John Hutchison-Anti-Radiation Shield-now you can SEE it!-UPDATE-PROOF the technology works-pag 19

The schematics for the entire system has been open sourced and posted on the internet since right after Fukushima blew.

The audio track is available to anyone who wants it.
Very large file. Need to Skype it to you. What is on the internet is compressed and not complete.
You can private message me here with your Skype name, or email me at
[email protected]

There is a group in Germany that bought the anti-gravity portion of John's lab, just before we left to help at the Gulf of Mexico (BP oil disaster). They bought it for $50,000. Worth close to $1 million. I have repeatedly told them they have enough equipment to build THREE anti-radiation stations. Have sent the schematics. They have pressured and pressured John to go to Germany and set up the equipment for anti-gravity, and refuse to do anything about the radioactive contamination.

these are the people in Germany:
Göde Wissenschafts-Stiftung
Am Heerbach 5
63857 Waldaschaff
Tel: ++49 (0)6095 999 198


I wish I knew if there are different frequencies that effect different radioactive elements. From the Colbern report, the entire decay change of uranium was present, as well as lead and gold. Looking at the report, one would assume all the radioactive elements in the uranium decay chain are effected by these frequencies. We have also had success with cs137.

The cost of setting up a full lab with a scanning electron microscope and staff would be in the millions of dollars and would take years.

We don't have years.
But we do have the everyday person on GLP that can participate.
Get a Geiger counter -- alpha, beta and gamma detection.
Help with the testing.

Preliminary tests here show when the uraninite is in a field created by SOUND, the Geiger counter readings go down by 20%. Once the sound (music/tones) stop, the readings go back up. BUT--the alpha, beta and gamma mix has changed. POTENTIALLY, the audio tones could be used for decontamination.

However, we are in the field that John has created. I don't know if the "sound field" is just amplifying what we have here. Or, if it is effective on its own.

The ONLY way to find out, is to get people OUTSIDE this area to do testing.
And before that happens, I need to refine the method of testing so that it will be simple to duplicate.

If the sound does NOT work "outside this field", there are ways that you can "bring in" the signal. Antennas. Ham radio operators can pick up the signal and rebroadcast.

Also, the entire system can be "built inside a computer" with "virtual" RF signal generators. John is NOT a computer whiz, and someone else will need to figure out how to do this. The BIG problem with this, is there is no way to OUTPUT radio frequencies from a computer -- at least none we know of.

Lots of solutions.
Just need people to work together to make it happen.

Isn't ham radio frequency response range much lower than a computer audio file?


EXACTLY! We have military RF signal generators. John INPUTS the audio file, which tells the RF signal generator WHAT to send out (plus he does his own modulation). ELF is part of what we use, ham can pick it up and "bounce it".

There are computer programs for signal generators. We can input the music/tones to these computer programs, but because there is no way to "get them out", we can't just give everyone a computer that will build a shield for them. We need a way to get the RF signal (ELF, VLF, etc.) OUT of the computer.

Last Edited by Nancy (Lazaryan) Hutchison on 08/12/2013 11:24 PM

Bugs, flying insects looking for that next charge. The proximity to the camera and the IR bulbs is what makes them show up like that.


We do NOT have bugs or flying insects here, other than an occasional house fly or a moth. if these were "bugs" it would be like a locust swarm, it is NOT bugs!


Hazel Courtney has a book called 'Countdown to Coherency', explains a lot about energetic orbs and what they are attracted to. I've seen them , they are attracted to the right vibration. This world we live in, what we are able to perceive is not even the top of the barrel, its the prelude to the real book, and we can't even read yet, but we learn fast! Theres not a lot on this site that really grabs my attention anymore, very interesting thread.


The security camera picked this up. I went out with a flashlight to investigate.
Couldn't see the "orb".

We do NOT have bugs or flying insects here, other than an occasional house fly or a moth. if these were "bugs" it would be like a locust swarm, it is NOT bugs!


Hazel Courtney has a book called 'Countdown to Coherency', explains a lot about energetic orbs and what they are attracted to. I've seen them , they are attracted to the right vibration. This world we live in, what we are able to perceive is not even the top of the barrel, its the prelude to the real book, and we can't even read yet, but we learn fast! Theres not a lot on this site that really grabs my attention anymore, very interesting thread.


The security camera picked this up. I went out with a flashlight to investigate.
Couldn't see the "orb".




I hate to say this, because I am a real believer and have seen some crazy things, but that "orb" is actually a spider web thread, because you can see the line in front of it and behind it.

I see these where I work at on our security cameras.

My reply to the video above ^^^

"I hate to say this, because I am a real believer and have seen some crazy things, but that "orb" is actually a spider web thread, because you can see the line in front of it and behind it. Now for your first video, OP, that was interesting. But this one is just a spider web. It didn't go "bonkers" when you shined the light way out past it. In fact, if you looked at the camera, you would have seen one small spider web thread.

I see these where I work at on our security cameras."

I hate to say this, because I am a real believer and have seen some crazy things, but that "orb" is actually a spider web thread, because you can see the line in front of it and behind it.

I see these where I work at on our security cameras.


I thought i was, as well, because we have had spider webs on other cameras.
But I couldn't find the web.
Another person went out about ten minutes later with a broom.
As soon as he opened the door, the "orb" disappeared.
Why didn't it disappear when I can through the door?

And the "orb" is going BEHIND the post.
There wasn't a web there.

Last Edited by Nancy (Lazaryan) Hutchison on 08/13/2013 12:43 AM

I thought i was, as well, because we have had spider webs on other cameras.
But I couldn't find the web.
Another person went out about ten minutes later with a broom.
As soon as he opened the door, the "orb" disappeared.
Why didn't it disappear when I can through the door?

And the "orb" is going BEHIND the post.
There wasn't a web there.


For the bolded, its because the thread was too close to the camera, that is why it filmed through it making it an "orb" appear to be behind the pole. You can clearly see, that it is a spider web thread.
I am not hard to convince, but that certain video has an actual explanation, which I gave.

To stay more on topic, that is amazing about the radiation shield, completely amazing. Who is to say that "TPTB" already know about this, though?

For the bolded, its because the thread was too close to the camera, that is why it filmed through it making it an "orb" appear to be behind the pole. You can clearly see, that it is a spider web thread.
I am not hard to convince, but that certain video has an actual explanation, which I gave.

To stay more on topic, that is amazing about the radiation shield, completely amazing. Who is to say that "TPTB" already know about this, though?


I believe TPTB know because MIT was presented a paper in 2005 concerning this technology. Also, John has lots of spooks that follow what he is doing, and even email him. Everything we do is wide open, no secrets.

Have had lots of different strange images on the FLIR security cameras. The person who owns the security company hasn't seen anything like the "swarms" outside. That why I filmed with my TV camera in infrared.

And I recognized the PATTERNS from previous filming done on the Gulf of Mexico and Minnesota.

When things are "really active" outside, they "come inside".
We saw "balls bouncing down an empty hallway". John went to investigate.
John believes ALL of these "things" have intelligence.
Also, we are literally sitting on a huge pile of quartz.
Quartz is a transmitter.



Last Edited by Nancy (Lazaryan) Hutchison on 08/13/2013 01:06 AM

Hey Nancy,

I always liked the work that John and you have been doing.
Been an observer of John's work since the first internet posts made. Videos added a better feel later on.

Any chance you and John could get onto Clyde Lewis show soon ?

It's cool to see you here on GLP, thanks for the update.

Would like to run my guitar output through this stuff someday !
Well That might fry a tree or something ! Lol .


Take care Nancy.

Nonsense

TOTAL Nonsense

Elements eventually become Lead !!!!! ????? Is down right LIE !!!

This is Pure Bunk.

Why is that your business.

agreed? why is that important?

not sure i agree with it all, but i am interested in helping with the testing.... ANYTHING is worth a look at the moment....

Learn to read English
read the thread
then apologize
or I remove your post and ban you

Large Area Imaging Detector for Long-Range,
Passive Detection of Fissile Material

Abstract
Recent events highlight the increased risk of a ter-
rorist attack using either a nuclear or a radiological weapon. One of the key needs to counter such a threat is long-range detection of nuclear material. Theoretically, gamma-ray emissions from such material should allow passive detection to distances greater than 100 m. However, detection at this range has long been thought impractical due to spatially fluctuating levels of natural
background radiation. These fluctuations are the major source
of uncertainty in detection and mean that sensitivity cannot be increased simply by increasing detector size. Recent work has shown that this problem can be overcome through the use of
imaging techniques. In this paper we describe the background
problems, the advantages of imaging and the construction of
a prototype, large-area (0.57 m2) gamma-ray imager to detect
nuclear materials at distances of 100 m.

[link to people.csail.mit.edu]

On the long-range detection of radioactivity using electromagnetic radiation

Abstract
A series of recent publications (Tech. Phys. Lett. 19 (1993) 184; Atom. Ener. 80 (1996) 47; Atom. Ener. 80 (1996) 135; Physics–Uspekhi 168 (1998) 515; Izvestiya 28 (1992) 262; Geomagn. Aeron. 34 (1994) 229; J. Atmos. Solar-Terres. Phys. 59 (1997) 961; Stud. Geophs. Geod. 42 (1998) 197; Adv. Space Res. 20 (1997) 2173) has provided experimental evidence that radiation fields can be detected well beyond the 10–100-m limit that holds for conventional (direct) approaches for detecting radiation. The techniques that are claimed to provide this capability use remote electromagnetic interrogation to record changes atmospheric electrostatic parameters arising from elevated radiation levels. This paper examines the physics that underlies these proposed new approaches for detecting radiation. If found to be viable for applications, the proposed techniques would be highly significant as they directly address a variety of problems in national security and environmental monitoring.

doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)01372-9

Monday, November 1, 2010
NPL Builds Long Range Portable Alpha Radiation Detector

[link to nanopatentsandinnovations.blogspot.com]

Last Edited by StarPath on 08/13/2013 03:46 AM

Stand-alone and network capable pocket radiation detection system

Abstract
A multi-functional and networked pocket radiation detection system has been developed at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) capable of detecting and storing gamma ray and neutron data. The device can be used as a stand-alone device or in conjunction with an array to cover a small or large area. The device has programmable alarm trigger levels that can be modified for specific applications. The data are stored with a date/time stamp and can be transferred and viewed on a PDA via direct connection or, in networked configuration, wireless connection to a remote central facility upon request. Data functional/bench tests have been completed successfully and the device was demonstrated to detect radiation from a 55.6 μCi 252Cf source at 5 m and from 1.4 mCi 252Cf source at 10 m which exceeds both ANSI and IAEA standards for pocket radiation detection. In terms of sensitivity, this detection system detects neutron and gamma-ray fields down to 10 μrem/h levels and therefore can find the location of the radioactive source quickly. The detection system is small enough to be put in a pocket or clipped to a belt.

doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.146

Last Edited by StarPath on 08/13/2013 03:42 AM

John says a military contact of his mentioned they (the USA) have this technology to detect nuclear stuff from satellites, and have since at least 2005

Maybe another way of approaching it Nancy?

[link to play.google.com (secure)]

It's not the real deal, sure, but might be a means of deriving 'something'.

If your guitar amp is a tube amp, it should work well.


RadChick asked for an interview some time ago.
She is first in line.
John has done over 200 TV shows and over 1000 radio shows.
On the Jesse Ventura show, Jesse absolutely refused to talk about the work eliminating radioactive contamination. People have stuck John Hutchison in a box from 20 years ago.
He has advanced and refined the "Hutchison Effect", to be used strictly for restorative instead of destructive purposes.
I've tried to show this in video after video. The entire environment responds.
Birds flock in, come right up to the equipment and build nests; shrimp and minnows filling a creek so full, the fish were bubbling out the top; major storms pounding around us and we had clear skies; the ocean "dancing" with the frequencies, clouds changing and showing the patterns of the frequencies.

Remember
YOU can change matter
with TONE
YOU can change reality
with the TONE of your VOICE

YOU are a receiver and sender of electromagnetic energy.

This is all of our destiny.
We either understand WHO we are and use the POWER we possess
to defend and restore life on Earth

or we ALL are dead.

Like I said before
I don't want your money
However, I do want your energy, your action

Actually, there are some interesting things you can do with a camera, (which is a radio receiver).

This is what I've been thinking as well. The trick is establishing light and RF sources so that radiation can be mapped out. Stereoscopy should aid with distance calibration.

drop my nic on radchick, i think it might help for interview

Isn't ham radio frequency response range much lower than a computer audio file?


EXACTLY! We have military RF signal generators. John INPUTS the audio file, which tells the RF signal generator WHAT to send out (plus he does his own modulation). ELF is part of what we use, ham can pick it up and "bounce it".

There are computer programs for signal generators. We can input the music/tones to these computer programs, but because there is no way to "get them out", we can't just give everyone a computer that will build a shield for them. We need a way to get the RF signal (ELF, VLF, etc.) OUT of the computer.


Please forgive my unfortunate choice of wording.

I had meant the the ham transmission width within the band (audio or data or tv) was far more limited than even a compressed computer file.

What frequency or frequencies are you transmitting on in the ELF range?

i interviewed you and John a while back. How do you make these shields?
Could i go to radio shack and pick the parts up to build one?

Thanks

Clandestine Timelord aka 2342

THIS is why I posted the info to GLP and not to any other "news source". ^^^^^^

I know energy is running on a spiral.
When that energy is at certain frequencies it appears as matter.

Frequencies, when audible, are called sound.
So sound runs on a spiral.

All patterns in nature repeat.
We are using the audio patterns (input into the RF signal generators) and playing them at the same time.
Originally, the audio was input "normal", then it was phase shifted several times before input..."spun". The result was over 2 times the strength of the shield.

Look at the original video I posted.
Spirals.
If we can map the spirals of the radioactive contamination, and of the music/tones, we could get a better idea of HOW and WHERE the tones "bring the radioactive elements to rest".

Think of FIRE.
Does fire "exist"?
Or its it contained within the wood?
Take a match, "open" the fire within the match, light the match.
The fire has a VIBRATION, a FREQUENCY.
Put the lit match next to a piece of paper. The paper "releases" the fire in the paper, joining the fire from the match. Then bring the larger fire you have to a piece of wood. The fire in the wood releases and joins the fire in the paper.
Once the fire is completely released, what do you have left?
Ashes. not wood, but ashes. A transmutation.
If you never put the fire next to the wood, the wood WILL eventually change form, decompose. When you add fire, you speed up the process.

The radioactive elements are trying to transmutate, change form, stabilize.
We give then the frequency that they need to do so.
In this analogy with the wood, we are giving fire.

Last Edited by Nancy (Lazaryan) Hutchison on 08/13/2013 02:36 PM

i interviewed you and John a while back. How do you make these shields?
Could i go to radio shack and pick the parts up to build one?

Thanks

Clandestine Timelord aka 2342


Here are the links to the schematics, posted on the web.
there is one change that we did not get up on these schematics, it you are going to build it, contact me and I will go over the change.

BTW--all of this can be programmed into a computer, using existing software. We just don't know HOW to get the RF signal OUT of the computer.

[link to s1189.photobucket.com]

[link to s1189.photobucket.com]

Last Edited by Nancy (Lazaryan) Hutchison on 08/13/2013 02:32 PM

Vibrational Alchemy?

all matter is in the process of "alchemy"
it is energy, changing vibrations and thereby changing form

I dont think all matter is changing form as we speak. I could be wrong.

Last Edited by rexxturbo on 08/13/2013 03:10 PM

That is not a "Schematic" but really a block diagram and it makes absolutely no sense

Forget what you have been programmed to think.
Start OBSERVING.