New Genetic Study Proves Whites Most Evolved.

The "Blacks" of China are Australoid and are literally the farthest separated from the Congoid (genetically). A black car and a black boat aren't the same mode of transportation.




Humans are a production genetic mutations, so at some point a change in skin pigmentation occurred in European Caucasoid and Japanese, Chinese, etc. Mongoloids.

Is this guy serious or is he a troll trying to be disruptive?

First, all humans are equally evolved. "whites" are not a

species unto themselves; they are simply a breed of human.

You premise is grossly flawed for these two reasons. You

would not say one breed of dog is more evolved than

another. Or that a particular breed of dog is more evolved

than a wolf. This would be ridiculous of course. That

being said it is a well understood fact that bred animals

tend toward genetic disease and problems with temperament

to which mutts are not as susceptible. Genetic diversity as

well as cultural diversity leads to healthy growth and

advancement of society. Where you see great strides by

human populations in complexity of thought and cultural

development you see relatively diverse populations with a

great deal of genetic and cultural diversity. Where you see

stagnation you tend to see isolated and xenophobic

populations.

Then who built the pyramids 5000 years before Whitey wised up?

* Afrocentrists argue that all other civilizations of the ancient world were either black or owe their achievements to the theft of African ideas. India and China are, in the Afrocentric model, indebted to black ingenuity. "The early inhabitants of India were black," writes John Jackson. "They have Negroid features, dark skin, and woolly hair. " Indeed, those who built the Mohenjo Daro and Harappa civilizations in India were not Indians at all, he claims, but "Asiatic Ethiopians. " Similarly, the great philosophy and art that emerged in China during the Shang dynasty really derives from black Africans. In They Came Before Columbus, Ivan Van Sertima argues that it was Africans, rather than Columbus, who discovered America. Scrutinizing artifacts of the Olmec civilization of ancient Mexico to find Negro features, Van Sertima argues that Africans using advanced navigational techniques migrated to produce the mathematical and architectural wonders wrongly attributed to the Mayas, Incas, and Aztecs.

[link to web.archive.org]

New study done by ACAD, University of Mainz, Germany, and National Geographic show that a massive genetic turnover occurred in Central Europe 4500 years ago. They measured a quantum leap in DNA in 'real time' of dramatic evolution in population changes.

Genetic markers were completely replaced over night. Can you say Annunaki offspring?

Article here: [link to reinep.wordpress.com]

Actual genetic study here: [link to www.nature.com]

First, all humans are equally evolved. "whites" are not a

species unto themselves; they are simply a breed of human.

You premise is grossly flawed for these two reasons. You

would not say one breed of dog is more evolved than

another. Or that a particular breed of dog is more evolved

than a wolf. This would be ridiculous of course. That

being said it is a well understood fact that bred animals

tend toward genetic disease and problems with temperament

to which mutts are not as susceptible. Genetic diversity as

well as cultural diversity leads to healthy growth and

advancement of society. Where you see great strides by

human populations in complexity of thought and cultural

development you see relatively diverse populations with a

great deal of genetic and cultural diversity. Where you see

stagnation you tend to see isolated and xenophobic

populations.

I am not sure if we are getting smarter. Various populations are adapting to their circumstances in various ways. Some would say the modern "western" values of technical achievement and scientific are counter to healthful adaptation. Yes we have clean drinking water about in proportion to the amount that is made undrinkable due to pollution. I don't know if all our scientific achievements have made us objectively wiser or more adapted to survival. Maybe, maybe not.

Everyone sure loves to default to how science is so prevalent and all that but nobody wants to talk about where the scientists living wage comes from & I was always taught follow the $$$.

Advancements sure but the illusion is really that we know so much more than we actually do!

All these scientist dying too?

I agree that it's not exactly black & white but I just love to counter the common perceptions... Challenge thought.

Sound Vibrations

I think trying to breed animals for desired characteristics

is reckless in dogs and dangerous when thinking in terms of

humans. Nature or providence has enabled humans to breed

with each other based on a wide range of criteria.

Thankfully, usually centered on the concept of love. Not

all groups are good at math, but much of this is cultural in

basis. Even if it is not, saying a group is only good at

basketball is not fair. This group may also be musically

gifted or have deep instincts of ethics or any of a number

of desirable traits that are not foisted about by people

whose motives are suspect.

I think trying to breed animals for desired characteristics

is reckless in dogs and dangerous when thinking in terms of

humans. Nature or providence has enabled humans to breed

with each other based on a wide range of criteria.

Thankfully, usually centered on the concept of love. Not

all groups are good at math, but much of this is cultural in

basis. Even if it is not, saying a group is only good at

basketball is not fair. This group may also be musically

gifted or have deep instincts of ethics or any of a number

of desirable traits that are not foisted about by people

whose motives are suspect.

Harmonics

I think trying to breed animals for desired characteristics

is reckless in dogs and dangerous when thinking in terms of

humans. Nature or providence has enabled humans to breed

with each other based on a wide range of criteria.

Thankfully, usually centered on the concept of love. Not

all groups are good at math, but much of this is cultural in

basis. Even if it is not, saying a group is only good at

basketball is not fair. This group may also be musically

gifted or have deep instincts of ethics or any of a number

of desirable traits that are not foisted about by people

whose motives are suspect.

I honestly don't think breeding selective characteristics is wise... Can't say I am a fan of it involuntarily anyway as to be honest the thought has crossed my mind many times what would be best for my posterity.

I think humanimals (humans & some animals)can be steered through understanding if the environment is right and/or desire is truly there. Most of what each of us thinks is "normal" was taught to us in some form/fashion.

Rh - explanations

O blood type rarity

O RH - = majority of the Awake

A certain sound will create a frequency which will levitate the blocks

I don't think I could have chosen a dumb woman as my wife, no matter how hot her body, because I would know that then my kids could turn out dull.

Wise, unwise, I don't care, I didn't want that. I am declining to overthink the problem. If I don't want a particular outcome, I steer away from it. And others can call that whatever they choose to.

The issues are complex. I come from a fairly diverse

society. I see problems with "race" relations but more

often I see interesting combinations of influences and

people who overcome their differences to enjoy each others'

contributions to the whole.

Agreed, I stated "involuntary" bc I was referencing eugenics performed by the elites... Im not overthinking it.

We can create all those frequencies. We can go from 0 Hz to a million Hz. We could scan thru those frequencies with a speaker to create those sound waves and put a big stone block nearby and see if at some frequency the block starts to levitate or at least becomes lighter (have the block sitting on a scale.)

I bet this experiment would not produce a positive result, but I would love to see if it did.

Ladies and/or gentlemen, not sure who I am replying to and I am not trying to overthink this either. The motives I find suspect are by those who overgeneralize about "races" with the intent of denigrating those who are different from their narrow group. Not directed at anyone in particular. I have had experience with many different racial groups and I find they all have both brilliant members and morans. To believe anything else shows a lack of experience with these groups in a setting in which individuals can be at their best.

Ladies and/or gentlemen, not sure who I am replying to and I am not trying to overthink this either. The motives I find suspect are by those who overgeneralize about "races" with the intent of denigrating those who are different from their narrow group. Not directed at anyone in particular. I have had experience with many different racial groups and I find they all have both brilliant members and morans. To believe anything else shows a lack of experience with these groups in a setting in which individuals can be at their best.