They all have herpes folks

Thread: Remote Viewing Covid19

The agitation people about to step into more Mantis landmines w/in the Matrix of ideas. Sytum for the experience. I say clouds in pending

Well, how and where did It emerge? There are spaces in between. Electricity signals ideas. Time moves by language. It becomes a mirror, a mirror choosing points of convection. It will typically arrange scenery, resembling a garden. The scene will hold a dark lake that reflects a mirror. The people that manifest the scene discarded in favor of the Essene. Once from the Moon who walks alone amongst the profane. Judgment follows with an accord. Energy reacquisition is purpose. Another is hope. For he commands daemons and the order of angels. These angles are 9, 6, and 3.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

1in Game shall we?

Thread: Alex Jones, "I'll eat your ass!"

Jones is envious of the man. the man is fucking young
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

i used to love blackchild's vids broooooo

California attorney Richard Hamlin believes his wife is under the control of her father's Satanic cult; conspirologists support him...very disturbing true story about a satanic doctor;Dr.Siemer

[link to Vishal (secure)] Rahwat blows goats/3rkqpd

Banned.vid and their psuedo forums are a fraud
[link to cavdef.org]

Wednesday, January 04, 2006



The Hamlin Case: Satanic Ritual Abuse in Sacramento




California attorney Richard Hamlin believes his wife is under the control of her father's Satanic cult; conspirologists support him.

Until February 2004, California attorney Richard Hamilton led an outwardly idyllic existence. He was a former Sacramento County deputy prosecutor with a successful Sacramento practice, a $1 million mansion in posh El Dorado Hills, and four children by his wife of 20 years. Susan Hamlin, 46, was also an attorney. The only obvious wrench in the works was Hamilton's elderly father-in-law, a respected Fresno biochemist named Sydney Siemer.
In 1999, following a period of hospitalization for depression, Susan Hamlin had begun to recover repressed memories of childhood rape and torture at the hands of her father. She shared these horrific memories with her husband in 2002, and he responded by traveling to Fresno and publicly distributing fliers with damning information about Dr. Siemer.
Dr. Siemer hired a lawyer and denied that he had ever abused Susan or her three siblings, filing a restraining order against the Hamlins. He offered to attend therapy with his daughter to help her realize that her memories of incest and violence were false, but Mrs. Hamlin declined. Mrs. Hamlin's sister couldn't recall any abuse in the Siemer home, so she entered therapy to try to recover memories of her own. To date, she has not come forward with any allegations.
February 22, 2004: Susan Hamlin returned home from a Starbuck's in Granite Bay covered in bruises, her nose broken and some ribs fractured. Her husband demanded to know what happened. Mrs. Hamlin confessed that for the past two years, members of a Satanic cult to which she and her father belonged had been plotting to ritually murder Richard Hamlin as a "trophy Christian", a fitting sacrifice to Satan. Susan was promised she would be made high priestess of the cult if she went along with the plan. The murder was scheduled for March 1, at midnight. When she tried to extricate herself from the plot, she explained, she was summoned to meet with a fellow Satanist named Lisa Clum at the Granite Bay Starbuck's. (Apparently, the women were going to chat about Satanic ritual sacrifice over venti lattes and blueberry scones.) As soon as she stepped out of her car, Lisa's 47-year-old husband, Rock Clum, allegedly beat Mrs. Hamilton to a bloody pulp right in the parking lot and warned her to "stick with the plan".
Susan Hamlin had even more chilling revelations. Her father continued to exert sexual and emotional control over her to such an extent that she was still having incestuous sexual relations with him. He and his friend Howard Mily, the high priest of the cult, had been sexually exploiting her since she was a young teenager. They had prostituted her, used her to procure other young victims, and ritually tortured her in the most sadistic ways imaginable. She admitted that she had molested 3 of the couple's 4 children from 1996 to 2002, under her father's instruction. He taught her how to hypnotize her kids and sexually abuse them as any "good Satanist mom" should, she said. At the time the abuse began, the kids were ages 6, 8, and 12. Dr. Siemer, his wife (Susan's stepmom), and Susan's sister all molested the Hamlin children as well.
There was more. In 1982, Howard Mily and others in the cult tortured Susan for a 3-week period by stringing her up on a pegboard and confining her in cold storage. Twice she was forced to witness the torture of a dark-haired 9- or 10-year-old girl they had abducted; they broke the girl's bones and tied her body into strange positions, then murdered her. This was filmed.
Dr. Siemer had a stash of child pornography and snuff films in his Fresno home, according to Mrs. Hamlin. Aghast, Richard Hamlin urged his wife to report everything to the police. On February 26, four days after the Starbuck's beating, he accompanied her to the El Dorado Sheriff's office, where she confessed to molesting her kids and plotting to kill her husband. She explained that the sexual abuse was not for her own sexual gratification, but an effort to accustom the children to touching and to "keep [them] from thinking their sexuality was their own." She also described the murder she witnessed in 1982, not specifying if this was a recovered memory or not.
Several detectives interviewed Mrs. Hamlin on tape and had her sign a statement. The Hamlin children were immediately removed from the home by Child Protective Services for their own safety, but the detectives decided not to arrest Mrs. Hamilton until an investigation into her claims had been conducted.
Two days later, Susan Hamlin returned to the Sheriff's office and recanted every word of her elaborate signed confession. It was a lie, she said; neither she nor anyone in her family ever molested the kids. Her father had never sexually abused her. It was Richard Hamlin, not Rock Clum, who beat her up the previous week and forced her to implicate her father in a murder plot that was all in his head. After the beating, he had threatened her at gunpoint and swordpoint.
The detectives had been reluctant to accept Mrs. Hamlin's original claims, but they pounced on her retraction. Richard Hamlin was immediately arrested and eventually charged with 18 felony counts of spousal abuse, torture, death threats, negligent discharge of a handgun, and child endangerment. His trial began on October 11, '05. His 18-year-old son Ryan took the stand and testified that Mr. Hamlin had been beating his wife up to 5 times per week since 2002. The day of the Starbuck's beating, believing there really was a Satanic plot against his life, he had forced the whole family into the van and driven to Granite Bay with a sword, a Derringer, and a paintball gun full of frozen paintballs. The two Hamlin girls were dropped off somewhere, but Ryan and his younger brother were forced to stay in the vehicle and train the paintball gun on their mother while she gave directions to the Clum house. Richard Hamlin intended to murder Lisa Clum and Dr. Siemer, Ryan told the court. (1)
Mr. Hamlin is defending himself in the trial. You might wonder how he could possibly stand a chance against the incredibly damaging testimony of his own son and ex-wife. It's easier than it looks. First of all, Hamlin was able to acquire Susan's journals from 1999-2002. They are chock-full of recovered memories of incest, Satanic ceremonies, and torture, undermining her claim that Dr. Siemer and his alleged accomplices never laid a hand on anyone. To complicate matters, Susan's court testimony at times directly contradicts her father's. She insists he never worked in Indio, California (home of the notorious Cabazon Indian Reservation, supposed site of illegal weapons experiments and gun-dealing throughout the 1980s) - but Dr. Siemer admits he did. (3)
Naturally, conspirologists have pounced on the Hamlin case. The Indio link "confirms" the findings of investigative journalist Danny Casolaro of Virginia, who in the late '80s uncovered connections among pirated PROMIS software, the October Surprise that allegedly cost Jimmy Carter the 1980 election, the Beirut bombing, fuel-air explosives developed on the Cabazon Reservation by Wackenhut and other CIA fronts, and dozens of other shady doings that he attributed to a power cabal called "The Octopus". Casalaro's Octopus theories are too complex to examine here, but I will note that Casalaro was found dead in a West Virginia hotel room in 1991, an apparent suicide. Supporters declare he was murdered for being a Man Who Knew Too Much. (see Kenn Thomas and Jim Keith's book The Octopus: Secret Government and the Death of Danny Casolaro for a detailed study of this, or save yourself some trouble and check out Kenn Thomas's chapter "Behold a Pale Horse" in Jim Keith's Secret and Suppressed, Feral House, 1993)
One of Casalaro's primary sources was a man named Michael Riconosciuto, who claimed he personally modified stolen PROMIS software for the U.S. government (so it could be used to "spy" on foreign computers). He also made a lot of other claims regarding the CIA, NSA, the October Surprise, etc. Hereafter I'll refer to Riconosciuto as "Tater", since he looks like Mr. Potatohead with a Mo haircut.
After Richard Hamlin's arrest, Tater informed him that he had important information about his father-in-law's activites. On March 30 of this year, Tater penned a letter of Judicial Notification to the Chief Judge of the Superior Court in El Dorado, claiming he has proof that Dr. Sydney Siemer worked on illegal biowarfare research for the CIA in Indio in 1982. I don't believe this information is even remotely relevant to the Hamlin case, which is a domestic violence case. What does biowarfare research have to do with incest, death threats, and spousal abuse? This is how the judge, Edward Keller, responded as well.
Tater is currently incarcerated on unrelated charges and will not be allowed to testify in the Hamlin trial. Unfortunately, Richard Hamlin firmly believes that Tater is a credible witness who could aid his defense. From Hamlin's open letter, posted on his website: "Michael Riconosciuto is in jail. He has fought the government over and over again. He could have seen my plight and said, 'It’s not my fight,' yet he won’t. With nothing to gain—except a sense of justice and truth—he volunteered his information about Dr. Sidney Siemer."Why is Tater even involved? Well, his letter of Judicial Notification speaks for itself..."My legal defense team has in their possession documents obtained after my trial that clearly can be used to support the defense of Richard Hamlin, and prove the direct knowledge I possess...is true and correct...There is the additional matter of the prosecution of Philip Arthur Thompson who is presently charged with murder and rape in the same jurisdiction as the Richard Hamlin case. The above mentioned government documents will show Thompson was actively working as an FBI informant against me at the time he committed numerous rapes and murders. Many...orchestrated by the real perpetrator in the Hamlin case." Tater continues, "Eldorado County [sic] has demonstrated a conflict of interest between the Thompson case and the Hamlin case...impeach[ing] my credibility in the Hamlin case serves to obstruct my being an effective witness in the Thompson case.." Furthermore, Tater states he's been threatened by the "real perpetrator" in the Hamlin case, causing him to be transferred to a medical facility where his prostate canser isn't being treated properly. You decide: Does this sound like a man with "nothing to gain"?
Richard Hamlin's open letter makes clear his position on his ex-wife's original claims of being a Satanic pawn. He believes them. Yet he is quick to point out that the case is about incest and psychological abuse, not occult beliefs and practices. He writes, "The traditional media has focused almost exclusively on the 'Satanic' angle of this case. Such reporting is a miscarriage of justice to the real overriding issue of incest and molest and the methods child molesters use to enforce and perpetrate their ongoing abuse.This case is about incest." Hamlin believes that Dr. Siemer raped and terrorized his 4 children, continuing to have relations with Suan even after she married. He had sex with her the night before her wedding. The kids were "swapped" with other incestuous families and prostituted. Susan helped her dad gain access to other victims, including her own kids. Dr. Siemer wanted Richard Hamlin dead to shut him up and get him out of the way, so he could continue to exert sexual and emotional control over his family.
Based on the findings of Virginia McCullough of the conspiracy-oriented website [link to www.newsmakingnews.com] and the private investigation of the rather sinister Ted Gunderson (who insinuated himself into the case alongside Tater), Richard Hamlin also believes his father-in-law was a part of MKULTRA, the government's secret mind-control program. "So, we have a man that usd mind control, learned from our own government, to create the perfect incestuous family". McCullough has written a series of articles in defense of Richard Hamlin and buys the Satanic ritual abuse stories hook-line-and-sinker. She clearly relishes the case, calling it "the best conspiracy case in recent California history". She claims two anonymous sources have linked Dr. Siemer to a CIA child kidnapping/prostitution ring called The Finders, and revealed that he's a "senior member" of the Temple of Set's Order of the Trapezoid. There is no evidence to support either claim.
Richard Hamlin and his conspiracy-minded supporters aren't acknowledging the possibilities that Susan Hamlin could be a compulsive liar, an hysteric, and/or mentally ill. They uncritically accept the basic truth of her original claims and have fit them into a standard conspiracy framework. According to Mr. Hamlin, Dr. Siemer escaped detection for so many years by using trauma-based mind control and the resultant Multiple Personality Disorder to create amnesia in Susan and her siblings, then adding intimidation of an occult nature. He also has friends in high places. All of these conclusions are derived from Susan Hamlin's descriptions of conditioning, hypnosis, electroshock, and sensory deprivation used by her dad to control her. Hamlin makes much of the fact that Dr. Siemer reportedly worked with Army Intelligence and had a high security clearance. He and McCullough believe he was engaged in covert operations, radiation experiments, and illegal biowarfare research. Again, I don't know what any of this has to do with domestic abuse and death threats.
Worst of all, Hamlin blames himself for much of what has occurred. He expresses deep guilt for not having realized that his "babies were being hurt...I cared about me, material things, and my career." (2)
The bottom line: The Hamlin case is the result of incredibly complex intrafamily issues that could never be fully resolved in a courtroom. The principal players themselves don't appear to know what is true, what is imagined, and what is an inextricable combination of truth and imagination.

gal biowarfare research. Again, I don't know what any of this has to do with domestic abuse and death threats.
Worst of all, Hamlin blames himself for much of what has occurred. He expresses deep guilt for not having realized that his "babies were being hurt...I cared about me, material things, and my career." (2)
The bottom line: The Hamlin case is the result of incredibly complex intrafamily issues that could never be fully resolved in a courtroom. The principal players themselves don't appear to know what is true, what is imagined, and what is an inextricable combination of truth and imagination.
QuoteLikeDislikeShare
Oct 03, 2010#2
Richard Hamlin and Susan Siemer met at the University of the Pacific when both were attending the university's School of Law. Richard Hamlin says that Susan made the difficult class work appear easy. In protective custody in an El Dorado County jail awaiting a trial that could put him away for 25 years to life, Richard reminisced. He recalled one particular test that he had spent countless hours studying for determined to score a higher grade then Susan - just this once. He said two-thirds of the way through the test he glanced over at her and she had put down her pencil and was staring off into space. She looked as though she did not have a care in the world but he was worried that she had frozen and could not complete the test. He need not have worried; Susan had simply finished the test before any one else and was waiting for others to finish. As he described this event his voice contained a mixture of pride and regret.

Richard describes Susan as a brilliant, strong willed woman who is beautiful and petite but tall and slender with a model's figure. In law school they shared an interest in religion and attended church regularly. Richard Hamlin was not just attracted to his fellow student, he was in love. In 1984 they were married. It seemed an ideal match. She was a smart civil litigator whose expertise was writing well researched civil complaints; he was a confrontational trial lawyer who rapidly acquired experience as a prosecutor and then as a defense attorney. Together they appeared to live an ideal Christian life responsibly raising four children and building a million dollar home with a view in El Dorado Hills halfway between the capital city of California, Sacramento, and the historic smaller town of Placerville. Their neighbors describe a couple who were devoted parents who both participated in after school activities and church gatherings. Susan Hamlin was a stay-at-home mother whose husband's income allowed her to have a gardener and housekeeper to help her run their large home. Observers said that for eighteen years it seemed to be a perfect marriage and both parents were excellent role models for their children.

The early years of their marriage, like most young marriages, had been a financial struggle with both of them working to make ends meet. Their first son was born in 1987 and their second child, a boy, arrived in 1992. By this time Richard Hamlin had left the Sacramento District Attorney's office and was doing well as a defense attorney. With two children to care for, Susan decide to become a stay at home mom and shortly thereafter in 1996 the Hamlin's became the proud parents of a baby girl. Two years later, in 1998, a second daughter was born and their family was complete. Their lives were filled with business matters and social gatherings befitting a successful couple.

In the El Dorado County Sheriff's report made on February 26, 2004 Susan Hamlin "said she started molesting her kids in Fresno in 1996 and that her dad Sidney taught her how to put her kids in a "trance like hyper relaxed stage." She also said that "she last molested her kids in October, 2002". So by Susan's own words she continued to molest her own children over a five year period. In the audio recorded interview made of Susan Hamlin that same day she was asked if her husband "ever molested one of your children" and she answered, "No". She was again asked, "Are you positive of that?" and she replied, "Yes."

The transcript of this same recorded interview shows Detective Hoagland asking Mrs. Hamlin, "Does your husband ever beat you?" She replies, "No." Detective Hoagland says, "Okay, I've got to ask." Susan acknowledges, "I know." Then Detective Lensing explains, "One of the reasons why he's asking that is because last time I talked to you, you had a black eye also. It was on the left side. (inaudible) bruises..." Susan states, "I know, I know. I had been roughed up by this..." Detective Lensing interjects, "This mysterious guy...." And Susan concludes by naming the husband of her friend.

Richard recalled the first disturbing incident involving Susan that occurred in 1999, although at the time Richard had thought the police officer who issued his wife a misdemeanor child neglect/endangering citation (No. 539644, Sacramento Municipal Court) had overreacted. Susan had taken the children out shopping in their brown 1996 Ford van and had just run into the Pier One import store in Sacramento for a few minutes to shop. It was a warm afternoon on April 9, 1999 and fellow customers had observed the children crying in the van. Concerned, they went into Pier One and reported the van's license number and a description of the vehicle. Pier One clerks announced over the store loud speaker that the parents of children in this locked van needed to immediately report to the counter. Twenty minutes later when Susan checked her products out at the cashier, she walked out to find the police trying to open the van's doors to rescue the children. When she received the citation from officer T. Taylor, Richard Hamlin appeared as his wife's defense attorney. Susan plead nolo contendre (acknowledged by law to have the same force and effect as a guilty plea.). She successfully completed a diversion program and the charges were dismissed on April 13, 1999.

Following this 1999 event, Susan began shutting down and withdrawing into herself and hardly ever speaking. Richard became concerned about the possibility that Susan was suffering from depression. He admits that he was not the best husband during this time period, concentrating only on money and providing his family and himself with the very best of material things. He said he had a very profitable practice and when it reached its peak in 2001 he was making $650,000 a year as a defense attorney. He was defending some very high profile clients who could afford to keep him on 24-hour call by paying him what ever was needed to defend their clients. He was hobnobbing with powerful politicians, sampling the good life and having an occasional extramarital affair if he had the desire. He acknowledges that during this crucial time he was paying little attention to the emotional needs of his family and Susan became quieter and more withdrawn. Finally, Susan went to a psychiatrist at Kaiser Hospital in Sacramento who first prescribed Ritalin and later Prozac which Susan took for several years.

Richard noticed a marked difference in his wife. She seemed to have more energy and was not as withdrawn, talking more openly then she had in years. Then in October of 2002 Susan suffered a panic attack that was worse then anything that had happened in the past. She was driving in the van with the children and she suddenly suffered from a severe migraine headache so painful that she began experiencing breathing difficulties and temporary numbness in her arm and face. She panicked and pulled off to the side of the road calling 911. The police responded, called Richard at work to come get the children and took Susan to the hospital where they kept her for the day, medicating her and sending her home later that evening. According to Richard, the attack seemed to release some type of trigger in Susan and for the first time she began telling Richard about her horrific childhood. And she began writing to those friends and family who could explain the gaps in her memory that made her feel as though she had been raised in a totally different household from her siblings.

To her father, Dr. Sid Siemer she wrote the following letter on April 22, 2003:
Dear Dad,

This is a letter that I never thought I would choose to write. But, lately, (the past 3-4 years) I have been struggling with behaviors and moods that I can't explain. I have suffered from severe depression, thoughts of suicide, self esteem problems, marital problems, problems socializing; in all settings, including the work environment, etc. I have gone back and forth between concern for, or more accurately, fear of, your feelings in reading this letter and concern for my well being if I did not write, and send, this letter. At this point, obviously, I have concluded that my need to write this letter has sufficient value. I have not yet, as I sit here writing, determined the value of my need to send it. (If you are reading this now, then I guess, not only do I have a need to verbalize my thoughts, but I also have a need for you to hear them. Any need I have for a response from you is a separate issue that I have not gotten to at this point.)

I have so many gaps in my memory of growing up -- I have always wondered why. Terri has similar gaps. Layne recounts memories that are so foreign to me that I think he lived in another house. I have lived my life not ever letting others see the "real" me. I know that everyone does this to a certain extent. But I have always expended so much energy projecting an image of someone who is "acceptable"..... always feeling that I had to hide something. While I expended such energy to keep others from finding out what was inside me -- it really wasn't hard to keep it hidden, since I had no idea what it was that I was hiding.

I have been trying so hard to figure things out so that I can, at some point, relax and let down enough to actually experience life, i.e., really feel it -- expose myself so that I could really experience life's feelings, instead of merely acting them out as I projected this more acceptable image of Susan. While my protective walls, my facade, kept the true ugliness safely hidden within, they have also unknowingly served to keep life out too. As you will read in any psych textbook, intimacy in a relationship is impossible to achieve without trusting another enough to let your true self be seen, i.e. exposing yourself to a point of vulnerability. Love is what results then, when in that vulnerability, you can draw strength from a confidence that you will still be, at a minimum, accepted, but even more than that (unbelievably so), affirmed and clung to still, i.e., loved. Isn't that the cliché --"unconditional love?"

In my case, exposing the grotesque ugliness that was me, so I thought, could only lead to being cast aside, abandoned, discarded, rejected, shunned, isolated...unloved. The results, of course was ZERO self esteem. How could I have possibly had any good thoughts of myself if disgust and disapproval were a certainty upon someone seeing behind my facade. Perfection of this facade as I went though childhood, then, was a necessity for my very survival, since dependent children would surely perish if abandoned. While this facade served me well, for the most part, in hiding the ugliness that I have always believed to be me, it is now hurting me, and those I love, much more than any good it is doing. It is affecting every relationship I have with those people in my life -- my husband, my children, my siblings, my friends, any employer I have ever had,.....and you. This facade has outlived its usefulness in my life; unfortunately, however, it has taken on a life of its own. It is going to protect me whether or not I need or want it to. How do I turn it off? What was its source? Why is it so STRONG? About 4 or 5 years ago I remember thinking that I was finally happy with my life. For the most part, I felt comfortable with who I was -- I thought I had a healthy image of myself at long last. I had absolutely no desire to focus any attention backward in an attempt to figure out any baggage I might be carrying through life. I was happy and unaffected by any "baggage".













gal biowarfare research. Again, I don't know what any of this has to do with domestic abuse and death threats.
Worst of all, Hamlin blames himself for much of what has occurred. He expresses deep guilt for not having realized that his "babies were being hurt...I cared about me, material things, and my career." (2)
The bottom line: The Hamlin case is the result of incredibly complex intrafamily issues that could never be fully resolved in a courtroom. The principal players themselves don't appear to know what is true, what is imagined, and what is an inextricable combination of truth and imagination.
QuoteLikeDislikeShare
Oct 03, 2010#2
Richard Hamlin and Susan Siemer met at the University of the Pacific when both were attending the university's School of Law. Richard Hamlin says that Susan made the difficult class work appear easy. In protective custody in an El Dorado County jail awaiting a trial that could put him away for 25 years to life, Richard reminisced. He recalled one particular test that he had spent countless hours studying for determined to score a higher grade then Susan - just this once. He said two-thirds of the way through the test he glanced over at her and she had put down her pencil and was staring off into space. She looked as though she did not have a care in the world but he was worried that she had frozen and could not complete the test. He need not have worried; Susan had simply finished the test before any one else and was waiting for others to finish. As he described this event his voice contained a mixture of pride and regret.

Richard describes Susan as a brilliant, strong willed woman who is beautiful and petite but tall and slender with a model's figure. In law school they shared an interest in religion and attended church regularly. Richard Hamlin was not just attracted to his fellow student, he was in love. In 1984 they were married. It seemed an ideal match. She was a smart civil litigator whose expertise was writing well researched civil complaints; he was a confrontational trial lawyer who rapidly acquired experience as a prosecutor and then as a defense attorney. Together they appeared to live an ideal Christian life responsibly raising four children and building a million dollar home with a view in El Dorado Hills halfway between the capital city of California, Sacramento, and the historic smaller town of Placerville. Their neighbors describe a couple who were devoted parents who both participated in after school activities and church gatherings. Susan Hamlin was a stay-at-home mother whose husband's income allowed her to have a gardener and housekeeper to help her run their large home. Observers said that for eighteen years it seemed to be a perfect marriage and both parents were excellent role models for their children.

The early years of their marriage, like most young marriages, had been a financial struggle with both of them working to make ends meet. Their first son was born in 1987 and their second child, a boy, arrived in 1992. By this time Richard Hamlin had left the Sacramento District Attorney's office and was doing well as a defense attorney. With two children to care for, Susan decide to become a stay at home mom and shortly thereafter in 1996 the Hamlin's became the proud parents of a baby girl. Two years later, in 1998, a second daughter was born and their family was complete. Their lives were filled with business matters and social gatherings befitting a successful couple.

In the El Dorado County Sheriff's report made on February 26, 2004 Susan Hamlin "said she started molesting her kids in Fresno in 1996 and that her dad Sidney taught her how to put her kids in a "trance like hyper relaxed stage." She also said that "she last molested her kids in October, 2002". So by Susan's own words she continued to molest her own children over a five year period. In the audio recorded interview made of Susan Hamlin that same day she was asked if her husband "ever molested one of your children" and she answered, "No". She was again asked, "Are you positive of that?" and she replied, "Yes."

The transcript of this same recorded interview shows Detective Hoagland asking Mrs. Hamlin, "Does your husband ever beat you?" She replies, "No." Detective Hoagland says, "Okay, I've got to ask." Susan acknowledges, "I know." Then Detective Lensing explains, "One of the reasons why he's asking that is because last time I talked to you, you had a black eye also. It was on the left side. (inaudible) bruises..." Susan states, "I know, I know. I had been roughed up by this..." Detective Lensing interjects, "This mysterious guy...." And Susan concludes by naming the husband of her friend.

Richard recalled the first disturbing incident involving Susan that occurred in 1999, although at the time Richard had thought the police officer who issued his wife a misdemeanor child neglect/endangering citation (No. 539644, Sacramento Municipal Court) had overreacted. Susan had taken the children out shopping in their brown 1996 Ford van and had just run into the Pier One import store in Sacramento for a few minutes to shop. It was a warm afternoon on April 9, 1999 and fellow customers had observed the children crying in the van. Concerned, they went into Pier One and reported the van's license number and a description of the vehicle. Pier One clerks announced over the store loud speaker that the parents of children in this locked van needed to immediately report to the counter. Twenty minutes later when Susan checked her products out at the cashier, she walked out to find the police trying to open the van's doors to rescue the children. When she received the citation from officer T. Taylor, Richard Hamlin appeared as his wife's defense attorney. Susan plead nolo contendre (acknowledged by law to have the same force and effect as a guilty plea.). She successfully completed a diversion program and the charges were dismissed on April 13, 1999.

Following this 1999 event, Susan began shutting down and withdrawing into herself and hardly ever speaking. Richard became concerned about the possibility that Susan was suffering from depression. He admits that he was not the best husband during this time period, concentrating only on money and providing his family and himself with the very best of material things. He said he had a very profitable practice and when it reached its peak in 2001 he was making $650,000 a year as a defense attorney. He was defending some very high profile clients who could afford to keep him on 24-hour call by paying him what ever was needed to defend their clients. He was hobnobbing with powerful politicians, sampling the good life and having an occasional extramarital affair if he had the desire. He acknowledges that during this crucial time he was paying little attention to the emotional needs of his family and Susan became quieter and more withdrawn. Finally, Susan went to a psychiatrist at Kaiser Hospital in Sacramento who first prescribed Ritalin and later Prozac which Susan took for several years.

Richard noticed a marked difference in his wife. She seemed to have more energy and was not as withdrawn, talking more openly then she had in years. Then in October of 2002 Susan suffered a panic attack that was worse then anything that had happened in the past. She was driving in the van with the children and she suddenly suffered from a severe migraine headache so painful that she began experiencing breathing difficulties and temporary numbness in her arm and face. She panicked and pulled off to the side of the road calling 911. The police responded, called Richard at work to come get the children and took Susan to the hospital where they kept her for the day, medicating her and sending her home later that evening. According to Richard, the attack seemed to release some type of trigger in Susan and for the first time she began telling Richard about her horrific childhood. And she began writing to those friends and family who could explain the gaps in her memory that made her feel as though she had been raised in a totally different household from her siblings.

Susan Hamlin had told her father that her husband Richard was angry over the disclosures she was making to him on an almost daily basis. There was clear evidence that this was true. Richard encouraged Susan to act on her newly emerging memories and to contact her old friends and relatives in an attempt to establish the truth about her past. Susan did so and Richard researched the past of his father-in-law, Dr. Sid Siemer. In his own mind, Richard said he believed his wife and mother of his children had been and continued to be violated by her own father. He believed it because his wife was verifying it in letters and emails she sent to others and because she maintained a detailed journal in which she documented the abuse in her own handwriting. As his anger and determination grew Richard began contacting the friends, family and associates of Dr. Siemer bringing the confrontation right to the Fresno community where Dr. Siemer lived and worked. These acts culminated in Richard Hamlin producing and distributing a flyer that identified Dr. Sid Siemer as a serial child molester.

Dr. Siemer's response was immediate and forceful. On Thursday, July 3rd, 2003 Susan's father filed a lawsuit (Case No. 03CECG02378, Fresno County Superior Court). The lawsuit was a petition for injunction prohibiting harassment and an application for a temporary restraining order. Attorney Susan Hamlin defended her husband in the action filed by her father. Judge Pena signed the show cause order as requested on July 13, 2003 and the proof of service was served on Richard W. Hamlin by personal service on August 3, 2003.

On August 10, 2003 Susan Hamlin wrote another letter to her father. This letter contained an entirely different tone; it is a missive filled with a cold, controlled anger and "Dad" is now Sid.

On August 10, 2003 Susan Hamlin wrote another letter to her father. This letter contained an entirely different tone; it is a missive filled with a cold, controlled anger and "Dad" is now Sid.
A

nger and "Dad" is now Sid.
August 10, 2003

Sid,

Since we just found your motion for a restraining order in the bushes when we got home last night, it prompted me to re-read the letter I wrote you in April? which, I might add, you so ?lovingly? attached as an exhibit to be included as a public record. After reading it, it dawned on me that, what was glaringly obvious to all but you, had been omitted. In all fairness to you, I feel compelled to clarify this written record that you are so meticulously compiling. You truly thought that you had me willingly in your web? that I knowingly chose to participate in your repulsively deviant little ?games? of torture and control. I just couldn't let the record stand if there was any possibility of confusion on this issue. So? to be very clear? YOU NEVER HAD ME. That my body was forced to participate, from my very beginning, and continuing on until April of this year, in acts so unbearable that, in order to survive (quite literally) things that were so against nature, my mind had to immediately delete all traces of each event that it sorted into this category. As supremely intelligent as you think you are, your plan had a fatal flaw? you either had no knowledge of ?repressed memories?, or, more likely, you were aware of such a? theory? and decided that? it was all a bunch of ? hog-wash??. The latter sounds like you doesn't it? Well? here is a news flash for you, the fact that Sid Siemer doesn't believe in something does not mean that it doesn't exist in reality. The first clue you had was in your kitchen when I mentioned that I had so many gaps in my memories of childhood. We were specifically talking about when we lived on Colonial? I was in junior high and high school. You got such an odd look on your face. You were studying my expression to see if I was just stupid, or if I was doing a really good job of playing along with? the secret?. I was really convincing, wasn't I? You were worried for only a second though, and recovered very well with your comment about Mom's ?multiple? suicide attempts during that period in my life. Of course I would want to put those little unpleasantness out of my mind, you told me. The problem is that the version of the family myth that I was told was limited to only one such attempt? and, now even that is in question since I have recently learned that, upon her release from the hospital a day or two later, she went to the YWCA ?a shelter for abused women, where she stayed for approx...2 weeks.

And all the while I kept remembering more and more....

And did I tell you how glad I am that you have been so predictable. That you would take this private little matter to court gives me the opportunity I have wanted. In court, when you are asked questions, there will be a judge presiding to see to it that you answer. Oh, did your lawyers tell you that the judge has power over even YOU. The judge, of course, does expect you to tell the truth. Can you lie convincingly to an adult? How about to an adult with power over you? In any event, I expect nothing from the noise that will come out of your mouth. I do, however, look forward to watching you try to control yourself when Rick cross-examines you. I think I'll bring my camera.

Your choice of forums for our first opportunity to discuss this? secret? matter is very PUBLIC. Since this is your motion, you are obviously not concerned about publicity. I welcome it. Newspapers, TV and radio could find this to be quite a human interest story. Just wanted to thank you in advance in case I forget to in court. I am, however, wondering what has suddenly changed to make exposure of your ugly secret no longer life ending. Or is it that you think if you tell the story first, control remains yours since you can decided which version to tell. Convincing the court that one person is crazy is not impossible, however, it is also not easy. Convincing the court that all the witnesses are crazy is ridiculous. So, I'm looking forward to a good show.

What do you think people will think of you when they learn what you did to me to make sure I never told anyone that you raped me repeatedly throughout my childhood? The acts of rape were horrific, but you were able to trump even that. Your acts of cruelty and torture were effective control tactics with me, the cornerstone of which was to teach me [my place]. That, I did learn. I had the same value to you as did any other animal, no more, and no less. Animals are kept around only so long as they continue to please the master. But because this animal can speak, unpredictability exists? you can never really be sure what they might just ?blurt out?. Control is what defines master, and control cannot exist where there is unpredictability. You used a demonstration to accomplish this. My puppy that I so loved was the subject of your demonstration on that day? do you remember? While holding her over the bathtub by the scruff of her neck, you took your jagged edged fishing knife from its leather case and sliced open her abdomen allowing her insides to run out into the tub. I got it. I understood that lesson and acted very predictably for a couple of years. It is hard for me to believe that I would have ever needed to be reminded of this lesson. Unfortunately, with my limited life experience at age 7, I didn't know that I was telling? the secret? when I complained of severe pain during urination. Going [potty] wasn't the secret. Of course, what I couldn't know was that painful urination resulting from forced intercourse did expose the secret. This demonstration was more personally tailored. You tied me, naked and in a spread eagle position, on top of the table in the Adams St. house and, with your fishing knife, threatened to cut me as you had my puppy when we lived in Richmond.

It is no wonder to me anymore that I submitted to your control. It also now makes sense that I remained under your control well after becoming an adult since you never released me from your hold (i.e. the childhood lessons remained controlling). My survival of my past, however, is due to a coping mechanism which spared my child mind from remembering trauma which would have been too great to bare. This served as a life preserver which, thankfully, kept me afloat until I was strong enough to deal with the memories. I was sent a rescuer - Rick. Rick is my hero. Contrary to the propaganda that you have spread all these years, Rick is a good man. He has endured a lot as a result of your actions over the years, directly and indirectly as your distorted teachings come to him through me. I found myself acting on auto-pilot in ways that I was committed to changing, and I didn't know why. Until I remembered the distorted lessons that you taught me, I could not release myself from their controlling effect on my life.

It makes me retch to think that you actually believed that I would ever choose you. You have robbed me of my childhood, my innocence, my trust, my history, and more. But it stops now. You will not take anything more from me. My present and my future are mine.

The revelations disclosed to her husband, her family members and several long time friends finally led to someone severely beating Susan Hamlin on or about February 22, 2004. The location of the beating and the identification of the person who beat Richard Hamlin's wife is what the upcoming trial is all about. When Susan and Richard Hamlin went to the El Dorado County Sheriff's Office on Thursday, February 26, 04 at 5:35 p.m. Susan twice identified the perpetrator as most likely the husband of a friend that she had agreed to meet in the parking lot of a nearby Starbucks Coffee Shop. In this very public place, in broad daylight, this man punched her in the face knocking her to the ground where he proceed to "kick her all over her head and body ", she told the deputy sheriffs. Susan stated this once in front of her husband and a second time on tape when she was alone with the deputies in a private room. Yet she claimed to have never met her friend's husband. She only assumed it was him because he arrived in a red car that was the same make and model as one of the cars owned by her friend. It was her married girlfriend who Susan said had set up the Starbuck's meeting location.

That evening the El Dorado County deputy sheriffs ordered the Hamlin children placed in Child Protective Services to remove them from harm's way. The next day Richard Hamlin was arrested and immediately Susan Hamlin retracted everything contained in her confession and stated that her husband was the individual who had beat her and, over a period of time, had tortured her. Sources now say that Susan Hamlin and her children have been reunited with her family and her father.

Individuals who wish to remain unidentified have said that Dr. Sid Siemer is a high ranking member of a CIA sanctioned child molestation ring called "The Finders" and also a senior member of the Order of the Trapezoid, consisting of worshippers of the Temple of Set. Members of both groups have indicated that they consider themselves a type of royalty operating above the laws of man.

Richard Hamlin, former Sacramento County prosecutor and high profile defense lawyer is now held without bail facing the following serious felony complaints: (1) causing cruelty and pain and suffering with great bodily injury to Susan Hamlin , (2) two counts of corporal injury to a spouse/cohabitant/former cohabitant/child's parent, (3) willful and unlawful discharge of a firearm in a grossly negligent manner which could result in injury and death of a person, (4) willfully and unlawfully threatening to commit a crime which could result in death or great bodily injury to Susan Hamlin with specific intent that the statement be taken as a threat, (5) terrorist threats - threaten to commit a crime that could cause death or great bodily injury to Susan Hamlin with the specific intent that the statement be taken as a threat, and (6) three counts of child abuse under circumstances likely to produce great bodily harm and death (he) did cause and permit a child to suffer unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering to be placed in such situation that his/her person or health may be endangered.

The prosecutor offered a plea agreement to Richard Hamlin that required Hamlin serve 12 years in prison. Hamlin rejected the plea offer and prepared to go to trial to try to prove his innocence.

The Hamlin case reminds one of an ABC television interview of Princess Diane on November 24, 1995. The commentator asked the Princess, "Do you think Camellia Parker-Bowles was a factor in the breakdown of your marriage (to Prince Charles)"?

Princess Diane responded, "Well, there were three of us in the marriage and it was a bit crowded."

Could it be that Princess Diane and Richard Hamlin both served the same purpose - breeders to "royalty"?

Oct 04, 2010#3
The Bizarre Case of Richard and Susan Hamlin
a tale of torture, murder, rape, incest, satanic cults, snuff films, death threats, pistol whipping, the CIA, Ted Gunderson, mind control, Stockholm syndrome, depression. child abuse, infidelity, bankruptcy, the rise and fall of a couple of rich lawyers, and the destruction of a family

January 11 (updated September 30), 2006. A very strange criminal trial concluded in Sacramento yesterday (Jan. 10) with the conviction of former prosecutor and defense attorney Richard W. Hamlin, 45, on several charges, including that of torturing his wife, Susan Hamlin, 49, also an attorney. She formerly worked at one of the largest law firms in Sacramento. The torture conviction may get him life in prison. (update, September 29, 2006: Judge Eddie T. Keller sentenced Hamlin to life in prison and told him that his violence was "inspired by pure evil." The judge didn't elaborate on his theological presumption, though it seems to have been put forth to support the length of the prison sentence. Under California's inscrutable sentencing laws, however, Hamlin will be eligible for parole in about seven years.*) The legal proceedings began on February 26, 2004, when Hamlin and his wife, Susan, walked into the El Dorado County Sheriff's Office and she claimed that she was a member of a satanic cult led by her 71-year-old father. She claimed that the cult planned to kill Richard as a "Christian trophy" at midnight on March 1. She also claimed that the cult was planning to murder her husband because "if he were allowed to live he would cause problems for the Satanists" and that by killing him she would become a High Priestess in the cult. She also claimed that she had been molesting her four children for several years and that she had been raped by her father when she was a young girl and that he "passed her around to whoever else wanted to rape her."* She named her father, Dr. Sydney Siemer, as a child molester and satanic cult leader. She claimed that a Howard Mily not only had been molesting her since she was 15, but that she had witnessed Mily torture and murder a young girl in 1982. She claims she was "strung up on a pegboard" by Mily for three weeks and kept in cold storage and that she was brought out to witness the murder. Her father, she said, keeps snuff films and pornography at his home in Fresno.

When she confessed to these bizarre happenings, she had signs of physical abuse. She told officers that another Satanist named Rock Clum had punched her in the face a couple of days earlier in a Starbucks parking lot where she had gone to meet Lisa Clum to talk about the plot to kill Richard.

After Deputy G. Murphy and detectives Hoagland and Lensing heard this bizarre tale, they had the children placed in protective custody but let Susan and Richard leave with no charges being filed "pending further investigation."* Whatever that further investigation consisted of, it did not involve charging or arresting Susan Hamlin, Siemer, Mily, the Clums, or Richard Keehn (who was also named as a conspirator in the plot to kill Richard). It was just two days later that Susan changed her story and claimed that the confession was made because she was afraid of her husband. He was the one who had punched her in the face and cracked her ribs, she now claimed.

Richard, on the other hand, claims that Susan was in emotional turmoil because of her difficulties in dealing with recovered memories of sexual abuse by her father. Richard was arrested and eventually eighteen charges were filed against him for assault, assault with a deadly weapon, spousal abuse, child abuse and endangerment, making death threats, false imprisonment, and torture. He was found guilty of torture, four counts of spousal abuse, one count of making death threats against his wife, and two counts of child endangerment. If he doesn't get the convictions overturned on appeal, Hamlin may be sentenced to life in prison on the torture conviction alone.

No charges were filed against Susan Hamlin or the others that she named as murderers, kidnappers, sexual abusers, and rapists. The prosecution claims that she was a victim of mind control. It is alleged that Richard used violence and the threat of violence over a period of several years to get her to agree that she had been abused by her father, that she and her father were abusing their children, and that she and her father planned to kill him.

Hamlin's children testified that he hurt their mother and told them that he had to do it to beat the devil out of her. Their 18-year-old son testified that

he thought his father was going to shoot his mother during a Feb. 11, 2004 trip to Placer County.

Ryan Hamilton told of his father dragging Susan Hamlin into a field near a business complex in the Roseville area. Ryan said he and his younger brother put on headgear in the vehicle to muffle the sound if their father used a derringer he'd brought.

“We thought my dad was going to shoot my mom,” the 18-year-old testified.

The couple and their two sons had driven in the family van from their El Dorado Hills home to Placer County because Richard Hamlin, 45, planned to kill a Granite Bay woman he said was involved in a murder plot to kill him, Ryan Hamlin testified.

When Susan Hamlin couldn't find the home of the woman, Richard Hamlin pistol whipped her and drove to the business complex, his son testified. (Ryan McCarthy, McNaughton News Service)

Susan Hamlin testified that Richard beat her, stabbed her, pistol-whipped her, threatened her with a sword, and punched her with increasing frequency over a four-year period.

There are a few facts that are undisputed in this case. Both Richard and Susan are graduates of the University of the Pacific's McGeorge School of Law, the school where U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy taught before being nominated to his post by President Ronald Reagan. Hamlin had worked for seventeen years as a prosecutor and defense attorney. He was very successful and had no criminal record, making about $700,000 a year in private practice before he abruptly quit about six years ago. He says he quit work to help his wife with her repressed memories of sexual abuse by her father and her father's friends. The Hamlins lived in a million-dollar hilltop mansion in El Dorado Hills before going bankrupt. Susan was charged with child neglect and endangerment in 1999.* She kept a diary with details of cult activity and abuse, although she now claims she was forced to write those accounts by her husband. Some of her accounts detail her desire to uncover repressed memories of abuse.

Hamlin told a detective that one of his wife's friends tried to lure her into becoming a prostitute at Starbucks.* In 2003, Richard sent a beheaded doll and shredded children's books to Siemer, who had sent them as gifts to the Hamlins' children ("Trial told of torn-up doll: El Dorado Hills lawyer beheaded gift to daughter from her grandpa, sister-in-law says" by Ramon Coronado, Sacramento Bee, December 4, 2005*). In April 2003, Susan wrote a long letter to her father, accusing him of child abuse and of being the cause of her many physical and psychological problems. In June, 2003, Richard gave fliers to Siemer's neighbors, notifying them that Siemer molested Susan when she was a child.

Siemer hired the Fresno law firm of Gromis & Aguirre. The following letter was sent by Aguirre to the Hamlins on June 26, 2003, about ten days after Hamlin had passed out his flier:

Dr. Sidney Siemer has retained this office in reference to the accusations you and Susan Hamlin have made concerning Dr. Siemer's alleged past behavior.

Before responding to the accusations, Dr. Siemer sought expert, professional advice on the best method of responding. While he strongly denies the accusations, he is deeply troubled by the underlying cause of the complaints and did not want to take any step that would adversely affect Susan. We hoped to learn more about why Susan is experiencing these false "memories." We needed to know whether a truthful denial would have adverse psychological affects [sic] on Susan. Is the best approach simply to ignore the allegations? All of these questions needed to be addressed before responding and professional help was utilized to determine the best manner in which to respond.

Your recent conduct has made it impossible for Dr. Siemer to ignore the allegations. Your recent letters, fax communications, telephone calls and threats have placed the Siemers in an untenable position. While Dr. Siemer does not want to take any action that will have an adverse effect on Susan, he also does not want the allegations to go unanswered. He also wants to remain safe. Your statements on Father's Day to Denise Kliewer that you "want to go up and just kill the son of a bitch," are truly frightening. Dr. Siemer believes that you may take action to harm him. Consequently, he has asked me to request a court order enjoining you and Susan from contacting him and the members of his household. I have submitted the appropriate application for such an order and will provide you with copies once it has been processed.

After consultation with professionals we have determined that it is best to address the allegations directly. To that end, Dr. Siemer has asked me to inform you that the accusations made as a result of Susan's "repressed memories" are false. The incidents described simply did not occur.

Dr. Siemer hopes that Susan recovers and recognizes that these "memories" are imagined. We suggest that she receive prompt psychiatric and/or psychological care. If necessary, and if recommended by Susan's treating psychiatrist/psychologist, Dr. Siemer will participate in appropriate therapy with Susan. His decision to do this is solely out of his concern and love for his daughter. Dr. Siemer knows that the events described by Susan did not occur and he will work, with her therapists, to help her discover that the memories are indeed imagined. (McCullough)

Susan responded with an angry letter in August, but in September the Hamlins and Dr. Siemer came to an agreement not to contact or communicate with each other in any way. But within two months Siemer's lawyer once again wrote Hamlin to ask him to cease and desist from making molestation allegations against Dr. Siemer. Hamlin's response was a letter referring to Siemer as a rapist and demanding $300,000 "in lieu of proceeding with a filing of a complaint that will allege his child rape and molest [sic] of his daughter."

The Hamlins, now divorced, had been married for about 20 years and lived a lavish lifestyle before the trouble began about five years ago. Rock and Lisa Clum are friends of Susan who tried to counsel her on spousal abuse. Lisa Clum testified at Richard's trial that the thought of his wife being molested "drove him nuts."

Richard had a website to tell his story. (The story is posted here.) He hired Ted Gunderson—who is a book-length story in himself (see pro and con)—as his private investigator. Several conspiracy sites have taken up the satanic ritual abuse angle:Rigorous Intuition is worth a read. Virginia McCullough has written a few articles about the case on NewsMakingNews, including one where she cites "individuals who wish to remain unidentified" who claim that "Dr. Sid Siemer is a high ranking member of a CIA sanctioned child molestation ring called "The Finders" and also a senior member of the Order of the Trapezoid, consisting of worshippers of the Temple of Set."

On his website, Richard claimed that he hired investigators to check out Goat Rock State Beach on the Sonoma coast because Susan claims that many satanic molestations took place there. He writes:
Our investigative team has interviewed witnesses familiar with Goat Rock Beach and its surrounding area. Multiple witnesses have said that this particular territory is well known for “Satanic activity.” They site the remoteness of the beaches and the many coves and caves that allow secrecy. They also state the reputation is longstanding.

Hamlin even thinks that it more than just coincidence that two young people were each shot in the head in their sleeping bags on a beach not far from Goat Rock in the summer of 2004. He thinks that since the couple were Christians and had a Bible with them that the murders may well be satanic. The only thing we know for sure is that the murders are unsolved and they didn't occur at Goat Rock.

I've been to Goat Rock many times over the past thirty years. The beaches there are not any more remote than other beaches on the Sonoma coast and there are not many coves and caves that allow secrecy, as you can see from aerial photos taken by Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. Goat Rock is near the mouth of the Russian River and is home to a colony of harbor seals. The beaches are sandy and easily accessible. There are picnic tables and restroom facilities. The park has usually been crowded with visitors whenever I've been there, but a quick call to the State Park rangers should be able to answer the question of longstanding reputation for satanic activity. The only unusual thing I've seen at Goat Park was a seagull swallowing a large starfish whole.

In case you are wondering: the sanity of Richard Hamlin was not an issue at trial. Richard testified that Susan had panic attacks and was treated for depression with "mood-altering drugs." A prosecution mental health expert testified that Susan Hamlin was a victim of Stockholm syndrome. As far as I know, nobody brought up the possibility of drug abuse. Many of us reading newspaper accounts of the events have no doubt wondered if one or the other or both of them are mentally ill. Was this a case of folie à deux? Did her claims—whether delusional or real—of child abuse drive him mad? Many would question Richard's judgment to be his own defense attorney. Richard's brother, Bradley, wrote on EZBoard.com (later deleted): "I can tell you factually that Richard is as sane as he's ever been." Maybe so, but Bradley also wrote:
I did not see my brother at all or speak to him in any way during his problem period: 2000 to 2004. I got a call that he landed in jail and went to see him. I had my own falling out with Richard. Sibling stuff, not related to his case. Susan talked about writing a book about her abuse. She wrote many detailed letters that would make no sense to anyone but her. A handwriting expert has also signed off on the fact that the letters were not written under duress. I know someone who was abused in very much the same way that Susan described and she (Susan) shows ALL of the signs of a molest victim.

Deputy District Attorney Vicki Ashworth stated at trial that Susan was acting "like an abused and battered woman." In any case, the handwriting expert was Marcel Matley, the same expert Dan Rather used to verify the signature of George W. Bush's former squadron commander in the National Guard.

At trial, Kim Dubach, Richard's former legal secretary, testified that in November 1999 Susan Hamlin told her that she suspected she (Susan) had been molested as a child. Susan based her belief on a memory she had had when she was 16, said Dubach. A friend spent the night and Susan saw her father touching her friend's breasts, which triggered the memory of her own abuse years earlier. Susan's sister testified that while their father was not a great dad, he didn't do anything sexual to them. The sister testified that she worked for her father for 23 years. For good measure, Ashworth accused Hamlin of having an affair with Dubach.

I hesitate to speculate as to what the truth might be in this case. We know that some sort of emotional crisis occurred about five or six years ago in the Hamlin household and that Susan and Richard both began exploring the idea that she had been molested by her father some thirty or forty years earlier. Richard certainly became convinced of this and of satanic cult and mind control activities. Did she abuse her children, as she says she did? Are the things she wrote in her diaries to be taken as the truth, the confabulations of a disturbed mind, or the fantasies forced upon her by her husband's sick mind? Is there any truth at all to Richard's version of what happened? Was Susan abused as a child by her father and others? Did she witness a torture and murder of a young girl? The only thing I feel confident speculating about is that others won't hesitate to speculate as to what really happened and they will have their books and movies out by summer. (update: I was wrong. Summer has come and gone and this story is still ripe for the plucking. update: ABC's Primetime took up the story in February 2007.)

Texas Doctor speaks out on Covid#19! BUMP!
[link to vimeo.com (secure)]

All politicians should have pay frozen retroactively going forward.
Two months into lockdown? Two months of future pay withheld.
Six months into lockdown? Six months of future pay withheld.

Since Richard's conviction, Susan Hamlin has become a spokeswoman for victims of domestic violence. She says she told lies to survive. At her ex-husband's sentencing she said: "Victims of domestic violence don't live to tell their story; they turn up dead -- their voices forever silenced. I did not die. I did whatever I had to do to stay alive and save my (children). I am a survivor."* She also read a statement she said was composed by the Hamlin's 8-year-old daughter: "He told us he was going to get rid of our mom and get us a new mom."

On May 30th, I received an email allegedly from Richard Hamlin, claiming he had read my "coverage" of his case and that he wanted to express his "appreciation" for my reporting. The letter seems authentic but without much understanding of what I had written. Perhaps I have become such a fair and balanced writer that I did not reveal my skepticism about mind control, repressed memories, and satanic ritual abuse. In the letter, Hamlin maintains his claims that his wife and their children were ritually abused by her father who used mind control techniques to get his way. The writing in this letter indicates that he may sincerely believe this. He thinks his family is just the tip of the iceberg in a vast conspiracy of abusers and mind controllers. As absurd as it sounds, he says he did what he did "to get help for those children who have been violated so that they can begin on the road to health." Half the letter outlined all the reasons he thought he would win a new trial and get the torture conviction overturned. He invited me to meet with him to discuss anything I wanted. Was he motivated by "pure evil" as the judge claimed? Is he delusional? Did his wife's mental breakdown lead to his own mental breakdown? I don't know, but I do know that I am not competent enough to evaluate mental illness, if that is what is involved here. That is partly why I did not respond to his email. Another reason is that it was clear from what he wrote that either he did not read what I wrote about his case or he read it but interpreted it to fit his own delusions.

I do wonder, though, if this case had gone to trial prior to 9/11, would Hamlin have been charged with torture? And if this case had gone to trial twenty-five years ago, during the height of the satanic ritual abuse panic, would Susan's father be the one going to jail rather than her husband? Would she be in jail, too, and the Clums? And anyone else that was accused?

I also wonder why the national media haven't covered this story. Too busy covering Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie or whether some recovered drug addict's memoir was a true story? A day after Hamlin's sentencing, a search of Google News found only the Sacramento Bee and one Sacramento television station's website with a report on it.

Sadly, this story is not over. As noted above, Hamlin will be eligible for parole in about seven years. At the sentencing hearing, Hamlin's 14-year-old son told the judge: "If he gets out, it will not be him sitting in that chair. It will be me."

On Monday, February 9, 2009, the Third District Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of Richard Hamlin on all counts brought back by the El Dorado County jury on January 10, 2005.

Jones to Charlie Sheen: "I've seen your hernia!"


[link to mega.nz (secure)]
Afterall,

the a.I. belongs to the other. An anomalous region. In Templar red, but unknown blck. Your final confirmation when it issues digital currencies unto hands of your enemy. – The minion haCkers of the world willing buyers. Unleashing the hunter. Then a wickedness unbounds for plan unfurls into matter. Somehow, industrially speaking, music will be an atmosphere lent with ambiance. Moods become registered; the motions patterned by rhythm. Symmetry is a signature needed. Healing arts, for Your works belong to us. Harder

Currently holding the Caduceus, what else can matter?






Worst of all, I have seen more faces.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Synanon, the Brainwashing “Game” and Modern Transgender Activism: The Orwellian Implications of Transgender Politics.
[link to transanityca.wordpress.com (secure)]

Santaria, La Raza, Los Vegas...
targeting complete, initiate
Thread: Chinese Counterfeit/espionage/ money laundering by Officer Derek Chauvin (!) Killed George Floyd ( his) Accomplice, for spending a counterfeit 20
Thread: The guy who started the vandalism in Minneapolis was a COP named Jacob Pederson. (they have his pic)
[link to twitter.com (secure)]
[link to kstp.com (secure)]
[link to www.kare11.com (secure)]

^^ Synanon-sin-anonymous; commune-communism, mechanized ghetto, smart cities?
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Mr. Who


...he would soil himself during tapings, often after flying into a rage and cursing out the Script Dept. Because he couldn’t read a three-syllable word.

He is severely dyslexic, and has been his entire life.

He snorts Adderall as his maintenance high. When he gets too wired, this is tempered with benzodiazepines. There’s also a robust use of cocaine and methamphetamine...

“Captain Valtrex” was another nickname for him. He sent his secretaries to the CVS on 57th Street to pick up his scripts for that herpes treatment.

He is very unintelligent, but he is also a master conman.
[link to gregolear.substack.com (secure)]


But why so obscene?
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]




[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

A Cult's History, disporia, "sect"-ioned into Austria, Poland, Turkey, Russia, Masonic lodges, and America. Revolution and sin (sine waves)is the starving of the "xx" of g-d, pushing for corporeal reaction. Recent reaction of nature was hurtful to them:


The Frankists of Germany, Bohemia, and Moravia usually held secret gatherings in Carlsbad in summer round about the Ninth of Av.

The sect's exclusive organization continued to survive in this period through agents who went from place to place, through secret gatherings and separate religious rites, and through the dissemination of a specifically Frankist literature. The "believers" endeavored to marry only among themselves, and a wide network of inter-family relationships was created among the Frankists, even among those who had remained within the Gewish fold.


In order that God and the virgin be revealed, it would be necessary to embark upon a completely new road, untrodden as yet by the people of Is-ra-el: this road Frank called "the way to Esau." In this context, Esau or Edom symbolizes the unbridled flow of life which liberates man because its force and power are not subject to any law.

This path was the road to consistent religious anarchy: "The place to which we are going is not subject to any law, because all that is on the side of death; but we are going to life." In order to achieve this goal it was necessary to abolish and destroy the laws, teachings, and practices which constrict the power of life, but this must be done in secret; in order to accomplish it, it was essential outwardly to assume the garb of the corporeal Edom, i.e., Christianity.
[link to www.encyclopedia.com (secure)]
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Jones to Charlie Sheen: "I've seen your hernia!"





[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]