UPDATED: China releases TWO NEW pics of the Moon and claims it's the "last time". | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10277451 United Kingdom 12/15/2013 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The official explanation to the lack of stars in space images is "daylight exposure of the camera", but the problem is that when you watch a timelapse video made from the ISS, you see plenty of stars even when the station is flying in the orbital daytime. didn't go over the polar regions, we might have seen the main entrance points to the inner earth, like where i believe the aurora borealis's come from |
Inspired 2 User ID: 51446176 Belgium 12/15/2013 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
green_girl User ID: 49871189 Canada 12/15/2013 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: green_girl i can use mirror like surfaces to cast reflections on anything, soil or not. not sure what your point is? My point is: 1. Where the source of the light that's causing that reflection coming from below the panel? 2. The reflection is not moving accordingly to the irregular terrain. 3. Why there are not other parts reflecting as well? the very ground itself is a light source. shuning up from below. and then reflecting back. also in one pic it looks like the other panel is in shadow, so no light to reflect there. Nope, the ground may reflect light but it's not a source and there's no fucking way of a dark soil reflecting the sunlight onto the bottom side of solar panel and then bounce it back to the ground. Plus 90% of the rover's surface is exposed to the sunlight, therefore should be way more than just a small reflection in the ground. yes,you know what i meant. you asked for the source of the light, and i gave one. aside from the sun the light that is being reflected form the underside of the panels would be the ground. :malefav: I love this place!! |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 51508342 Brazil 12/15/2013 05:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it's not snapshots of a fucking machine we want, it is LIVE HD video of what's infront, to the sides and rear we need to see, not shots of the paddle picking up soil samples to be analysed nobody gives a damn about that we want to see the moon in full HD and LIVE Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10277451 You should write a letter to the Chinese parliament demanding HD videos in the next moon mission. It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51558734 United States 12/15/2013 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd speed up that part and made a gif so that you can see what I'm talking about: Quoting: Ford Prefect [link to i26i.img-up.net] Zoomed [link to x13i.img-up.net] Since when metallic parts reflect in soil like that?? i can use mirror like surfaces to cast reflections on anything, soil or not. not sure what your point is? Uh hey witchy...just curious...Have you ever taken an anti-government explanation on anything? |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 51508342 Brazil 12/15/2013 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Ford Prefect My point is: 1. Where the source of the light that's causing that reflection coming from below the panel? 2. The reflection is not moving accordingly to the irregular terrain. 3. Why there are not other parts reflecting as well? the very ground itself is a light source. shuning up from below. and then reflecting back. also in one pic it looks like the other panel is in shadow, so no light to reflect there. Nope, the ground may reflect light but it's not a source and there's no fucking way of a dark soil reflecting the sunlight onto the bottom side of solar panel and then bounce it back to the ground. Plus 90% of the rover's surface is exposed to the sunlight, therefore should be way more than just a small reflection in the ground. yes,you know what i meant. you asked for the source of the light, and i gave one. aside from the sun the light that is being reflected form the underside of the panels would be the ground. No I don't know what you mean because the ground is not a source of light, it only reflects it, and again, EVEN if the ground is reflecting sunlight onto the bottom side of the panel, it wouldn't bounce back, not to mention that there should be more reflections in the ground since the whole rover is wrapped in gold foil. That single piece of reflection doesn't make any sense at all. FACT. Last Edited by Ford Prefect on 12/15/2013 05:50 PM It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51558734 United States 12/15/2013 05:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd speed up that part and made a gif so that you can see what I'm talking about: Quoting: Ford Prefect [link to i26i.img-up.net] Zoomed [link to x13i.img-up.net] Since when metallic parts reflect in soil like that?? I think the fact that they are being so careful to show SO LITTLE of "the sky" is very telling.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10277451 United Kingdom 12/15/2013 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it's not snapshots of a fucking machine we want, it is LIVE HD video of what's infront, to the sides and rear we need to see, not shots of the paddle picking up soil samples to be analysed nobody gives a damn about that we want to see the moon in full HD and LIVE Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10277451 You should write a letter to the Chinese parliament demanding HD videos in the next moon mission. i will and for them to send arnie up there too, he'll sort em out. |
Dirtyboy User ID: 51604821 United States 12/15/2013 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Youll find the reason they havent built an aircraft carrier is they are nowdays huge floating coffins Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51560747 If a big war breaks out they will be sunk from space. Exactly, even the US admirals know the df-21 will put every carrier in range on the bottom in the first 5 minutes of a REAL war...wont that be great? 5 or 6 more fuckushimas bubbling away in the pacific... The idea is to launch as many planes as possible before they get sunk. Too many submarines from many countries to be affective other than one launch. Then again, first off the carriers will probably be top brass. Dirtyboy Think beyond impossible. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45996551 New Zealand 12/15/2013 06:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't care what they claim. They did not land a rover on the moon. You realize when it comes to technology, it's far easier and affordable to use camera tricks, cgi, and actors to convince the world you've achieved something incredible than it is to achieve something incredible. Quoting: sinistersindicate 36442461 It is easy to say that when you are in your mom's basement at 45. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10277451 United Kingdom 12/15/2013 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't care what they claim. They did not land a rover on the moon. You realize when it comes to technology, it's far easier and affordable to use camera tricks, cgi, and actors to convince the world you've achieved something incredible than it is to achieve something incredible. Quoting: sinistersindicate 36442461 It is easy to say that when you are in your mom's basement at 45. but why would they want or need to fabricate these moon landings? don't tell me to show off to the west because that would be bullshit... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33435073 United States 12/15/2013 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 51508342 Brazil 12/15/2013 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd speed up that part and made a gif so that you can see what I'm talking about: Quoting: Ford Prefect [link to i26i.img-up.net] Zoomed [link to x13i.img-up.net] Since when metallic parts reflect in soil like that?? I think the fact that they are being so careful to show SO LITTLE of "the sky" is very telling.... I just can't wait to see the panoramic pics. The mission engineer said they would put the rover to hibernate before the next set of pics, but I think they are bullshitting the audience and downloading all the raw stuff before throwing the crumbles to the sheeple. Last Edited by Ford Prefect on 12/15/2013 06:18 PM It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Inspired 2 User ID: 51446176 Belgium 12/15/2013 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10277451 United Kingdom 12/15/2013 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd speed up that part and made a gif so that you can see what I'm talking about: Quoting: Ford Prefect [link to i26i.img-up.net] Zoomed [link to x13i.img-up.net] Since when metallic parts reflect in soil like that?? I think the fact that they are being so careful to show SO LITTLE of "the sky" is very telling.... I just can't wait to see the panoramic pics. The mission engineer said they would put the rover to hibernate before the next set of pics, but I think they are bullshitting the audience and downloading all the raw stuff before throwing the crumbles to the sheeple. of course they are we aint gonna see anything they don't want us to see - we are fucking slaves and all we need to know is nothing. |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 51508342 Brazil 12/15/2013 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't care what they claim. They did not land a rover on the moon. You realize when it comes to technology, it's far easier and affordable to use camera tricks, cgi, and actors to convince the world you've achieved something incredible than it is to achieve something incredible. Quoting: sinistersindicate 36442461 It is easy to say that when you are in your mom's basement at 45. but why would they want or need to fabricate these moon landings? don't tell me to show off to the west because that would be bullshit... Because the moon is an alien space station with giant mining machines crawling on the surface, spaceships parked in craters, bases, towers and shit. They can't allow this stuff being aired on national TV, so they have a studio-made landing for the show, while the real deal is being secretly monitored. Last Edited by Ford Prefect on 12/15/2013 06:26 PM It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51600831 Australia 12/15/2013 06:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
saintk User ID: 50275345 Canada 12/15/2013 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51600831 Australia 12/15/2013 06:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
watchZEITGEISTnow User ID: 51607421 Australia 12/15/2013 06:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well done China! Keep those images coming fast. :) NASA Moon - Mars - Saturn ANOMALIES: [link to www.youtube.com] |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 51508342 Brazil 12/15/2013 06:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, if that's supposed to be taken in full sunlight, why does the light fall off so much towards the edges? Cheap Chinese lenses? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51600831 Shouldn't be a hotspot there at all. Anybody got an answer? I guess GG gave up already. It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51604783 Venezuela 12/15/2013 06:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6987213 United States 12/15/2013 06:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't care what they claim. They did not land a rover on the moon. You realize when it comes to technology, it's far easier and affordable to use camera tricks, cgi, and actors to convince the world you've achieved something incredible than it is to achieve something incredible. Quoting: sinistersindicate 36442461 It is easy to say that when you are in your mom's basement at 45. but why would they want or need to fabricate these moon landings? don't tell me to show off to the west because that would be bullshit... Because the moon is an alien space station with giant mining machines crawling on the surface, spaceships parked in craters, bases, towers and shit. They can't allow this stuff being aired on national TV, so they have a studio-made landing for the show, while the real deal is being secretly monitored. Is this sarcasm or do you actually believe it? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49889043 United States 12/15/2013 06:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't care what they claim. They did not land a rover on the moon. You realize when it comes to technology, it's far easier and affordable to use camera tricks, cgi, and actors to convince the world you've achieved something incredible than it is to achieve something incredible. Quoting: sinistersindicate 36442461 yeah, but, but "The mission specialist claim the command center is downloading the images in almost-real-time (20 seconds delay), what means there's no time for tampering." :) |
green_girl User ID: 49871189 Canada 12/15/2013 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, if that's supposed to be taken in full sunlight, why does the light fall off so much towards the edges? Cheap Chinese lenses? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51600831 Shouldn't be a hotspot there at all. Anybody got an answer? I guess GG gave up already. hardly. just no time for your straw grasping. love you, ford, but i disagree with you on a lot of stuff, this being one of them. the pics look fine to me. you want to make a theory out of it, be my guest, but you will need something a little more damning than the fact that you disagree with reflections. :malefav: I love this place!! |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 51508342 Brazil 12/15/2013 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, if that's supposed to be taken in full sunlight, why does the light fall off so much towards the edges? Cheap Chinese lenses? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51600831 Shouldn't be a hotspot there at all. Anybody got an answer? I guess GG gave up already. hardly. just no time for your straw grasping. love you, ford, but i disagree with you on a lot of stuff, this being one of them. the pics look fine to me. you want to make a theory out of it, be my guest, but you will need something a little more damning than the fact that you disagree with reflections. I didn't disagree with reflections, I just find odd the way that that particular reflection is moving in the irregular soil and the lack of OTHER reflections, since the rover is fully exposed to sun light. I just don't get why you're so butthurt for the Chinese government, but if it makes you sleep better at night not talking about awkward reflections in the lunar surface (or in a lunar set in some Chinese studio), I'll leave you alone. It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 51508342 Brazil 12/15/2013 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45996551 It is easy to say that when you are in your mom's basement at 45. but why would they want or need to fabricate these moon landings? don't tell me to show off to the west because that would be bullshit... Because the moon is an alien space station with giant mining machines crawling on the surface, spaceships parked in craters, bases, towers and shit. They can't allow this stuff being aired on national TV, so they have a studio-made landing for the show, while the real deal is being secretly monitored. Is this sarcasm or do you actually believe it? It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |
green_girl User ID: 49871189 Canada 12/15/2013 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hardly. just no time for your straw grasping. love you, ford, but i disagree with you on a lot of stuff, this being one of them. the pics look fine to me. you want to make a theory out of it, be my guest, but you will need something a little more damning than the fact that you disagree with reflections. I didn't disagree with reflections, I just find odd the way that that particular reflection is moving in the irregular soil and the lack of OTHER reflections, since the rover is fully exposed to sun light. I just don't get why you're so butthurt for the Chinese government, but if it makes you sleep better at night not talking about awkward reflections in the lunar surface (or in a lunar set in some Chinese studio), I'll leave you alone. i am far from butthurt. i dont actually even care. i just didnt see anything odd in the reflections. :malefav: I love this place!! |
Free Planet User ID: 51624649 United Kingdom 12/16/2013 01:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ford Prefect (OP) User ID: 51508342 Brazil 12/16/2013 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | UPDATE: IMAGE ( [link to p4.img.cctvpic.com] ) This is the alleged pic of the lander Chang'E 3 taken by the rover, and it looks a CGI job to me. The quality is way inferior to the pic of the rover, and it should be exactly the opposite, as long as the cameras of the rover are supposed to take hi-res images. But what bothers me most is that EARTH is nowhere to be seen in the sky behind the lander, but the satellite dish of the rover is pointed in that direction. IMAGE ( [link to p2.img.cctvpic.com] ) It's a tough galaxy. If you want to survive, you've gotta know...where your towel is. |