What Wil Happen If Africans Realize WWIII Is Being Fought Over Who Controls Africa's Trade?

You Europeans,Americans Russians,Chinese and Arabs can now

tip toe around quietly hoping the Africans don't wake up and

notice.


:growlbear: "Bitch You Think This Shit Is A Game!?!"




"Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither."
Benjamin Franklin


"Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.....or we will have to give these jobs to Black guys".

Totally agree. There's more to be said, including about HIV. But I won't go there.

Rothschilds Zionist empire would collapse without Africa's resources. The fiat money scheme could not stand without Africa's commodities controlled by Foreigners.

they are too thick to know whats going on next door let alone worldwide - no need to 'destabilise' africa they fuckup anything on their own ! and what is not destroyed is stolen - thats the african culture

WWIV?

About a year ago, Bibi said "Our Great Prophet Moses, lead us out of bondage in Egypt (Africa), But he did not lead us to a place with many natural resources"

They will have to resort to selling dope, pimpin' hos and killing each other...

[link to www.troll.me]



"Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.....or we will have to give these jobs to Black guys".

Hey, lets build a city in an uninhabitable part of Africa

What happened to getting out of foreign countries and going home? IT doesn't apply when it comes to Africa because The West thinks of Africans and Africa as their property.

KONY2012!!!

Well, AFRICOM already has a base in Sub-Saharan Africa in Congo.

As for Al Qaeda, you are onto something. In order to get rid of Gaddafi, Western countries armed lots of riff raff rebels. Immediately after the war ended, those very arms ended up in the hands of Muslim extremist fighters in Mali. That's why the same Western powers rushed in to quell the rebellion. Basically, Al Qaeda almost took over an entire nation.

Is this a fight for resources? Of course it is. But the control of those resources has been in Western powers' hands. In the last couple of decades, Africans have been waking up. With the end of the Cold War, America found itself competing for the resources with a capitalist Russia and a growing China. China's investments in Africa now equal America's, dollar for dollar. However Chinese investments are more long term and will quickly outstrip America's. Africans no longer dish out their resources for free. This growing sense of self by Africans, coupled with an increasing sense of fairness in the Western population (leaders simply can't get away with crap for a long time) is dreaded by Western leaders.

Will this be the cause of WWIII? I doubt it. For one thing, the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Mali and now Syria have enabled Al-Qaeda to re-organize. Instead of being some underground low-tech Lone Ranger, other militant groups are coalescing around the ideal. Don't be fooled by Saudi Arabia. The main founders of fundamentalist Islam are believed to be the very people shaking hands with Western leaders all the time.

The Israel/Palestine problem will be the spark that lights the fire, IMO. All it takes is for one party to do some serious damage and the whole world will divide itself into alliances again.

Perhaps if there are all these natural disasters people seem to be fascinated by, Africa and especially Sub-Saharan Africa will become a factor. There will be a need for land to resettle people. The only real place with huge tracts of fertile, virgin land is Sub-Saharan Africa. Somehow I don't see that happening yet.

First respectfully,

WWIII started when Saddam was baited into invading Kuwait In operation Desert Shield. This didn't start with PNAC and the Neo cons. Which brings me to my next point. There is no distance between American Intelligence,Al Qaeda and Saudi Arabia .

Do you really think America would give heavy weapons to Al Qaeda in Syria if they did not have absolute control of them? After all didn't Al Qaeda blow up the World trade Center and aren't they supposed to be Americas mortal enemy? When did that change(rhetorical question).

There has never been a meaningful conflict between the West and the Arab's that I can find in history. The Arab's have worshiped the West back to the age of the Greek before there even was an Arab named Arab.

The Arab and the Western White Man have been partners from the beginning in the enslavement and exploitation of Africans and their resources.

I used to puzzle as to how the European was able to gain such a foot hold in Africa and why so Many Africans wer sold into slavery.

It was not technology because the Blacka Moors of Spain had access to and create alot of the tech that Europe used. The Blacka Moor invented the first rifle. It as called "Fire Stick" and yes Europeans perfected it and made it into the musket etc.

The way that Europe was able to subdue Africa was because of its partner the Arab a relationship mind you that is not openly chronicled in History books but remains discreet to this day.

Arab Muslims through their Imams in Africa instigated Jihads at the same time that Europe instigated slave markets. The attacks and counter attack among te Africans between the Muslim and the non Muslim weakened the Nations of Africa dramatically and the demand for War captives created by Europeans caused a war frenzy to break out to the point where Slavery became the main economy of the Majority of Africans.

Those who escalated Slave sales became far richer than those who refused and therefore they were able to buy more rifles from the Europeans and more goods as well.This caused them to dominate resulting in those bing dominated in war and being sold of to engage on Slavery of THEIR captives in order to match the weapons of THEIR slaving enemy and it severely weakened the Clans and Nations.

This was planned by the Arab and the European together.

Fast forward to today and the increase in Attacks by "Al Qaeda" and the picture become clear on the strategy to recolonize Africa when they are destabilized into accepting Africom. This will fail for several reason that it would take a while to go into.

Israel is a distraction and means nothing. It is a plot of dirt. Syria's ports are far more valuable than anything Israel has. Israel has a part in this but I will remain silent on that also.

The point is that we always hear how most Arabs LOVE America and that the fundamentalists are the minority. This is true. Most Arabs see whites as superior and worthy and Blacks as inferior and as slaves.

All of the Arabs policies toward Africa since they came to be known as Arabs in the 9th century have been to double cross Africans while dominating them with religion at the same time.

Al Qaeda is a cut out.

Once Africa was stunned by the destabilization of the 18th century one two punch of African Jihad on orders from the Arabs and Western instigation together they both have been hitting Africa with punch after punch so that it can never regroup: Colonization,Neocolonization,Jihad,Despotism,Debt,Aid,disease​,Reverse Agriculture(destroying the natural economies),pogroms,war,Apartheid.

These have been "punches" thrown in quick succession to exploit the labor and resources and instill a feeling of being unfavored by God in Africans. To use trauma based MK Ultra in a sense to make them feel like they must be inferior and incapable of running their own affairs without help.

this has been the work of the west and the Arab together with the Arab remaining in the shadows allowing it to appear as though the European must be an Super Man to be able to dominate a continent in this manner.

Together the Arab and the White Man have worked to utterly confound the Black Man in his own land.

I used to wonder why it was the Blacka Moor who ruled Spain for 700 years and wee loyal Muslims who was sold into slavery in the West once Spain fell.

Where were the Arab ally's come rushing in from North Africa and Arabia to help the Black Moor save his kingdom in Spain with its palaces,hanging gardens and opulent Mosques?

They were nowhere to be found. They stood by and cut a deal with the European. They cut and ran probably because they were actually jealous of the civilization that the African Blacka Moor who was the Arabs former Slave had built in Europe and North Africa.

So they have worked to systematically push Blacks out of North Africa since Spain fell.

This was again seen with the double cross of Qaddafi who was bringing Black Africans into North Africa and allowing them to work and marry. In a sense he was repatriating the African back into North Africa. The most damning par is that these Black Africans were ALL SUNNI Muslims just like the North African s and the Arabs in Saudi Arabia, yet once France surprise Attacked the Arabs in Benghazi began to systematically attack,mutilate,and round up the Black SUNNI Muslim Africans and dump them at the Train stations. The Libyans in Tripoli for the most part did not do this.

There are many accounts of very Black skinned Libyans who are natives of Libya going back to the days of Carthage who had to prove to the Arabs of Benghazi and around Libya that they were long time natives.

To the Barbarian this looks natural to round up "Foreigners" and send them out but in Islam according t the Koran no Muslim is a foreigner.

So what we have here is a conspiracy between Arabs and Western Whites, a partnership of oppression of Black skinned human beings between them that Islam means nothing to. Arabs basically Shit on the Koran when it comes to Black Africans.

Muslims from Afghanistan to Syria and in between are actually being false flagged. There is no conflict between Arabs and the West.

your so full of shit OP china have the trade locked down with africa , they are already there building and mining , the west is long out of there bar shipping weopons to them for there wars ...

typical libtard ...

No Black African should ever accept the false border of a "Sub Saharan Africa". ALL of Africa is for Africans.

The term "Sub Saharan Africa" is a psychological device of mind control.

Some of what you say is true. I don't understand where you're coming from with the whole Western/Arab domination thing. I don't see how Israel will stop being a sore in the world's political arena. But let's discuss some things.

Regarding Syria, I think America would give anybody weapons as long as they are fighting her enemies. All she wants is to win and if any problems occur later, she will handle them. It's hubris of course. But the same thing happened in Afghanistan. America built the Taliban part of which formed Al Qaeda....and the rest is history. That history proves that regardless of how clever you are, of how many alliances you have today, things change.

Osama bin Laden changed his target to America. Was he conspiring with Americans? I'm not convinced about that. The theories that make sense are that Osama was "allowed" to attack or that Osama never attacked in the first place (false flag stuff) but to say he was working with American leadership?

Regarding Al Qaeda in Syria, how do we know this for sure? MSM? Is Al Qaeda (as we knew it) even still in play? If America is working with Islamic fundamentalists to bring down Syria, the end result will be further radicalization of North Africa. They will pretty much handover yet another country to radicals. What's the point of doing that? It's not possible to properly exploit a country that is at war, or that isn't politically stable. Political stability and Fundamentalism are two mutually exclusive states, IMO.

I know Saudi Arabia has been an ally for a long time, what I said is that those very princes were/are the funders of Al Qaeda and other Islamist groups. Now your belief that Arabs have always "worshipped" the West seems odd. The Arab civilization pre-dates that of the West. There was Babylon, Assyria, Mesopotamia and Persia. You know that Western civilization is a late comer and that it isn't really a civilization since it borrowed from all the above plus Egypt, India and China. Calling the West a civilization is plain wrong. You have to break it up into French, British, Russian, Nordic, etc. But as I said, they are late comers in the game. So how can Arabs have worshipped the West since they came before them?

Slavery and the Arabs. Please enlighten me about how Arabs worked together with Europeans to enslave West Africans. I know that Arabs took slaves from the East Coast when they first arrived on our shores. Upon arrival in Arabia, most of the men were castrated to prevent breeding. Cruel stuff. But the ones who weren't, intermarried and exist as Black Arabs across Arabia. Slave trade for Arabs was quickly given up and they annexed whole islands and parts of the coast and settled there. They intermarried and their descendants in East Africa are known as the Swahili. I wasn't aware of major Arab participation in the West Coast Slave trade. Interesting. More info please.

Sub-Saharan meaning below the Sahara. You know the green part of Africa that is not a desert? That part. How can the term be used as mind control?

OP, what's your issue with Arabs?

If true this could power space craft.

Israel is as real as the Romans made it. I suspect more each day that they invented it,along with Christianity and Islam.



There is a difference in Hubris and the concept of letting an enemy who killed three thousand of your citizens have heavy weapons and potential access to chemical weapons facilities in Syria. I think its clear that Al Qaeda is completely controlled and 9/11 was an inside job. There's no doubt at this point. No, the Taliban in native to Afghanistan/Pakistan border region they were not created by the uS.



Bin Laden probably had nothing to do with 9/11(He said he didn't).He was a known CIA operative since Afghanistan in the 80's against the Soviets.He was obviously being hidden in Abbottabad and was silencec instead of captured.




There is no clash of Civilizations it is all a giant false flag.
Its a controlled demolition of Western Civilization by Illuminati to replace it with NWO.




Babylon, Assyria, Mesopotamia and Persia are not Arab civilizations, the first three are founded By Blacks and the last was founded by Persians,Persians are not Arabs.

Arabs are a mixed race people who rose out of the land of Saudi Arabia around 2 A.D.. There were mixed race people throughout the region of West Asia but the "Arab" is distinctly a tribal people called Semites because of their language grouping. They cannot be grouped racially because they are mixed.

Western Civilization is a real civilization that grew out of the remnants of of the old Phoenician(Palestine)civilization which was originally Canaan which was a colony of Black Africans from Egypt who settled in the Area,Not The Hyksos as some claim. The Hyksos were from Libya and wen they were driven out they were driven back to Libya.

True Europe grew out of borrowing from Greece and Egypt and Rome but Western Civilization officially became into being because the Blacka Moor(Black Africans)who ruled Spain for 700 years meticulously set about transcribing any Greek,Phoenician,Egyptian and Roman texts that they found into Arabic as well as introducing the Cypher into European Mathematics which was using the cumbersome and limited Roman Numeral system.

The Moors introduced civilization again into Europe because the Vandals,Goths and Ostrogoths of Northern Europe had sacked Europe driving it into the "Dark Ages". The Blacka Moors technology and the fact that they were Africans which made them tolerant of other religions taught Jewish and Christians scholars who went on to found the great institutions and Universities of Europe and After the Moors were driven out and back to Africa those seeds caused the Renaissance and the official birth of what we know as Europe and Western Civilization. For those who dispute the identit of the Moors as being black African I would point out the fact that the first Slaves sent into the West in Haiti were the Royal Moors who ruled Spain. It is kind of strange that no Arabs were sent into slavery? Where were they? They were not native to the region and Spain the Blacka Moors were. The Arabs did not send troops from Arabia to save Spain from falling because of their own racism and jealousy over their former African Slaves who were the rulers of North Africa and Spain. Arabs consider the white Man their father and they teach their children to despise Blackness.




It is not taught but a large part of West Africa was Islamic before Slavery even Started. They peacefully converted when Mali was still a world economic Superpower.
Mosques all had and Have a Maghreb who is responsible for the maintenance of Islam. African Muslims lived side by side with African Jewish converts,Christian converts,and Native Africa religion practitioners or tree hundred years without Jihads. The university of Timbuktu andits Market attracted elites from Spain,to Egypt to West Asia and all over Africa to study and trade. The university of Djenne was the Oxford of the ancient world yet suddenly with the advent of European traders suddenly African Muslim Maghreb's,Morroccans and others start to demand Jihad against infidels while at the same time Europeans start to try to invade Africa bombing from ships, building dungeons on the coast and fomenting internal conflict while at the same time diving up the price they will pay for slaves.I explained this already in a previous post.

Though it give some people a flush to say Blacks were being castrated by Arabs, this practice was not limited to Blacks it was also done to White male slave and Arab males slaves but it was only done by the elites who didn't want their guard servants fucking their Harem. Arabs are a mixed race people and they sold many white slaves to Africa(mainly females)as well as Arab slaves but the only slaves talked about are the African ones and the only slave trade focused on is the African one and this is intentional even though the White/Arab slave trade has never ended and White Women are STILL to this day being sold into Slavery by Europe to the Arabs to this day without pause.

The Arabs have always worshiped the Whites. Everyday you hear how they do not ant war with the West and they have admired the West going back to the Greeks before they were even called Arabs.

Together they are working together with their Master the European to save the Economic Apartheid system in Africa that has made both of their houses extremely wealthy at the expense of Africans who have been killed,maimed,dispossessed,sold,kidnapped beaten mutilated and murdered in the name of theft.
China is a direct threat to the whole scam which would collapse into rubble if China and Africa begin a direct trade relationship.

The Fiat money system and the whole web of control of mental slavery and illusion of race,money and free dumbs as well as the religious schemes will come crashing down. Unless China is eradiated because sharing is not an option. There is no room to coopt or buy off China.There is o way to launch them off into space and make their voracious thirst for goods and resources go away.

If chin and Russia were smart they would work to expose the cover up African history and the scheme but NO ONE wants Africa awake they just want Africa's resources so China,Russia,the Arabs and the West all tip toe around quietly wrestling as not to awaken Africa lest He become enraged and rise like a giant with a long memory and unite all of the people of African descent around the entire planet in a fiery rage.

No. The term Sub Saharan Africa is a trick of the mind it is a subtle racial demarcation line that only exists if BLACK Africans accept it.

It is a pen and a cage. Black Africans are in every part of the African continent and it ALL belongs to them. Anyone who says that ALL of Africa is the birthright of Black Africans must be kicked off the continent.

Before there was a Sahara Black Africans were there. The archeological digs in North Africa and in the Sahara prove that.

The Brezhnev "Clash of Civilizations" is a joke being played on the world.

Nothin.

Keep it comin.

Nothing at all. They are too damn lazy or stupid.

That being said the entire thread is a lie.

Many local African warlords profited from slavery of their own people.

But, you have interesting points.