Ancient Europeans: dark skinned, blue eyed? | |
Oyster (OP) User ID: 18401048 United States 01/27/2014 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49054928 Germany 01/27/2014 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. I wonder what's that supposed to mean... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53474208 Portugal 01/27/2014 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | An ancient European hunter-gatherer man had dark skin and blue eyes, a new genetic analysis has revealed. Quoting: Oyster The analysis of the man, who lived in modern-day Spain only about 7,000 years ago, shows light-skin genes in Europeans evolved much more recently than previously thought. The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. [link to www.foxnews.com] 50% rule observed 40,000 years to 7,000 years is a pretty big difference dont ya think? This pseudo-science makes no sense. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25499676 United Kingdom 01/27/2014 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. I wonder what's that supposed to mean... when we starting processing foods. like bread. |
Oyster (OP) User ID: 18401048 United States 01/27/2014 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. I wonder what's that supposed to mean... I think it us supposed to mean exactly what it says, that diet played more of a role than light conditions. |
Oyster (OP) User ID: 18401048 United States 01/27/2014 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | An ancient European hunter-gatherer man had dark skin and blue eyes, a new genetic analysis has revealed. Quoting: Oyster The analysis of the man, who lived in modern-day Spain only about 7,000 years ago, shows light-skin genes in Europeans evolved much more recently than previously thought. The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. [link to www.foxnews.com] 50% rule observed 40,000 years to 7,000 years is a pretty big difference dont ya think? This pseudo-science makes no sense. how so? |
Kowalski User ID: 13505409 Poland 01/27/2014 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Oyster (OP) User ID: 18401048 United States 01/27/2014 10:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53474208 Portugal 01/27/2014 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AtsuiPanda User ID: 48829977 United States 01/27/2014 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | well i mean i would think this anyways if we all came from africa. I dont think white blonde hair blue eyed people walked out of africa. Not saying we was black but prolly brown. :/sdfhasdfshasd/: Those who live by the sword die by the sword, those who don't live by the sword are subject to those who do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51900843 United States 01/27/2014 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. That makes no sense since Agriculture existed long before White skin did. Such foolishness. Whites will do ANYTHING to rationalize White "Supremacy". |
AtsuiPanda User ID: 48829977 United States 01/27/2014 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. That makes no sense since Agriculture existed long before White skin did. Such foolishness. Whites will do ANYTHING to rationalize White "Supremacy". what are you smoking? :/sdfhasdfshasd/: Those who live by the sword die by the sword, those who don't live by the sword are subject to those who do. |
Oyster (OP) User ID: 18401048 United States 01/27/2014 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From the same article: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53474208 "Many scientists have believed that lighter skin gradually arose in Europeans starting around 40,000 years ago, soon after people left tropical Africa for Europe's higher latitudes." Question: What about Chinese people? China specifically or do you mean all of Asia? either way, Asia doesnt seem to be the focus of this study. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51900843 United States 01/27/2014 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From the same article: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53474208 "Many scientists have believed that lighter skin gradually arose in Europeans starting around 40,000 years ago, soon after people left tropical Africa for Europe's higher latitudes." Question: What about Chinese people? The Chinese developed slanted Eye folds to adapt to the winds on the Steppes. Also they were all Black skinned as well moving North from th Equatorial regions. Notice the Wall they built to keep out the Mongoloid savages who kept invading and raping them? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25499676 United Kingdom 01/27/2014 10:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. That makes no sense since Agriculture existed long before White skin did. Such foolishness. Whites will do ANYTHING to rationalize White "Supremacy". are you retarded? this article is saying the whiter shade of skin was CAUSED by agriculture.. so it must have come first! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4580828 United States 01/27/2014 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49309043 Canada 01/27/2014 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. That makes no sense since Agriculture existed long before White skin did. Such foolishness. Whites will do ANYTHING to rationalize White "Supremacy". Anti-Whites will do anything to prevent White people's 'Diet Pride' Black pride OK Brown pride OK |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49309043 Canada 01/27/2014 10:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 01/27/2014 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. I wonder what's that supposed to mean... I think it us supposed to mean exactly what it says, that diet played more of a role than light conditions. Makes no sense. We rely on the sun for vitamin D. The sun is not as strong as we go further north pole ward or south pole ward so you'd think we'd have to adapt to that. And not to mention the end of ice age. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51900843 United States 01/27/2014 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. That makes no sense since Agriculture existed long before White skin did. Such foolishness. Whites will do ANYTHING to rationalize White "Supremacy". are you retarded? this article is saying the whiter shade of skin was CAUSED by agriculture.. so it must have come first! Diet and Climate both played a role. But there was also alot of ethnic cleansing among the Caucasians particularly of females. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25499676 United Kingdom 01/27/2014 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25499676 United Kingdom 01/27/2014 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49054928 That makes no sense since Agriculture existed long before White skin did. Such foolishness. Whites will do ANYTHING to rationalize White "Supremacy". are you retarded? this article is saying the whiter shade of skin was CAUSED by agriculture.. so it must have come first! Diet and Climate both played a role. But there was also alot of ethnic cleansing among the Caucasians particularly of females. we are talking about a time prior to the white race, yet ethnic cleansing was an issue? seems like it isn't "white mans" fault after all! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53474208 Portugal 01/27/2014 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From the same article: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53474208 "Many scientists have believed that lighter skin gradually arose in Europeans starting around 40,000 years ago, soon after people left tropical Africa for Europe's higher latitudes." Question: What about Chinese people? The Chinese developed slanted Eye folds to adapt to the winds on the Steppes. Also they were all Black skinned as well moving North from th Equatorial regions. Notice the Wall they built to keep out the Mongoloid savages who kept invading and raping them? Really? My point is: I DON'T BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD "SCIENCE" WRITE ABOUT THIS SUBJECT. Because they don't know what they are talking about. Explain how they get to construct bosnian pyramid [link to www.bosnianpyramids.org] because men was hunter-gatherer,they didn't know how to construct such a complex building when they even didn't know how to plant cereals. Get my point? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51900843 United States 01/27/2014 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. I wonder what's that supposed to mean... I think it us supposed to mean exactly what it says, that diet played more of a role than light conditions. Makes no sense. We rely on the sun for vitamin D. The sun is not as strong as we go further north pole ward or south pole ward so you'd think we'd have to adapt to that. And not to mention the end of ice age. The Eskimo's are Brown skinned. So vitamin d from the Sun is not the only factor. The Eskimo had Fish to get Vitamin D from. Caucasians were trapped in an extremely brutal environment during the Wurm. They were huddled in Caves and ate their dead to survive when they couldn't grab a beast. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25499676 United Kingdom 01/27/2014 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it us supposed to mean exactly what it says, that diet played more of a role than light conditions. Makes no sense. We rely on the sun for vitamin D. The sun is not as strong as we go further north pole ward or south pole ward so you'd think we'd have to adapt to that. And not to mention the end of ice age. The Eskimo's are Brown skinned. So vitamin d from the Sun is not the only factor. The Eskimo had Fish to get Vitamin D from. Caucasians were trapped in an extremely brutal environment during the Wurm. They were huddled in Caves and ate their dead to survive when they couldn't grab a beast. |
Oyster (OP) User ID: 18401048 United States 01/27/2014 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Quoting: Oyster Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. I wonder what's that supposed to mean... I think it us supposed to mean exactly what it says, that diet played more of a role than light conditions. Makes no sense. We rely on the sun for vitamin D. The sun is not as strong as we go further north pole ward or south pole ward so you'd think we'd have to adapt to that. And not to mention the end of ice age. It's new information to me, I'd be misspeaking if I said I understood all the details. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51489454 United States 01/27/2014 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 01/27/2014 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it us supposed to mean exactly what it says, that diet played more of a role than light conditions. Makes no sense. We rely on the sun for vitamin D. The sun is not as strong as we go further north pole ward or south pole ward so you'd think we'd have to adapt to that. And not to mention the end of ice age. The Eskimo's are Brown skinned. So vitamin d from the Sun is not the only factor. The Eskimo had Fish to get Vitamin D from. Caucasians were trapped in an extremely brutal environment during the Wurm. They were huddled in Caves and ate their dead to survive when they couldn't grab a beast. Not really that dark... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51900843 United States 01/27/2014 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From the same article: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53474208 "Many scientists have believed that lighter skin gradually arose in Europeans starting around 40,000 years ago, soon after people left tropical Africa for Europe's higher latitudes." Question: What about Chinese people? The Chinese developed slanted Eye folds to adapt to the winds on the Steppes. Also they were all Black skinned as well moving North from th Equatorial regions. Notice the Wall they built to keep out the Mongoloid savages who kept invading and raping them? Really? My point is: I DON'T BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD "SCIENCE" WRITE ABOUT THIS SUBJECT. Because they don't know what they are talking about. Explain how they get to construct bosnian pyramid [link to www.bosnianpyramids.org] because men was hunter-gatherer,they didn't know how to construct such a complex building when they even didn't know how to plant cereals. Get my point? You are desperately seeking to make a White point of Civilization to make sense of and it doesn't exist because "Whites" are a very new addition to the human family. All of these places were populated before "White" skin existed. It's not really your fault since the NWO of the 17th Century tried to create White Supremacist world view that is dying quickly since the 20th century. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 01/27/2014 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it us supposed to mean exactly what it says, that diet played more of a role than light conditions. Makes no sense. We rely on the sun for vitamin D. The sun is not as strong as we go further north pole ward or south pole ward so you'd think we'd have to adapt to that. And not to mention the end of ice age. It's new information to me, I'd be misspeaking if I said I understood all the details. I wonder about Neanderthal DNA that non-african races have. |