| Users Online Now: 2,115 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,661,719 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,432,004 | Threads Today: 669 | Posts Today: 13,733 |
| 07:49 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,115 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,661,719 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,432,004 | Threads Today: 669 | Posts Today: 13,733 |
| 07:49 PM | ||
New climate model scenarios for the future based on the last four years!! | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 41295490  United Kingdom06/10/2013 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Governments are pouring tens of Billions into climate change. putting the framework in place to charge people for there emmisions. the problem they are having is that mother nature is no longer playing along which has shown up there theory's and models. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 39475233  United States06/10/2013 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
NSF001  User ID: 40808766 United Kingdom06/10/2013 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ice is not a carbon sink full stop. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41295490 Governments are pouring tens of Billions into climate change. putting the framework in place to charge people for there emmisions. the problem they are having is that mother nature is no longer playing along which has shown up there theory's and models. Are you referring to the last 16 years? Please read the Met link I posted, this 16 years is incorrect, if not full blown dis-info. As for governments, where is this money being spent? In the UK there are grants for building renewable energy sources and the land owners often walk away with huge pay-outs. This doesn’t show the science is flawed though, just our governments and their crony-capitalist system and friends. I don't think so, he's up there with the others laying low, vying with those who you've traded your life to to bless your soul, |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 41295490 United Kingdom06/10/2013 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ice is not a carbon sink full stop. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41295490 Governments are pouring tens of Billions into climate change. putting the framework in place to charge people for there emmisions. the problem they are having is that mother nature is no longer playing along which has shown up there theory's and models. Are you referring to the last 16 years? Please read the Met link I posted, this 16 years is incorrect, if not full blown dis-info. As for governments, where is this money being spent? In the UK there are grants for building renewable energy sources and the land owners often walk away with huge pay-outs. This doesn’t show the science is flawed though, just our governments and their crony-capitalist system and friends. The money is being spent on research and other projects like you say. Don't forget the MO had to be asked the question 6 times and despite spin they have admitted no significance to any rises there is some good reading and as always excellent comments here; [link to bishophill.squarespace.com] No matter how you look at temperatures they have not risen and certainly nowhere near as predicted we are well below "scenario c", we often chuckle to ourselves here at work on the adjustments that are made to temp series, fortunately my salary is not earned from CC related study's any more. |
| NSF001 User ID: 40808766 United Kingdom06/10/2013 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ice is not a carbon sink full stop. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41295490 Governments are pouring tens of Billions into climate change. putting the framework in place to charge people for there emmisions. the problem they are having is that mother nature is no longer playing along which has shown up there theory's and models. Are you referring to the last 16 years? Please read the Met link I posted, this 16 years is incorrect, if not full blown dis-info. As for governments, where is this money being spent? In the UK there are grants for building renewable energy sources and the land owners often walk away with huge pay-outs. This doesn’t show the science is flawed though, just our governments and their crony-capitalist system and friends. The money is being spent on research and other projects like you say. Don't forget the MO had to be asked the question 6 times and despite spin they have admitted no significance to any rises there is some good reading and as always excellent comments here; [link to bishophill.squarespace.com] No matter how you look at temperatures they have not risen and certainly nowhere near as predicted we are well below "scenario c", we often chuckle to ourselves here at work on the adjustments that are made to temp series, fortunately my salary is not earned from CC related study's any more. So you are actually qualified on the subject? How do you respond to NASA assertion that there is a point where co2 becomes dangerous. I don't think so, he's up there with the others laying low, vying with those who you've traded your life to to bless your soul, |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States06/10/2013 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ice is not a carbon sink full stop. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41295490 Governments are pouring tens of Billions into climate change. putting the framework in place to charge people for there emmisions. the problem they are having is that mother nature is no longer playing along which has shown up there theory's and models. Are you referring to the last 16 years? Please read the Met link I posted, this 16 years is incorrect, if not full blown dis-info. As for governments, where is this money being spent? In the UK there are grants for building renewable energy sources and the land owners often walk away with huge pay-outs. This doesn’t show the science is flawed though, just our governments and their crony-capitalist system and friends. The money is being spent on research and other projects like you say. Don't forget the MO had to be asked the question 6 times and despite spin they have admitted no significance to any rises there is some good reading and as always excellent comments here; [link to bishophill.squarespace.com] No matter how you look at temperatures they have not risen and certainly nowhere near as predicted we are well below "scenario c", we often chuckle to ourselves here at work on the adjustments that are made to temp series, fortunately my salary is not earned from CC related study's any more. So you are actually qualified on the subject? How do you respond to NASA assertion that there is a point where co2 becomes dangerous. Paranoid idiot gonna paranoid. CO2 is totally harmless... |
| NSF001 User ID: 40808766 United Kingdom06/10/2013 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: NSF001 Are you referring to the last 16 years? Please read the Met link I posted, this 16 years is incorrect, if not full blown dis-info. As for governments, where is this money being spent? In the UK there are grants for building renewable energy sources and the land owners often walk away with huge pay-outs. This doesn’t show the science is flawed though, just our governments and their crony-capitalist system and friends. The money is being spent on research and other projects like you say. Don't forget the MO had to be asked the question 6 times and despite spin they have admitted no significance to any rises there is some good reading and as always excellent comments here; [link to bishophill.squarespace.com] No matter how you look at temperatures they have not risen and certainly nowhere near as predicted we are well below "scenario c", we often chuckle to ourselves here at work on the adjustments that are made to temp series, fortunately my salary is not earned from CC related study's any more. So you are actually qualified on the subject? How do you respond to NASA assertion that there is a point where co2 becomes dangerous. Paranoid idiot gonna paranoid. CO2 is totally harmless... It's all about quantity, go and sit in a sealed room and increase the % of co2 up towards 100%, lemme know how far you get. I don't think so, he's up there with the others laying low, vying with those who you've traded your life to to bless your soul, |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 41466144 United States06/10/2013 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  Because I think this is important. Under scenario A2 (co2 emissions rising) the entire US will have a summer 8 degrees hotter than average in just 50 years, 12-25 degrees hotter by the end of the century. Now we wait……. Back in 2000 my son was taught that by 2010 the Northeast would no longer have winter because of global warming. They were wrong Back in 1967 I was taught by 2000 we would have flying cars and a moon base. That hasn't happened either. |
| No Dhimmi User ID: 100741 United States06/10/2013 12:51 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So what are you saying: that evidence accumulated over 30 years can't be the basis for changing a prediction? Thirty years of lies make no valid argument The sun and volcanoes have much more affect on our climate than does man. ALL relevant scriptures that include a time factor prove no pre-trib rapture. Over 50 verses! Kindle Edition only 99 CENTS! Biblical Eschatological “Time-Stamps” Relevant to the Last Day/Days (Amazon) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States06/10/2013 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States06/10/2013 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States06/10/2013 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41295490 The money is being spent on research and other projects like you say. Don't forget the MO had to be asked the question 6 times and despite spin they have admitted no significance to any rises there is some good reading and as always excellent comments here; [link to bishophill.squarespace.com] No matter how you look at temperatures they have not risen and certainly nowhere near as predicted we are well below "scenario c", we often chuckle to ourselves here at work on the adjustments that are made to temp series, fortunately my salary is not earned from CC related study's any more. So you are actually qualified on the subject? How do you respond to NASA assertion that there is a point where co2 becomes dangerous. Paranoid idiot gonna paranoid. CO2 is totally harmless... It's all about quantity, go and sit in a sealed room and increase the % of co2 up towards 100%, lemme know how far you get.  You're so ignorant. NAVY did studies on how much CO2 sailors can withstand in the submarines. It's much higher than what we are seeing right now... I think pre mature babies get CO2 treatment... Greenhouse nurseries pump extra CO2 inside to improve growth... YOu're really paranoid about nothing. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States06/10/2013 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IPCC's Gold-Standard HadCRUT Confirms: CO2's Impact On Global Temps Statistically Immaterial & Insignificant The extreme anti-CO2 jihadists, and the green-fundamentalists at the UN's IPCC, claim that modern warming has been historically unusual, unique and statistically "significant" due to human CO2 emissions - yet, when the UK's HadCRUT4 global temperature dataset is examined, it is readily apparent that modern temperature change is primarily a repeat of the past natural climate patterns. :Pic33: |
