BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 990640 Malaysia 03/19/2013 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36505977 Germany 03/19/2013 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! I do not believe Putin will play footsies with the jews under the table, i think he wants to DO THEM. He had ancestors lost to the Bolsheviks, bears have long memories. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36416791 United Kingdom 03/19/2013 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! ... Quoting: Anderson_G everyone would be flattened there would be no victor an open war could not be contained The death and destruction would be staggering, but mutual assured destruction is a fairy tale. They can hit the centralized populations areas in China and the US but most of Russia and the rural US would be left virtually untouched in a thermonuclear exchange. Neither side has what it claims in destructive power. I hope we never have to find out if so I'd rather go in the blasts... The nuclear winter and thousands of years of radiation ala MAD MAX are all bullshit. Thermonuclear weapons don't leave much fallout at all and their destructive power is much more limited than what you have been led to believe. its not N part of NBC im worried about |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1673157 Canada 03/19/2013 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36480809 Belgium 03/19/2013 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! |
hillybilly~deluxe User ID: 31781644 United States 03/19/2013 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MHz User ID: 34243878 Canada 03/19/2013 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! Let me guess, it just happens to be solved by the US and Israel getting paid by the UN to run armed drones in hunting and killing the 'bad terrorists' while protecting the 'good terrorists' from having to face the people of Syria on a face by face situation. If Damascus says it wasn't their aircraft that entered Lebanese territory the other day then it only leaves one alternative and was it a drone or a fighter? Israel already set the rule, if a threat is across a political border it means use the sneak approach. By right Syria should be able to take out the runway they used for the mission and no retaliation could be done without ending up posing in the ICC. It will be the slaughter of the witnesses just like the opening shot in Mali against the rebels they used in Libya. Kill their own captured spy and all his jailers was also on the 'to do list'. (just like the Iraq mess just this last month, get rid of all the witnesses) Hopefully the Syrian investigators have their own version of youtube as far as witnesses and confessions about events they saw) Have that data bank open to the 'out of work public' and they should be able to take it apart and sort fact from fiction that is put together in a easy to understand format so the Judges have no more information than that. Sound bites rather than printed text where the user picks what to quote and what isn't important to the issue. Say I stutter or something and voice chat would suck for me so I would have my own vocal alphabet on file so my typing was converted into a voice that is known to me mine and that is how my replies would be made in a vocal discussion room. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! ... Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1340984 The death and destruction would be staggering, but mutual assured destruction is a fairy tale. They can hit the centralized populations areas in China and the US but most of Russia and the rural US would be left virtually untouched in a thermonuclear exchange. Neither side has what it claims in destructive power. I hope we never have to find out if so I'd rather go in the blasts... The nuclear winter and thousands of years of radiation ala MAD MAX are all bullshit. Thermonuclear weapons don't leave much fallout at all and their destructive power is much more limited than what you have been led to believe. its not N part of NBC im worried about Again, the effectiveness of these weapons is far more limited than the media has led you to believe. How do I know? I've read the damned tech material first hand. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36416791 United Kingdom 03/19/2013 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! That and London and Tel aviv and I have a feeling a lot of the trouble would evaporate overnight. I also think we need to remove the UN from US soil and get the fuck out of NATO and the Jew-N you do know that UN was estb in USA same with NATO |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! That and London and Tel aviv and I have a feeling a lot of the trouble would evaporate overnight. I also think we need to remove the UN from US soil and get the fuck out of NATO and the Jew-N you do know that UN was estb in USA same with NATO Yeah, to make us the scapegoats when it's really Europe behind it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9014106 Australia 03/19/2013 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! I'm trying to understand here.. Chemical Weapons is the line red - NATO will become actively involved in assisting the side that uses chemical weapons in order that terrorism is further spread? Is this what all the 'hooha' is about?? There is some policy that genocide 'is good' and needs international support? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36416791 United Kingdom 03/19/2013 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! The nuclear winter and thousands of years of radiation ala MAD MAX are all bullshit. Thermonuclear weapons don't leave much fallout at all and their destructive power is much more limited than what you have been led to believe. its not N part of NBC im worried about Again, the effectiveness of these weapons is far more limited than the media has led you to believe. How do I know? I've read the damned tech material first hand. you have read manuals for bio and chem warfare ? I haves US doctrines/ manuals on NBC myself |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36480809 Belgium 03/19/2013 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36505878 United Kingdom 03/19/2013 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
zvezda 1 User ID: 36439935 Bulgaria 03/19/2013 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MHz User ID: 34243878 Canada 03/19/2013 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! That and London and Tel aviv and I have a feeling a lot of the trouble would evaporate overnight. I also think we need to remove the UN from US soil and get the fuck out of NATO and the Jew-N Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1340984 It could almost be a digital building in this day and age where video conferencing is how 98% of the business is done. All the evidence in any trial is open to public viewing as it is when the Lawyers share what they find, by the time the actual trial covers it it has been gone over thy the 'audience' that had 3B viewers worldwide, all with a thumbs up or down button and a question box to explain why. $4 each time you do it just cause the Rothschild bankers are paying the tab. lol (in part) Syria's opposition will not enter into dialogue with the regime of President Bashar Assad, the country's newly elected rebel prime minister said Tuesday in his inaugural speech. "We confirm to the great Syrian people that there will be no dialogue with the Assad regime," Ghassan Hitto said. Hitto was chosen early Tuesday by a majority of the main opposition National Coalition members, after hours of closed-door consultations. The 50-year-old will be tasked with setting up an interim government which would be based in rebel-held territory in Syria. [link to www.naharnet.com] In an instance like this the UN would end up doing nothing as a veto would be used. Let the 5 stay as security and take away their right to vote on any issues that comes up that might require military intervention, one on a very limited budget so they won't be all gung ho to solve things through war. The verdict would be arrived at by one vote per UN member where alliances of more than one nation means combined they get one vote only. Not perfect but better than we have today. Last Edited by MHz on 03/19/2013 05:26 PM |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! Just to give you an accurate idea of the actual scale of destruction of a 20 megaton thermonuclear warhead (about the max usable), if you are within a five mile radius of the detonation and not well below ground, you will be incinerated. at a 10 mile radius the damaging effects fall off logarithmically, that is 1/10 what they were at 5 miles, most would survive with burns and some degree of acute radiation sickness.. At 20 miles out you can stand and watch and be relatively unaffected, so long as you avoid the pressure wave. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25765737 Netherlands 03/19/2013 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! ... Quoting: Anderson_G everyone would be flattened there would be no victor an open war could not be contained The death and destruction would be staggering, but mutual assured destruction is a fairy tale. They can hit the centralized populations areas in China and the US but most of Russia and the rural US would be left virtually untouched in a thermonuclear exchange. Neither side has what it claims in destructive power. I hope we never have to find out if so I'd rather go in the blasts... The nuclear winter and thousands of years of radiation ala MAD MAX are all bullshit. Thermonuclear weapons don't leave much fallout at all and their destructive power is much more limited than what you have been led to believe. [link to www.businessinsider.com] And tell that to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki victims. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! ... Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1340984 The nuclear winter and thousands of years of radiation ala MAD MAX are all bullshit. Thermonuclear weapons don't leave much fallout at all and their destructive power is much more limited than what you have been led to believe. its not N part of NBC im worried about Again, the effectiveness of these weapons is far more limited than the media has led you to believe. How do I know? I've read the damned tech material first hand. you have read manuals for bio and chem warfare ? I haves US doctrines/ manuals on NBC myself Yes I have. Most of it works well in laboratory conditions but in the real world it isn't so easy. There are all sorts of factors effecting it. For instance weaponized anthrax can only survive in the environment for a maximum of two days and is non transmittable to others.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33464940 Canada 03/19/2013 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lime Flavoured Redux User ID: 36239413 United Kingdom 03/19/2013 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! Again, the effectiveness of these weapons is far more limited than the media has led you to believe. How do I know? I've read the damned tech material first hand. you have read manuals for bio and chem warfare ? I haves US doctrines/ manuals on NBC myself Yes I have. Most of it works well in laboratory conditions but in the real world it isn't so easy. There are all sorts of factors effecting it. For instance weaponized anthrax can only survive in the environment for a maximum of two days and is non transmittable to others.. I doubt anthrax is the main fear. Nerve gas is more of a likely weapon. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! ... Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1340984 The death and destruction would be staggering, but mutual assured destruction is a fairy tale. They can hit the centralized populations areas in China and the US but most of Russia and the rural US would be left virtually untouched in a thermonuclear exchange. Neither side has what it claims in destructive power. I hope we never have to find out if so I'd rather go in the blasts... The nuclear winter and thousands of years of radiation ala MAD MAX are all bullshit. Thermonuclear weapons don't leave much fallout at all and their destructive power is much more limited than what you have been led to believe. [link to www.businessinsider.com] And tell that to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki victims. You have to understand two things when analyzing the destruction an death in those two instances. They hit the most concentrated areas of people in a country that has a large population and a small land mass at a time when they knew they would be exposed and in a small radius(@ 1 mile), and two, it was different kind of weapon. Even so, being a fission bomb, the results of the fallout were quite minimal as to what was expected. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! ... Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1340984 Again, the effectiveness of these weapons is far more limited than the media has led you to believe. How do I know? I've read the damned tech material first hand. you have read manuals for bio and chem warfare ? I haves US doctrines/ manuals on NBC myself Yes I have. Most of it works well in laboratory conditions but in the real world it isn't so easy. There are all sorts of factors effecting it. For instance weaponized anthrax can only survive in the environment for a maximum of two days and is non transmittable to others.. I doubt anthrax is the main fear. Nerve gas is more of a likely weapon. That's why you should have a gas mask and several sealed filters for every person in your household. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25765737 Netherlands 03/19/2013 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! The nuclear winter and thousands of years of radiation ala MAD MAX are all bullshit. Thermonuclear weapons don't leave much fallout at all and their destructive power is much more limited than what you have been led to believe. [link to www.businessinsider.com] And tell that to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki victims. You have to understand two things when analyzing the destruction an death in those two instances. They hit the most concentrated areas of people in a country that has a large population and a small land mass at a time when they knew they would be exposed and in a small radius(@ 1 mile), and two, it was different kind of weapon. Even so, being a fission bomb, the results of the fallout were quite minimal as to what was expected. You forget Nuclear reactors that will be blown apart when nuclear weapons are used. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36416791 United Kingdom 03/19/2013 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! Just to give you an accurate idea of the actual scale of destruction of a 20 megaton thermonuclear warhead (about the max usable), if you are within a five mile radius of the detonation and not well below ground, you will be incinerated. at a 10 mile radius the damaging effects fall off logarithmically, that is 1/10 what they were at 5 miles, most would survive with burns and some degree of acute radiation sickness.. At 20 miles out you can stand and watch and be relatively unaffected, so long as you avoid the pressure wave. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1340984 I take it that you are considering the climate terrain altitude humidity and so on wind speed and direction type of structures and the way say the city is constructed your going on text book material |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! Did you ver wonder why they didn't just hit Tokyo and get it over with? Why did they do it when Japan was suing for peace anyway? IT WAS A TEST. That's right, they wanted to test the weapons and demonstrate to the world the destructive power, so they chose two cities they knew had large concentrations of people in tiny areas to maximize casualties. It was all entertrainment. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1340984 United States 03/19/2013 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BRKG; Commander: NATO makes plans for involvement in Syria!! Intervention in Syria!! Obama; chemical attack would be a game-changer! Just to give you an accurate idea of the actual scale of destruction of a 20 megaton thermonuclear warhead (about the max usable), if you are within a five mile radius of the detonation and not well below ground, you will be incinerated. at a 10 mile radius the damaging effects fall off logarithmically, that is 1/10 what they were at 5 miles, most would survive with burns and some degree of acute radiation sickness.. At 20 miles out you can stand and watch and be relatively unaffected, so long as you avoid the pressure wave. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1340984 I take it that you are considering the climate terrain altitude humidity and so on wind speed and direction type of structures and the way say the city is constructed your going on text book material There is a a maximum effective altitude of course, but all of the other things you mention MITIGATE not ATTENUATE the destructive power. |