MH 370 new search area ? This simple formula....

no one? well i suppose they could have flown in a zig zag or made a circle. But a simple autopilot straight line means this talking heads information is wrong.

You are right OP
time x speed = distance

Yes, so why cant all those TV experts question this simple fact?

They want the people to be dumb, so they spread nonsense.

I am surprised that the engine report from Rolls Royce did not tell them exactly how fast the plane was flying.

I am sure that would be important information if you were monitoring engines -- rpm would equal speed.

As I said from the beginning -- when they show you a photo of two Iranians who were flying on faked passports and the photo shows the two Iranians with the same legs -- and then they never correct the photo -- their is something they are hiding.

They have to prolong the search until the black box quits sending signal (30 days).

Hate to spoil the party -- but-- the truth here is rare....as the rattle of small change on the border.

You are right OP but I have tried to determine the end on this story and as such not caught up at debunking every fairytale they sell us.

Thread: Missing Malaysian Airline is Conspiracy Wonderland With Pit Stops - Are You Alice? You're being taken for a Ride!

Thread: Outcomes of the Missing Malaysian Airline

Thread: Search for Malaysian Airline as much a joke as the search for WMD after 9/11 - Bush and Aaron Russo's Take

Again like I said, there is nothing at sea where they are looking at. In psychological terms, even though your logic is sound, what the MSM are actually saying to the dumbed down masses looking only at imagery, with this new search area, is to somehow add validity to the BS data from original Inmarsat data that got us here and the masses would say, yes they are close, but not too far off from where they initially thought that the plane "ENDED". So, they remain in trance until the MSM herd them toward the nice little package of a FF they have prepared for them at the end of the story.

Last Edited by Ohwell on 03/29/2014 03:33 PM

What they are trying to get at is that it was flying faster and therefore burning more fuel, so wasn't able to fly as far/long as they had originally thought. But, nothing about anything they say is making sense at this point.

On the contrary, they are not hiding but revealing information. The problem here is that since some people missed the boat and bought into this story, the MSM has taken control of their thoughts and have only been releasing as much info as they want to herd the world towards their end goal of a massive FF on the backs of this. When this happens, the story of the Iranians on board this hijacked airline will make sense to them. Also the idea of the pilot having extremist ideology especially with his picture with a meat cleaver in his hand. Everything is heading that way and there will be some survivors who will tell the story of this hijack and solve some of the mystery.

They could had used 15 drones and covered the earth 20 times by now.

You are not following simple logic. It flew for 7 hours. Faster fuel burn makes no difference, it still flew for 7 hours. Like i said, this new area only makes sense if it flew slower, not faster. d=r*t

Nope! Logic doesn't need to prevail. To make matter worse…..have you seen the planes taking part in a visual only search that needed more eyes to maximise the probability of a sighting?

[link to upload.wikimedia.org] That's a P3

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
That's a P8.

Kind of a serious search, eh? Barely any windows.

You're right, sir! This is just so ridiculous it's not even funny anymore.

They are searching an area known for TRASH VORTEXES

Search-
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Indian Ocean garbage patch

Found this from another thread: Making my case:

None of this makes sense!!

Just think about it. They know how long the plane was "pinging" the satellites. For 7 hrs they were getting pings.

Now, they say it was traveling faster than first thought, thus looking 1100 miles to the NE (closer to Australia ). Meaning it crashed sooner as it burned up more fuel.

Well, if it crashed sooner, then how can it ping for 7 hrs?

Still think there was cargo on that plane that they want recovered and are sending and having everyone look over there while they either recover the cargo or verify it is still with the plane.
Quoting: TeamReaper



Ah, I was waiting for someone to ask the technical question. My thought is that they measured it going faster over Malaysian Peninsula, which means that in order to survive long enough to get that 8:11 am ping, it had to SLOW DOWN after it turned south. They've placed the new search area on an arc that was originally shown earlier this week in a release of the inmarsat data analysis. That arc corresponds to a speed closer to 400 knots than 450 knots (the 'old' search area).

The only way the plane could've ditched on that arc is if it was going south more slowly than previously stated, not faster. I think this comes down to stupid lazy communicating, and the fact that no one in the MSM has a background in simple geometry, much less physics. They were all liberal arts majors apparently.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24177525