Sandy hook.....How is this possible unless it was FAKE!

Here is another one for you dumb-dumb

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

More science to disprove you theorists.

lol, this is crazy and proves nothing.

Oh, duh! Why didn't I think of that! Obviously!

American ensalvement is the goal. Can't figure out how they are doing it, only look at the end result. Lessons can be learned by the Russian Revolution how it was hijacked by the Russian Jewish Bolshevicks who killed millions.

I can't understand you nutjobs...

For being a professional set... If it's true, it is the laziest, most unprofessional, professional set... with some of the BEST actors in the world apparently.

The tags? People where tags... If everyone is involved, then why the hell is it a tag here... and a tag there. More are tagless than tagged, and all the tags are completely different; shapes, sizes, print, colors (not siding with the theorist... I'm saying, they aren't related)

What we want you to think;

" hey, person I know sitting in the car, we found <insert beloved family member>. Everything is ok."

What "we" know it means:

"that's a wrap crew. It's miller time"

Wear*... Hate spelling errors.

I agree with this ^

Doesn't get any better than that. 5*'s

^^ Dumb Dumb

Lmao!! Why make it so complicated?? How about, it isn't the same area at all so this is totally inaccurate. This has nothing to do with geometrical optics. A little less optics and a bit more common sense can go a long way.

I was skeptic and watched the first video multiple times.
i wasn't exactly sure what he was communicating...

butOK. That did it for me.
When the video panned out you can clearly see them all going back into the building and coming out again.

that's some fucked up shit, right there!

watch in full screen... just watch.

^^ Another dumb-dumb

maybe too complicate for you....

but really there is 1 video
[link to www.youtube.com]
and 1 wiki page
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

i am sure you could understand.

Excellent , I know where your coming from as every SH video I saw was taken down within an hour , removed by user . Sorry to see what they've done to your PC , cunts .

people actually think this wasn't a staged event? lmao

anyway the burden of proof lays with the accusers, isn't that the law? The accusers here are the authorities and they've haven't shown 1 piece of credible evidence against the accused, Adam Lanza

prove to me it actually happened the way authorities claim shills..u cant

I don't know not really, but that has to be a studio, because you can't have a back ground outside, with a disappearing policeman over and over again.

I will remember quite a few years ago, went Clinton was president, that the technology had been created so they could place anyone somewhere they aren't and people would not be able to tell the difference. That is not true for everyone.

I watched the first time they used it, Blair was in two places at the same time.

I dunno.

In the clip he showed at the beginning, the wall of the building on the left was smooth.

On the google maps one, the wall of the building was composed of horizontal beams (whatever they're called).

Are we absolutely sure that really is "the exact same spot"? Maybe it is and the clip just wasn't clear enough to show the detail of the wall, but they look like different buildings.

Also, I have a quick question for those who believe Sandy Hook was a complete fake as in no guns fired, no children dead, et cetera.

Wouldn't it be easier for the powers that be to just go in with real guns loaded with real bullets and kill real people? Wouldn't that be a hell of a lot easier to do and all but eliminate any chances of it being exposed?

I can certainly understand those who think it was a false flag, and I can also understand why people think the behavior of the family and other inconsistencies are strange, but I can't think of one good reason why the powers that be would completely fake (special effects, green screens, actors, no one really hurt) the event when it would be infinitely easier, effective, and safer (for TPTB) to actually carry out the deed and forgo all the shit necessary to put together a hoax of this scale.

I'm genuinely curious what you guys think their motivation for FAKING (vs false flagging) would be? I like to explore theories of such events from all angles to form a better opinion.

Last Edited by KonspiracyKitty on 05/03/2013 02:13 AM

[youtube] [link to youtu.be]

classic

Great post. The people in the background of the "actors" are disproportionate. Their bodies are just as large, if not larger than the people in the foreground. This is physically impossible. Also, a skilled eye can tell by the demeanor and body language of the "actors" that they are illegitimate. The green screen section, and the firehouse circulation are just icing on the cake. The question that baffles me, is with so many people involved, how do they keep all of them from blowing the whistle. The link below is an interview of Niel Heslin that was on Piers Morgan. When i initially saw it live, I immediately perceived it as acting. Check it out for yourself. I believe this is at least faked to a certain degree, if not completely faked. If so, I hope everyone involved gets what they deserve.

Thread: Piers Morgan interview Sandy Hook father Niel Heslin. Looks like an actor to me. Whats your thoughts??

Good explanation...

Except that in the first video OP posted... the foreground AND the background are in perfect focus. which is impossible.

It's a GREEN SCREEN!

every1 wonders how they could pull this off, so many actors would cost a fortune..even if they are low budget actors lol obviously they are

just remember how much money they rake in everytime 1 of these takes place..sandy hook would've raised hundreds of millions of dollars in donations, easily enough to cover the boston project

dude you're retarded.

You can clearly see them coming out the back of the building and walking back&#65279; in via the front entrance street side. everyone going out and coming back in is strange in of itself. Normally people would sparse out in different directions. . . wouldn't they??

mmmm not perfect focus and it proves only that the cameraman have a very good lens.
with a big depth of field
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

how come no popular astrologers or psychics werent able to predict this event if it was sooooooo horrible?