Sandy Hook shooting PREDICTED in 2010

If it is, it's pretty damn heiness.

PAY ATTENTION GUYS...

The link to the page was: showthread.php?3417-Obama-use-school-shooting-to-disarm-Ameri​ca.

The "3417" is an id. The very first message thread however long ago was a number much smaller than that...

For example the thread here: showthread.php?55-Welcome-to-Unforumzed!-Please-post-your-com​ments-or-questions-here

Has an id of 55.... it was started on 06-15-2010, 12:27 PM

Let's look at some more:
[link to www.unforumzed.com]

Has an id of 3312, started on 11-04-2012, 08:04 PM

showthread.php?1895-The-All-Purpose-Bitch-About-Dots-Reputati​on-Points-Thread

Han an id of 1895, started on 04-23-2011, 06:34 PM

See the theme here?? The id of the thread increases as time increases...

So lets again look at the original thread:

showthread.php?3417-Obama-use-school-shooting-to-disarm-Ameri​ca.

3417 is the id... thus looking at the ids above it falls after 11-04-2012...

This is all misconstrued... someone was trying to make a point that the dates could be altered, but thread ids, certainly can't... it is the unique identifier and anyone who knows databases knows that it can't be altered...

so you ask how did I find this out?? I didn't! I read it on that site:

drseussofporn:
Yeah . . . there was some timestamp manipulation here. If you look at the thread, the ID is 3417. Around that time, all other thread IDs were in the low to mid 1000's. Nice try though.

Ryan:
Yeah, it was done to prove to a Sandy Hook truther here on our forum that not everything "timestamped" on the internet is accurate. Things can be manipulated. But I guess that was lost on some people...

sorry to burst everyone's bubble...

Yep this could be the end game of what is currently transpiring in nk.

You're a little slow on the trigger pull, aren't ya fella?

The date field of the post cannot be manipulated by the poster. Let me repeat myself --- the date field of a thread cannot be manipulated by the poster. Get it? Neither can the ID of a thread. Anyone who says it can be done then prove it here.

So that leaves only one other option aside from it being real, and that is that the forum administrators (or whoever has access to the server) changed the date and manipulated that thread. I can believe that. But as Superbowl Dave points out, if they did this for traffic and attention then why shut their site down to new members?

Bro, no reason to sy "fella", we are having a civil conversation... I hope this is right, it would be amazing! However there is a huge problem here... I understand that a user can't change a date stamp, but an admin or whoever runs that site can, and the post from that guy Ryan on that site says,"Yeah, it was done to prove to a Sandy Hook truther here on our forum that not everything "timestamped" on the internet is accurate. Things can be manipulated. But I guess that was lost on some people..."

The id of the thread makes no sense... you cannot explain and no one else here can explain how the id of that thread, 3417 is way way higher than all the posts from 2010 and in fact is in the range of all the posts from 2013!

This thread is also from 2010... so are the "debunkers" claiming that this thread was manipulated as well?

Is everything which pokes holes in their view of the world just being "manipulated"?

But how do you account for the Google timestamp of when the page was indexed on Dec 17, 2010?

[link to www.google.com (secure)]

I agree with you... it seems like #2 from your list but your questions are valid... was the post totally fabricated? was it a true post and only the dates were modified?? Its just weird, but I am fairly certain that exact page of posts wasn't from Dec 2010... I am pissed off cause at first I was thoroughly astonished...

Bro, no reason to sy "fella", we are having a civil conversation... I hope this is right, it would be amazing! However there is a huge problem here... I understand that a user can't change a date stamp, but an admin or whoever runs that site can, and the post from that guy Ryan on that site says,"Yeah, it was done to prove to a Sandy Hook truther here on our forum that not everything "timestamped" on the internet is accurate. Things can be manipulated. But I guess that was lost on some people..."

The id of the thread makes no sense... you cannot explain and no one else here can explain how the id of that thread, 3417 is way way higher than all the posts from 2010 and in fact is in the range of all the posts from 2013!


Sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying.

So the thread was manipulated to show how thread timestamps can be manipulated OR that the Google search timestamp can be manipulated?

That's where I'm unsure.

I don't know how you'd alter a Google timestamp even if the date on the thread is Dec 17, 2010. I posted articles with one date and then they get indexed a few days later and the timestamp is on the date they were indexed, not the date of the article.

No in the link I gave. That is a search for that thread and it comes up with a Google timestamp of Dec 17, 2010.

people dont realize that when you move a posted thread to a different part of a forum, it generates a new server entry identification.

That's my point. The thread on that forum with an ID of 3417, which is supposedly recent, was indexed by Google on Dec 17, 2010 - the same date as the date in the postings.

shills be lurking, waiting, hoping





TOOOO BAD

The shills are regrouping.

now then, which tme period does the ammended thread id relate to? is it yesterday? i'm going to check.....

I cant believe non of you know about kathaksung, old internet legend, about as famous as John Titor. Search for the Kat Hak Sung manifesto.

It's very strange to me that all of the sudden there are claims to this "timestamp manipulation"..which never seemed to be an issue before. Are people really that bored to where they would go about changing times, to try and fool people? The comments below the forum are also a bit strange. I don't know, it doesn't particularly interest me, but it is a bit odd that I've never heard of timestamp manipulation ever before until this happened.

all the way back to thread 3399 is private

thread 3398 - 11th Jan 2013



thread 3417 - **OUR THREAD** private



thread 3418 - 16th January 2013


so thread id's 3399 through 3417 are all private.


hmmmm

It was moved to private 2 months ago in january between 9th and 16th jan. That could very well mean that the thread was bought to the attention of the MOD at this time who made the thread private. Just because someone stumbled on it yesterday does not alter anything.

i hope you understand the gist of what i am saying.

It really doesn't matter.

Sandy hook was faked by the the powers that be, period.

ok we are on to something

Timestamp manipulation must happen admin side of the server, or by being hacked. One cannot just "manipulate" whatever they choose.

Timestamp manipulation is just another term to throw off the sheeple, as they have NO CLUE how computers/servers/forums/etc work. Therefore, they won't question it either...


If a normal user can just get into Admin controls and "manipulate" the time, then somebody, please, show us an example. This has never, ever, ever, ever been talked about until people started to question that Victoria Soto page over on the facebook. Never.

It's just a lame excuse for people when they get backed into a corner with their beliefs of being wrong.

If this Kat Hak Sung was so crazy, they type so well while being utterly insane.

maybe one of the original posters in the thread remembered something? is there any way to contact any of them?

Skull and Bones connected to Sandy Hooked and much more at:
[link to douseewhateyec.blogspot.com]

It certainly does here.

It matters because it is hard proof of a pre planned massacre.