Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,736 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 549,072
Pageviews Today: 779,672Threads Today: 182Posts Today: 2,682
07:15 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

BREAKING: Oath Keepers Reject Adam Kokesh’s Armed March as Potentially being “Willful Endangerment”

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40524084
Canada
05/27/2013 07:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
BREAKING: Oath Keepers Reject Adam Kokesh’s Armed March as Potentially being “Willful Endangerment”
Hey Adam...hows that March coming along? Oath Keepers just threw you under the bus.

That's what you get for being a stupid head!

Oath Keepers does NOT endorse Adam’s march. The leadership at Oath Keepers has a wealth of tactical experience, and marching into the enemy’s camp, to be captured makes no sense. What is to be accomplished by this action? What could possibly go wrong? These are the questions a responsible leader asks before sending his troops into harm’s way. This is either tactical ignorance, or willful endangerment; the latter being the worst of the two choices.

I would say that Adam’s choice of the words “Oath Keepers” is no accident. He is VERY familiar with Oath Keepers and our mission. Not only are his tactics questionable, so are his ethics. Not only has he embarrassed himself by announcing a pointless and irresponsible armed march, he has damaged his integrity by using the good name of Oath Keepers to bolster his own agenda.

James Hanna
Oath Keepers
Board of Directors


[link to willyloman.wordpress.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21703332
United States
05/27/2013 07:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Oath Keepers Reject Adam Kokesh’s Armed March as Potentially being “Willful Endangerment”
In-fighting amongst the far-right extremist groups.

loosa
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 40524084
Canada
05/27/2013 07:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Oath Keepers Reject Adam Kokesh’s Armed March as Potentially being “Willful Endangerment”
No doubt in my mind that this guy is an Agent Provocateur and not a very good one at that.

Anyone who supports this march will get exactly what they deserve!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34978498
United States
05/27/2013 07:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Oath Keepers Reject Adam Kokesh’s Armed March as Potentially being “Willful Endangerment”
Oh snap!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 40524084
Canada
05/27/2013 07:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Oath Keepers Reject Adam Kokesh’s Armed March as Potentially being “Willful Endangerment”
In-fighting amongst the far-right extremist groups.

loosa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21703332


lmao
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39828519
United States
05/27/2013 07:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Oath Keepers Reject Adam Kokesh’s Armed March as Potentially being “Willful Endangerment”
In-fighting amongst the far-right extremist groups.

loosa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21703332


I thought civil rights were more of a left kind of thing?

So wait, you're calling people who desire civil rights... extremist?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21703332
United States
05/27/2013 07:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Oath Keepers Reject Adam Kokesh’s Armed March as Potentially being “Willful Endangerment”
In-fighting amongst the far-right extremist groups.

loosa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21703332


I thought civil rights were more of a left kind of thing?

So wait, you're calling people who desire civil rights... extremist?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 39828519


I consider many far left and far right groups (I've been in both) extremists, including those operating under the guise of "civil rights."





GLP