Become a contributing writer to GLP | |
SteveWutabi User ID: 1210803 United States 03/10/2013 07:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
plouf User ID: 1138594 United States 03/10/2013 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MHz User ID: 34243878 Canada 03/10/2013 08:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For instance the expanding earth theory is 'debunked by science' without using science to show it is possible. Seems more like a fishing expedition where they take the letters and use the concepts to come up with some new explanation they will benefit from in a materialistic way and the sender gets a nod of the head, maybe it will just pretend to blackhole the post. If I introduced the subject of bomb damage and then looked at the data from the assassination that the STL is based on could the 'community' buck the system and say it was a missile strike and not a truck bomb as is the currently promoted one. PS I agree with the other poster GLP should be changed so it doesn't conflict with this site. If people need those instructions do you think they should even be writing scientific shit? Last Edited by MHz on 03/10/2013 08:36 AM |