UFO Video about Flying Saucers from Billy Meyer

Billy Meier is the WORST UFO hoaxer of ALL time!

..well, here might come a shocker for ya.
..according to photograph analysis ,photos he made are not hoaxes

[link to video.google.com]

Can you get a dont_use_this2 - aint watching a 1 hour 40 minute movie.

CONSPIRACY_MASTER : how can u tell it's all lies? have u read or know what were the results of the analysis of his photographs? I'm not that quick to rule out any possibility just because it sounds bizzare...

***All lies, who the hell buys this UFO crap anyway.***

I guess this means you've never seen one. It changes your perspective on these things if you see one. I'm a good observer, someone who would be given a lot of credibility, and I saw one with two friends back in 1965 way up in North Ontario near a hydroelectric project on the Ottawa River.

We watched for about twenty minutes in dangerously freezing weather as this 'craft' did maneuvers that were physically impossible by our standards of physics. At the crack of dawn the next day a Canadian Air Force fighter jet broke the sound barrier right in my face chasing this thing.

The only plausible explanation I ever heard for how it flew was given by Bob Lazar who described its flight perfectly and explained how it could be done using gravity amplifiers.

It literally could accelerate to thousands of miles an hour in a split second and then stop on a dime.

Being with other people, hearing of a few dozen other witnesses descriptions, including phd's and scientists working on the dam project, I never doubted what we we saw was an intelligently controlled vehicle or that it was not from any earthly technology.

Since then I've had a very 'open mind' about UFOs. When you finally see one you'll understand. Making a proclamation about them without having studied the evidence or having been lucky enough to see one only makes you sound like a bigot. That which cannot be explained instills fear in some people and wonder in others.

roflmao they bleeped dont_use_this2....lol

74711 : whoa..thank u very much for your input, much appreciated

they bleeped s h o r t e r l i n k.

The photos are not frauds because they are models.
I am sorry I do not buy it,although I think Mier was genuine.
He was the victim of a huge disinformation effort.

op is it possible for you to provide a dont_use_this2 ?

I don't frigging believe this - I put spaces between the letters and they still bleeped it.

Umm I saw the exact same ship in 1978, this is legit.

#87: the link works for me...what do u mean by "is it possible for you to provide a dont_use_this2 ?"

74645: ...care to elaborate?

I am just trying to see if there is a link to a site with a video of a duration less than 1 hour 40 minutes...which is how long that the link said the video is...they keep bleeping 2 words when they are put together. one word is shorter, and the other word is link.

" CONSPIRACY_MASTER : how can u tell it's all lies? have u read or know what were the results of the analysis of his photographs? I'm not that quick to rule out any possibility just because it sounds bizzare..."

tell me gentlemen, was "CONSPIRACY_MASTER" in this thread?

did he get nuked? wha'd up?

75989 : ..umm..very interesting...yes indeed, he posted here and that quote is what he posted...

I remeber seeing it - oh no his post was "abducted"!

well i didn't quote exactly what he said but the fact is that he posted in this thread

its a conspiracy

..lets not jump to conclusions

CONSPIRACY_MASTER
User ID: 8887
3/31/2006 11:03 AM

All lies, who the hell buys this UFO crap anyway.

Good on ya mod's – that asshat had no place being here.

Thank-you, gentlemen (Ashen, and #87)

[link to www.steelmarkonline.com]

This 23-page document is very technical and describes the methods used for analyzing and evaluating Billy's UFO pictures. The first section was written by Wendelle Stevens which gives a broad overview of the test procedures:

1.Microscopic examination of film, transparency or print to very high magnifications, up to 500 diameters.
2. Microdensiometric scanning of film or transparencies, using various scanning programs.
3. Scanning Electron Microscope examination of the film and film make-up.
4. Laserscopic examination of film or transparencies, and preparation of laser holographic plates for computer work.
5. Computerization of the data for storage on discs or tapes.
6. Videographic display of stored data, examinations, and the results of various tests, also transferred to storage disc or tape together with analysis programs used.

The second section is the report filed by lead photo investigator, Jim Dilettoso. Jim's knowledge, experience and attention to detail brought the scientific evidence of the UFO photo analysis to the forefront of the investigation. The results of his analysis PROVED beyond a reasonable doubt that Billy Meier had taken authentic UFO pictures showing alien spacecraft over Switzerland.

The 'Photographic Analysis Document' costs
nine bucks, so I'm not going to read it.
Wendelle Stevens and Jim Dilettoso don't
strike me as unbiased researchers though.
They are professional 'UFOlogists'.
(Read: making a living of people's gullibility.)

And, conveniently, the metal samples
have disappeared.

Double post.

<<according to photograph analysis ,photos he made are not hoaxes>>

yeah, sure

Nobody has ever been able to disprove Billy Meier's claims and photos and film. They keep on trying and nowadays they simply SAY they have disproved them without ever having done so...such is the desperation to keep him from getting his mesasge out. I recently saw a whole show that was devoted to getting you to believe that Billy Meier wanted to start a cult and have everyone kill themselves. What a lot of trouble 'somebody' is going to in order to discredit a one-armed Swiss farmer! Amazing!

that is an interesting point Monty, I had not heard of that- but some of the photo's- c'mon, horribly fake

..imo, tha facts speaking in favor of ufo/alien existence on earth are irrefutable. The fact that u don't want to see it and cling to the safe old beliefs won't change the reality. If u would be sincere and truly wanted to learn the truth u would realise we are not being told truth..i think it's begining to be seen even by masses now (iraq,911,...). Meier is just one of many but what surprises me is how the suppresion of truth works. In cases like Meier they try to ridicule the messenger, without any thorough research they will claim it's all hoax. In cases which are more difficult to suppress (..like Disclosure Project) the thing that worked so far was total avoidance of the whole thing, noone seems to listen, (almost) no media attention.

..here's a good (..and not that long) video with steven greer, as always very interesting...

[link to video.google.com]