NASA Swamp Gas Photo | |
Weasel Keeper User ID: 38966922 ![]() 04/27/2013 11:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/27/2013 11:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weasel Keeper User ID: 38966922 ![]() 04/27/2013 11:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a scratch on the photo, just like dozens of scratches all over it, look again. Quoting: Weasel Keeper Not the white marks, try again. Yes it is, what color do you think paper is? Do you really not see the object I'm talking about? Look again and the object is not white. "we all need a helping hand, at the same time giving two to help" - me |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38577984 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12762865 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a scratch on the photo, just like dozens of scratches all over it, look again. Quoting: Weasel Keeper Not the white marks, try again. Yes it is, what color do you think paper is? Do you really not see the object I'm talking about? Look again and the object is not white. grey dot with grey scratch under it? |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do you really not see the object I'm talking about? Look again and the object is not white. grey dot with grey scratch under it? No, the giant brown/black object. "we all need a helping hand, at the same time giving two to help" - me |
Weasel Keeper User ID: 38966922 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weasel Keeper User ID: 38966922 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see it now, that is where the film was clipped when it was hung up to dry, there's even a scratch on the top of it where the clip bit into the paper. Quoting: Weasel Keeper You understand it is a digital image right? That was not a digital image, hence the scratches, and of course the CLIP MARK gives it away, how do you scratch a digital image? Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me! |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see it now, that is where the film was clipped when it was hung up to dry, there's even a scratch on the top of it where the clip bit into the paper. Quoting: Weasel Keeper You understand it is a digital image right? That was not a digital image, hence the scratches, and of course the CLIP MARK gives it away, how do you scratch a digital image? The lens? And then why is there not the same mark on any other photos? Surly they made that mistake before, if it happened with this one. "we all need a helping hand, at the same time giving two to help" - me |
Weasel Keeper User ID: 38966922 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see it now, that is where the film was clipped when it was hung up to dry, there's even a scratch on the top of it where the clip bit into the paper. Quoting: Weasel Keeper You understand it is a digital image right? That was not a digital image, hence the scratches, and of course the CLIP MARK gives it away, how do you scratch a digital image? The lens? And then why is there not the same mark on any other photos? Surly they made that mistake before, if it happened with this one. That's an old photograph that was scratched up before it was digitized, there's even artifacts from the developer solution, meaning it was dirty when the photo was processed, anyone that has worked in film processing will tell you the same. Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me! |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That was not a digital image, hence the scratches, and of course the CLIP MARK gives it away, how do you scratch a digital image? The lens? And then why is there not the same mark on any other photos? Surly they made that mistake before, if it happened with this one. That's an old photograph that was scratched up before it was digitized, there's even artifacts from the developer solution, meaning it was dirty when the photo was processed, anyone that has worked in film processing will tell you the same. You mean the 2 dark lines on the right edge? The ones that are in all the photos before and after this photo, in the same place? Keep trying. This is getting funny. "we all need a helping hand, at the same time giving two to help" - me |
MadMatt User ID: 30619939 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7803168 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Weasel Keeper That was not a digital image, hence the scratches, and of course the CLIP MARK gives it away, how do you scratch a digital image? The lens? And then why is there not the same mark on any other photos? Surly they made that mistake before, if it happened with this one. That's an old photograph that was scratched up before it was digitized, there's even artifacts from the developer solution, meaning it was dirty when the photo was processed, anyone that has worked in film processing will tell you the same. You mean the 2 dark lines on the right edge? The ones that are in all the photos before and after this photo, in the same place? Keep trying. This is getting funny. ![]() Clip bit the paper. Developers solution. Lol wtf! |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weasel Keeper User ID: 38966922 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Weasel Keeper That was not a digital image, hence the scratches, and of course the CLIP MARK gives it away, how do you scratch a digital image? The lens? And then why is there not the same mark on any other photos? Surly they made that mistake before, if it happened with this one. That's an old photograph that was scratched up before it was digitized, there's even artifacts from the developer solution, meaning it was dirty when the photo was processed, anyone that has worked in film processing will tell you the same. You mean the 2 dark lines on the right edge? The ones that are in all the photos before and after this photo, in the same place? Keep trying. This is getting funny. Those dark lines are pieces of hair or fiber that got stuck inside the camera when the lenses were last changed, it happened to me on occasion when switching between different focal length lenses, those hairs or fibers will leave a shadow on every photo in the same place until the lens is removed and cleaned. Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me! |
#Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 38995318 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are you talking about the scratch in the image? Last Edited by #Geomagnetic_Storm# on 04/28/2013 12:57 AM |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Oengus The lens? And then why is there not the same mark on any other photos? Surly they made that mistake before, if it happened with this one. That's an old photograph that was scratched up before it was digitized, there's even artifacts from the developer solution, meaning it was dirty when the photo was processed, anyone that has worked in film processing will tell you the same. You mean the 2 dark lines on the right edge? The ones that are in all the photos before and after this photo, in the same place? Keep trying. This is getting funny. Those dark lines are pieces of hair or fiber that got stuck inside the camera when the lenses were last changed, it happened to me on occasion when switching between different focal length lenses, those hairs or fibers will leave a shadow on every photo in the same place until the lens is removed and cleaned. So what are you saying the developer solution is? The darker blue hue in the bottom right corner? "we all need a helping hand, at the same time giving two to help" - me |
Weasel Keeper User ID: 38966922 ![]() 04/28/2013 01:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Weasel Keeper That's an old photograph that was scratched up before it was digitized, there's even artifacts from the developer solution, meaning it was dirty when the photo was processed, anyone that has worked in film processing will tell you the same. You mean the 2 dark lines on the right edge? The ones that are in all the photos before and after this photo, in the same place? Keep trying. This is getting funny. Those dark lines are pieces of hair or fiber that got stuck inside the camera when the lenses were last changed, it happened to me on occasion when switching between different focal length lenses, those hairs or fibers will leave a shadow on every photo in the same place until the lens is removed and cleaned. So what are you saying the developer solution is? The darker blue hue in the bottom right corner? When dust or dirt particles get into the solution they will leave artifacts, "birdseye" is the term we use in the printing and photo industry, they're the little defects in the photo some look like an eye spot, some are just a "glop", they're all over the pic you posted. Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me! |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 01:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Oengus You mean the 2 dark lines on the right edge? The ones that are in all the photos before and after this photo, in the same place? Keep trying. This is getting funny. Those dark lines are pieces of hair or fiber that got stuck inside the camera when the lenses were last changed, it happened to me on occasion when switching between different focal length lenses, those hairs or fibers will leave a shadow on every photo in the same place until the lens is removed and cleaned. So what are you saying the developer solution is? The darker blue hue in the bottom right corner? When dust or dirt particles get into the solution they will leave artifacts, "birdseye" is the term we use in the printing and photo industry, they're the little defects in the photo some look like an eye spot, some are just a "glop", they're all over the pic you posted. NASA develops digital images from ISS at a horrible quality, then scans them back to a digital image to upload to their server. Why not print it with a high quality ink printer, then scan them back to a digital image? Best argument ever. NASA is going to steal this one. ![]() "we all need a helping hand, at the same time giving two to help" - me |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38864142 ![]() 04/28/2013 01:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 01:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weasel Keeper User ID: 38966922 ![]() 04/28/2013 02:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Weasel Keeper Those dark lines are pieces of hair or fiber that got stuck inside the camera when the lenses were last changed, it happened to me on occasion when switching between different focal length lenses, those hairs or fibers will leave a shadow on every photo in the same place until the lens is removed and cleaned. So what are you saying the developer solution is? The darker blue hue in the bottom right corner? When dust or dirt particles get into the solution they will leave artifacts, "birdseye" is the term we use in the printing and photo industry, they're the little defects in the photo some look like an eye spot, some are just a "glop", they're all over the pic you posted. NASA develops digital images from ISS at a horrible quality, then scans them back to a digital image to upload to their server. Why not print it with a high quality ink printer, then scan them back to a digital image? Best argument ever. NASA is going to steal this one. ![]() I don't know where you got the picture from, but it definitely wasn't digital, they probably came from the early space shuttle missions, because that was definitely an old photo that was scanned and posted without being cleaned up. Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38864142 ![]() 04/28/2013 02:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 02:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Oengus So what are you saying the developer solution is? The darker blue hue in the bottom right corner? When dust or dirt particles get into the solution they will leave artifacts, "birdseye" is the term we use in the printing and photo industry, they're the little defects in the photo some look like an eye spot, some are just a "glop", they're all over the pic you posted. NASA develops digital images from ISS at a horrible quality, then scans them back to a digital image to upload to their server. Why not print it with a high quality ink printer, then scan them back to a digital image? Best argument ever. NASA is going to steal this one. ![]() I don't know where you got the picture from, but it definitely wasn't digital, they probably came from the early space shuttle missions, because that was definitely an old photo that was scanned and posted without being cleaned up. You got the image number in the link, look it up. "we all need a helping hand, at the same time giving two to help" - me |
Oengus (OP) User ID: 12527214 ![]() 04/28/2013 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38802311 ![]() 04/28/2013 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |