Comet C/2012 S1 ISON is Nibiru the great perturber.

You are the one making claims HERE.


Never claimed that.
I said, and have proven, that YOUR assertion that EVERYWHERE outside the US and Canada any teacher can be called professor was incorrect.

Is this a language problem, or are you just slow?
You rarely seem to understand what people are actually saying.


So Earth passing through Comet Halley's tail wasn't close enough?

BTW, where is the geological evidence of Earth getting flash-fried ever so often?


But if it is a subject you don't understand or know much off?
If every expert on the planet disagrees with you are you still going to go with your gut-feeling, or will you do the rational thing and reassess your opinion.
(Which usually implies learning a lot more about it.)


I asked YOU a question.

Just waving to a pile of paper and saying "it's in there somewhere" doesn't wash here.
You make a claim HERE, you provide evidence HERE.


As if you can tell frozen volatiles from other stuff from a picture.

I'm old enough to remember GIOTTO.
Discover 80% water in the coma.


Wut.


There have been a lot of flyby-s though.


It's got at least one member there...


You are a disgusting ableist.
Fuck off, troll!


And only to himself.
He's put a lot of effort in avoiding reality checks.


You're disgusting bigot, a woo, and guy.


For every claim you made.

You know, scientist usually present their evidence WITH their claims.
You haven't presented anything yet.


What's your obsession this time?


So you're a coward as well.


How is this any different from a Christian apologist pointing to the Bible while saying: "The proof is in there (somewhere)."
Can't you think and speak for yourself.

Cultist.


It would not be evidence, not a reason to JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS.
Merely a reason to inquire.


EVIDENCE!

Folks, really good to talk to you, but I'm going home and probably my IP will be blocked there. I guess I will not be able to access during the whole weekend, so this thread will find his peace finally.

Feliz Páscoa e Juízo!

Like I said, it wouldn't have made it to print or on his bio webpage without him first approving it. Do you really think he hasn't read it ?

Astro is nothing but some fuck with a telescope in his backyard, an amateur, you can ask him yourself he has no PHD. Plain sight shit just gets swept under the rug, the whole point is lost an derailed once again another thread destroyed. People focus on his title as a professor/teacher rather than if his theories are true. You could be a professor at the best school for 50 years straight and be just as wrong as some ghetto school teacher in the bronx. Ignorance exists in all shapes & colors, and so does camouflage.

WHERE IN THE DEFINITION DOES IT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT HAVING A PHD? YOU DO NOT NEED A PHD TO BE A PROFESSOR POINT BLANK PERIOD CAN YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? Jesus fucking christ I really didn't think people could be this stupid outside of facebook.

Status has nothing to do with it, it is the false status that he gives himself, if he can exaggerate his status he can exaggerate on anything.

What makes his status as a professor false and by who's definition of what a professor is, dude you either straight up aren't reading what i'm saying or literally are just to fucking stupid to understand english.

read through this thread.


Thread: the Doppler Effect, the spirals, and Nibiru

What was it again?



I feel a not-so-subtle energy change if I skip breakfast.



What you said was an ad hominem attack, IOW an attempt to avoid dealing with the evidence.
I thought I made that clear.


The idea of it isn't.


Than why can't you deal with it?


Nice example of you not dealing with the evidence.
You need to show it is bullshit.
To do that you need to deal with it and confront it.
All you do is try to handwave it away.


'It' isn't here. People are.

Most of them are opinionated asses, moi included.


Oh, you're crazy.
That explains it.

I understand exactly what you are saying, now I shall try in laymans terms to help you understand what I am saying.


I can drive, but to earn a drivers license I must first have many lessons, I would then have to take a test. Then I can call myself a driver. I can get a driving job. I can hold my license up and say "I earned that".

"This piece of cognitive dissonance annoyed me." - OP

You are trying way too hard to be intelligent OPie...trying this hard makes you dumb.

Why this matters? You don't trust me due to a semantics problem!


Alright, so you win other flower
That are other peoples smarter then me talking about this Professor semantic problem now. I preffer to focus on comets.


Halley is a small comet and was not so close.


You could read Earth In Upheavel from Immanuel Velikovsky, he gives a lot of evidences from naturalists and geologists.


Actually I knew a little bit about this subject, but I don't open.


You want me to write the whole scientific paper here? I gave you the source, read the Abstract at least.


With so many water in the coma, we should have enough ice to be found in the comet nucleous. Where are the pictures? I want Hi Res pictures, I know that satellites are equiped with military technology.


I'm serious, see how Astronut acts!


Five I guess, all of them in small comets. As I said, big comets are uncommon, small comets are very common.


Who? Is a girl or a man?


I'm honest, I consider him as an example because he holds that poor life for decades! Girl, you have to learn to play!


Reality is inside your mind.


But I'm pretty handsome =)


I need more info on what you want, I'm writing for days! And I'm not a scientist, most I can do is: go see other sources.



I think you like me =)


Should I wish that for me? I would not wish that even for... for... Dr. Astronut!


The difference is that McCanney is not Christ. YET! Hhuahuahuaaha, I'm kidding.
I can, but first I need something to start and you must give it to me, otherwise I will start talking till I die!


Exactly. But you would not just let it go as nothing happens. What would you do if he start stutter? Ask more. Till you have your conclusions by yourself.


EVIDENCE OF WHAT??? I'm talking for three days about McCanney being or not a Professor, then I discuss about ISON proximity and how we should observe it, and then you appear shooting me! You must be more specific!

Lol he doesn't even have a master's degree. He's just an amateur everything.

jeez.... look at all these ego's fighting for their truth on this tread while slowly but surely moving away from the original topic

LOL

Someone pinned the thread and I have to read through four pages - will take some time.


In the meantime let's have some fun with JMcC:

"January 20, 2013 posting ... !!!!!!! ... THIS JUST IN ... IT IS TOO EARLY TO CONFIRM BUT SOME INITIAL DATA SUGGESTS THAT COMET C/2012/S1 HAS AT LEAST ONE COMPANION AND POSSIBLY UP TO SEVEN ... WHEN SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAPPENS ONE HAS TO BE VERY CAUTIOUS BUT AFTER EXAMINING THE DATA THAT I HAVE SEEN I WOULD SAY THAT IT APPEARS TO BE REAL ... FURTHERMORE ONE OF THE POSSIBLE COMPANIONS APPEARS TO BE AT ABOUT TWO LUNAR DISTANCES (HALF A MILLION MILES) AND HAS NOT FORMED A COMA FOR SOME ODD REASON ... IF THE OBJECT IS ORBITING THE NUCLEUS OF THE COMET AT THAT DISTANCE IT IMPLIES THAT THE NUCLEUS OF THIS COMET IS POSSIBLY AS BIG OR BIGGER THAN EARTH ..."
[link to www.jmccanneyscience.com]
Sorry for the caps, but this is the original formatting of the quote.

JMcC came to this shocking conclusion after watching a video posted at Spaceweather:
[link to spaceweather.com]

Can you find the companion(s)? Look at the 8 o'clock position - the little bright white dot following the comet.

What an idiot someone must be to mistake a hotpixels for companions?
What an idiot someone must be to publish the "shocking evidence" with only one source and without doublechecking?

And this guy tought orbital mechanics - no surprise Cornell fired him.



After the astronomical community had some fun with JMcC he tried to backpadel:
(For easier commenting I break the JMcC quote into pieces.)

"January 23, 2013 posting ... this just in ... it appears that there was a hoax initiated to entrap me and others posted by none other than SPACEWEATHER.COM ... this known gov NASA mouthpiece posted on their page a link to a video with apparent companions to comet C/2012/S1 ...
The wellknown paranoia of JMcC. Well, except him and some doomtards nobody else took the hotpixels for companions.

"i have access to other much better data than the spaceweather.com hoax link AND as a result i posted a very cautious note stating exactly that"
And as usual JMcC don't reference his source of "better data".
And dear JMcC, where can one find this "very cautious note" - or do you mean your caps text quoted above. If this is a "very cautious note", you have some issues with your keyboard.

"and that this had to be taken with a large grain of salt and had to be confirmed"
Yes, with looking carefully at the video, looking for other sources and doublechecking - before publishing it at your site.

"later spaceweather dropped the posting"
Ooops - it's still there: [link to www.spaceweather.com]
And there: [link to www.spaceweather.com]
And there: [link to www.spaceweather.com]
And there: [link to www.spaceweather.com]
James McCanney: You are a liar.

"BUT then the disinfo crew jumped on other pages to slam me stating that i was starting a HEAVENS GATE type rumor referring to the spaceweather.com hoax video ... HMMMM ... it was spaceweather.com who posted the link to this hoax video"
And you are the idiot who made "companions from it" - or did Spaceweather anywhere claim, that the video shows C/2012 S1 had companions?

"and note that in my posting i never mentioned spaceweather.com NOR did i ever mention any specific video nor link to any video and especially i did not reference the hoax link noted in the spaceweather.com posting ... i simply stated i had seen data ... and there is other data that i have seen that is far better than the hoax video they posted but i remain skeptical and NOTE I DID NOT POST ANY DATA KNOWING HOW IT COULD BE MISCONSTRUED ...
Stammering, stammering, stammering ...
Is the above the justification for your idiocy?

"you see how the disonfo crew works ... disinfo has its form of operation ... this was obviously a trap set to try to ensnare me and to try to mock my success informing the public about this comet ... but as with all their efforts now more people will come to my web site and will learn first hand the lies and deceit and immense efforts they are going to try to damage my name and work ... jim mccanney"
LOL

"look at my posting of January 20 regarding data i have seen ... NOTE NOWHERE DO I REFERENCE ANY LINK OR DATA THAT WAS ORIGINALLY POSTED ON SPACEWEATHER.COM !!! "
Right, as said before: you never reference any data - somebody could have the idea to verify your claims.
[link to www.jmccanneyscience.com]


.

this ^



Subject: Comet C/2012 S1 ISON is Nibiru the great perturber

thank you folks!

You're a special kind of asshole, huh?

Turn your caps lock off, there is no need to shout and bitches? Might wanna look into that mirror and then proceed to give yourself a cold lenny for being such a dbag.

There are numerous reasons as to why it is hard for people like me, to take people like you, with any ounce of respect.

You raise some very valid points, but what is with the ad hominems? They are totally unnecessary and detract from what you're pushing is a professional view.

Secondly, you naturally move into the collectivism and mass generalizations of 'groups' of thinkers. This is not how truth should be conveyed and leads others to believe that you are merely disinformation or this or that. Leave the personal agenda out of it, some of us are interested in learning and do not have the time/money to dedicate to pursuing it independently.

And what's with the '.' at the end of every post... I get the intent, but every post?

Thx for the interesting arguments, you was were well mannered during the attack.

Some people think they all have it figured out when it comes to the universe but little do they no that something that come bit them in where the sun doesn't shine.

But we have facts! but the real facts is that we have only a pebble amount of information about the universe.

So a big Electric comet, why not.

Cheers.

glauco OWNING the shills. first rate.

or it may exceed them spectacularly.

§ 132a StGB - Mißbrauch von Titeln, Berufsbezeichnungen und Abzeichen
(German criminal code, § 132a - Misuse of (academic and aristocratic) titles, job titles and badges)

:)

.

it is kinda odd that this commet is going to do exactly what nibru was suposed to do last year
at the very least it is very perculiar

Myans date calculations were out by a year apparently, all you have to do is post a thread with the name ISON in it and it's like berley to the shrills hehe

Year zero'd