Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,023 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,094,091
Pageviews Today: 1,826,719Threads Today: 740Posts Today: 13,162
05:55 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject What's your opinion on Tomek?
Poster Handle Mr spock
Post Content
Diagnosis is based on the self-reported experiences of the patient, in combination with secondary signs observed by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist or other competent clinician. There is no objective biological test for schizophrenia, though studies suggest that genetics, neurobiology and social environment are important contributing factors. Current research into the development of the disorder often focuses on the role of neurobiology, although a reliable and identifiable organic cause has not been found. In the absence of objective laboratory tests to confirm the diagnosis, some question the legitimacy of schizophrenia's status as a disease.

The term "schizophrenia" translates roughly as "shattered mind," and comes from the Greek σχίζω (schizo, "to split" or "to divide") and φρήν (phrēn, "mind"). Despite its etymology, schizophrenia is not synonymous with dissociative identity disorder, also known as multiple personality disorder or "split personality"; in popular culture the two are often confused. Although schizophrenia often leads to social or occupational dysfunction, there is little association of the illness with a predisposition toward aggressive behavior.

Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia are highly likely to be diagnosed with other disorders. The lifetime prevalence of substance abuse disorders is typically around 40%. Comorbidity is also high with clinical depression, anxiety disorders, social problems, and a generally decreased life expectancy is also present. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia typically live 10-12 years less than their healthy counter-parts, owing to increased physical health problems and a large suicide rate.

flower
spock

That’s all fine on paper, but it does not fit the parameters of dislocation that is known to happen upon the planet in various random places, and reported by very reliable sources. I'm referring in this instance to trained personnel who some time find themselves in a twighlite zone of real substance but when it passes are at a total loss as to explaining it coherently.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP