A White Society: How Can We Get There? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48175751 United States 10/19/2013 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just find it odd that this man actually believes that invading lands with a colored indigenous population equals settling down in those lands and establishing white European strongholds wherever they feel like it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48175751 Yeah something's wrong with that type of thinking. How do whites/Europeans react when they bring in boat/planeloads of dark foreigners to their European nations and those same people establish minority cities/strongholds in THIER white little towns???? Actually, most white folk are perfectly fine with other groups establishing their own ethnic strongholds. In fact I think it would be beneficial if America were divided into large quadrants, one for people of European descent, one for Africans, one for hispanics, and one for Asians. And most importantly, all of these quadrants should be taxed separately from one another, meaning that the European quadrant's taxes would only be used for that particular quadrant. You white people are going to just LOVE multiculturalism because your forefathers invented it! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48175751 Jewish intellectuals are not my forefathers. The vast majority of people on this planet do not want multiculturalism. Just look at the hispanic immigrants moving into the southwest. Many of them refuse to learn english, they'd rather wave a mexican flag than an American flag. Clearly these people would prefer to have their own separate hispanic state within America rather than assimilate. Multiculturalism = genetic genocide, but whites can't hide from what their ancestors' invasions have wrought. And I don't fall for that whole DNA spiel either. Whites' origins are Europe, from the Caucuses. Even white scientists use that same DNA "evidence" to prove that whites descend from a race called the Neanderthals (but I bet that's one piece of DNA "evidence" you choose to reject). I quite frankly don't trust ANY of it. As for those Europeans who follow Judaism: They've tried the same tactic in a vain effort to prove that they descend from a certain group of people by using DNA "evidence", and someone from their own ranks was brave enough to come forth and prove that those DNA "findings" were fabricated, and that the genetic findings actually prove a CAUCASIAN lineage with a very significant matrilineal (female) contribution. In the old prophetic writings, whites are described as: "The scatterer who spreads out." In other words, you're land-thieves. It's going to be real funny to see how all this closes out (the old prophets have already told us). You see, you can't invade other people's territories and just INVENT proof of your perceived "right" to be there simply because you want the land. But you all will learn that the hard way. It's your destiny. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44932919 United States 10/19/2013 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25934082 Canada 10/19/2013 01:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here ... choose one. [link to en.m.wikipedia.org] ... or maybe you can learn from your surroundings... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48589121 United Kingdom 10/19/2013 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to create an all white society = pretty simple really and we are almost there thanks to the rich white elite nazi-like luciferians who control the planet. Fill the western world with unassimilable parasitic hostile colonisers freeloaders communists jihadists brain dead liberals etc till it collapses - then turn off the grids and let it devolve into an all out racial ethnic religious civil war fought amongs't the most primitive and brutal conditions - those who have prepped and armed themselves, have the most courage tenacity toughness, intelligence, virtue and perseverance will ultimatley triumph and wipe out the losing completely. Probably have to nuke the Chinese or use Bio-weapons, but I am sure they will have thought of that! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48591355 United Kingdom 10/19/2013 01:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Denis Rodman was the only Black person in North Korea this year, want me to book you a flight? Quoting: SheldonReturns LOL, very good, that's what these tards want. A White Society: How Can We Get There? Why would you want one, it would be so boring? Besides, genetic diversity is the key to long term survival. The jew, the driving force behind multiculturalism, has always wanted to lower the White IQ to the point we are too stupid to resist him. He dreams up all manner of idiotic slogans like, "we can't survive" to coax us into breeding with the inferior races and breeding ourselves out of existence. We've been surviving just fine so far without polluting our gene pool with subhuman DNA. The jew, who has a smaller gene pool than we do, has also made out quite well. In fact he rules the world with it. Kind of puts the lie to the whole breed with negroids or die theory doesn't it? The Jew also has BIG genetic problems, due to the Talmudic influence over marriage and reproduction. Due to (or Jew to) centuries of inbreeding, physical defects and mental illness are absolutely rife among them. So much so, that the pervert, Freud, had to invent the vile "science" of "psychoanalysis." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48598693 United Kingdom 10/19/2013 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it already has inside my mind i live in a dream world, where no dirty fuckers exist it works for me, anyway. i just don't see them. don't engage with them, or give them any time, or credit for anything in my mind, a white tramp living under a bridge outranks an Indian Billionaire |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1511429 Canada 10/19/2013 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why don't we petition the UN to set up a country specifically for white people based on the genocide of white Russians by Marxists the same way they did for Jews in Israel? That way we could lawfully murder and expel any people who weren't white the same way the Jews did to the Palestinians and, though deception, pursue a strategy of "Greater White People." For those of you who think I'm serious: /sarcasm. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46410065 United States 10/19/2013 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It`s really pretty clear why libtard apologists and most minority groups launch all out assaults on any white group that espouses a desire to live in a white society with traditional white values and one free from all the govt. implemented checks and balances that are put into place.Ones that cull our best and brightest in order to provide a more level playing field for the less capable in society,aka affirmative action,quotas,the bell curve,etc.etc.These actions have clearly created a dumbed down society in America, and all of the hypocritical accusatory charges leveled at whites by others are simply an attempt to reign in any thoughts of independent existence by whites through social pressure and the manipulation of a primordial need of man to belong to the group and not be outcast by the Klan,which in the early days of man certainly would have been a death sentence. The reason whites dont care about black colleges,black television,black congressional caucuses,THE NAACP, black history month,etc.etc., is because whites aren`t threatened by black unification,in fact it`s encouraged. But as much as the minorities jealousy of whites fans there flames of hatred towards us,they need us and they know it.They cant let us go because riding our coattails is the only thing that`s given them a modern existence.Why else would it be any of there concern who white people want to be around? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48591355 United Kingdom 10/19/2013 02:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It`s really pretty clear why libtard apologists and most minority groups launch all out assaults on any white group that espouses a desire to live in a white society with traditional white values and one free from all the govt. implemented checks and balances that are put into place.Ones that cull our best and brightest in order to provide a more level playing field for the less capable in society,aka affirmative action,quotas,the bell curve,etc.etc.These actions have clearly created a dumbed down society in America, and all of the hypocritical accusatory charges leveled at whites by others are simply an attempt to reign in any thoughts of independent existence by whites through social pressure and the manipulation of a primordial need of man to belong to the group and not be outcast by the Klan,which in the early days of man certainly would have been a death sentence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46410065 The reason whites dont care about black colleges,black television,black congressional caucuses,THE NAACP, black history month,etc.etc., is because whites aren`t threatened by black unification,in fact it`s encouraged. But as much as the minorities jealousy of whites fans there flames of hatred towards us,they need us and they know it.They cant let us go because riding our coattails is the only thing that`s given them a modern existence.Why else would it be any of there concern who white people want to be around? Good, but please use paragraphs and white space. WHITE space! See what I did there? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48592243 United States 10/19/2013 02:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38547592 United States 10/19/2013 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38547592 United States 10/19/2013 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mind Control User ID: 21051903 Canada 10/19/2013 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Easy. Kick out all the animals. “Our minds have been poisoned and our accepted beliefs are unnatural and artificial.” - Bryant McGill Stop governments from spying on you by encrypting your communications: [link to prism-break.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48175751 United States 10/19/2013 02:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just find it odd that this man actually believes that invading lands with a colored indigenous population equals settling down in those lands and establishing white European strongholds wherever they feel like it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48175751 Yeah something's wrong with that type of thinking. How do whites/Europeans react when they bring in boat/planeloads of dark foreigners to their European nations and those same people establish minority cities/strongholds in THIER white little towns???? They don't like that shit. And guess what? The colored indigenous don't like it either! So he can thank his forefathers for teaching the indigenous how to invade Europe and settle in wherever the hell they want. You white people are going to just LOVE multiculturalism because your forefathers invented it! It was their departing gift to YOU. (Don't you just love how the Spaniards mixed out the indigenous populations of the Americas and created the Mestizan ("Mexican") mixed race? Yeah, Mexican comes from Mestizan (Mestizos) and means an indigenous native who is MIXED with European. SO MUCH FOR MULTICULTURALISM. You can only shrug 'Mexico' derives from 'mexica', an Aztec word. 'Mestizo' is a Spanish word derived from the Latin word 'mixticius' meaning 'mixed/mongrel'. That's not an Aztec word. They claim it's origins are UNKNOWN, and based on what I've gathered from my in depth research of them and the mixing that took place, the word Mexica it's a corruption of the European Spanish word mestiza. Mestiza is the feminine of the masculine Spanish word Mestizo and simply refers to a female who is of mixed indigenous and European stock. Of course, that makes sense considering the Conquistadors had to sleep with the indigenous females in order to produce their mixed seed. See here (from Wikipedia): The name of Mexico entails the origin, history, and use of the name Mexico, which dates back to 14th century Mesoamerica. Mexico was named after its capital, Mexico City, whose original name was Tenochtitlan. (Now they claim the word is Nahuatl, and then in the same breath, they admit that its form/etymology is unknown, so it is not of that indigenous group's tongue otherwise they could trace it). They admit: The Nahuatl word Mexico means place of the Mexica but the ethnonym Mexicatl itself is of unknown etymology. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Your argument regarding the meaning of the word of Mexica is apropos to the point that they are mixed. The word Mexican also does not identify one ethnic group called the Mexica, because "Mexicans" have been identified to come from various origins (from Wikipedia): The Mexican people have varied origins and an identity that has evolved with the succession of conquests among Amerindian groups and by Europeans. The area that is now modern-day Mexico has cradled many predecessor civilizations, going back as far as the Olmec. [link to en.wikipedia.org] So don't be deceived into believing that "Mexico" is what they told it was. It isn't. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 148371 United States 10/19/2013 02:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48175751 United States 10/19/2013 02:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just find it odd that this man actually believes that invading lands with a colored indigenous population equals settling down in those lands and establishing white European strongholds wherever they feel like it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48175751 Yeah something's wrong with that type of thinking. How do whites/Europeans react when they bring in boat/planeloads of dark foreigners to their European nations and those same people establish minority cities/strongholds in THIER white little towns???? They don't like that shit. And guess what? The colored indigenous don't like it either! So he can thank his forefathers for teaching the indigenous how to invade Europe and settle in wherever the hell they want. You white people are going to just LOVE multiculturalism because your forefathers invented it! It was their departing gift to YOU. (Don't you just love how the Spaniards mixed out the indigenous populations of the Americas and created the Mestizan ("Mexican") mixed race? Yeah, Mexican comes from Mestizan (Mestizos) and means an indigenous native who is MIXED with European. SO MUCH FOR MULTICULTURALISM. You can only shrug 'Mexico' derives from 'mexica', an Aztec word. 'Mestizo' is a Spanish word derived from the Latin word 'mixticius' meaning 'mixed/mongrel'. That's not an Aztec word. They claim it's origins are UNKNOWN, and based on what I've gathered from my in depth research of them and the mixing that took place, the word Mexica it's a corruption of the European Spanish word mestiza. Mestiza is the feminine of the masculine Spanish word Mestizo and simply refers to a female who is of mixed indigenous and European stock. Of course, that makes sense considering the Conquistadors had to sleep with the indigenous females in order to produce their mixed seed. See here (from Wikipedia): The name of Mexico entails the origin, history, and use of the name Mexico, which dates back to 14th century Mesoamerica. Mexico was named after its capital, Mexico City, whose original name was Tenochtitlan. (Now they claim the word is Nahuatl, and then in the same breath, they admit that its form/etymology is unknown, so it is not of that indigenous group's tongue otherwise they could trace it). They admit: The Nahuatl word Mexico means place of the Mexica but the ethnonym Mexicatl itself is of unknown etymology. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Your argument regarding the meaning of the word of Mexica is apropos to the point that they are mixed. The word Mexican also does not identify one ethnic group called the Mexica, because "Mexicans" have been identified to come from various origins (from Wikipedia): The Mexican people have varied origins and an identity that has evolved with the succession of conquests among Amerindian groups and by Europeans. The area that is now modern-day Mexico has cradled many predecessor civilizations, going back as far as the Olmec. [link to en.wikipedia.org] So don't be deceived into believing that "Mexico" is what they told it was. It isn't. AND I forgot to note that the reference source notes that the term Mexica is recorded to have come into use in the Americas in the 1400s. Care to tell us when the Conquistadors invaded the Americas? 14th century. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48552744 Dominican Republic 10/19/2013 02:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Totally white? Not healthy. Diversity/Diversion is your friend. It will not be paradise. The society will probably be replaced with other types of stupidity like this: kick ginger day [link to www.foxnews.com] I mean, really... don't they have anything better to do? |
Mickeyblue User ID: 9806228 United States 10/19/2013 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You do not live in a 'white' world. Get over it. I only read part of your opening post and did not open the video. What are "white values"? To just simply cast out all people due to the color of their skin and include all people who share in the designated color is about the most ill conceived of concepts in how to share a good life together. It is dusgusting and ani like it is not funny. What are our wonderful 'white values'? Please elucidate them for us. Please crawl back into your absurd hole. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48591355 United Kingdom 10/19/2013 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You do not live in a 'white' world. Get over it. I only read part of your opening post and did not open the video. Quoting: Mickeyblue 9806228 What are "white values"? To just simply cast out all people due to the color of their skin and include all people who share in the designated color is about the most ill conceived of concepts in how to share a good life together. It is dusgusting and ani like it is not funny. What are our wonderful 'white values'? Please elucidate them for us. Please crawl back into your absurd hole. We definitely need to get rid of Talmudic jew values, as represented by the likes of you. That would immediately improve the entire world by thousands of percent. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48175751 United States 10/19/2013 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Totally white? Not healthy. Diversity/Diversion is your friend. It will not be paradise. The society will probably be replaced with other types of stupidity like this: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48552744 kick ginger day [link to www.foxnews.com] I mean, really... don't they have anything better to do? They're jealous of beautiful freckled-face red-heads because they are the remnant of Japheth's true descendants. They are amongst the few "whites" whose melanin (from Adam) still tries to express itself (that's why they're covered in freckles). A true descendant of Japheth will be red-head, have VERY curly to afro-type curls/fro, and very pale with melanin- freckles that cover most of their body if not all. And THAT's why they are always attacking Reds. Reds (also called Edomites by some) have a form of albinism, just like their "black" albino counterparts in Africa, and many black albinos in Africa also have natural ginger-colored hair. They're just fucking jealous. But they better leave gingers the fuck alone; they're our people (Hail Japheth!), even if they are afraid/ashamed to admit it. [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] |
two books User ID: 48596965 United States 10/19/2013 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just find it odd that this man actually believes that invading lands with a colored indigenous population equals settling down in those lands and establishing white European strongholds wherever they feel like it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48175751 Yeah something's wrong with that type of thinking. How do whites/Europeans react when they bring in boat/planeloads of dark foreigners to their European nations and those same people establish minority cities/strongholds in THIER white little towns???? They don't like that shit. And guess what? The colored indigenous don't like it either! So he can thank his forefathers for teaching the indigenous how to invade Europe and settle in wherever the hell they want. You white people are going to just LOVE multiculturalism because your forefathers invented it! It was their departing gift to YOU. (Don't you just love how the Spaniards mixed out the indigenous populations of the Americas and created the Mestizan ("Mexican") mixed race? Yeah, Mexican comes from Mestizan (Mestizos) and means an indigenous native who is MIXED with European. SO MUCH FOR MULTICULTURALISM. You can only shrug 'Mexico' derives from 'mexica', an Aztec word. 'Mestizo' is a Spanish word derived from the Latin word 'mixticius' meaning 'mixed/mongrel'. That's not an Aztec word. They claim it's origins are UNKNOWN, and based on what I've gathered from my in depth research of them and the mixing that took place, the word Mexica it's a corruption of the European Spanish word mestiza. Mestiza is the feminine of the masculine Spanish word Mestizo and simply refers to a female who is of mixed indigenous and European stock. Of course, that makes sense considering the Conquistadors had to sleep with the indigenous females in order to produce their mixed seed. See here (from Wikipedia): The name of Mexico entails the origin, history, and use of the name Mexico, which dates back to 14th century Mesoamerica. Mexico was named after its capital, Mexico City, whose original name was Tenochtitlan. (Now they claim the word is Nahuatl, and then in the same breath, they admit that its form/etymology is unknown, so it is not of that indigenous group's tongue otherwise they could trace it). They admit: The Nahuatl word Mexico means place of the Mexica but the ethnonym Mexicatl itself is of unknown etymology. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Your argument regarding the meaning of the word of Mexica is apropos to the point that they are mixed. The word Mexican also does not identify one ethnic group called the Mexica, because "Mexicans" have been identified to come from various origins (from Wikipedia): The Mexican people have varied origins and an identity that has evolved with the succession of conquests among Amerindian groups and by Europeans. The area that is now modern-day Mexico has cradled many predecessor civilizations, going back as far as the Olmec. [link to en.wikipedia.org] So don't be deceived into believing that "Mexico" is what they told it was. It isn't. AND I forgot to note that the reference source notes that the term Mexica is recorded to have come into use in the Americas in the 1400s. Care to tell us when the Conquistadors invaded the Americas? 14th century. Me·xi·ca noun \ˈmehēˌkä, ˈmāh-\ -s Full Definition of MEXICA : nahuatl Origin of MEXICA Sp méxica, prob. fr. Nahuatl Mexictli, an Aztec war god ------------------------------------------------------- "the Aztecs were from Aztlan. Aztecs means people from Aztlan. Mexica means people from Mexico. Aztecs wandered until they found their new homeland, Mexico. When the found it, they changed their name to Mexica, people from Mexico. According to Dr. Alejandro Villalobos a learned expert from Mexico City, the Aztecs turned into Mexica once Huitzilopochtli appeared in a dream to four priests (Teomama) when our people settled at Chapultepec. Dr. Villalobos says the Huitzilopochtli gave his name to the Aztecs since his was also known as Mexi. So Mexica also means sons of Mexi or Huitzilopochtli. Apparently in the Mexicayotl Chronicle, Mexi is one of the names given to Huitzilopochtli" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48175751 United States 10/19/2013 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: two books 'Mexico' derives from 'mexica', an Aztec word. 'Mestizo' is a Spanish word derived from the Latin word 'mixticius' meaning 'mixed/mongrel'. That's not an Aztec word. They claim it's origins are UNKNOWN, and based on what I've gathered from my in depth research of them and the mixing that took place, the word Mexica it's a corruption of the European Spanish word mestiza. Mestiza is the feminine of the masculine Spanish word Mestizo and simply refers to a female who is of mixed indigenous and European stock. Of course, that makes sense considering the Conquistadors had to sleep with the indigenous females in order to produce their mixed seed. See here (from Wikipedia): The name of Mexico entails the origin, history, and use of the name Mexico, which dates back to 14th century Mesoamerica. Mexico was named after its capital, Mexico City, whose original name was Tenochtitlan. (Now they claim the word is Nahuatl, and then in the same breath, they admit that its form/etymology is unknown, so it is not of that indigenous group's tongue otherwise they could trace it). They admit: The Nahuatl word Mexico means place of the Mexica but the ethnonym Mexicatl itself is of unknown etymology. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Your argument regarding the meaning of the word of Mexica is apropos to the point that they are mixed. The word Mexican also does not identify one ethnic group called the Mexica, because "Mexicans" have been identified to come from various origins (from Wikipedia): The Mexican people have varied origins and an identity that has evolved with the succession of conquests among Amerindian groups and by Europeans. The area that is now modern-day Mexico has cradled many predecessor civilizations, going back as far as the Olmec. [link to en.wikipedia.org] So don't be deceived into believing that "Mexico" is what they told it was. It isn't. AND I forgot to note that the reference source notes that the term Mexica is recorded to have come into use in the Americas in the 1400s. Care to tell us when the Conquistadors invaded the Americas? 14th century. Me·xi·ca noun \ˈmehēˌkä, ˈmāh-\ -s Full Definition of MEXICA : nahuatl Origin of MEXICA Sp méxica, prob. fr. Nahuatl Mexictli, an Aztec war god ------------------------------------------------------- "the Aztecs were from Aztlan. Aztecs means people from Aztlan. Mexica means people from Mexico. Aztecs wandered until they found their new homeland, Mexico. When the found it, they changed their name to Mexica, people from Mexico. According to Dr. Alejandro Villalobos a learned expert from Mexico City, the Aztecs turned into Mexica once Huitzilopochtli appeared in a dream to four priests (Teomama) when our people settled at Chapultepec. Dr. Villalobos says the Huitzilopochtli gave his name to the Aztecs since his was also known as Mexi. So Mexica also means sons of Mexi or Huitzilopochtli. Apparently in the Mexicayotl Chronicle, Mexi is one of the names given to Huitzilopochtli" LOL!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48175751 United States 10/19/2013 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48175751 That's not an Aztec word. They claim it's origins are UNKNOWN, and based on what I've gathered from my in depth research of them and the mixing that took place, the word Mexica it's a corruption of the European Spanish word mestiza. Mestiza is the feminine of the masculine Spanish word Mestizo and simply refers to a female who is of mixed indigenous and European stock. Of course, that makes sense considering the Conquistadors had to sleep with the indigenous females in order to produce their mixed seed. See here (from Wikipedia): The name of Mexico entails the origin, history, and use of the name Mexico, which dates back to 14th century Mesoamerica. Mexico was named after its capital, Mexico City, whose original name was Tenochtitlan. (Now they claim the word is Nahuatl, and then in the same breath, they admit that its form/etymology is unknown, so it is not of that indigenous group's tongue otherwise they could trace it). They admit: The Nahuatl word Mexico means place of the Mexica but the ethnonym Mexicatl itself is of unknown etymology. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Your argument regarding the meaning of the word of Mexica is apropos to the point that they are mixed. The word Mexican also does not identify one ethnic group called the Mexica, because "Mexicans" have been identified to come from various origins (from Wikipedia): The Mexican people have varied origins and an identity that has evolved with the succession of conquests among Amerindian groups and by Europeans. The area that is now modern-day Mexico has cradled many predecessor civilizations, going back as far as the Olmec. [link to en.wikipedia.org] So don't be deceived into believing that "Mexico" is what they told it was. It isn't. AND I forgot to note that the reference source notes that the term Mexica is recorded to have come into use in the Americas in the 1400s. Care to tell us when the Conquistadors invaded the Americas? 14th century. Me·xi·ca noun \ˈmehēˌkä, ˈmāh-\ -s Full Definition of MEXICA : nahuatl Origin of MEXICA Sp méxica, prob. fr. Nahuatl Mexictli, an Aztec war god ------------------------------------------------------- "the Aztecs were from Aztlan. Aztecs means people from Aztlan. Mexica means people from Mexico. Aztecs wandered until they found their new homeland, Mexico. When the found it, they changed their name to Mexica, people from Mexico. According to Dr. Alejandro Villalobos a learned expert from Mexico City, the Aztecs turned into Mexica once Huitzilopochtli appeared in a dream to four priests (Teomama) when our people settled at Chapultepec. Dr. Villalobos says the Huitzilopochtli gave his name to the Aztecs since his was also known as Mexi. So Mexica also means sons of Mexi or Huitzilopochtli. Apparently in the Mexicayotl Chronicle, Mexi is one of the names given to Huitzilopochtli" LOL!!! I notice you didn't provide a link but anyways... I had to get that laugh out and it's still winning. You cite a SPANIARD. That ghost. GET outta here.... At least cite a NATIVE ( a brownie). The majority population of what is now called Mexico are classified as WHITE. The indigenous of that land were FAR from white. So no, that didn't work either. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9806228 United States 10/19/2013 03:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A White Society: How Can We Get There? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34982889 Why would you want one, it would be so boring? So basically you're saying that white people are boring. Is that right, you racist? I totally disagree with you, I think white people are fascinating, intelligent, artistic, and civilized. Do you think Japan is a boring country? Japan is 99.99% ethnic Japanese. That's a very broad statement which doesn't really explain anything. The reason why our ancestors were very selective about the mates they chose is because they knew that it would affect the survival of their future offspring. Our ancestors didn't just hop in the sack with any stranger who crossed their path. Many ancient groups prohibited mixing with foreign outside groups. The reason why most Europeans don't want to mix with African people, is because it is acknowledged among Europeans that Africans are intellectually inferior and those African traits aren't as valuable in a modern society. African traits might be valuable in the old hunter-gatherer model but not in a modern society that favors high intelligence. OP, you are most ignorant. There are few fully black people even in Africa. Where do you get your garbage about Eurpo centric peoples being selective in who they mated with? |
two books User ID: 48596965 United States 10/19/2013 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48175751 AND I forgot to note that the reference source notes that the term Mexica is recorded to have come into use in the Americas in the 1400s. Care to tell us when the Conquistadors invaded the Americas? 14th century. Me·xi·ca noun \ˈmehēˌkä, ˈmāh-\ -s Full Definition of MEXICA : nahuatl Origin of MEXICA Sp méxica, prob. fr. Nahuatl Mexictli, an Aztec war god ------------------------------------------------------- "the Aztecs were from Aztlan. Aztecs means people from Aztlan. Mexica means people from Mexico. Aztecs wandered until they found their new homeland, Mexico. When the found it, they changed their name to Mexica, people from Mexico. According to Dr. Alejandro Villalobos a learned expert from Mexico City, the Aztecs turned into Mexica once Huitzilopochtli appeared in a dream to four priests (Teomama) when our people settled at Chapultepec. Dr. Villalobos says the Huitzilopochtli gave his name to the Aztecs since his was also known as Mexi. So Mexica also means sons of Mexi or Huitzilopochtli. Apparently in the Mexicayotl Chronicle, Mexi is one of the names given to Huitzilopochtli" LOL!!! I notice you didn't provide a link but anyways... I had to get that laugh out and it's still winning. You cite a SPANIARD. That ghost. GET outta here.... At least cite a NATIVE ( a brownie). The majority population of what is now called Mexico are classified as WHITE. The indigenous of that land were FAR from white. So no, that didn't work either. "The original inhabitants of Mexico called themselves the "Mexicas". The word 'Mexico' is identical in several languages, such as Mixtec, Otomi, Pame, and Tarasco. In "Nahuatl" (the language of the "Aztecs/Mexicas") it is the combination of three words: 1. Metx(tli) - 'moon' 2. xic(tli) - 'navel' 3. co - 'in' This gives Mexico a meaning of "In the navel of the Moon". Since the postions of the lakes, upon which Mexico City was founded, are shaped like a rabbit and correspond to the same pattern on the moon, thus: Mexico = The Rabbit's Navel" Indians.org ---------------------------------------------------------- "The Aztecs who left Aztlan had wandered for many years and finally settled in Coatepec (Snake Hill in Nahuatl) near Tula. There the Aztecs built a city and lived for many years. When the Aztecs were in Coatepec, a dispute arose. Some of the Aztecs who followed Huitzilopochtli wanted to leave and some of the Aztecs who followed Coyolxauhqui (Huitzilopochtli's Sister) wanted to stay in Coatepec. In the battle that ensued the followers of Huitzilopochtli won and they changed their name to Mexicas. The Sculpture of Coyolxauhqui's dismembered body lies today at the foot of the Templo Mayor the religious center of the Mexica people. Mexicas, therefore, are the Aztecs that split from the other Aztecs in Coatepec. The Mexicas were led by Huitzilopochtli. They continued south and founded the city of Tenochtitlan or Mexico (what is now Mexico City) in Anahuac. Tenochtitlan in Nahuatl means the place of prickly pear cactus. Tenochtitlan was also refered to as Mexico. The Empire of the Mexicas was also called Mexico. Mexicas means people from Mexico. Hence, Mexicano or Mexican means the same as Mexica, people from Mexico The City of Tenochtitlan was built in the middle of Lake Texcoco. Anahuac or the Valley of Mexico was full of lakes at the time the first Europeans came to Mexico. Anahuac in Nahuatl means "Near the water or sea." Tenochtitlan, like Venice in Italy, was a city built on water with many canals. Canals and canoes were an important method of transportation for the Mexicas. In summary, the Aztecs were from Aztlan. Aztecs means people from Aztlan. Mexica means people from Mexico. Aztecs wandered until they found their new homeland, Mexico. When the found it, they changed their name to Mexica, people from Mexico. According to Dr. Alejandro Villalobos a learned expert from Mexico City, the Aztecs turned into Mexica once Huitzilopochtli appeared in a dream to four priests (Teomama) when our people settled at Chapultepec. Dr. Villalobos says the Huitzilopochtli gave his name to the Aztecs since his was also known as Mexi. So Mexica also means sons of Mexi or Huitzilopochtli. Apparently in the Mexicayotl Chronicle, Mexi is one of the names given to Huitzilopochtli." mexica.net The majority of the mex pop. may be categorized as White (I doubt it) but only about 10% are actually White people. Most are like you, a mestizo. So you got caught talking out of your ass. No big deal. Move on. |