Sheba and Solomon, and followers rebelling against Persian rule.
It is also a big jolt back to reality, for the supposed extreme ages of so called civilization/culture by the aboriginals in Australia, 40-60,000 years is just so much lies, the methods to arrive at those dates are subject to deliberate choices to choose the data set that best suits the objectives of whosoever is publishing the great age figure, meaning that when the age of an artifact/ground is measured the figures will range from recent to extreme. With all sorts of wonderful reasons as to why the presenters choice of dates is "valid" and "scientific".

Mmmm kangaroo curry. No one ever said.