COMET C2012/S1 ISON : COMA/TAIL OF OVER 64,400 KM [UPDATE]

Indeed, all he provides is blind faith. It's a religion of anti-science. Like so many, it demands that the believer actively avoid looking at any evidence that would contradict it. Anyway, I'm off to go look at more evidence that contradicts kooky bullshit.

Good, read and then we discuss.
1) incorrect axiom #1 states that there is only gravity governing the cosmos AND MORE IMPORTANTLY that outer space is universally electrically neutral

also, yes but not the only one.



.

Physics, Astronomy. MANY axioms in both disciplines.



.

They have made a living off axioms.



Useful idiots will follow them no matter what they say.

He is an Ad hominem like astro



Let me go into the bowels of this thread and find another example.




Ah yes the bitchass comedian.

Then somewhere astroboys only response to that was a link to some mainstream science shill wesbite where you have to be a member to even read the gay article.

She wants to discuss the meaning of the word axiom, I want to discuss the axioms itself. If I'm presenting them, for sure I know what an axiom is. So to keep the focus, let's talk about the four axioms and later we discuss the meaning of the word. You guys move the focus all the time.

People like you are simply illogical. You introduce a topic science related but when someone discusses the topic on a scientific level all you can do is insult. Either discuss on a scientific level or STFU.

Where did this little piece of shit AC come from?

Is that Astro?


Maybe you should read the statement I made then see the comedians response, now read what you just wrote.


contradict much?

3) incorrect axiom #3 states that comets were thought to be dirty snow balls that "melt" (sublimate) when near the sun


"That is not incorrect. Comets were (you used the past tense) once thought to be dirty snowballs. That is not the current view."






1:41*


:lulz:



Should I bother going through the rest for you?

An Axioms is an unquestionable universal truth, and may be the bases of arguments or theories. It is very used in Physics and Math,

1) incorrect axiom #1 states that there is only gravity governing the cosmos AND MORE IMPORTANTLY that outer space is universally electrically neutral;

2) incorrect axiom #2 states that the solar system began all at one time 4.5 billion years ago

3) incorrect axiom #3 states that comets were thought to be dirty snow balls that "melt" (sublimate) when near the sun

4) incorrect axiom #4 states that the cause of galactic red shifts is due to movement

Love for what?

Actually I'm having some constipation ultimately.

Credibility =D ?? It is enough for me to have credibility in my family. I'm just a poor Latin American guy.

Well, you and your pals do that with me all the time.

Last night I had to prove to a crioulo I'm really a Brazilian.

You are incapable.

Just because one video may say something it does not mean it is the accepted view. Read the current scientific literature and the concept of "dirty snowball" is considered an old concept.

You are incapable.

Just because one video may say something it does not mean it is the accepted view. Read the current scientific literature and the concept of "dirty snowball" is considered an old concept.

3) incorrect axiom #3 states that comets were thought to be dirty snow balls that "melt" (sublimate) when near the sun
Quoting: glauco

Not an axiom. -"halcyon"


Axiom def,

An axiom, or postulate, is a premise or starting point of reasoning. As classically conceived, an axiom is a premise so evident as to be accepted as true without controversy.

Nope, that is nasa's standard model.

The dirty snowball.


You are relieved of your position shill.

3) incorrect axiom #3 states that comets were thought to be dirty snow balls that "melt" (sublimate) when near the sun
Quoting: glauco

Not an axiom. -"halcyon"


Axiom def,

An axiom, or postulate, is a premise or starting point of reasoning. As classically conceived, an axiom is a premise so evident as to be accepted as true without controversy.





Endless circles of how stupid you people truly are.

Nope.

The Complex Evolution of Comet Nuclei: Evidence from Deep Impact and Stardust-NExT

Veverka, J.; Stardust-NExT Science Team

American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2011,

Abstract
Spacecraft exploration of comets is revealing that far from being dirty snowballs that have changed little since their formation 4.6 billion years ago, many comet nuclei have undergone complex evolution. Observations of 9P/Tempel 1 made by Deep Impact (DI) in 2005 and Stardust-NExT (SN) in 2011 provide evidence for diverse geologic processes including the formation of layered structures, the episodic eruption of materials from the interior onto the surface, the formation of pit-like depressions and scarps by sublimation of volatiles, etc. A significant fraction of Tempel 1's activity appears to be associated with the back-wasting of scarps. Scarps on the comet display a variety of morphologies. Comparisons of DI and SN images reveal that the rate of scarp retreat varies from place to place. These observations point to differences in composition and/or texture of surface materials.

1) incorrect axiom #1 states that there is only gravity governing the cosmos AND MORE IMPORTANTLY that outer space is universally electrically neutral;
Dark Matter is the best example I may expose for this axiom. This was created some decades ago because they realized that the galactic arms are simetric. But these arms stretchs long way out of the galactic nucleous, where there are no gravity to do the simetry. So they created the Dark Matter, which states that more then 97% of the matter of the Universe are made of, and this is the responsible to create the galactic arms.

This because they do not consider anything then gravity as formative forces in the cosmos. I personaly don't understand why do we have so gravitational effects in this dark matter, but things gravitates only around "white matter". Do you see the axiom here?


2) incorrect axiom #2 states that the solar system began all at one time 4.5 billion years ago
A good example here are the moons and planets spreaded all around the Solar System. The formative process should keep all the bodies in the Solar System turning in the same direction, the clockwise direction. But Uranus do his way in the counter-clockwise direction, and each moon in the Solar System do his own way.
Also, Venus is too hot and have too much active volcanoes to have 4.5bi years. It is clearly in its formative process.
Also, all the geological process like mountain building must start only after the formative process because astronomers claims that nothing existed before. Can you see the axiom here?

3) incorrect axiom #3 states that comets were thought to be dirty snow balls that "melt" (sublimate) when near the sun
We have had five or seven flybys to comets, and none shows any trace of ice in the nucleous, only water in the coma and tail. An axiom example here is comet Lovejoy which the astronomers claims that have only 400m of icy-rock nucleous, but survived for hours in an environment of 2mi degrees Celsius. The axiom were very clear when they had to explain how could ice balls turns into hard cristal inside pockets inside the nucleous of the comet to avoid him to brake itself in parts. This is a magical ice that got stronger after being warmed. But they do not explain how this thing did not melted to his molecules, as any thing so little as this nucleous should do in a so high temperature. This comet got even bigger after passing to this inferno, like a cosmic phoenix. Can you see the axiom here?

4) incorrect axiom #4 states that the cause of galactic red shifts is due to movement (they failed to realize there is another source of red shift ... the induced electric dipole red shift) and they incorrectly concluded that the universe must be expanding.
This last one remains due to the sacred Big Bang theory and the first axiom that states that there is no electricity in outer space, so no redshift should occur due to this, correct? See how cyclic is this one? Can you see the axiom here?

So mainstream science got that wrong, and still follow their model according to this day?


What else do you suppose is just made up bullshit for money?


astroboy was smart to bounce when he did.

So mainstream science got that wrong, and still follow their model according to this day?

So mainstream science got that wrong, and still follow their model according to this day?

It is polite to source your quotes, sir.

[link to www.jmccanneyscience.com]

McCanney's ideas are adored by Young Earth Creationists, but not too many scientists. He's been at this for years, and his Planet-X stuff has pretty much been destroyed along with Nancy Lieder's.

[link to www.badastronomy.com]
[link to www.badastronomy.com]
[link to planet-x.150m.com]

The following are the true axioms of astrophysics:

1. The universality of physical laws - physical laws are the same throughout the universe
2. The cosmological principle: On large spatial scales, the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic.
3. The Copernican principle: named after Nicolaus Copernicus, states the Earth is not in a central, specially favored position.
4. The Principle of equivalence - There is no way of distinguishing between the effects on an observer of a uniform gravitational field and of constant acceleration
5. The correspondence principle - The behavior of systems described by the theory of quantum mechanics reproduces classical physics in the limit of large quantum numbers

You and the high priests of science are wrong.

[link to www.badastronomy.com]

"The Sun is a big ball of gas"

Really? next

[link to www.badastronomy.com]

"The Sun is a big ball of gas"

Really? next



I mean it is a step up from it being a big piece of coal burning in the sky.

However a turd is still a turd and you are wrong.

You and the high priests of science are wrong.