Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,775 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 624,285
Pageviews Today: 816,906Threads Today: 234Posts Today: 3,272
07:11 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??

 
UnmannedAerialPilot

User ID: 48170373
United States
10/29/2013 09:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
You believe secret service agents are aliens, and that there are aliens hiding behind the curtains during Bush and Obama speeches.

You believe aliens invented the Bible.

You also believe William and Kate's baby is an alien, oh wait, they didn't have one...it's a government-controlled alien pretending to be their baby...

Are we supposed to be surprised that you can't figure out how to use advanced NASA imagery? HAHA OK!

serious
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 45723380
Australia
10/29/2013 09:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
advanced NASA imagery?

rofl5
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 09:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
You believe secret service agents are aliens, and that there are aliens hiding behind the curtains during Bush and Obama speeches.

You believe aliens invented the Bible.

You also believe William and Kate's baby is an alien, oh wait, they didn't have one...it's a government-controlled alien pretending to be their baby...

Are we supposed to be surprised that you can't figure out how to use advanced NASA imagery? HAHA OK!

serious
 Quoting: UnmannedAerialPilot


I don't see the results of what you think you can do with the same advanced imagery, anywhere here!

norespect
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 10:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
bumpbumpbump
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 10:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
whatever
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 48376296
United States
10/29/2013 10:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Human curiosity works better, thus if gastro has is involved in a subject you can bank on it being tainted.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45723380


I wonder if indeed there are two different raw data on web, one showing ISON on STEREO and other not, what suggests that one is fabricated and not exactly "raw".

I think I obtained the same or similar result as the "background subtraction to remove the solar glare gradient" mentioned by Astro, as you can see below.

[link to w36i.img-up.net]
[link to j27i.img-up.net]

If so, the $ one million in this case is; Is ISON going through another entirely different path, as some doomers claim???


 Quoting: Ford Prefect


Good lord, I SHOWED YOU it was in the images where it was predicted to be. What the hell dude? I wasted my time apparently.
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 48376296
United States
10/29/2013 10:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Interesting is that NASA set a estimate date when ISON would be seen on STEREO A HI2 FOV, but it's still unseen on SECCHI A HI2.

But apparently that doesn't prevent some people from uploading mysterious videos allegedly showing ISON on HI2 with images of unknown origin.

wtf
 Quoting: Ford Prefect


It is seen on HI2, when they said it would be, where they said it would be. Here, I'm not going to make a whole video on it, but here is ISON in Ahead HI2 on October 12th. I processed the raw fits files like I said, by doing a dynamic background subtraction to remove the solar glare gradient in PixInsight.
[link to img690.imageshack.us]
You can access the raw fits files here:
ftp://stereoftp.nascom.nasa.gov/pub/ins_data/secchi/L0/a/img/​hi_2/20131012/
I used 20131012_000921_s4h2A.fts and 20131012_200921_s4h2A.fts
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Bump for non-tards.
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 48376296
United States
10/29/2013 10:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Hint hint, note how many more stars you can easily see in the area around the pleiades in my photo above vs the OP's video. He didn't properly adjust the histogram levels after subtracting the background before converting to an 8 bit image.
astrobanner2
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 11:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Human curiosity works better, thus if gastro has is involved in a subject you can bank on it being tainted.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45723380


I wonder if indeed there are two different raw data on web, one showing ISON on STEREO and other not, what suggests that one is fabricated and not exactly "raw".

I think I obtained the same or similar result as the "background subtraction to remove the solar glare gradient" mentioned by Astro, as you can see below.

[link to w36i.img-up.net]
[link to j27i.img-up.net]

If so, the $ one million in this case is; Is ISON going through another entirely different path, as some doomers claim???


 Quoting: Ford Prefect


Good lord, I SHOWED YOU it was in the images where it was predicted to be. What the hell dude? I wasted my time apparently.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You showed me an ALLEGED post-processed image, with a faint dot ALLEGEDLY in the same predicted path, but I downloaded the raw data from the SAME FTP server you suggested, used the same "background subtract" resource you said, and I don't see shit where NASA says it's supposed to be.

U mad because someone is questioning you, as usual???
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 11:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
blahblah5

Hint hint, note how many more stars you can easily see in the area around the pleiades in my photo above vs the OP's video. He didn't properly adjust the histogram levels after subtracting the background before converting to an 8 bit image.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Here we go.

Same "histogram-levels" yadayada psychobabble again.

What next? Parallax?
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 11:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
The problem I see here, is that there's nobody else outside Astro's social shilling club, besides me, willing to download the raw data, process it and get their own results, to further comparisons.

Everybody around here is always regurgitating someone else's video, someone else's images, someone else's claims.

When it comes to the ISON issue around here, it looks a lot like good cop/bad cop routine.

Last Edited by Ford Prefect on 10/29/2013 11:14 PM
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 11:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??

It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48136264
Spain
10/29/2013 11:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Ford.

I think the genuine problem here is nobody else knows what the fuck what they are doing. Apart from Astro do we have anyone else who knows what they are talking about down to the smallest detail??

Let me guess...no we don't! And there is your problem. Not that I am defending Astro...but it's a bit like seeing your doctor. You may want a second opinion and unless you trust someone else you just have to go with what you got.

If you are truly serious about researching this there are loads of forums online out there. And there will be plenty of people to explain and help you with what you want to know. But prepare yourself...there will be serious lack of doom tounge
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48525015
Australia
10/29/2013 11:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Ford.

I think the genuine problem here is nobody else knows what the fuck what they are doing. Apart from Astro do we have anyone else who knows what they are talking about down to the smallest detail??

Let me guess...no we don't! And there is your problem. Not that I am defending Astro...but it's a bit like seeing your doctor. You may want a second opinion and unless you trust someone else you just have to go with what you got.

If you are truly serious about researching this there are loads of forums online out there. And there will be plenty of people to explain and help you with what you want to know. But prepare yourself...there will be serious lack of doom tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48136264



Yes.

Try a good astronomy forum (well frequented) and find someone who is vastly experienced in this field. Most people on here are retards.

I hope you do this and return back with your findings.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 11:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Ford.

I think the genuine problem here is nobody else knows what the fuck what they are doing. Apart from Astro do we have anyone else who knows what they are talking about down to the smallest detail??

Let me guess...no we don't! And there is your problem. Not that I am defending Astro...but it's a bit like seeing your doctor. You may want a second opinion and unless you trust someone else you just have to go with what you got.

If you are truly serious about researching this there are loads of forums online out there. And there will be plenty of people to explain and help you with what you want to know. But prepare yourself...there will be serious lack of doom tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48136264



Yes.

Try a good astronomy forum (well frequented) and find someone who is vastly experienced in this field. Most people on here are retards.

I hope you do this and return back with your findings.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48525015


I really don't think people will be willing to spend the whole fucking day downloading tons of raw data, batch-processing, converting and making videos for free, just to satisfy the curiosity of someone who thinks that comet ISON may be off the path.

cruise
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/29/2013 11:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Ford.

I think the genuine problem here is nobody else knows what the fuck what they are doing. Apart from Astro do we have anyone else who knows what they are talking about down to the smallest detail??

Let me guess...no we don't! And there is your problem. Not that I am defending Astro...but it's a bit like seeing your doctor. You may want a second opinion and unless you trust someone else you just have to go with what you got.

If you are truly serious about researching this there are loads of forums online out there. And there will be plenty of people to explain and help you with what you want to know. But prepare yourself...there will be serious lack of doom tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48136264


I can't shake off the feeling that the "confrontations" between Astro's "info" and doomtards disinfo around here, is just bad cop/good cop routine.
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 48376296
United States
10/29/2013 11:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Human curiosity works better, thus if gastro has is involved in a subject you can bank on it being tainted.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45723380


I wonder if indeed there are two different raw data on web, one showing ISON on STEREO and other not, what suggests that one is fabricated and not exactly "raw".

I think I obtained the same or similar result as the "background subtraction to remove the solar glare gradient" mentioned by Astro, as you can see below.

[link to w36i.img-up.net]
[link to j27i.img-up.net]

If so, the $ one million in this case is; Is ISON going through another entirely different path, as some doomers claim???


 Quoting: Ford Prefect


Good lord, I SHOWED YOU it was in the images where it was predicted to be. What the hell dude? I wasted my time apparently.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You showed me an ALLEGED post-processed image, with a faint dot ALLEGEDLY in the same predicted path, but I downloaded the raw data from the SAME FTP server you suggested, used the same "background subtract" resource you said, and I don't see shit where NASA says it's supposed to be.

U mad because someone is questioning you, as usual???
 Quoting: Ford Prefect

Ford, I can only lead you to the water, I can't make you drink, nor can I make you process high bit depth fits files properly. Repeatedly you show me you can't do it.
astrobanner2
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/30/2013 01:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
...


I wonder if indeed there are two different raw data on web, one showing ISON on STEREO and other not, what suggests that one is fabricated and not exactly "raw".

I think I obtained the same or similar result as the "background subtraction to remove the solar glare gradient" mentioned by Astro, as you can see below.

[link to w36i.img-up.net]
[link to j27i.img-up.net]

If so, the $ one million in this case is; Is ISON going through another entirely different path, as some doomers claim???


 Quoting: Ford Prefect


Good lord, I SHOWED YOU it was in the images where it was predicted to be. What the hell dude? I wasted my time apparently.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You showed me an ALLEGED post-processed image, with a faint dot ALLEGEDLY in the same predicted path, but I downloaded the raw data from the SAME FTP server you suggested, used the same "background subtract" resource you said, and I don't see shit where NASA says it's supposed to be.

U mad because someone is questioning you, as usual???
 Quoting: Ford Prefect

blahblah5

Ford, I can only lead you to the water, I can't make you drink, nor can I make you process high bit depth fits files properly. Repeatedly you show me you can't do it.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm not an astronomer and I never pretended to be one, but there's NOBODY else around here, outside your shilling club, to corroborate your psychobabble. Also it seems that there's NOBODY else besides me around here, willing to go through that FITS stuff, to validate your point or mine.

Repeatedly you use the same excuses and create the same diversions when questioned.


It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48525015
Australia
10/30/2013 01:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Ford.

I think the genuine problem here is nobody else knows what the fuck what they are doing. Apart from Astro do we have anyone else who knows what they are talking about down to the smallest detail??

Let me guess...no we don't! And there is your problem. Not that I am defending Astro...but it's a bit like seeing your doctor. You may want a second opinion and unless you trust someone else you just have to go with what you got.

If you are truly serious about researching this there are loads of forums online out there. And there will be plenty of people to explain and help you with what you want to know. But prepare yourself...there will be serious lack of doom tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48136264



Yes.

Try a good astronomy forum (well frequented) and find someone who is vastly experienced in this field. Most people on here are retards.

I hope you do this and return back with your findings.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48525015


I really don't think people will be willing to spend the whole fucking day downloading tons of raw data, batch-processing, converting and making videos for free, just to satisfy the curiosity of someone who thinks that comet ISON may be off the path.

cruise
 Quoting: Ford Prefect



OK well get the fuck off this website then cunt!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48525015
Australia
10/30/2013 01:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
skull_fingskull_fingskull_fingskull_fingskull_fing
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/30/2013 01:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Ford.

I think the genuine problem here is nobody else knows what the fuck what they are doing. Apart from Astro do we have anyone else who knows what they are talking about down to the smallest detail??

Let me guess...no we don't! And there is your problem. Not that I am defending Astro...but it's a bit like seeing your doctor. You may want a second opinion and unless you trust someone else you just have to go with what you got.

If you are truly serious about researching this there are loads of forums online out there. And there will be plenty of people to explain and help you with what you want to know. But prepare yourself...there will be serious lack of doom tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48136264



Yes.

Try a good astronomy forum (well frequented) and find someone who is vastly experienced in this field. Most people on here are retards.

I hope you do this and return back with your findings.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48525015


I really don't think people will be willing to spend the whole fucking day downloading tons of raw data, batch-processing, converting and making videos for free, just to satisfy the curiosity of someone who thinks that comet ISON may be off the path.

cruise
 Quoting: Ford Prefect



OK well get the fuck off this website then cunt!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48525015


butthurt9
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Doommincus Maximus

User ID: 15009918
New Zealand
10/30/2013 01:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Ford.

I think the genuine problem here is nobody else knows what the fuck what they are doing. Apart from Astro do we have anyone else who knows what they are talking about down to the smallest detail??

Let me guess...no we don't! And there is your problem. Not that I am defending Astro...but it's a bit like seeing your doctor. You may want a second opinion and unless you trust someone else you just have to go with what you got.

If you are truly serious about researching this there are loads of forums online out there. And there will be plenty of people to explain and help you with what you want to know. But prepare yourself...there will be serious lack of doom tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48136264



Yes.

Try a good astronomy forum (well frequented) and find someone who is vastly experienced in this field. Most people on here are retards.

I hope you do this and return back with your findings.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48525015


I really don't think people will be willing to spend the whole fucking day downloading tons of raw data, batch-processing, converting and making videos for free, just to satisfy the curiosity of someone who thinks that comet ISON may be off the path.

cruise
 Quoting: Ford Prefect


And when they do you call bullshit because you can't do it?

Someone showed you how, and yet you just said "allegedly"

come on man use your common sense.
Stand up for what you believe in, even if you stand alone.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/30/2013 01:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Interesting how Astro always show up with everything cooked and he never tells how he obtained what he shows, of a way that others can verify. He always throw a technical psychobabble on the way, so that we think he's irrefutably right.

Of course nobody else is willing to go through that FITS stuff to at least TRY to see if it's as he says it is.


It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Doommincus Maximus

User ID: 15009918
New Zealand
10/30/2013 01:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Interesting how Astro always show up with everything cooked and he never tells how he obtained what he shows, of a way that others can verify. He always throw a technical psychobabble on the way, so that we think he's irrefutably right.

Of course nobody else is willing to go through that FITS stuff to at least TRY to see if it's as he says it is.


 Quoting: Ford Prefect


Then pay someone to do it for you.

Or just shut the fuck up.

He helped you for free and you give him shit about it, if you don't believe him that's fine but you don't have to troll him because you cant process the images.

Obviously its not easy.

so ether find someone else who is qualified of stop you bitch crying.

I bet you $100 ANYONE that processed these images for you on this site would be wasting their time because they would be accused of faking the data or being part of the so called "Astro shill team."


Time to grow up buddy.

Last Edited by Doommincus Maximus on 10/30/2013 01:40 AM
Stand up for what you believe in, even if you stand alone.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/30/2013 01:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Ford.

I think the genuine problem here is nobody else knows what the fuck what they are doing. Apart from Astro do we have anyone else who knows what they are talking about down to the smallest detail??

Let me guess...no we don't! And there is your problem. Not that I am defending Astro...but it's a bit like seeing your doctor. You may want a second opinion and unless you trust someone else you just have to go with what you got.

If you are truly serious about researching this there are loads of forums online out there. And there will be plenty of people to explain and help you with what you want to know. But prepare yourself...there will be serious lack of doom tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48136264



Yes.

Try a good astronomy forum (well frequented) and find someone who is vastly experienced in this field. Most people on here are retards.

I hope you do this and return back with your findings.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48525015


I really don't think people will be willing to spend the whole fucking day downloading tons of raw data, batch-processing, converting and making videos for free, just to satisfy the curiosity of someone who thinks that comet ISON may be off the path.

cruise
 Quoting: Ford Prefect


And when they do you call bullshit because you can't do it?

Someone showed you how, and yet you just said "allegedly"

come on man use your common sense.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


When they do what?? Show me ONE video with raw FITS data of ISON on GLP, besides mine, that was not brought up pre-cooked by Astro??

Not the post-processed color stuff of SECCHI or SOHO, the raw stuff.
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48525015
Australia
10/30/2013 01:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Interesting how Astro always show up with everything cooked and he never tells how he obtained what he shows, of a way that others can verify. He always throw a technical psychobabble on the way, so that we think he's irrefutably right.

Of course nobody else is willing to go through that FITS stuff to at least TRY to see if it's as he says it is.


 Quoting: Ford Prefect


If you are expecting more experts on here you are just trolling and know you are dumb and wrong.

Go to another website with people who know what the fuck they are on about and report back with your fucking findings!
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/30/2013 01:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Interesting how Astro always show up with everything cooked and he never tells how he obtained what he shows, of a way that others can verify. He always throw a technical psychobabble on the way, so that we think he's irrefutably right.

Of course nobody else is willing to go through that FITS stuff to at least TRY to see if it's as he says it is.


 Quoting: Ford Prefect


Then pay someone to do it for you.

Or just shut the fuck up.

He helped you for free and you give him shit about it, if you don't believe him that's fine but you don't have to troll him because you cant process the images.

Obviously its not easy.

so ether find someone else who is qualified of stop you bitch crying.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Don't tell me to shut up a thousand miles away, behind the comfort and security of your keyboard your motherfucker.

He didn't "help me", he just threw a bone expecting I wouldn't go through all the trouble of messing with that raw stuff, because nobody else around here does it and everybody stops in front of his technical psychobabble.

I'm not trolling anybody, I'm ARGUING over a data that differs from a questionable result.

If you're so butthurt for him, go suck his dick and tell him how brilliant he is.

Douchebag!

Last Edited by Ford Prefect on 10/30/2013 01:47 AM
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Ford Prefect  (OP)

User ID: 49127649
Brazil
10/30/2013 01:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Interesting how Astro always show up with everything cooked and he never tells how he obtained what he shows, of a way that others can verify. He always throw a technical psychobabble on the way, so that we think he's irrefutably right.

Of course nobody else is willing to go through that FITS stuff to at least TRY to see if it's as he says it is.


 Quoting: Ford Prefect

blahblah5

If you are expecting more experts on here you are just trolling and know you are dumb and wrong.

Go to another website with people who know what the fuck they are on about and report back with your fucking findings!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48525015


Go change your tampon you fucking cunt.
It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is.
Doommincus Maximus

User ID: 15009918
New Zealand
10/30/2013 01:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Interesting how Astro always show up with everything cooked and he never tells how he obtained what he shows, of a way that others can verify. He always throw a technical psychobabble on the way, so that we think he's irrefutably right.

Of course nobody else is willing to go through that FITS stuff to at least TRY to see if it's as he says it is.


 Quoting: Ford Prefect


Then pay someone to do it for you.

Or just shut the fuck up.

He helped you for free and you give him shit about it, if you don't believe him that's fine but you don't have to troll him because you cant process the images.

Obviously its not easy.

so ether find someone else who is qualified of stop you bitch crying.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Don't tell me to shut up a thousand miles away, behind the comfort and security of your keyboard your motherfucker.

He didn't "help me", he just threw a bone expecting I wouldn't go through all the trouble of messing with that raw stuff, because nobody else around here does it and everybody stops in front of his technical psychobabble.

I'm not trolling anybody, I'm ARGUING over a data that differs from a questionable result.

If you're so butthurt for him, go suck his dick and tell him how brilliant he is.

Douchebag!
 Quoting: Ford Prefect


But what is going to stop you from arguing over anyone else giving you data.

If anyone else posted that data it would be valid?, but because its Astro its fake.

So you believe in shills, but just one?


let me guess, I am now part of the Shill team. Fucktard.
Stand up for what you believe in, even if you stand alone.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48525015
Australia
10/30/2013 01:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Over 400 mb of raw images straight from NASA/NASCOM server, as suggested by ASTRO, but ISON still NOWHERE to be seen on STEREO A HI-2, or is it??
Interesting how Astro always show up with everything cooked and he never tells how he obtained what he shows, of a way that others can verify. He always throw a technical psychobabble on the way, so that we think he's irrefutably right.

Of course nobody else is willing to go through that FITS stuff to at least TRY to see if it's as he says it is.


 Quoting: Ford Prefect

blahblah5

If you are expecting more experts on here you are just trolling and know you are dumb and wrong.

Go to another website with people who know what the fuck they are on about and report back with your fucking findings!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48525015


Go change your tampon you fucking cunt.
 Quoting: Ford Prefect


I started off nice but your ignorance has turned me nasty cunt!





GLP