Dr. Astro: what object could be this, seen from Volcan Turrialba?

It's clearly the same thing. I'm sorry but the question is just asinine. They claim it keeps appearing every day (that the sun is shining, of course). Magically it's not the same thing when it happens to appear in front of a cloud?

If you'd actually read my posts on this thread, you would not have not found my claim that it is Nibiru? I was merely commenting on the content of the video and have made zero claims as to what the video claims the object is?

well said sir

Nope. It isn't.

If it was "Clearly" the same thing - it would be unquestionable.

Hypothetically, I could see an object in the sky - the next day it's cloudy - I point my camera up in the sky - at the right time of day, and at the right angle and a lens flare could appear in the same general area the 'real' object I saw was.

I'm sure it's nothing - it's always nothing. But, if that's the only proof the 'skeptics' of this latest theory are going on...well..maybe it is something to look into at least a tiny bit further..

Nope. Idiots don't see even the obvious when it comes to shit like this. This incident in particular has taught me that. It's self-evidently the same thing, regardless of those idiots.

I've seen the 'object' few time, and never in front of clouds. Perhaps through the smoke, but that's absolutely different thing.

Also have seen the sun shining but no sun dogs, no flares, no cgi, no blue dots, and no object if the smoke from volcano was too thick, at the same time.

I've seen the 'object' few time, and never in front of clouds. Perhaps through the smoke, but that's absolutely different thing.

Also have seen the sun shining but no sun dogs, no flares, no cgi, no blue dots, and no object if the smoke from volcano was too thick, at the same time.

No, it's not. If it appears in front of the smoke, then guess what? IT'S NOT A CELESTIAL OBJECT!


Depends on the angle of the sun and how obscured the sun is. I've seen idiots claiming it's not there when it should be with the sun was unobscured; I went and looked and the sun WAS obscured.

I'll upload photo later, can!t do it right now while on mobile
where the sun is on up left corner and no dogs no flares down on the right, that has nothing to do with obscurity.

Oh sod it! I've had enough of this bull****


Anon. "something on lens? always on same place"...

Dr.Astro "And to answer the OP's question, it's a lens flare, it appears in front of clouds as long as the sun is unobscured:"

Geomagnetic storm. "Lens flare"

Anon. "nothing to see here folks, just a "lens flare"... move along"

The Dudester. "Well it ain't Nibiru and I ain't no government shill. It's a lens flare. Get over it."

Dr.Astro. "It IS a lens flare regardless of their excuses to the contrary. It appears in front of the clouds when the sun is unobscured and it always appears in a straight line with the other elements of the flare which in turn point back to the sun."

Dr.Astro. "I am not going to waste an hour watching a video when I already know the answer. It is a lens flare. That is confirmed by its nature. I don't care what some idiot says."

Dr.Astro. "Yes, it's absolute nonsense. They make themselves sound authoritative, but they're really just setting up strawmen arguments and in reality it's just a lens flare."

Anon. "I knew it!!! I was debating between lens flare or swamp gas."

404error. "You need to get out more. There is no Nibiru doom, & their won't be any Nibiru doom."

Dr.Astro. "No, it's not. If it appears in front of the smoke, then guess what? IT'S NOT A CELESTIAL OBJECT!"

Dr.Astro. "I've seen idiots claiming it's not there when it should be with the sun was unobscured; I went and looked and the sun WAS obscured.

Idiots! That'll be me then!

Yeah! Right!


[link to i1354.photobucket.com]




Last Edited by Just the facts! on 02/27/2013 03:37 AM

Stop calling others names trying to prove yourself, ignore the haters,get over yourself. We get it your opinion is it's a lens-flare, unless both sides of the argument have new evidence to contribute, other than re-hashing the same bs diatribes over and over! I am getting repetitive reading syndrome

personally I think there is a line of lens flares, and the object itself it a spec of dirt on the camera housing window.

^^^^

Probably lens defect. Not lens flare.

Sweet!!! I am famous.

Hey! There's a LENSE FLARE right now!!

[link to www.ovsicori.una.ac.cr]

Oh no! It isn't!!

But why aren't you all wondering what's going on every night in this mysterious CAVE!!

...and is it connected? We know UFO's love volcanoes!!

Lens Flare?

Strangest "lens flare" I have ever seen. I'm not buying it.

It may be a lens flare or it may be an as yet unexplained anomaly. It is certainly not a lens flare for the reasons (or lack thereof) that "Dr." NASA has stated. "Dr." Astro's opinion carries no more weight at this point than that of Mr. Masters.

The fact remains, if it was a celestial object, shit would currently be hitting the fan.

It's a fucking lense flare, stop making mountains out of mole-hills.

Yes, it's a lens flare, not matter how much you deny it. Celestial objects don't appear in front of smoke or clouds.

Last Edited by Astromut on 02/27/2013 04:24 AM

Best line in the whole Vid; it’s not much faster than watching paint dry.

The main pic shows everything and perspective is obvious.

Here's a LENSE FLARE and guess what?

NO OBJECT!!!!!

[link to i1354.photobucket.com]

Hey! Maybe it's BEHIND the clouds?



Last Edited by Just the facts! on 02/27/2013 04:47 AM

Agreed.

I watched the whole video and honestly, it appears to be a lens flare - regardless.

He keeps referring to the ufo as blue bonnet

Hey COTA, due respect, but I was being facetious. I don't think it was lens flare. I was just amassing the shill pulse...

Watch it yourself live

You have a brain

Use it - don't make it be what you want

Let it be what it is

I watched it in its entireity Ice. You should also, it's not a bad vido. Don't listen to all the shill commentary prevalent throughout this thread.

I am kind of certain at least from his 'footage' that it is a lens flare. You can see it through the clouds which is kind of a dead give away. It is also angular, if you connect the flares to the bottom right and left you can clearly see where the path of light is coming from and where it is hitting within the lens of the camera.

JMHO.

In case you didn't notice, the thread title called me out and asked me specifically! Don't like it? Don't participate! I'm not a fucking shill!

The object does not “track a line” ever. It sits in one single place the whole time because it is a reflection in the lens.


The only thing that happened was 49 min of my life was wasted.

The narrator was rather colorful, I did not know stars or lens flares could do the hoochie coochie dance.

I never called you out specifically DA; I'm not sure why you have set your sites on moi?

Fine, play stupid.