"PETRUS ROMANUS" - The Prophecy Explained

fix the vid, anonymous poster, for now it is available only to your private circle.

the king god is just a farce

he just have to fullfill their prophecies

or its not him

its all a farce of sick idiots

dangerous people that must be internated in hospital

You can trust the Vatican.

People have listened to the wrong people on the internet over the years, people that have no information. They've listened to the UFO Disclosure 2009 prediction, and Pattie Brassard, and Marshall Masters, and Sheldon Songstad.

But the Vatican is a real secret society. They know. You've developed a distrust for everything because you've been on GLP and people have foolishly listened to predictions from internet alternative media types rather than waiting for confirmation from a bona-fide secret society. Internet alternative media types don't belong to a secret society.

But secret societies don't lie. They tell the truth. The Final Judgement has arrived in which we will sit before St. Peter in judgement during the Great Tribulation. The Vatican won't give you the date, but they have confirmed that we are now living in the time of Petrus Romanus.

The resurrection of St. Peter on November 24th was the Vatican's way of confirming what we have all suspected, which is that St. Peter is indeed Petrus Romanus, and we are now living in the times of the Final Judgement and the Great Tribulation, and that during this papacy we will experience the final judgement. It's logical and lucid. The Vatican's disclosure on this matter is crystal clear.

The Vatican would never embarrass itself by getting the prophecy of St. Malachy incorrect. That would be the biggest embarrassment imaginable to the Vatican. They do know what lies ahead, and they have precise knowledge of the future. They would never allow themselves to get this wrong. They knew what they were doing on November 24th when they resurrected Petrus Romanus (St. Peter, considered to be the first Pope of Rome, a.k.a. Peter the Roman. There is only one Peter in the Catholic church, and that's St. Peter). The Final Judgement is upon us. Nothing is more important to the Vatican than getting that right.

Last Edited by Crackhead_Bill on 12/19/2013 10:36 AM

Take a look at his coffin and his coat of arms:

[link to thebeastfromrevelation.files.wordpress.com]
[link to thebeastfromrevelation.files.wordpress.com]

Notice the cross and the M on both pictures.

Now read those two prophecies by Nostradamus:

Nostradamus prophecy: Quatrain 9, 84
The King exposed will complete the slaughter,
After having discovered his origin:
Torrent to open the tomb of marble and lead 1,
Of a great Roman with “Medusine” sign 2.

[link to www.crystalinks.com]

and

Nostradamus prophecy: Quatrain 6, 66 (666, coincidence?)
At the foundation of the new sect 3,
The bones of the great Roman will be found,
A sepulchre covered by marble 1 will appear,
Earth to quake in April 4 poorly buried.

[link to www.crystalinks.com]

What we learn from that?

1 His coffin is made of lead and covered by marble:

“the Pope was buried in three coffins, the first of wood, which was displayed during the funeral, the second of lead, which is sealed, and the third, external one, which is also made of wood” [link to www.zenit.org]

“The triple coffin which was lowered into the tomb, is covered with a plain marble slab featuring his name in Latin” [link to saintpetersbasilica.org]

2 The M on both his coffin and the coat of arms is the Medusine sign.

3 His “resurrection” will be the foundation of the new world order religion.

4 He is to be made saint in April 2014. [link to www.bbc.co.uk]

“When he opened the sixth seal, I looked, and behold, there was a great earthquake, and the sun became black as sackcloth, the full moon became like blood, and the stars of the sky fell to the earth as the fig tree sheds its winter fruit when shaken by a gale.”

A total lunar eclipse will take place on April 15, 2014

[link to thebeastfromrevelation.files.wordpress.com]

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

source: [link to thebeastfromrevelation.wordpress.com]

they want to make apocalipse , kill your family and anyoneelse
outside their sect
or even make a collective suicide

and say that the guilty is their chief

it wouldn't be the first time..

that would be odd indeed since Christ warned his apostles not to be in any way associated with and/or referenced as "priests"

he was not advocating a place of worship wherein some man, any man, would place themselves between each and every individual upon the earth and their Father who art in Heaven

quite the opposite in fact, which is why the veil that kept the general public from entering into the "holy of holies"
was rent, top to bottom in one fell swoop...

gag...

the original sin just entered the building however, and that will change everything from the ground up

for a time, a time, and half a time

best brace yourselves to be "quick studies" in all things Supernatural in nature

cuz that IS the nature o' the beast...

original sin

they dont even trust what they say

thy contradict averything they say

they cancle the original sin
with baptism

they trust in a chief for disobeybg his condemnation
for the original sin

to wok hard
to make babis with pain
to die
and what else...


it was just a tale for children
useful for someone
but just a tale


don go to mental asylum for a tale

you have it inside

I respected Catholicism as a religion,not mine of course, but I did respect it. Then one day on the net I saw a catholic priest masturbating under his robe during the choir boys singing in the middle of mass. I have never seen a catholic priest the same.. Too many stories and too much proof. The icing on the unholy cake.

I respected Catholicism as a religion,not mine of course, but I did respect it. Then one day on the net I saw a catholic priest masturbating under his robe during the choir boys singing in the middle of mass. I have never seen a catholic priest the same.. Too many stories and too much proof. The icing on the unholy cake.

In addition, we know almost for sure that Nero decided to accuse Christians because in the days before they alluded to a very close end of the world, which was held in the flames.

-------------------------------------------------

No alternative to the traditional version , the historian Gerhard Baudy , taking up a thesis previously processed by Carlo Pascal and Leon Herrman, put forward the hypothesis that they were actually Christians to voluntarily set fire to Rome, in order to take action on a Egyptian apocalyptic prophecy , according to which the rising of Sirius , the star of Canis major, would indicate the fall of the great wicked city [2]. Recently, an Italian scholar , Dimitri Landeschi , through a careful historical reconstruction of the dramatic events that took place in Rome in the years 64 and 65 AD ( the great fire and the conspiracy of Piso ) has suggested that fire to Rome was not Nero but , in all likelihood , a handful of fanatics belonging to the extremist fringe of the Christian community of Rome, with the complicity of certain moral environments of the senatorial aristocracy , among which were hidden the true inspirers of that nefarious operation . Landeschi in formulating his hypothesis , takes up and develops similar arguments advanced in the past by historians such as Charles Pascal , Gerhard Baudy and Joseph Caiati .

-----------------------------------------------

The Romans had initially distinguished with difficulty Christians from other Jewish sects and Suetonius gives a measure of the Emperor Claudius, who drove out the Jews from Rome because of the riots were born in the wake of "Chrestus" ("instigator Chresto tumultuantes" Suetonius, De vita Caesarum, Claudius, 25.4).
The same is also confirmed by Suetonius that Nero had sent Christians to torture and defines them as "a new and evil superstition" ("afflicti suppliciis Christiani, genus hominum superstitionis nouae ac maleficae" Suetonius, De vita Caesarum, Black, 16), but without link this measure to the fire.

Well considering that the antichrist and false prophet will probably be portrayed to the public at first as being great men of humbleness that bring peace and prosperity,this really does not surprise me.

Yes outwardly he seems to be a nice guy and way different then any pope we've ever seen.That makes it even more probable to me then that he may be the false prophet.

^^^^^ THIS

Initially I also thought that Petrus Romanus was like a bookend for Malachy's prophecy since every pope assumes the mantle of St. Peter when they become pope, and no pope would ever take the name Peter, so the last pope embodies the spirit of St. Peter (Peter, who is considered to be the first Pope of Rome, a.k.a. Peter the Roman) when the Apocalypse finally takes hold since every pope is considered to be "Peter." But in actuality, it's not a reference to the identity or nationality of the final pope at all. Just a few weeks ago I suddenly remembered from my CCD classes in the early 90's that the teacher had said "During the Final Judgement, we will all sit in judgement before St. Peter." That's what Petrus Romanus means. It simply means that during the papacy that comes after "Glory of the Olive" (Benedict XVI, the second-to-last pope, who left in February 2013), the Final Judgement/Apocalypse/Great Tribulation will occur, and St. Peter (Petrus Romanus, a.k.a. Peter the Roman, considered to the first bishop/pope of Rome) will feed his flock as the world comes to an end. "Petrus Romanus" has nothing to do with the Italian nationality or name of the final pope. Based on what I read, there is only one PETER in the catholic church, and that's St. Peter, the first pope of Rome. Malachy would never attribute the name "Petrus Romanus" to Pope Francis or to any pope, no matter what their name or nationality is. That's sacrilege, it's blasphemy. When Malachy says "PETRUS ROMANUS" he is referring to the St. Peter and the Last Judgement. All Malachy's prophecy is stating is that after "Glory of the Olive," the next pope (Pope Francis) will preside over the church when the Great Tribulation occurs, resulting in the rise of St. Peter and the Final Judgement that catholics have been talking about forever.

I'm surprised that guys like Tom Horn and Chris Putnam still don't see this, and even I fell for that at first and was hoping it would be an italian pope with a name Peter. Horn and Putnam continue to latch on to the whole italian descent nonsense and the Jesuit crap. "Petrus Romanus" is attributed to this pope because it's during this pope's reign that the Final Judgement occurs, St. Peter (Peter the Roman) will judge his people and feed his flock as the world as we know it comes to an end. The spirit of St. Peter returns when the Great Tribulation occurs. That's why the Vatican resurrected St. Peter's bones on November 24th - That's a hint that the Great Tribulation is now at hand, the Final Judgement will soon occur, and that we are living in the times of Petrus Romanus. It confirms St. Malachy's prophecy and it confirms the interpretation that Petrus Romanus is St. Peter, and it confirms that Pope Francis is history's last Pope. It's obvious. 

"Petrus Romanus" means "Apocalypse" to Catholics. That's what happens while Pope Francis presides over the Church. He's history's last pope, and once the Apocalypse starts, St Peter (Petrus Romanus) presides over his people. There is only one Peter in the Catholic Church.

St. Peter (Petrus Romanus) has risen. The end is nigh.

St. Peter (Petrus Romanus) has risen. The end is so very nigh.

First of all, Peter was not a pope, not the first one and not ever one. Peter didn't even evangelize Rome, Paul did.

Secondly, those weren't Peter's bones, anyone with any kind of common sense knows you don't believe a bunch of lying, homosexual, child molesters in the Vatican about anything!

Thirdly, the Papacy is the antichrist power of the Bible and they and those who continue to be connected with them will ultimately receive the mark of the beast (which will be enforced Sunday worship egged on by the RCC and the US in cohorts together). Receiving the mark of the beast will mean you will receive the wrath of God poured out in the 7 last plagues, culminating with the coming of Jesus at which time they will be destroyed by the brighness of his coming.

Pay attention to what's happening between the US and the Papacy (and apostate Protestantism), especially in regards to Sunday laws if you want to REALLY know what's going to happen in the future. It won't be pretty and don't try to say you weren't warned. I'm a watchman standing on the walls trying to give the trumpet a certain sound and wake you up! Please pay attention for your own good.

It stands to reason they wouldn't be able to appoint another pope if the Vatican is utterly destroyed.

I guess time will tell.


Why not, The Vatican is just a place, not the Church. The Pope is chosen by the senior Bishops (Cardinals), doesn't matter where. A Bishop can make new Priests and new Bishops only need one even on his deathbed.

You are an IDIOT

the dude who predicted an argentine as pope said he was told this would be the last pope.

Of course Peter was not called Pope but it is possible that he was in Rome as there was a large jewish population in Rome so he would have been there to proselytize to them.