There REALLY IS something strange in western sky around sunset...!!!

wow bluepill, now I know what you are talking about - I must have missed this when you posted it the first time ... that is fantastic ! ... never EVER seen a "lens-flare" that looked like that - and I have seen a ton of them ... of course the "experts" would HAVE to say that ... we can expect nothing less - from individuals in DENIAL

Wow, this thread is getting more bizarre by the minute.

What is fantastic about that photo?

If I had to give someone a typical example of a lens flare, this would be at the top of the list.

SunnyDaze, do you see the lens flare in front of OR behind the power line?

Will you answer?

Anyone?

first they laugh
then they ridicule
then they fight
and then you win ... ghandi

Wow, this thread is getting more bizarre by the minute.

What is fantastic about that photo?

If I had to give someone a typical example of a lens flare, this would be at the top of the list.

SunnyDaze, do you see the lens flare in front of OR behind the power line?

Will you answer?

Anyone?

GLP'ers our job is almost done here. The government agents here are beyond desperate. Consider these things:

1) The government had a ZetaTalk "contact" come on the thread and post ONE message--3rd Eye E is bad. Never heard from ZetaTalk person ever again. Imagine that. 220 pages, one post from the group that the Government vilifies. Case closed on this piece.

2) Now, the government agents are claiming that I am one of them. Is that delusional or what? They planted me to fight with Setheory and post bogus pics. Case closed on this piece.

3) Item #2 was just newly introduced by Rayomagnetic or something like that. More on him later, including his Unsolicited email to me. And my response. Don't miss that.

4) Picture contoversy--I have provided pics from the ground, relevant because this planet is close to our horizon. 2 pics have been attacked and 8 - 9 ignored. The "Wire" pic was manipulated to INSTANTLY discredit me, but 220 pgs later it didn't work. Then I was accused of "photo-shopping" the "Winged Planet Picture". Besides patently false, with ZERO evidence to even support, this makes no sense. I manufactured a Winged Planet picture different THAN ANY IMAGE on Google. Different than ANY PICTURE of lens flare that ANYONE here has ever seen. But I couldn't photoshop my pictured which I suspect was photoshopped THEN magnified to a blur by Dr. Astro? Case closed on this piece.

5) Hypocrisy re: language--My formal apology to every person who has weathered this storm is forthcoming. But first this. The language used about a woman here was easily the most disgusting display of filth on the entire thread. Nobody called the government guy out for this. Ultimately Setheory was given the assignment of at least saying, he didn't agree with it. Well me cussing IN response to MEN who are cussing at me was a tactic I CHOSE to use to keep them engaged and to highlight their hypocrisy. Tactical or not, I will be apologizing to all. And the thread I have started, has ZERO profanity on it. For the record, they unleashed the potty-mouth Godzilla and Kitty as soon as I arrived. Case closed on this piece. (Apology coming).

6)Transparency--I have demonstrated it from the start. My releasing of accurate personal information was/is not an invitation to conflict. Simply an anti-bullying tactic and a credibility measure I took to defend my name. If I were an agent (greatest compliment I could possibly imagine), I would not be typing right now. See Jack Wheeler story. So if you can't beat 'em, just say he's one of us. Case closed on this point.

7) This thread is now dead--Just think, I was ready to leave, until the shill got cocky and said I ran away after having my arse kicked. He messed up there. I don't have an arse, haven't had my ass kicked since 2nd grade, and have run from one thing in my life (a dog chasing me @ 2am while running home after my alternator died on my Chevy Monza in Fayetteville, NC).

My work here is done, I will be an active, positive, poster on the 2 legitimate threads regarding this subject. I also, will re-open the Sethory tribute thread, SANS name. Look for something like "STRAIGHT LYING vs. Straight Line You Decide"

Here are the pics they couldn't make go away.

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This is relevant b/c this is an illustration of the Winged Planet we are seeing. Make note of CLEAR and OBVIOUS "upward turn of the wings". This is important b/c in another picture they couldn't handle, you will clearly see this feature, not the "circle in a circle" lens flare garbage. Important b/c clearly this illustration isn't a "circle around a circle"

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This is the picture they won't even touch. Look at 3 UNIQUE things:

a) Winged Planet has WINGS not "circle in a circle"
b) Trailing object (moon, dust cloud, whatever) is present and is NOT on the same vector line
c) There is exactly ONE tail of debris...and yes, I think that is the greatest threat...When this thing starts its way "back home" I suspect this tail could be problematic.

At any rate a, b, c are the ONLY objects like themselves in the picture and they are on NO VECTOR LINE. If anyone can reproduce this with a, b, c AND the sun and the horizon all in the pick, JUST DO IT. Furthermore, if ANYONE can even find a Google Image to match, JUST DO IT.

Note: Can someone scale to size the Winged Planet from my real pic and drop it on top of the illustration to show the match? Then drop one of those "circle in a circle" on top to show the fraudulent attempt to call them the same.

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: They wouldn't even acknowledge the picture. To be clear, there are only 2 objects in the sky in this picture:

a) Our Moon--is above the tall street light
b) Winged Planet--Much brighter object, above 3 sets of lights. Much closer to the horizon than anything in the sky.

Note: I have been stopping at that traffic light for 11 years. For 4+ years I have watched this planet from that intersection. The only changes have been: closer/lower to the horizon and is now captured by my camera (previously 12 - 18 months could see it easily, but wouldn't show up)

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This one started the unraveling that we are seeing. I photographed the planet while looking right at it (that's why it is in good focus). However, b/c the object had JUST ARRIVED in the SW sky (I was waiting b/c my sons have played football there for 13 years combined--including the last 4 years and I know she comes above the goalpost). This picture confused the government agents b/c they didn't know what to respond to. I waited for people to say they didn't see anything BEFORE I told them to zoom over goalposts. Once they did, they were stuck. SINGLE BRIGHT object in the SW sky shortly after sunset matching worldwide sightings and shot less than a week ago. What could they say? Kudos to Setheory, "he said maybe a planet, but I need more info". Read that again. Which planet, Setheory. You said "maybe a planet", but just not the planet everyone is seeing at the same relative time of evening in the same sky space. To call that logically flawed is the greatest compliment I could give Setheory. That is delusional and by itself enough reason to substantiate his government status. His work buddy (either Geo or Boxer, I believe...as I don't really distinguish them), said that it was stadium lighting. You know the "new" LEVITATING kind. Nevermind, the planet is not emitting rays/flares as a light in the night AlWAYS will. Kudos to Astro, he is clearly their front guy, he has never acknowledged that picture or his fondness of EarthSky.org.

The case is closed now, by me. Keep watching the sky AND the government's moves/actions.

Lenghty post, yes. Coherent, yes. Relavent, yes. With pics THAT even the Government couldn't handle, yes. What more is there?

This thread is too long to quote unnecessarily. Here is a copy of the poster who emailed to get pics (clearly an attempt to get pics that I had not and have not posted--I have LOTS). Now you can understand the "progressive release of information" technique I implored.

Here is the unsolicited request email:

Raymantheheretic .
To Me
Oct 14 at 1:09 PM
I would appreciate if you would e-mail me some of the pics you have of the mysterious celestial object.

Thanks in advance,

Quentin

The thread continued until "Quentin" used profane language and was duly dismissed.

Also, here are the 4 pictures that NOBODY has explained away. Someone mentioned the links didn't work. No surprise there.

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This is relevant b/c this is an illustration of the Winged Planet we are seeing. Make note of CLEAR and OBVIOUS "upward turn of the wings". This is important b/c in another picture they couldn't handle, you will clearly see this feature, not the "circle in a circle" lens flare garbage. Important b/c clearly this illustration isn't a "circle around a circle"

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This is the picture they won't even touch. Look at 3 UNIQUE things:

a) Winged Planet has WINGS not "circle in a circle"
b) Trailing object (moon, dust cloud, whatever) is present and is NOT on the same vector line
c) There is exactly ONE tail of debris...and yes, I think that is the greatest threat...When this thing starts its way "back home" I suspect this tail could be problematic.

At any rate a, b, c are the ONLY objects like themselves in the picture and they are on NO VECTOR LINE. If anyone can reproduce this with a, b, c AND the sun and the horizon all in the pick, JUST DO IT. Furthermore, if ANYONE can even find a Google Image to match, JUST DO IT.

Note: Can someone scale to size the Winged Planet from my real pic and drop it on top of the illustration to show the match? Then drop one of those "circle in a circle" on top to show the fraudulent attempt to call them the same.

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: They wouldn't even acknowledge the picture. To be clear, there are only 2 objects in the sky in this picture:

a) Our Moon--is above the tall street light
b) Winged Planet--Much brighter object, above 3 sets of lights. Much closer to the horizon than anything in the sky.

Note: I have been stopping at that traffic light for 11 years. For 4+ years I have watched this planet from that intersection. The only changes have been: closer/lower to the horizon and is now captured by my camera (previously 12 - 18 months could see it easily, but wouldn't show up)

For Google Map/Sky users--the intersection has these public landmarks (CVS Pharmacy @ 895 Holcomb Bridge Rd, Roswell, GA 30076 and Holiday Inn @ 909 Holcomb Bridge Rd Roswell, GA 30076)

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This one started the unraveling that we are seeing. I photographed the planet while looking right at it (that's why it is in good focus). However, b/c the object had JUST ARRIVED in the SW sky (I was waiting b/c my sons have played football there for 13 years combined--including the last 4 years and I know she comes above the goalpost). This picture confused the government agents b/c they didn't know what to respond to. I waited for people to say they didn't see anything BEFORE I told them to zoom over goalposts. Once they did, they were stuck. SINGLE BRIGHT object in the SW sky shortly after sunset matching worldwide sightings and shot less than a week ago. What could they say? Kudos to Setheory, "he said maybe a planet, but I need more info". Read that again. Which planet, Setheory. You said "maybe a planet", but just not the planet everyone is seeing at the same relative time of evening in the same sky space. To call that logically flawed is the greatest compliment I could give Setheory. That is delusional and by itself enough reason to substantiate his government status. His work buddy (either Geo or Boxer, I believe...as I don't really distinguish them), said that it was stadium lighting. You know the "new" LEVITATING kind. Nevermind, the planet is not emitting rays/flares as a light in the night AlWAYS will. Kudos to Astro, he is clearly their front guy, he has never acknowledged that picture or his fondness of EarthSky.org.

This thread is too long to quote unnecessarily. Here is a copy of the poster who emailed to get pics (clearly an attempt to get pics that I had not and have not posted--I have LOTS). Now you can understand the "progressive release of information" technique I implored.

Here is the unsolicited request email:

Raymantheheretic .
To Me
Oct 14 at 1:09 PM
I would appreciate if you would e-mail me some of the pics you have of the mysterious celestial object.

Thanks in advance,

Quentin

The thread continued until "Quentin" used profane language and was duly dismissed.

Also, here are the 4 pictures that NOBODY has explained away. Someone mentioned the links didn't work. No surprise there.

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This is relevant b/c this is an illustration of the Winged Planet we are seeing. Make note of CLEAR and OBVIOUS "upward turn of the wings". This is important b/c in another picture they couldn't handle, you will clearly see this feature, not the "circle in a circle" lens flare garbage. Important b/c clearly this illustration isn't a "circle around a circle"

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This is the picture they won't even touch. Look at 3 UNIQUE things:

a) Winged Planet has WINGS not "circle in a circle"
b) Trailing object (moon, dust cloud, whatever) is present and is NOT on the same vector line
c) There is exactly ONE tail of debris...and yes, I think that is the greatest threat...When this thing starts its way "back home" I suspect this tail could be problematic.

At any rate a, b, c are the ONLY objects like themselves in the picture and they are on NO VECTOR LINE. If anyone can reproduce this with a, b, c AND the sun and the horizon all in the pick, JUST DO IT. Furthermore, if ANYONE can even find a Google Image to match, JUST DO IT.

Note: Can someone scale to size the Winged Planet from my real pic and drop it on top of the illustration to show the match? Then drop one of those "circle in a circle" on top to show the fraudulent attempt to call them the same.

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: They wouldn't even acknowledge the picture. To be clear, there are only 2 objects in the sky in this picture:

a) Our Moon--is above the tall street light
b) Winged Planet--Much brighter object, above 3 sets of lights. Much closer to the horizon than anything in the sky.

Note: I have been stopping at that traffic light for 11 years. For 4+ years I have watched this planet from that intersection. The only changes have been: closer/lower to the horizon and is now captured by my camera (previously 12 - 18 months could see it easily, but wouldn't show up)

For Google Map/Sky users--the intersection has these public landmarks (CVS Pharmacy @ 895 Holcomb Bridge Rd, Roswell, GA 30076 and Holiday Inn @ 909 Holcomb Bridge Rd Roswell, GA 30076)

[link to imageshack.us]

Analysis: This one started the unraveling that we are seeing. I photographed the planet while looking right at it (that's why it is in good focus). However, b/c the object had JUST ARRIVED in the SW sky (I was waiting b/c my sons have played football there for 13 years combined--including the last 4 years and I know she comes above the goalpost). This picture confused the government agents b/c they didn't know what to respond to. I waited for people to say they didn't see anything BEFORE I told them to zoom over goalposts. Once they did, they were stuck. SINGLE BRIGHT object in the SW sky shortly after sunset matching worldwide sightings and shot less than a week ago. What could they say? Kudos to Setheory, "he said maybe a planet, but I need more info". Read that again. Which planet, Setheory. You said "maybe a planet", but just not the planet everyone is seeing at the same relative time of evening in the same sky space. To call that logically flawed is the greatest compliment I could give Setheory. That is delusional and by itself enough reason to substantiate his government status. His work buddy (either Geo or Boxer, I believe...as I don't really distinguish them), said that it was stadium lighting. You know the "new" LEVITATING kind. Nevermind, the planet is not emitting rays/flares as a light in the night AlWAYS will. Kudos to Astro, he is clearly their front guy, he has never acknowledged that picture or his fondness of EarthSky.org.

That's it! No other stars in the sky when it shows up, right as the sun sets in the southwest.

2)The most fascinating explanation of this mystery body, which is so cold it casts no light and
has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space, is that it is a giant gaseous
planet as large as Jupiter and as close to Earth as 50 trillion miles. While that may seem like a
great distance in earthbound terms, it is a stone's throw in cosmological terms, so close in fact
that it would be the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the outermost planet Pluto.

Analysis--Object is so cold and dark...Hmmmm, is that relevant here?

first they laugh
then they ridicule
then they fight
and then you win ... ghandi

I just added this video to today's article:


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]