Gun grab? No Trayvon Martin DNA on George Zimmerman gun, expert says (+video) | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31708378 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 42813113 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42812823 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42807565 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "touch DNA" is very difficult to collect and identify. Simply touching something does not necessarily leave behind enough genetic material to identify the DNA of who touched the object. George Zimmerman's DNA was also unable to be identified from the grip of the gun. The DNA tech collected an actual blood sample from the gun grip, but could not positively identify either GZ or TM DNA in the sample collected. The claim that because Martin's DNA was not identified on the gun, he could not have grabbed for it as Zimmerman claims, is a misleading presentation of the science of DNA . |
brassbat User ID: 15444309 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you listened to the whole testimony you would have heard the forensic expert testify that there is not 100% certainty that DNA evidence would be found on the gun. Several factors could have accounted for the lack of Trayvon's DNA on the gun such as rain, blood, inadvertent wiping of the gun, etc. So it's not a slam dunk because there is a lack of DNA evidence. jjjjj |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 42813113 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "touch DNA" is very difficult to collect and identify. Simply touching something does not necessarily leave behind enough genetic material to identify the DNA of who touched the object. George Zimmerman's DNA was also unable to be identified from the grip of the gun. The DNA tech collected an actual blood sample from the gun grip, but could not positively identify either GZ or TM DNA in the sample collected. The claim that because Martin's DNA was not identified on the gun, he could not have grabbed for it as Zimmerman claims, is a misleading presentation of the science of DNA . Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42807565 In a fight there is blood,sweat and Saliva. Zimmerman is obviously a liar because he said Trayvon had his hands all over his gun but he wrestled it away from him. You may WANT Zimmerman to be innocent but he is clearly guilty. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31381689 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 42813113 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16071631 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28020353 ![]() 07/04/2013 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "touch DNA" is very difficult to collect and identify. Simply touching something does not necessarily leave behind enough genetic material to identify the DNA of who touched the object. George Zimmerman's DNA was also unable to be identified from the grip of the gun. The DNA tech collected an actual blood sample from the gun grip, but could not positively identify either GZ or TM DNA in the sample collected. The claim that because Martin's DNA was not identified on the gun, he could not have grabbed for it as Zimmerman claims, is a misleading presentation of the science of DNA . Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42807565 In a fight there is blood,sweat and Saliva. Zimmerman is obviously a liar because he said Trayvon had his hands all over his gun but he wrestled it away from him. You may WANT Zimmerman to be innocent but he is clearly guilty. First of all Zimmerman did not say Trayvon had his hands all on it and he wrestled it away. I believe, he said he was going for it and besides zimmerman pulled trigger yet his dna wasn't on it either explain that. If Trayvon only touch holster it is very rough and it hard for dna to adhere to. Plus the fact it was raining that night. That testimony doesn't tell us anything one way or the other. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41950795 ![]() 07/04/2013 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I believe you said Zimmerman claims "Trayvon TRIED to grab his gun" there is a difference between tried and did if he failed to grab it than there would be no dna however I would be pretty surprised that after shooting a kid at almost point blank range that there would have been some sort of spread of dna to the gun and Zimmerman which I find weird |
Bluebird User ID: 27748381 ![]() 07/04/2013 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Everybody knows touch DNA doesn't happen and is even more rare on non-porous surfaces. Surely you're not pretending this actually means anything? Not all touch even leaves fingerprints let alone enough DNA to find. Besides, those of us following this trial closely watched the ENTIRE testimony and know this doesn't mean squat in actual evidence. . One of the most important aspects of conspiracy theories is being able to discern when there isn't one. Oh yeah, like you'd understand anyway. Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?. . .J. Handy |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26961254 ![]() 07/04/2013 03:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "touch DNA" is very difficult to collect and identify. Simply touching something does not necessarily leave behind enough genetic material to identify the DNA of who touched the object. George Zimmerman's DNA was also unable to be identified from the grip of the gun. The DNA tech collected an actual blood sample from the gun grip, but could not positively identify either GZ or TM DNA in the sample collected. The claim that because Martin's DNA was not identified on the gun, he could not have grabbed for it as Zimmerman claims, is a misleading presentation of the science of DNA . Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42807565 In a fight there is blood,sweat and Saliva. Zimmerman is obviously a liar because he said Trayvon had his hands all over his gun but he wrestled it away from him. You may WANT Zimmerman to be innocent but he is clearly guilty. You're a colored fella huh? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42087726 ![]() 07/04/2013 03:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |