The Positive Outcome Theory | |
Lucky Charms User ID: 33038256 Ireland 01/26/2013 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You're assuming that the current economic instability is not a product of their agenda, but most schools of thought on this will tell you it's all part of the plan, the system does what it does because they make it do so... the economy is not some blind force of nature, it's a construct, a machine, designed, built and controlled by them. Indeed if you have ever read the Shock Doctrine, you'll see that it's common practice to utterly destroy a nations economic system, then move in and "make it in your own image" as it were. Second, I agree that many police officers and soldiers would be reluctant to fire on their own people, but I believe that many UN troops would be reluctant to do so too, they're human too you know. That's why current military/police r&d is leaning heavily on drones and automated enforcement systems. Robots will fire on anybody they are programmed to. US citizens, no matter how well armed, stand no chance against fleets of UAVs dropping hellfires on them from the clouds. With drones etc being fully automated, literally a handful of people could control an entire army. You say they are destined to lose... I say, they can't lose. Not unless something happens that neither side can foresee. Last Edited by Lucky Charms on 01/26/2013 03:34 PM 'Magically Delicious' |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6866651 United States 01/26/2013 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You're assuming that the current economic instability is not a product of their agenda, but most schools of thought on this will tell you it's all part of the plan, the system does what it does because they make it do so... the economy is not some blind force of nature, it's a construct, a machine, designed, built and controlled by them. Quoting: Lucky Charms Indeed if you have ever read the Shock Doctrine, you'll see that it's common practice to utterly destroy a nations economic system, then move in and "make it in your own image" as it were. Second, I agree that many police officers and soldiers would be reluctant to fire on their own people, but I believe that many UN troops would be reluctant to do so too, they're human too you know. That's why current military/police r&d is leaning heavily on drones and automated enforcement systems. Robots will fire on anybody they are programmed to. US citizens, no matter how well armed, stand no chance against fleets of UAVs dropping hellfires on them from the clouds. With drones etc being fully automated, literally a handful of people could control an entire army. You say they are destined to lose... I say, they can't lose. Not unless something happens that neither side can foresee. A thoughtful response, but flawed IMO. The economy is their construct, but does not mean it isn't going to fail. It only works when all players are in. Right now germany is pulling out their gold, we just borrowed a trillion dollars from china, and other countries are considering following suit. This is why we just bought a bunch of silver. The eventual outcome is instability and failure. Our monetary value is imaginary, and many states are now pushing for their own currency. Drones are also destined to fail. There have been numerous demonstrations from DIY people at home taking control of them, disabling them, etc. Iran recently did this. It's based on a technology that can be hacked. As far as more advanced robotics doing the dirty work, DARPA is still in development stages with their technology. They are certainly not mass produced or ready for action. I don't see anything in your argument that disproves a positive outcome ;) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27008657 Germany 02/03/2013 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |