Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,137 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,541,137
Pageviews Today: 2,560,148Threads Today: 1,025Posts Today: 18,173
11:49 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.

 
rod777
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 46916034
United States
02/01/2014 12:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X

I noticed in his email that he had a new website for his enterprise. When I looked at it, something interesting caught my
eye.

He had a link on his site to an interview with a scientist named James M. McCanney on the subject of PX. I had
never heard of him, but in listening to it I learned that he was a real scientist, at one time with Cornell, who said that PX
was real and that NASA has been aware of this for 30 years!

By honoring an uncomfortable commitment, I was blessed
with an answer (not an unusual coincidence at all for those who serve God).

I studied McCanney's website and every radio show interview by him that I could find. I was pleased to discover that
he provided answers for all the questions and doubts I had concerning PX, which we shall cover in this chapter. Reassuringly, he did not claim to have pictures or enough evidence to prove it exists.

I say this because I have heard individuals claim they could “prove” PX existed when they realistically could not. Realistically, only space agencies like NASA have
the resources and reputation to “prove” scientifically to us that PX exists.

That said, if you take the time to look, you will find a fair amount of evidence leaked from NASA and other sources, summarized here. Later we will move on to prophecies of a similar threat (including instructions for facing it).

Why is NASA Silent On Planet X?
After the turn of the millennium, NASA made news about several new dwarf planets such as Eris, Sedna, and Xena.
Those small, harmless objects orbiting beyond Pluto fit only one definition of the term “Planet X.”

The definition we are concerned about is a large undiscovered body which can pose a threat to Earth. Regarding that PX, NASA offers no support for its existence, leaving people to consider it a hoax.

However, back in the 1980's, NASA was the first to announce
the discovery of a large planet, as reported in the June 19, 1982 edition of the New York Times:

Something out there beyond the furthest reaches of the known solar system is tugging at Uranus and Neptune. A gravitational force keeps perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities in their orbits.

The force suggests a presence far away and unseen, a large object, the long-sought Planet X.

Astronomers are so certain of this planet's existence that they have already named it “Planet X - the 10th Planet.”

A week later they retracted it and have been publicly silent ever since. Yet, there is sufficient evidence that they have had an internal project tracking PX, as this NASA internal document records years later:


NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service
Title: Search for Planet X
Authors: Harrington, Robert S.
Affiliation: Naval Observatory, Washington, DC.
Journal: In NASA, Washington, Reports of Planetary Astronomy, 1991 p. 53 (SEE N92-12792 03-89)
Publication Date: 10/1991
Category: Astronomy
Origin: STI
NASA/STI Keywords: PERTURBATION, SKY SURVEYS (ASTRONOMY), SOLAR ORBITS, SPACE OBSERVATIONS (FROM
EARTH), NEPTUNE (PLANET), URANUS (PLANET)
Bibliographic Code: 1991plas.rept...53H

ORDER BOOK HERE:
[link to www.escapeallthesethings.com]

Last Edited by rod777 on 02/01/2014 01:09 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 51116323
Serbia
02/01/2014 01:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40483731
United States
02/01/2014 01:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
Hmmmmm... i knew it!!!
rod777  (OP)

User ID: 46916034
United States
02/01/2014 01:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
More from Book...You'll need to buy it if you want to read more... [link to www.escapeallthesethings.com]

Why No One Sees It

If we accept that NASA knows about this object but will not tell us for whatever reason, then what about the amateur as astronomers who are not restricted from telling?

Why are they not reporting it? The problem, according to McCanney, is that a lack of brightness and position makes it hard to see.

Its current location makes it visible only in the spring, rather than all year round. Yet, even then, you have to be on the right place on Earth because of its skewed elliptical orbit.

Mc Canney claims that it actually approaches our solar system from below the ecliptic (plane of the planets' orbits) meaning the best viewing is from the Southern Hemisphere which is mostly water and less densely populated.

McCanney comments on this in his writing about the NASA abstract (quoted above) from his website:

In 1991 Robert S. Harrington, head of the Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. wrote an internal abstract which culminated over a decade of theoretical and observational astronomy with a team of experts.

He was in charge of the NASA directed search for a large
planet at the edge of our solar system that had been perturbing the orbits of the outer planets.

Many previous attempts had been made, all 20

Again, the point of this book is not to convince you that NASA and the government are lying about Planet X.

The point is to show you important new insights into prophecy that reveal a threat to our survival that nobody is talking about yet you would want to know about in advance if you had the chance.

The Bible's Explanation For the Cover-up 15
leading to incorrect results ... but this time Harrington was certain that he had found the location of the large rogue planet.

What is interesting is 1) NASA for decades had sponsored a search for this object with the highest level staff members available, 2) it was fully aware that something big was entering our solar system and 3) as you will see ...

It seems that anyone associated with the results has been
silenced either by death or by fear. A shroud of secrecy and deception surrounds this entire story.

Part of the discovery of Planet X was based on the fact the outer large planets Uranus and Neptune were being pulled DOWN in their orbits.

No other effect could cause such a change in the orbits of these planets except the existence of a very large previously undiscovered celestial object which had to exist down and in the direction of the unexplainable motions of these outer giant planets.

Harrington knew that it had to be BIG and it had to be down below the plane of the planets (the ecliptic). He also knew that since it had not been there before that it must be a new body entering the solar system.

Harrington wrote a brief abstract telling of his final trip scheduled to New Zealand in the springmonth of May to perform the blink photographic session with a 20 cm astrograph (approximately 8" aperture high precision camera).

This seemed like what should be a
routine observation and so sure was Harrington of the location of this object in the sky that he planned only two successive nights for the two required photos. These would be returned to Washington to determine the location and size of the new object.

An 8" camera in 1991 to 93 (the date that we believe Harrington made his final expedition ... NASA information is scarce) was not very large so we are not talking about professional grade equipment ...

That is, this object was expected to be very large and Harrington knew it would be only visible during the month of May from a very southerly remote location on Earth. He chose New Zealand over the rugged uncharted regions of Patagonia in South America.

Thus, a big reason why it is not obvious to the world already is because it is best viewed close to the South Pole— where there are fewer people and fewer observatories to find it.

Similarly, when dwarf planet 2003 UB313 Eriswas discovered, Mike Brown explained that the reason it was not discovered sooner was because it orbits 45 degrees off the
ecliptic which is an area less searched by astronomers.

McCanney reports another problem. At times there is much haze in the atmosphere that makes viewing a diffuse, dim
object like PX hard to do unless you are looking directly at it from a 90 degree angle (which is only possible from the South Pole itself).

All this, in conjunction with the science establishment's cover-up, gives the coming object the condi tions needed to blindside the majority of Earth's inhabitants.
A NASA scientist warns of the possibility of being blindsided.

David Morrison, Director of Space & Astrobiology at NASA's Ames Research Center spoke before Congress on the threat of cosmic impacts.

He wrote:

It is possible for a comet to 'sneak up' on Earth, escaping detection until it is only a few weeks from impact. A perpetual survey is required to detect long-period comets, and even with such a survey, we cannot be sure of success.


Another Cosmic Blind Spot

There is another reason why such an object would not be easily seen.

Objects that approach us from our sunward side are obscured by the glare of the Sun and are nearly impossible to see. Here are two examples of asteroids that recently “blindsided” the Earth from the direction of the Sun.

First, from March 8, 2004:
An asteroid large enough to have flattened a city buzzed Earth earlier this month and was not seen until after it flew harmlessly by.

The space rock approached Earth in the glare of the Sun, a blind spot that made it impossible to see during the day or night from any terrestrial vantage point.

The event illustrates the potential of a surprise hit by an asteroid, astronomers said.

In a telephone interview, Williams explained there was no way to see the asteroid until it moved out of the Sun's glare and to the opposite side of Earth in relation to the Sun -- Earth's night side.

Here's another one from December 19, 2004:
Astronomers spotted an asteroid this week after it had flown past Earth on a course that took it so close to the planet it was below the orbits of some satellites.

The rock approached Earth from near the Sun and so would have been nearly impossible to detect prior to close passage .

It soared over Antarctica -- underneath the planet, Washington State University researcher Pasquale Tricarico told the Asteroid/Comet Connection.

Astronomers are aware of this significant blind spot for asteroids that approach Earth while in the glare of the Sun.

Only a space telescope could detect such objects before they arrive.

What Evidence Is There?
With NASA's cover-up and the difficulty of an observation for amateurs, scientific evidence is scarce.

McCanney does not claim to have pictures of this object (such as the dubious ones found on the Internet) nor does he offer orbital data or estimate when it will come (such as 2012 as is popular but highly doubtful if everyone is talking about it).

He mainly points to the perturbations in the orbits of the planets as proof of its existence. As mentioned earlier, scientists noticed the orbits of Neptune and Uranus were not as expected in the mid-1800s.

These deviations could not be explained by miscal -21 Comets and Origin, P.254

www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsyste /asteroids_miss_020319.html

www.space.com/scienceastronomy/asteroid_close_041222.html

The Bible's Explanation For the Cover-up calculations in the masses of the planets, as the direction of the deviations was downward according to McCanney.

Nemesis “Death Star” Hypothesis
Related to the PX theory is the Nemesis hypothesis, advocated by physicist Richard Muller.

It offers an explanation to
the pattern of extinction events at regular intervals similar to the comet impact that is widely accepted to have eradicated the dinosaurs.

If there was a brown or red dwarf binary companion distantly orbiting the Sun, it would regularly pass
through the Oort cloud, scattering comets. Some of them would be sent towards the inner solar system, potentially colliding with Earth.

Evidence for this theory comes from the Oort cloud and one of its inner members, Sedna (discovered by Mike Brown
in 2003). There appears to be an uneven distribution of objects in the Oort cloud, as if a large body had cleared out a path.

Sedna itself, smaller than the moon, appears to be one of these displaced Oort objects. It is more than three times
further out than Pluto, with a wildly elliptical orbit.

As there are no planets or stars on its path to account for its positioning, it also could be evidence that a Nemesis-like object is out there causing trouble.

Last Edited by rod777 on 02/01/2014 01:09 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 53652226
United States
02/01/2014 01:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
bump
asymetriclogic

User ID: 53008909
United States
02/01/2014 01:09 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
Not news to many of us here at GLP but good enough to bring newcomers up to speed in a hurry.
Actually Immanuel Velikovsky mathematically proved this in the 50"s and published his research in a book titled "Worlds in Collision".
Where spirit, logic, intuition, and truth intermingle.

USMC Lifer.
rod777  (OP)

User ID: 46916034
United States
02/01/2014 01:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
Thanks just trying to help those who were complaining about him asking for money for his book, to see that IF A PERSON INVESTS time, and sweat into something, especially if it offers useful information, then it's not bad to pay for it.


Not news to many of us here at GLP but good enough to bring newcomers up to speed in a hurry.
Actually Immanuel Velikovsky mathematically proved this in the 50"s and published his research in a book titled "Worlds in Collision".
 Quoting: asymetriclogic
asymetriclogic

User ID: 53008909
United States
02/01/2014 02:12 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
Absolutely true.
Where spirit, logic, intuition, and truth intermingle.

USMC Lifer.
rod777  (OP)

User ID: 46916034
United States
02/01/2014 04:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53652226
Halcyon Dayz, FCD

User ID: 37781229
Netherlands
02/01/2014 08:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
He had a link on his site to an interview with a scientist named James M. McCanney on the subject of PX.
 Quoting: rod777

A "scientist" by certain non-scientific values of the word.
McCanney stopped being a scientist decades ago.

Realistically, only space agencies like NASA have
the resources and reputation to “prove” scientifically to us that PX exists.
 Quoting: rod777

This seriously underestimates the capabilities modern technology provides to amateurs.

However, back in the 1980's, NASA was the first to announce
the discovery of a large planet, as reported in the June 19, 1982 edition of the New York Times:
 Quoting: rod777

This is a lie.
The NYT whorenalist hyped one of a number of explanations of a new discovery.

IRAS was a NASA/NIVR/SERC programme, BTW.

Something out there beyond the furthest reaches of the known solar system is tugging at Uranus and Neptune. A gravitational force keeps perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities in their orbits.
 Quoting: rod777

After getting a more precise number for the mass of Neptune, this turned out not to be true.

Astronomers are so certain of this planet's existence that they have already named it “Planet X - the 10th Planet.”
 Quoting: rod777

No, they are not.
The "X" in Planet X stand for "Unknown", the term dates from the 19th century, and refers to any as yet undiscovered planet beyond Neptune.

A week later they retracted it and have been publicly silent ever since.
 Quoting: rod777

No, they CORRECTED the idiot NYT whorenalist.

IRAS has had 2 follow-ups, still no Planet X, that's not silence; that is a clear statement that they have been looking and didn't find anything.

Yet, there is sufficient evidence that they have had an internal project tracking PX, as this NASA internal document records years later:

NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service
Title: Search for Planet X
Authors: Harrington, Robert S.
Affiliation: Naval Observatory, Washington, DC.
Journal: In NASA, Washington, Reports of Planetary Astronomy, 1991 p. 53 (SEE N92-12792 03-89)
Publication Date: 10/1991
Category: Astronomy
Origin: STI
NASA/STI Keywords: PERTURBATION, SKY SURVEYS (ASTRONOMY), SOLAR ORBITS, SPACE OBSERVATIONS (FROM
EARTH), NEPTUNE (PLANET), URANUS (PLANET)
Bibliographic Code: 1991plas.rept...53H
 Quoting: rod777

But Harrington worked for the Navy, not NASA.

Harrington proposed a perfectly valid hypothetic planet (one that would have been no threat to Earth in anyway, BTW), based the data available at the time.
To bad he had the wrong number for the mass of Neptune.
Harrington's Planet does not exist.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Stop recycling antique bunk, and get us something fresh.
book
Reaching for the sky makes you taller.

Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
rod777  (OP)

User ID: 46916034
United States
02/01/2014 01:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Finally, A Scientist Warning About Planet X: And Why No One See's It...Excerpt from book.
Man that was a lot of effort you put into that post....Thanks...

Got any links to back all that up????




He had a link on his site to an interview with a scientist named James M. McCanney on the subject of PX.
 Quoting: rod777

A "scientist" by certain non-scientific values of the word.
McCanney stopped being a scientist decades ago.

Realistically, only space agencies like NASA have
the resources and reputation to “prove” scientifically to us that PX exists.
 Quoting: rod777

This seriously underestimates the capabilities modern technology provides to amateurs.

However, back in the 1980's, NASA was the first to announce
the discovery of a large planet, as reported in the June 19, 1982 edition of the New York Times:
 Quoting: rod777

This is a lie.
The NYT whorenalist hyped one of a number of explanations of a new discovery.

IRAS was a NASA/NIVR/SERC programme, BTW.

Something out there beyond the furthest reaches of the known solar system is tugging at Uranus and Neptune. A gravitational force keeps perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities in their orbits.
 Quoting: rod777

After getting a more precise number for the mass of Neptune, this turned out not to be true.

Astronomers are so certain of this planet's existence that they have already named it “Planet X - the 10th Planet.”
 Quoting: rod777

No, they are not.
The "X" in Planet X stand for "Unknown", the term dates from the 19th century, and refers to any as yet undiscovered planet beyond Neptune.

A week later they retracted it and have been publicly silent ever since.
 Quoting: rod777

No, they CORRECTED the idiot NYT whorenalist.

IRAS has had 2 follow-ups, still no Planet X, that's not silence; that is a clear statement that they have been looking and didn't find anything.

Yet, there is sufficient evidence that they have had an internal project tracking PX, as this NASA internal document records years later:

NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service
Title: Search for Planet X
Authors: Harrington, Robert S.
Affiliation: Naval Observatory, Washington, DC.
Journal: In NASA, Washington, Reports of Planetary Astronomy, 1991 p. 53 (SEE N92-12792 03-89)
Publication Date: 10/1991
Category: Astronomy
Origin: STI
NASA/STI Keywords: PERTURBATION, SKY SURVEYS (ASTRONOMY), SOLAR ORBITS, SPACE OBSERVATIONS (FROM
EARTH), NEPTUNE (PLANET), URANUS (PLANET)
Bibliographic Code: 1991plas.rept...53H
 Quoting: rod777

But Harrington worked for the Navy, not NASA.

Harrington proposed a perfectly valid hypothetic planet (one that would have been no threat to Earth in anyway, BTW), based the data available at the time.
To bad he had the wrong number for the mass of Neptune.
Harrington's Planet does not exist.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Stop recycling antique bunk, and get us something fresh.
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD





GLP