Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,783 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 10,175
Pageviews Today: 15,479Threads Today: 11Posts Today: 84
12:07 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Fukushima help on this.

 
AlaskaLove
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 48782962
United States
01/14/2014 06:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Fukushima help on this.
received this article and would like to here from some of the experts what is incorrect with this persons research. It is my concern that there is danger and that it could yet escalate. This article is well written and sourced and makes the claim that the amount released is no threat due to the size of the ocean. basically that the ocean can absorb this much radiation.

Thank you for your time and comments.

[link to skeptoid.com]
I love you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 51791338
Canada
01/14/2014 07:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Fukushima help on this.
His figures are wrong on the releases.

Chernobyl was a partial meltdown 1/3 the size of Fukushima.

Fukushima was three full meltdowns.

and he does the usual... not mentioning anything other than caesium, such as plutonium, uranium, strontium

not mentioning the fact that you can't dilute an isotope and the stuff is continually spilling into the ocean at the rate of 300 tons of radioactive water... forever.... because they don't know how to stop it.

and they don't know where the cores are, let alone what happens when 3 meltdowns go China syndrome since it has never happened before.

that's what I can see off the top of my head.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52887812
United States
01/14/2014 07:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Fukushima help on this.
His figures are wrong on the releases.

Chernobyl was a partial meltdown 1/3 the size of Fukushima.

Fukushima was three full meltdowns.

and he does the usual... not mentioning anything other than caesium, such as plutonium, uranium, strontium

not mentioning the fact that you can't dilute an isotope and the stuff is continually spilling into the ocean at the rate of 300 tons of radioactive water... forever.... because they don't know how to stop it.

and they don't know where the cores are, let alone what happens when 3 meltdowns go China syndrome since it has never happened before.

that's what I can see off the top of my head.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51791338


johnny
AlaskaLove  (OP)

User ID: 47443257
United States
01/14/2014 11:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Fukushima help on this.
His figures are wrong on the releases.

Chernobyl was a partial meltdown 1/3 the size of Fukushima.

Fukushima was three full meltdowns.

and he does the usual... not mentioning anything other than caesium, such as plutonium, uranium, strontium

not mentioning the fact that you can't dilute an isotope and the stuff is continually spilling into the ocean at the rate of 300 tons of radioactive water... forever.... because they don't know how to stop it.

and they don't know where the cores are, let alone what happens when 3 meltdowns go China syndrome since it has never happened before.

that's what I can see off the top of my head.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51791338


Thank you. this is what I need to be able to effectively reply.
I love you.





GLP