Former US Sec of Treasury want the return of $27 TRILLION back to the US Treasury

Dislike bumping my own threads but this one is too important.

Crime upon crime. Held in Switzerland is he?

Of course the present US Government want him there in Switzerland, under house arrest. That way they can shut him up or just leave him be and discredit him, as they effectively have.

So why would he want to give them
the money knowing damn well the
taxpayers would never see it?

27 trillion dollars!!
Anyone know the GDP of the USA?
And I thought my checkbook was screwed up.

>and is still serving, under house arrest in Switzerland, 10 years of
>a 22 year sentence for bogus Wisconsin income tax charges.

I find that IMPOSSIBLE to believe!

Sorry... I did mis read: the house arrest is in Wisconsin, not Switzerland.

"Wanta tells how he gave Vince Foster $250 million earmarked for The Childrens' Fund and its chairman Hillary Clinton right before Foster was found dead...He also was appointed trustee of $27 trillion, made as U.S. profits during the days he helped orchestrate the destabilization of the Russian currency."

sounds like a straight-up kinda guy that WE SHOULD TRUST

Good catch, OP! Thank you! I've long suspected that the Fed was using our tax dollars for investment purposes, then enriching TPTB with the profits. Either that, or they just printed up the money and did it that way.

Any way you look at it, they all need to be hanged for being the greedy manipulators they are. Skolnick produced a piece that shows the Bushes and the Queen of England share a joint bank account worth billion$! Where do you suppose they got that money? Through Allen Greenspan! Proven! Gotta love Skolnick.
.

You got off on the wrong foot when you claimed that Leo Wanta was a former US Sec. of Treasury.

He wasn't.

The Secretarys of Treasury for Reagan were Donald Regan, James Baker, and Nicolas Brady.

I listened to the interview.... it frightened and angered me.

Wow! isn't anybody else gonna chime in on this? Very interesting story.... check it out!

Hope he doesn't end up in happy camp.

Article says Treasury official. Title is incorrect.

maybe this is where NESARA is going to get the funding for their program.

Damn, it is not like me to produce such a misleading headline. I can't believe I did that. US Treasury OFFICAL is how it should have read.

Just too damn distract by all this immigration stuff in the Senate and trying to sort how who is on 1st and what pitch is going to be thrown next.

I do apologize. Not retracting the story, just the headline I titled the tread with.

(Oh, my word, a retraction on GLP?)

Considering the federal debt is around 8$ trillion and the richest people in the world supposedly not trillionaires I find the idea of someone hiding $27T to be beyond stupid.

No ONE person holds that kind of money without a huge trail impossible to hide.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR SEVENTH CIRCUIT


In Re: )

)

Ambassador Leo Wanta, Somalia )

Ambassador to Canada )

and Switzerland, DPP#-04362 ) Court of Appeal

& 12535, aka Lee E. Wanta, ) Case No: 02 1878

aka Leo E. Wanta; and )

)

)

Petitioner )

)

vs )

)

State of Wisconsin, Dane County Circuit )

Court presently presiding judge over )

Case No. 92-CF-683; and )

State of Wisconsin; )

)

James E. Doyle, Attorney General of the )

State of Wisconsin; and )

)

Such other parties with the State of )

Wisconsin subject to the Orders of this )

Court to satisfy the requested relief. )

)

Respondents. )

_____________________________________________________________​__________

DOCKETING STATEMENT
Counsel for Petitioner submit this Docketing Statement pursuant to the Circuit Court Rules and the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure:



1. Court-Location, Docket Number and Judge: Petitioner’s requested Writ of Mandamus and other requested relief would concern jurisdiction over the Petitioner in the State of Wisconsin and most particularly Case No. 92-CF-683 filed in State of Wisconsin, Dane County, Circuit Court. The majority of the proceedings in the subject case were before Dane County Circuit Court Judge Michael B. Torphy.

2. Parties to this Appeal: The parties to this cause of action are Ambassador Leo Wanta, aka Lee E. Wanta, aka Leo E. Wanta (collectively referred to herein as "Wanta") the Ambassador from Somalia to Canada and Switzerland as Petitioner and the named Respondents and such other Respondents known and/or unknown within the State of Wisconsin that would be needed or required to perform acts or duties within the State of Wisconsin to implement the Orders and/or Mandates from this Court.

3. Corporate Registration Disclosure: Petitioner is not aware of any corporate disclosure information that is required to be filed in conjunction with the cause of action brought before this Court by the Petitioner.

4. Brief Description of the underlying factual basis giving rise to Petitioner filing the present cause of action before this Court: Petitioner is entitled to inviolability from jurisdiction in the State of Wisconsin and other jurisdictions of the United States based on the following summary of the pertinent facts and issues more completely delineated in the Petition under consideration before this Court:

Wanta received official investiture from the President of Somalia as Ambassador from Somali to Canada and Switzerland in June of 1993. Wanta entered the United States in November of 1993 and was arrested by special agents of the FBI on a Federal Warrant based on a claim by the State of Wisconsin pertaining to flight to avoid prosecution. Wanta presented Diplomatic Passports as the Somalia Ambassador to Canada and Switzerland as his entry documents to immigration officials when clearing United States customs. His Diplomatic Passports contained Identification Cards for travel to the United States issued by the United States Consulate located in Switzerland. Wanta did not possess nor present to Immigration/Customs officials a United States passport for purpose of obtaining permission to enter the United States.

In personal luggage and briefcases, clearly marked as "Diplomatic Pouches", observed by Wanta to have been taken into possession by the arresting FBI agents upon his arrival in the United States, were original documents evidencing the official investiture of Wanta as an Ambassador from Somalia with Somalia Government seals and other appropriate certifications.

In an initial appearance before the United States District Court in New York on the Federal Warrant the sitting judge acknowledges the Diplomatic passports and other documents and on motion of the United States Attorney dismissed the case. Before leaving the United States Courthouse Wanta is arrested by local New York police based on a telephone request from the State of Wisconsin (USA). Wanta at no time regains possession of any of his personal items including his Diplomatic Passports. Without issuance of a Governor’s warrant or an extradition hearing, State of Wisconsin county law enforcement officers transport Wanta from the State of New York to the State of Wisconsin (USA).

Starting on or before the arrival of Wanta in the United States and continuing at virtually every stage of every county court proceeding in the State of Wisconsin Wanta asserts that the State of Wisconsin has no jurisdiction over him and reiterates repeatedly that he is the Ambassador from Somalia to Canada and Switzerland. Wanta not only repeatedly objected to jurisdiction at county court proceedings but also continually advised all jail personnel, law enforcement officers and others of authority in the State of Wisconsin (USA) of his entitlement to Diplomatic Immunity.

At one or more county court proceedings in the State of Wisconsin reference is made to the personal "Diplomatic" items of Wanta including, but not limited to, his Diplomatic Passports that are either being held by the State of Wisconsin county court, the Attorney General’s office or some other arm of the judicial system or agency of the State of Wisconsin (USA) Government. After almost daily claims and arguments by Wanta concerning his Diplomatic Immunity status, a hearing is held by the County Court and in summary the County Court rules that the evidence is not credible since all the court has is copies of what appears to be generic passports with no legible names and no documents that are believable. The County Court judge did not find that Wanta was not an Ambassador. The County Court judge found that the evidence documenting the Diplomatic status of Wanta was not credible for the reasons herein stated. The presiding county court judge denies Wanta’s claim of Diplomatic Immunity for the stated reasons irrespective that the county court judge had or should have had knowledge from previous court proceedings (in front of the same judge and clearly identified within county court transcripts) that the originals of the county court judge "questioned" documents were in the possession of an office or agency under the control of the State of Wisconsin (USA).

5. Result of Prior Court Proceedings: Petitioner on or before November of 1993 and at multiple and repetitive times thereafter, substantially complied with 22 USC 254 and Article 40 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. International law and laws of the United States require that upon compliance with the statutory reference and treaty, by a person claiming Diplomatic Immunity that the burden shifts to the "State" of establishing "jurisdiction" over the Diplomat by a preponderance of the evidence. Irrespective of the statutory and treaty compliance by Petitioner the State of Wisconsin has never met or assumed their required burden. The ruling by any court on this issue has resulted in an ongoing and continual miscarriage of justice based on clearly erroneous and misguided court opinions. Both the State of Wisconsin Dane County Circuit Court and the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin have improperly addressed and unjustly ruled on the issue of Diplomatic Immunity for the Petitioner. The applicable orders from either court set the basis and foundation for this Court to consider and appropriately rule on the pertinent and relevant issues in the Petition before this Court.

6. Issues to be presented on Appeal:

a. Is Petitioner entitled to Diplomatic Immunity under 22 USC 254 et seq. and the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 23 U.S.T. 3227? The legal references provide in part as follows:



22 USC 254(d) provides:

Any action or proceeding brought against an individual who is

entitled to immunity with respect to such action or proceeding

under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, under

section 254(b) or 254(c) of this Title, or under any other laws

extending diplomatic privileges and immunities, shall be dismissed.

Such immunity may be established upon motion or

suggestion by or on behalf of the individual, or as otherwise

permitted by applicable rules of procedure.



2. Article 40 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations provides in part:

If a diplomatic agent passes through or is in the territory of a

third State, which has granted him a passport visa if such

visa is necessary, while proceeding to take up or return to his

post, or when returning to his own country, the third state shall

accord him inviolability and such other immunities as may be

required to ensure his transit or return.



b. Does the United States Code Section and the provision of the Vienna Convention set forth in paragraph a., above, based on all known facts, result in a lack of jurisdiction over the Petitioner by the State of Wisconsin (USA)?

c. Are there sufficient documented facts that have been readily available and known by the State of Wisconsin (USA) since July of 1993 and on or before November of 1993 to lead a reasonable person to believe that Petitioner satisfied the requirements of 22 USC 254(d) and applicable provisions of Article 40 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations entitling Petitioner to be accorded inviolability from State of Wisconsin (USA) jurisdiction and such other immunities as necessary to protect Petitioner’s International Diplomatic position?

d. Has the State of Wisconsin (USA) wrongfully maintained possession of Diplomatic Passports, Diplomatic papers and/or Diplomatic/federally protected items beyond time periods deemed reasonable by International law and/or United States laws and regulations?

e. Has the State of Wisconsin (USA) had information, facts and/or substantiating documentation in the possession of the State of Wisconsin (USA) for more than a necessary period of time to enable a reasonable and prudent judicial court and/or judicial officer of the court to determine that Petitioner met the requirements of the applicable United States Code sections and provisions of International treaties to entitle Petitioner to his Diplomatic Immunity?

f. Has Petitioner, contrary to both International law and the Laws of the United States of America been held as a political prisoner by the State of Wisconsin (USA) and subjected to violations of internationally protected Human Rights?

7. Timeliness of the filing Petition before this Court: This action is timely brought before this Court as the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin and the State of Wisconsin, Dane County, Circuit Court improperly ruled on the issue of "jurisdiction". Jurisdiction by the State of Wisconsin over the Petitioner is the substantive issue in the Petition before this Court. Petitioner has never waived his right to object to jurisdiction, Somalia has never waived the Diplomatic Immunity rights that should be afforded to Petitioner and invalid jurisdiction over the "person" never waived is always an "issue" for appellate review. It does not seem logical that Diplomatic Immunity entitlement can be ignored by a "State". The clear intent of an international treaty to which the United States is a party cannot be ignored through an erroneous and obviously misguided ruling by any court. Reasonable satisfaction of the 22 USC 254 and the Vienna Convention by Petitioner negates jurisdiction and absent the "State" satisfying jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence all court proceedings are null and void and/or voidable.

7. Jurisdiction for the action brought before this Circuit Court of Appeals: The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked by the Petitioner pursuant to one of more of the following references:



Article 3, Section 2, Clause 1, United States Constitution



28 USC 1651



28 USC 1251 (b)(1). The Supreme Court has original but not exclusive jurisdiction.

d. 28 USC 1291.

8. Oral Argument: The Petitioner requests the opportunity to make oral argument on the Petition before the Circuit Court.



Respectfully submitted this ___ day of April 2002 by counsel for Petitioner.






Jan Morton Heger

CA State Bar No. 87441

29402 Castle

Laguna Niguel, CA 92677

Phone: 949-249-9170

Fax: 949-249-9171

Email: [email protected]







Certificate of Mailing

I hereby certify that on this ____ day of April I caused the above set forth Docketing Statement consisting of 7 pages inclusive of this Certificate of Mailing to be mailed postage and/or express mail charges prepaid to the following:



James E. Doyle Dane County Circuit Court

Attorney General Clerk of the Court

Wisconsin Department of Justice 210 Martin King Jr. Blvd

123 West Washington Avenue GR-10

P.O. Box 7858 Madison, Wisconsin 53709-0001

Madison, WI 53703



Unite States Court of Appeals

Seventh Circuit

Clerk of the Court

219 Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Here is some WILD STUFF about Wanta etc.

I have previously determined that Vreeland stuff was CRAP.
HHHHHHHHMMMMMMMmmmmmmmm!!!!!

[link to www.apfn.org]

Excerpt:

{{{With these thoughts in mind I would like to get down to some points that I think are fact:

1. Vreeland taken down during the Clinton admin
2. Wanta taken down during the Clinton admin
3. Look at the posts regarding others in similar position all taken down during the Clinton admin.
4. If anyone would research these situations I am of the opinion that you would learn that this
type of agent removal happened more during the Clinton admin that in any other period of time in
history.
5. A fact to research. There have been news articles posted that a plan was presented by military
intelligence to Clinton that if they would take out five of OBL cells they could neutralize this
enemy. I am sure you all recall the first WTC event, the Cole, the African American Embassies
etc., all during the Clinton admin. I am sure all are familiar with Somalia. Military action and a
recommended take out of OBL were squashed by Clinton admin. I appreciate that there was a
plan for military action on the Presidents desk for Afganistan prior to 9/11. There is also the
likelihood that this plan may have been the same plan that was on Clintons desk. I do not know
but the facts would be better than bashing.
6. A fact that is known. In todays news there are stories about the shoulder fired missile threat. If
you research Wanta stories you will note that during the Bush Sr. admin there was a plan in place
of buying back the stingers from OBL and Afgan. In fact in the financial papers that have been
published most recently I can assure you that not all of the money was going into the hands of
private people. Part of these financial transactions were used to do such business. Can you
imagine going to the Congress for a budget increase to buy back Stingers. Give me a break.
What brought this to a close was taking Wanta down.
7. There are also stories of the Russian briefcase dirty bomb. These were also being tracked and
monies from Wanta programs used to buy. There were biological weapons in the Philippines
money was needed to buy. The programs to buy these items and the Russian briefcase dirty
bombs went bye, bye during the Clinton admin in taking down Wanta and others. WHERE DID
THIS COVERT OPERATION MONEY GO AND WHY WAS IT STOPPED BEING USED FOR SUCH
PURPOSES. I question where some of the money ended up. I have stated before Marc Rich gets
pardoned and Wanta falls.
8. I realize I mention facts but I would also like to toss a hypothetical on the table and let you bash
(ha!ha!) around. From the financial sheets you have seen published there are many instances
where money was needed to pay for intelligence information. You all think you know the Lt's
personality. If his character is as some of you describe I am sure you can accept that he got
information by buying and not through charm. Some what of a joke but the fact of life is dirty
people that give up information will give up to anyone who can pay. This system of paying
virtually fell apart during the Clinton admin. During the Clinton admin there were those who
thought we could all walk around holding hands and melt into beloved brotherhood. Lets share
our weapons and technology and make everyone love each other. I do not believe anyone
questions who sold advance military technology to China. While we were selling technology,
making paper chase funny loans to Mexico, ignoring South America and blowing up Bosnia. Our
intelligence system fell apart.}}}
++++++++++++++++++++++

Daniel

Trillionaires don't get on the list of richest people, only billionaires and millionaires.

If there are financial instruments totalling 27 trillion, and they are associated in any way with the Bush family - for whom Clinton has long been working - then in all likelihood this stuff is counterfeit.

Read:

[link to www.theantechamber.net]

Problem is that if you go there you will be reading for days.

You can hide 27 trillion in a 25 cent floppy disk.

"...then in all likelihood this stuff is counterfeit."

Gold is much more likely with these neo-nerds. The guy did say Treasury Department (an actual US Government agency by the way) AND the people of the USA, not the fraudulent Federal Reserve Banking system (NOT an actual US Government agency, as you all well know). More likely than not, he knows where the gold is.

Slightly off topic, sorry.

[[[[ Only about 1/15 or less of the actual gold bricks held at the pre-911 WTC vaults were recovered post-911 (not very widely known news)...most of what was recovered was found in a dump truck (extra heavy load capacity quad rear axles) in a tunnel...it's forward progress was rudely interrupted by minor damage/major debris before it could follow God only knows how many others that left before those structures partially collapsed the tunnel, when they fell. Funny how hundreds of various law enforcement types showed up within minutes to guard the scene, without wondering exactly why this huge dump truck was packed with gold bricks in the first place. ]]]]

Where would you hide 100-200 billion in gold bricks? How about 27 trillion? Seems to me, that right out in the open (almost) would be the last place anyone would look.

He may have been a Deputy Sec

Couple of questions:-

1. What form is this 27 Trillion in?

2. How can you hide 27 T$?

3. If the origin of the funds is the Russian people, then surely it should be returned to them. Or, is this a case of Finders-keepers?