After Boston, lawmakers see case for use of drones to kill Americans | |
AmbyrJayde (OP) User ID: 35022827 United States 04/25/2013 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "I've never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on," Paul said. "If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash … I don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him." why would he need to be killed, wouldn't you want to apprehend him? |
AmbyrJayde (OP) User ID: 35022827 United States 04/25/2013 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AmbyrJayde (OP) User ID: 35022827 United States 04/25/2013 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27708153 United States 04/25/2013 11:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "I've never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on," Paul said. "If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash … I don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him." Quoting: AmbyrJayde why would he need to be killed, wouldn't you want to apprehend him? Thats an extremely dangerous attitude Paul has. I knew during the fake 'filibuster' that Paul was actually and actively paving the way FOR drone strikes in America, not against them. Very few people here understood that point at the time, and many fools actually praised him. |
AmbyrJayde (OP) User ID: 35022827 United States 04/25/2013 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "I've never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on," Paul said. "If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash … I don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him." Quoting: AmbyrJayde why would he need to be killed, wouldn't you want to apprehend him? Thats an extremely dangerous attitude Paul has. I knew during the fake 'filibuster' that Paul was actually and actively paving the way FOR drone strikes in America, not against them. Very few people here understood that point at the time, and many fools actually praised him. yes yes it is |
indiandave User ID: 27213312 United States 04/25/2013 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "I've never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on," Paul said. "If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash … I don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him." Quoting: AmbyrJayde why would he need to be killed, wouldn't you want to apprehend him? A drone strike would also destroy the liquor store and probably kill the owner and any workers. Can he be serious? |
AmbyrJayde (OP) User ID: 35022827 United States 04/25/2013 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "I've never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on," Paul said. "If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash … I don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him." Quoting: AmbyrJayde why would he need to be killed, wouldn't you want to apprehend him? A drone strike would also destroy the liquor store and probably kill the owner and any workers. Can he be serious? I certainly hope not, but I guess if it gets rid of the bad guys everything else would just be collateral damage. |
AmbyrJayde (OP) User ID: 35022827 United States 04/25/2013 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
indiandave User ID: 27213312 United States 04/25/2013 01:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AmbyrJayde (OP) User ID: 35022827 United States 04/25/2013 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oengus User ID: 12527214 United States 04/25/2013 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |