The Theory of Evolution is Preposterously Stupid!

If you were a Christian you would call on people to pray for those who belive in evolution. The christian God is a God of love, not hate and fear.


Oh, and go get yourself a thesaurus, calling someone preposterously stupid over and over again makes you look indescribably moronic.

I agree OP.

I was amused the other night while watching a documentary on the beginnings of the Universe. Well known American astrophysicist Alexei Vladimir Filippenko made the statement that at the Big Bang, in a millionth, of a millionth, of a millionth, of a millionth of a second, it went from the size of a golf ball to the size of 100 million galaxies across. I don't know about anyone else, but that sure sounds like something instantaneous to me, like the Creation story for instance.

The fact you believe everyone who doesn't believe in the same theory as you and is referred to as a God Hater, is enough for me. Makes this thread null void.

And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.
Jude 1.23

You started about Jude 23, but seem to not understand it....

Verse 22: “Be merciful to those who doubt;”

Verse 23: “snatch others from the fire and save them; to others show mercy, mixed with fear - hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh.”

Now Jude turns to the work of the believer in verses 22 & 23, which is being a witness by our life, our lifestyle, and our words. He makes three distinctions in those who should be helped:

1. Those who doubt: These are believers who have lost their way, who are wavering in their belief and understanding. We must remember the mercy shown to us when we were lost. - God still loved us and was merciful toward us. Through acts of love, teaching, prayer, and generosity of spirit, these wavering doubters can become pillars of the faith.

2. Those who need to be snatched from the fire: Those who are possibly close to salvation, but unsaved. The same for these - acts of love, teaching, prayer, and generosity of spirit, so that they who are “close” might be saved. Some people will come to God because they fear going to hell; but it’s far better to draw people to God through love than fear, so we should emphasize His love when we witness to unbelievers.

3. Those who are other than the above: Those whose eyes have been blinded and whose hearts have been hardened. We must still mix with such people; but not be party to their lifestyles

You just now figure that out and don't forget about the black hole crap too.

i find merit in the basic idea of evolution, yet strangely, i don't hate god

i also believe in god,but have respect for science, and the work of educated atheists

somehow, i don't feel that stupid

Why are these your only choices?

A God that createdeverything is equally silly and: who created God?

There's many cults and religions out there that have other options.

yeah, that's the answer,

frighten people into accepting your beliefs

start off easy, you know burn a library or two

then a public beheading

then burning unrepentant women at a stake

yeah, that'll bring em in line

oh, i forgot, it's already been tried

!!!! shill troll whateverthefuck alert !!!!


stop feading these threads people..

it's just a bored lonely fuck who wants to shit stir..
(like most of these kind of threads)

Are you preposterously stupid?

but not nearly as preposterous that god made man

you fucking ignorant sack of shit...

Hatred?

Its not a theory Moran its a fact.


Religitards hate this fact because it proves beyond a shadow of doubt that there fairy tales cant be true.
So they look on the web for anything that will disprove evolution hoping that this will restore there truth.

The earth is not flat (you would have been freaking out when they proved this )

Deal with it idiot and move out of the dark ages.

I agree.

You're not too bright are you?

research it Dick

Sure right after you research flying unicorns slow one.

God-haters are preposterously stupid.

Last weekend evolutionists fired off another round of metaphysics and as usual there was no counter attack. From their hilltop position evolutionists are free to throw down their religious mandates with impunity while the low-landers do nothing but run for cover. This time it was astrophysicist Alex “Philo” Filippenko lighting off the Infinite Regress howitzer from that bastion of Enlightenment, the SETICon 2 conference in Silicon Valley. Filippenko first fired a shot across the bow with his statement that “The Big Bang could’ve occurred as a result of just the laws of physics being there.” That had the Philistines cheering and the low-landers complaining as the evolutionist had left them with nothing but the laws of physics. That’s when Filippenko brought out the big gun and demolished even that last foothold:

"The question, then, is, 'Why are there laws of physics?'" he said. "And you could say, 'Well, that required a divine creator, who created these laws of physics and the spark that led from the laws of physics to these universes, maybe more than one.'"

But that answer just continues to kick the can down the road, because you still need to explain where the divine creator came from. The process leads to a never-ending chain that always leaves you short of the ultimate answer, Filippenko said.

The origin of the laws of physics remains a mystery for now, he added, one that we may never be able to solve.

"The 'divine spark' was whatever produced the laws of physics," Filippenko said. "And I don't know what produced that divine spark. So let's just leave it at the laws of physics."


In other words, we must avoid the dreaded infinite regress. This of course is straight from the pen of David Hume whose character Philo fired off this weapon centuries ago:

How, therefore, shall we satisfy ourselves concerning the cause of that Being whom you suppose the Author of Nature, … if we stop, and go no further; why go so far? why not stop at the material world? How can we satisfy ourselves without going on in infinitum? And, after all, what satisfaction is there in that infinite progression?


Or as evolutionist Mark Ridley put it:

Positing a God merely invites the question of how such a highly adaptive and well-designed thing could in its turn have come into existence. Theological sophistry about the perfect simplicity of God and the inexplicability of the First Cause can be ignored here: the problem is to explain adaptive complexity. The first alternative to natural selection, therefore, is a viciously circular argument, and unscientific.


For Hume and the evolutionists there are two possibilities: Design and complexity arise on their own via natural law, or there is an infinite regress of “designers.”

Given these two absurdities the evolutionists, of course, choose law. But this is not the key move, for at this point the metaphysical fire fight is long over. The key move—and metaphysical heavy lifting—came at the earlier stage where the alternatives were defined. Remember, he who defines the debate wins the debate.

Science doesn’t tell us that there are two possibilities. It doesn’t tell us that design and complexity either arose on their own or else there is an infinite regress of designers. That is a metaphysical assertion—one of many that underwrite the evolution research program.

Amazingly evolutionists claim they are just “doing science” as they fire off these metaphysical salvos. Religion drives science, and it matters.

The Earth is the Ark and we are the chosen

apps on gods iphone.

Martin Luther thought that germ theory was preposterously stupid. He said it was foolish to think sickness was the result of physical phenomena, rather than spiritual.

OP, evolution is accepted by people who are ridiculously smarter than you are, and some of them believe in God.

ya, i hate fucking god. he is an evil, egotistical, tyrant who has retarded assholes like you who think they're scoring brownie points by spewing his hateful bullshit.
go fuk off, loser