You lie

2013-11-23 03:30:08.6 31.76 S 177.82 W 46 M 4.9 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION 2013-11-23 10:24
earthquake2013-11-18 22:23:28.0 30.49 S 179.32 W 340 mb 5.0 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION 2013-11-19 06:55
earthquake2013-11-09 15:02:56.0 28.89 S 176.54 W 10 mb 4.6 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION 2013-11-09 20:26
earthquake2013-11-09 14:53:31.0 28.47 S 176.81 W 40 mb 5.4 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION 2013-11-09 21:12
earthquake2013-11-08 12:30:02.0 31.58 S 178.08 W 20 mb 4.8 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION 2013-11-15 07:58
earthquake2013-11-07 09:22:26.0 31.93 S 179.93 E 350 M 4.5 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION 2013-11-07 11:56
earthquake2013-11-05 09:36:58.0 32.52 S 178.21 W 30 M 4.8 SOUTH OF KERMADEC ISLANDS 2013-11-05 14:05
earthquake2013-11-05 05:31:27.0 32.63 S 178.17 W 30 mb 4.9 SOUTH OF KERMADEC ISLANDS 2013-11-05 12:09
earthquake2013-11-01 18:57:43.0 33.98 S 178.38 W 2 mb 4.9 SOUTH OF KERMADEC ISLANDS 2013-11-01 21:07
earthquake2013-11-01 04:04:07.9 29.52 S 178.20 W 10 M 4.7 KERMADEC ISLANDS, NEW ZEALAND 2013-11-01 07:55
earthquake2013-10-24 00:25:41.0 31.04 S 178.14 W 10 Mw 5.7 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION 2013-10-24 06:53
earthquake2013-10-19 01:38:36.0 29.76 S 176.68 W 59 mb 4.6 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION 2013-10-19 01:58
earthquake2013-10-18 01:39:11.0 29.04 S 177.29 W 60 mb 4.8 KERMADEC ISLANDS, NEW ZEALAND 2013-10-18 06:50
earthquake2013-10-15 02:02:30.0 29.48 S 178.34 W 25 mb 5.0 KERMADEC ISLANDS, NEW ZEALAND 2013-10-15 06:54
earthquake2013-10-12 15:49:03.0 30.55 S 176.50 W 30 mb 5.1 KERMADEC ISLANDS REGION

about the same for other "predictable areas"...

know that you are hopeless
so it's not for you but for preserved remnants of the mind


[link to all-geo.org]

Don’t believe anyone who claims they can accurately predict earthquakes over the short-term. These people are at best extremely misguided, and at worst frauds and charlatans. The only way that they are successful is to make loose ‘predictions’ in a seismically active area and adopt very broad criteria for ‘success’ (‘That magnitude 5 200 km from where I said there’d be a magnitude 8 was totally right. I’m a genius!’). People claiming the prospect of an even bigger shock in the aftermath of a big quake, such as seems to have been the case for last week’s destructive M 7.2 in the Philippines, operate from a similar playbook.

When you read headlines with the form ‘Can x predict earthquakes?’, the answer is always ‘NO’. For any value of x, be it planetary alignments, animal behaviour, weather, foreshock patterns, radon gas emissions, ionospheric disturbances, low frequency electromagnetic signals, anything, the answer is still ‘NO’.