The Supreme Court has called eyewitness testimony “notoriously unreliable”

Users Online Now: 2,188 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 1,189,223
Pageviews Today: 1,666,128	Threads Today: 460	Posts Today: 8,357
01:33 PM

Page 1 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
The Supreme Court has called eyewitness testimony “notoriously unreliable”
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43778991 Australia 07/21/2013 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	The Supreme Court has called eyewitness testimony “notoriously unreliable” In the stress and confusion of a situation like a mass shooting, misreporting is not just common, but the rule. And there’s a reason eyewitnesses are viewed so skeptically in criminal court cases: They often get things wrong. The Supreme Court has called eyewitness testimony “notoriously unreliable” [link to www.salon.com] Does this mean I can commit any crime, and then walk away because all the eyewitness's are unreliable? Supreme Court says I can.

Anonymous Coward User ID: 33483045 United States 07/21/2013 10:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: The Supreme Court has called eyewitness testimony “notoriously unreliable” well considering how freaking dumb, racist and idiotic some people are its probably the truth.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33786493 United States 07/21/2013 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: The Supreme Court has called eyewitness testimony “notoriously unreliable” it's always been that way. get rid of the witnesses, then we don't need to worry
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33786493 United States 07/21/2013 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: The Supreme Court has called eyewitness testimony “notoriously unreliable” so No need for witness protection then

Page 1 Top Previous Page Next Page

Related Threads

GLP